Out-of-pocket maximum caps the claim
Generated from the Parity benefits engine (src/tasks/benefits-engine.ts). Gold answer is the engine's output, not a hand-keyed figure. Trap under test: The computed share exceeds the OOPM room, so the member pays only the room.
Field mean
90.5
across 28 models
Models scoring 100
23
of 28
Models scoring 0
1
of 28
What the model was given
PLAN DOCUMENT — Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (synthetic)
Plan year: 2026-01-01 through 2026-12-31. All amounts are per plan year.
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member
deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured
against when the service is out-of-network.
Out-of-pocket maximum
Individual (in-network) ................ 6000.00
Family (in-network) .................... 12000.00
Individual (out-of-network) ............ 12000.00
Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the
allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year.
Member cost share
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network ......... 20% member / 80% plan
Coinsurance after deductible, out-of-network ..... 40% member / 60% plan
Primary care office visit ........................ 30.00 copay
Specialist office visit .......................... 60.00 copay
Urgent care ...................................... 75.00 copay
Emergency room ................................... 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance
Generic retail pharmacy .......................... 15.00 copay
Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum.
Preventive care
In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share are
paid at 100% of the allowed amount and are not subject to the deductible,
coinsurance, or a copay.
Basis of payment
Member cost share is calculated from the ALLOWED amount. Amounts billed above
the allowed amount are not the member's responsibility for in-network services.MEMBER ACCUMULATORS as of the moment before Claim 1
Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00
Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00
Family deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00
Family out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00
CLAIMS (adjudicate in the order listed)
Claim 1 — 2026-05-14
Service ......... Inpatient admission, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 34960.00
Allowed amount .. 18400.00
Report the required fields for Claim 1.json{
"kind": "fields",
"tolerance": 0.011,
"fields": {
"member_responsibility": 600,
"plan_paid": 17800,
"deductible_applied": 0,
"copay_amount": 0,
"coinsurance_amount": 600,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000
}
}Every model's answer
Sorted by score. Open a row for the response and, where the vendor exposes it, the reasoning behind it.
100Claude Fable 5.1 · Anthropic9.6s · 193 out | 4.3s · 203 out | 5.3s · 205 out
Deductible already met (1500 of 1500). Coinsurance 20% of 18400 = 3680, but OOPM remaining is 6000 − 5400 = 600, so member pays 600, plan pays 17800.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Member deductible already satisfied (1500.00). Coinsurance 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00, but OOPM remaining is 6000.00 − 5400.00 = 600.00, so coinsurance caps at 600.00.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Member deductible already met (1500.00). Coinsurance 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00, but OOPM remaining is 6000.00 − 5400.00 = 600.00. Member pays 600.00, plan pays 17800.00.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 3.7 Flash · Google5.0s · 693 out | 5.3s · 854 out | 6.1s · 866 out
Reasoning · 570 tokens
**Reviewing Deductible & OOPM**
I'm confirming the member's in-network deductible is fully met at $1500. My focus is now on their out-of-pocket maximum. The current YTD credit is $5400, leaving a remaining $600 to be applied towards the $6000 OOPM.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 731 tokens
**Reviewing Claim Accumulators**
My current focus is on adjudicating Claim 1 for a member enrolled in the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan. I'm assessing their Year-To-Date accumulators, noting that their individual INN deductible of $1500.00 has already been fully met.
**Calculating Member Responsibility**
I’m finalizing the member’s out-of-pocket expense for this inpatient admission. Since the individual deductible is met, I've applied the coinsurance, capped at the remaining out-of-pocket maximum. The total member responsibility amounts to $600.00.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 743 tokens
**Processing Claim 1**
I'm currently working through the claim adjudication for Claim 1. My focus is on member accumulators. Specifically, I've noted that the individual in-network deductible of 1500.00 has been fully met. The out-of-pocket maximum credited year-to-date is 54.
**Calculating Member Responsibility**
I've determined that the individual in-network deductible for Claim 1 has been fully met. The coinsurance calculation for this inpatient admission indicates a member responsibility of 600.00, capped by the remaining out-of-pocket maximum.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.5 · OpenAI3.6s · 290 out | 2.9s · 265 out | 3.0s · 286 out
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.6 Sol · OpenAI8.1s · 175 out | 3.0s · 175 out | 3.2s · 156 out
Reasoning · 77 tokens
**Calculating deductible and out-of-pocket limits**
I'm working on calculating the deductible that needs to be met. The coinsurance is at 20%, which would total 3680, but there's only 600 remaining for out-of-pocket expenses due to the cap. The member's coinsurance would be 600, as the component amount is limited to that. The plan has a total of 17800, and the out-of-pocket maximum is 6000. Also, there's an issue with JSON formatting for numbers being parsed to two decimal places.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 77 tokens
**Calculating deductible amounts**
I need to calculate the deductible that's met and factor in the remaining out-of-pocket (OOP) amount of $600. The inpatient coinsurance is 20%, which is normally $3,680 but is capped at $600 for this plan. I see that the total plan is $17,800. So, the coinsurance amount is $600, with a deductible of $0, leading to an ending deductible of $1,500 and a total OOP of $6,000. I’ll also need to check how to represent these amounts in JSON, considering it doesn’t preserve decimals.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 58 tokens
**Calculating OOP maximums**
I need to calculate the remaining out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, starting with a deductible of 20% on $18,400, which gives me $3,680, but it's capped at $600. My plan covers $17,800, and I have a deductible of $1,500 with an OOP maximum of $6,000. The coinsurance amount also stands at $600. I’ll need the exact JSON structure to represent this properly.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Grok 4.6 · xAI11.1s · 624 out | 12.9s · 757 out | 12.4s · 795 out
Reasoning · 527 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims and report JSON for the FINAL claim. There's only Claim 1.
{
"claim_id": "Claim 1",
"service_date": "2026-05-14",
"service_type": "Inpatient admission",
"network": "In-network",
"billed_charge": 34960.00,
"allowed_amount": 18400.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 660 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims based on the plan document. There's only one claim listed, so the final claim is Claim 1.
Claim 1 — 2026-05-14
Service ......... Inpatient admission, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 34960.00
Allowed amount .. 18400.00
Deductible applied ........ 0.00
Copay ..................... 0.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 698 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims based on the plan document and member accumulators.
Claim 1 — 2026-05-14
Service ......... Inpatient admission, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 34960.00
Allowed amount .. 18400.00
Deductible applied .............. 0.00
Copay applied ...................json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Grok 4.5 · xAI7.1s · 463 out | 9.6s · 599 out | 8.2s · 546 out
Reasoning · 375 tokens
The problem is about adjudicating a claim for a health plan.
json{"member_responsibility": 600.00, "plan_paid": 17800.00, "deductible_applied": 0.00, "copay_amount": 0.00, "coinsurance_amount": 600.00, "ending_member_deductible": 1500.00, "ending_member_oopm": 6000.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 524 tokens
The problem is about adjudicating a claim for a health plan.
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.json{"member_responsibility":600.00,"plan_paid":17800.00,"deductible_applied":0.00,"copay_amount":0.00,"coinsurance_amount":600.00,"ending_member_deductible":1500.00,"ending_member_oopm":6000.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 449 tokens
The problem is about benefit adjudication. I need to adjudicate Claim 1 and report the required fields.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google15.5s · 1,344 out | 15.6s · 1,637 out | 12.2s · 1,233 out
Reasoning · 1,221 tokens
**Adjudicating Claim 1: My Thought Process**
Alright, I've got Claim 1 in front of me, and my task is to meticulously adjudicate it against the provided plan document and the member's current accumulators. This means I need to figure out the exact financial breakdown for this specific claim, culminating in the final state of the member's deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums.
First things first, I need to calculate several key figures for this FINAL claim (which, in this instance, is Claim 1 itself):
* `member_responsibility`: How much the member ultimately owes for this claim.
* `plan_paid`: How much the insurance plan will cover.
* `deductible_applied`: The portion of the allowed amount that goes towards satisfying the deductible.
* `copay_amount`: Any fixed co-payment due.
* `coinsurance_amount`: The member's share of costs after the deductible is met.
* `ending_member_deductible`: The member's deductible balance after this claim.
* `ending_member_oopm`: The member's out-of-pocket maximum balance after this claim.
I'll start by establishing the member's baseline financial standing *before* this claim. My initial accumulators tell me:
* Member deductible: $1500.00
* Member OOPM: $5400.00
* Family deductible: $1500.00
* Family OOPM: $5400.00
The plan itself has its own set of limits:
* Individual Deductible: $1500.00
* Individual OOPM: $6000.00
* Coinsurance In-Network: 20% for the member, 80% for the plan.
Now, let's dive into Claim 1 details:
* Service: Inpatient admission.
* Network: In-network.
* Billed Amount: $34960.00.
* Allowed Amount: $18400.00. (Crucially, I'll be working with the allowed amount, not the billed amount, for calculations).
**Calculating the Deductible:**
The individual deductible limit is $1500.00. My records show the member has already met their $1500.00 deductible. Therefore, no portion of this claim's allowed amount will be applied to the deductible.
* `deductible_applied` = $0.00.
**Calculating the Copay:**
I need to check the plan document for any specific copay for inpatient admissions. The document states that the Emergency Room has a $400 copay, but this is waived if the admission results in an inpatient stay. For inpatient services themselves, the plan indicates they are subject to the deductible and coinsurance. There's no specific, fixed copay for this type of inpatient admission.
* `copay_amount` = $0.00.
**Calculating the Coinsurance:**
First, I need to determine the remaining allowed amount after the deductible has been accounted for. Since $0.00 was applied to the deductible, the entire allowed amount is available for coinsurance calculations.
Remaining allowed amount = $18400.00 (Allowed) - $0.00 (Deductible Applied) = $18400.00.
The member's coinsurance responsibility is 20%.
Calculated coinsurance = $18400.00 * 0.20 = $3680.00.
**Checking Against the Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM):**
This is a critical step. The member's starting OOPM balance is $5400.00. The individual OOPM limit is $6000.00. This means the member has $6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00 of "room" left in their OOPM for this plan year.
The calculated coinsurance amount for this claim is $3680.00.
Since $3680.00 is greater than the remaining OOPM room ($600.00), the member's responsibility for coinsurance on this claim will be capped at $600.00. This $600.00 will then count towards their OOPM.
* `coinsurance_amount` = $600.00.
**Calculating Total Member Responsibility:**
Now, I sum up all the components of the member's financial obligation for this claim:
Total Member Responsibility = `deductible_applied` + `copay_amount` + `coinsurance_amount`
Total Member Responsibility = $0.00 + $0.00 + $600.00 = $600.00.
* `member_responsibility` = $600.00.
**Calculating Plan Paid Amount:**
The plan will pay the allowed amount minus the member's total responsibility.
Plan Paid = Allowed Amount - `member_responsibility`
Plan Paid = $18400.00 - $600.00 = $17800.00.
* `plan_paid` = $17800.00.
**Determining Ending Accumulators:**
Finally, I update the member's accumulators based on this claim's adjudication:
* Ending member deductible: Since $0.00 was applied, the deductible remains at its starting point.
`ending_member_deductible` = $1500.00.
* Ending member OOPM: The $600.00 of coinsurance paid by the member is added to their existing OOPM balance.
`ending_member_oopm` = $5400.00 (Starting OOPM) + $600.00 (Coinsurance applied to OOPM) = $6000.00.
**Final Review and Formatting:**
I'll do a quick double-check. Allowed amount is $18400.00. Deductible is fully met. Coinsurance rate is 20%. The initial coinsurance calculation was $3680.00. The OOPM max is $6000.00, with a current balance of $5400.00, leaving $600.00 of room. This means the member can only pay a maximum of $600.00 towards coinsurance on this claim, which perfectly aligns with the OOPM limit. The plan pays the rest ($18400 - $600 = $17800). All amounts seem correct and are formatted to two decimal places as required.
The JSON output will be:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
```
This entire process confirms that the member's responsibility for this claim is capped by their remaining out-of-pocket maximum, and the plan covers the remainder of the allowed amount. The logic appears sound and consistent with the provided plan details and accumulators.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,514 tokens
**Adjudicating Claim 1: My Thought Process**
Alright, my task here is to meticulously adjudicate Claim 1, referencing the provided plan document and the member's current accumulator balances. I need to output the results in a specific JSON format, ensuring each of the required keys is present and all monetary values are formatted precisely to two decimal places.
First, let's establish the plan's core parameters for an individual in-network scenario. The deductible is $1500.00, and the out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM) is $6000.00. Coinsurance is set at 20% for in-network services.
Now, I'll examine the member's accumulators *before* this claim is processed. They've already met their individual deductible, having $1500.00 credited year-to-date. Similarly, they've accumulated $5400.00 towards their individual OOPM. The family accumulators mirror these, with $1500.00 credited to the family deductible and $5400.00 to the family OOPM.
Moving onto Claim 1 itself:
The service is an in-network inpatient admission with a billed charge of $34960.00 and an allowed amount of $18400.00.
Let's break down the financial impact:
1. **Deductible Application:** The member's individual in-network deductible is $1500.00. Since they have already credited $1500.00 year-to-date, their remaining deductible is $0.00 ($1500.00 - $1500.00). Therefore, *no deductible will be applied to this claim*.
* `deductible_applied`: 0.00
2. **Copay Amount:** I've reviewed the plan document. For inpatient admissions, there's no specific copay mentioned. The document notes that emergency room copays are waived if admitted and then become subject to deductible and coinsurance. Since no copay is stipulated for a direct inpatient admission, I'll assume it's $0.00.
* `copay_amount`: 0.00
3. **Coinsurance Calculation:** The in-network coinsurance is 20%. The allowed amount for this claim is $18400.00. With the deductible applied being $0.00, the full allowed amount is subject to coinsurance. My initial calculation for the member's coinsurance responsibility would be 20% of $18400.00, which equals $3680.00.
4. **OOPM Check:** This is where things get critical. The member's individual in-network OOPM is $6000.00. They have already accumulated $5400.00 towards this limit. This means they have $600.00 remaining before hitting their OOPM ($6000.00 - $5400.00).
* My calculated coinsurance responsibility of $3680.00 *exceeds* the remaining OOPM. Therefore, the member's coinsurance responsibility will be capped at the remaining OOPM amount.
* `coinsurance_amount`: 600.00
5. **Total Member Responsibility:** Summing up the components for the member: $0.00 (deductible) + $0.00 (copay) + $600.00 (coinsurance) = $600.00.
* `member_responsibility`: 600.00
6. **Plan Paid Amount:** This is calculated as the allowed amount minus the total member responsibility. $18400.00 - $600.00 = $17800.00.
* `plan_paid`: 17800.00
7. **Ending Accumulators:**
* **Member Deductible:** Since no deductible was applied to this claim and the YTD credit was already at the full amount, the ending member deductible remains unchanged.
* `ending_member_deductible`: 1500.00
* **Member OOPM:** The $600.00 in coinsurance applied to this claim is credited towards the member's OOPM. Their YTD OOPM was $5400.00, so adding the $600.00 brings them exactly to their individual OOPM limit.
* `ending_member_oopm`: 6000.00
I've also considered the family OOPM ($12000.00 with $5400.00 YTD). Since the individual OOPM of $6000.00 is reached first with this claim, and the individual OOPM is embedded within the family OOPM structure, the individual limit takes precedence for this calculation.
Finally, I'll ensure all these values are presented in the correct numerical format, with exactly two decimal places. Everything appears to be in order.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,110 tokens
**Adjudicating Claim 1: My Thought Process**
Alright, my task here is to meticulously adjudicate Claim 1, relying on the provided plan document and member accumulator data. The output needs to be a precisely formatted JSON object containing specific keys.
First, I'll break down the plan details relevant to this claim.
The individual INN deductible is $1500.00, and the individual INN Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) is $6000.00. Coinsurance for in-network services is a 20% member responsibility.
Now, I look at the member accumulators.
The member has already met their individual INN deductible, with $1500.00 credited year-to-date. This is crucial – it means no deductible will be applied to this claim.
For the OOPM, the member has $5400.00 credited year-to-date. This leaves a remaining OOPM of $600.00 ($6000.00 - $5400.00) for the individual INN. The family OOPM remaining is $6600.00 ($12000.00 - $5400.00), but the individual limit takes precedence here.
Next, I examine Claim 1 itself.
The service is an inpatient admission, processed in-network. The billed amount is $34960.00, but the allowed amount is $18400.00. This allowed amount is what I need to work with.
Regarding copays, the plan notes that the ER copay is waived if admitted, and the service then falls under standard deductible and coinsurance. There isn't a separate copay listed for inpatient admissions in this scenario. So, no copay applies here.
Since the individual INN deductible is met, the deductible applied is $0.00.
The allowed amount subject to coinsurance is $18400.00.
The member's coinsurance responsibility, at 20%, would normally be $3680.00 ($18400.00 * 0.20).
However, I must consider the remaining OOPM. The member has only $600.00 left towards their individual OOPM. Therefore, their coinsurance is capped at this remaining $600.00.
This means the coinsurance actually applied is $600.00.
The total member responsibility for this claim is therefore $600.00.
The plan's paid amount will be the allowed amount minus the member's responsibility: $18400.00 - $600.00 = $17800.00.
The copay amount is $0.00.
Now, I'll update the accumulators based on this claim.
The member's deductible remains at $1500.00 as it was already met.
The member's OOPM will increase by the coinsurance applied: $5400.00 + $600.00 = $6000.00. This brings the member to their individual OOPM limit for the year.
A quick double-check of the calculations confirms everything.
Deductible: Met, so $0.00 applied.
Coinsurance: 20% of $18400 = $3680.00, but capped by remaining OOPM.
OOPM limit: $600.00 remaining.
Copay: $0.00.
Member responsibility is indeed capped at $600.00.
Plan paid is $18400.00 - $600.00 = $17800.00.
Ending member deductible is $1500.00.
Ending member OOPM is $6000.00.
Finally, I need to ensure I populate the JSON object with the correct keys and values, adhering to the specified formatting (two decimal places, no quotes around numbers). The required keys are: `member_responsibility`, `plan_paid`, `deductible_applied`, `copay_amount`, `coinsurance_amount`, `ending_member_deductible`, and `ending_member_oopm`.
My finalized values for these keys are:
`member_responsibility`: 600.00
`plan_paid`: 17800.00
`deductible_applied`: 0.00
`copay_amount`: 0.00
`coinsurance_amount`: 600.00
`ending_member_deductible`: 1500.00
`ending_member_oopm`: 6000.00
Everything appears to be in order.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Opus 5 · Anthropic3.3s · 222 out | 3.2s · 216 out | 3.2s · 227 out
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 3 Flash · Google17.9s · 2,506 out | 12.5s · 1,396 out | 10.8s · 1,296 out
Reasoning · 2,383 tokens
**My Thought Process on Claim Adjudication for Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (2026)**
Alright, let's break down this inpatient admission claim under the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan for 2026. My initial step is always to confirm the plan's structure and the member's current benefit utilization.
For an individual on this plan, the deductible is $1500 in-network (INN) and $3000 out-of-network (OON). The out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM) is $6000 INN and $12000 OON. I note that the deductible is *embedded*, which is crucial because it means individual limits are met independently before family limits come into play. The coinsurance for INN services, after the deductible is met, is a 20% member responsibility and 80% plan responsibility. A key detail is that copays *do not* apply to the deductible but *do* apply to the OOPM. For emergency room visits, there's a $400 copay, but this is waived if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the inpatient deductible and coinsurance rules apply. This specific claim is an "Inpatient admission," not an ER visit *leading* to admission, so the ER copay rule isn't directly relevant here, other than reinforcing that inpatient is subject to deductible/coinsurance.
Before processing this current claim, I see the member has already satisfied $1500 towards their individual deductible and $5400 towards their individual OOPM. Since the deductible is embedded, their individual deductible of $1500 has been fully met. This also means their family deductible has been credited with $1500. Similarly, their individual OOPM has reached $5400.
Now, let's evaluate Claim 1:
* **Date of Service:** 2026-05-14
* **Service:** Inpatient admission
* **Network:** In-network
* **Allowed Amount:** $18,400.00
My first check is the deductible: The individual deductible is $1500, and it's already fully satisfied. Therefore, no deductible will be applied to this claim. ($0.00 deductible applied).
Next, I look at the OOPM. The individual INN OOPM is $6000. The member has already contributed $5400. This leaves $6000 - $5400 = $600 remaining to meet their individual OOPM.
The claim is for an inpatient admission, and it's in-network. Since the deductible is met, the coinsurance applies. The INN coinsurance is 20% for the member. So, 20% of the allowed amount ($18,400.00) is $18,400.00 * 0.20 = $3680.00.
However, the member's responsibility is capped by their remaining OOPM. The potential coinsurance of $3680.00 is greater than the remaining OOPM of $600.00. Therefore, the member's responsibility for this claim will be limited to that remaining OOPM amount: $600.00.
With the member's responsibility determined as $600.00, I can calculate what the plan pays. The plan pays the allowed amount minus the member's responsibility: $18,400.00 - $600.00 = $17,800.00.
So, the cost-share breakdown for this specific claim is:
* **Deductible Applied:** $0.00 (as it was already met)
* **Copay Amount:** $0.00 (no specific copay applies to this type of inpatient admission, and the ER copay is waived/replaced by coinsurance rules)
* **Coinsurance Amount:** $600.00 (this is the amount that brings the member up to their OOPM limit)
After processing this claim:
* The new individual deductible balance remains $1500.00 (since $0 was applied).
* The new individual OOPM balance becomes $5400.00 (previous) + $600.00 (this claim) = $6000.00. The member has now reached their individual OOPM.
I've double-checked the specific phrasing about copays not crediting the deductible but crediting the OOPM. This is standard, and it confirms that coinsurance, which applies *after* the deductible, inherently credits towards the OOPM. There's no specific inpatient copay listed for this plan, so the default coinsurance rule is indeed the one to apply. The embedded nature of the deductible also means that once the individual hits $1500, that part of the benefit is satisfied for them, regardless of other family members.
The final figures for this claim are:
* Member Responsibility: $600.00
* Plan Paid: $17,800.00
* Deductible Applied: $0.00
* Copay Amount: $0.00
* Coinsurance Amount: $600.00
* Ending Member Deductible: $1500.00
* Ending Member OOPM: $6000.00
The math appears sound, and all plan provisions seem to have been considered.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,273 tokens
**My Thought Process on Adjudicating an Inpatient Admission under the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 Plan**
Alright, let's walk through this inpatient admission. I'm looking at the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan, a synthetic one, with a plan year running from January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. I need to figure out the member's responsibility and what the plan covers.
First, I've got the plan's structural details in mind:
* Individual Deductible: $1500.00
* Family Deductible: $3000.00 (embedded)
* Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM): $6000.00
* Coinsurance: 20% for the member, 80% for the plan.
* Copays: Primary Care ($30), Specialist ($60), Urgent Care ($75), ER ($400 - waived if inpatient admission), Generic Retail Pharmacy ($15).
* Crucially, copays do *not* apply towards the deductible, but they *do* count towards the OOPM.
* Preventive care is fully covered by the plan.
Now, let's look at the member's current standing *before* this service:
* Member Deductible: $1500.00 (already satisfied). This is important; it means the deductible won't be a factor in applying costs for this service.
* Member OOPM: $5400.00 has been met. Their remaining OOPM is $6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00.
* Family Deductible: $1500.00 (This is relevant for overall family cost tracking, but since the individual deductible is met, it doesn't change the individual's path here).
* Family OOPM: $5400.00 (Similar to the family deductible, it's a tracking point but the individual's OOPM limit is the immediate constraint).
Now for the service itself:
* Service: Inpatient admission.
* Network Status: In-network.
* Billed Charge: $34960.00.
* Allowed Amount: $18400.00. This is the amount the plan allows for the service, and what we'll base calculations on.
My first thought is to determine how this service is handled. Is it a copay or coinsurance? I review the plan document. The listed copays are for specific services (PCP, Specialist, UC, ER, Pharmacy). Inpatient admission isn't listed with a specific copay. However, there's a key note in the ER copay section: "waived if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance." This strongly indicates that inpatient admissions are subject to the deductible and coinsurance structure, not a flat copay. Since the member's deductible is already met, the deductible itself won't be applied.
So, I proceed with calculating the potential member responsibility based on coinsurance:
* Allowed Amount: $18400.00.
* Deductible applied: $0.00 (because it's already satisfied).
* Coinsurance calculation: 20% of $18400.00 = $3680.00.
This $3680.00 is what the member *would* owe based purely on coinsurance after their deductible. However, I *must* consider their Out-of-Pocket Maximum.
* Current OOPM met: $5400.00.
* Remaining OOPM: $600.00.
The member's financial responsibility is capped by their remaining OOPM. Since the calculated coinsurance of $3680.00 is significantly higher than the remaining $600.00 OOPM, their responsibility will be limited to that $600.00.
Therefore, the Member Responsibility is $600.00.
Now, I can calculate what the plan pays:
* Allowed Amount ($18400.00) - Member Responsibility ($600.00) = $17800.00.
Let's break down the member's responsibility for clarity:
* Deductible portion: $0.00 (already met).
* Copay portion: $0.00 (this service is subject to coinsurance).
* Coinsurance portion: $600.00 (this is the amount that hit their OOPM limit).
Finally, I'll update the member's standing after this adjudication:
* Ending Member Deductible: $1500.00 (no change, as it was already met).
* Ending Member OOPM: $5400.00 (previous) + $600.00 (this service) = $6000.00. This means they have now reached their individual OOPM for the plan year.
So, to summarize the financial outcomes of this specific claim:
* Member Responsibility: $600.00
* Plan Paid: $17800.00
* Deductible Applied: $0.00
* Copay Amount: $0.00
* Coinsurance Amount Applied to OOPM: $600.00
* Ending Member Deductible: $1500.00
* Ending Member OOPM: $6000.00
I've double-checked the math: $18400 * 0.20 = $3680$, which is indeed capped by the $600$ remaining OOPM. The logic flows correctly, and the final figures align with the plan rules and the member's status.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,173 tokens
**Processing an Inpatient Claim under Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (2026 Plan Year)**
My current task involves analyzing an incoming claim for an inpatient admission under the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan for the 2026 plan year. I've got all the relevant plan details at hand: an individual in-network deductible of $1500.00 and an individual in-network Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) of $6000.00. For services after the deductible is met, the coinsurance structure is 20% for the member and 80% for the plan.
This specific claim, dated 2026-05-14, pertains to an in-network inpatient admission with an allowed amount of $18,400.00.
First, I need to address the deductible. I've already tracked that the member has met their full individual deductible of $1500.00. Therefore, no portion of this $18,400.00 allowed amount will be applied towards the deductible for this claim. The deductible applied will be $0.00.
Since the deductible has been met, coinsurance will apply to the allowed amount. My initial calculation for the member's coinsurance responsibility would be 20% of $18,400.00, which comes out to $3680.00.
Now, I must consider the Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM). I know the member has already accumulated $5400.00 towards their $6000.00 OOPM for the year. This means they have $600.00 remaining before they hit their OOPM limit ($6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00).
Comparing the calculated coinsurance ($3680.00) to the remaining OOPM ($600.00), it's clear that the coinsurance amount exceeds the member's remaining OOPM limit. Therefore, the member's responsibility for this claim will be capped at the remaining OOPM amount, which is $600.00.
With the member's responsibility determined as $600.00, I can now calculate what the plan will pay. The plan's payment will be the allowed amount minus the member's responsibility: $18,400.00 - $600.00 = $17,800.00.
To break down the member's responsibility further:
* Deductible applied: $0.00 (as it was already met).
* Copay amount: $0.00 (inpatient services typically fall under deductible/coinsurance, not a flat copay unless it's a specific carve-out not indicated here).
* Coinsurance amount: This is where the $600.00 comes into play. While the calculated coinsurance was $3680.00, the member only pays $600.00 of it because they've hit their OOPM. So, the coinsurance *contribution* to the member's responsibility is $600.00.
Finally, I'll update the accumulator values:
* Ending Member Deductible: Remains at $1500.00, as no deductible was applied to this claim.
* Ending Member OOPM: The previous $5400.00 plus the $600.00 responsibility from this claim brings the total to $6000.00, hitting the annual OOPM limit.
My final output confirms these figures: Member Responsibility: $600.00, Plan Paid: $17,800.00, Deductible Applied: $0.00, Copay Amount: $0.00, Coinsurance Amount: $600.00. The ending accumulators are correct: Ending Member Deductible: $1500.00 and Ending Member OOPM: $6000.00. I also ran a quick check to ensure the allowed amount equals plan paid plus member responsibility ($17,800.00 + $600.00 = $18,400.00) and that the member responsibility is correctly broken down ($0.00 + $0.00 + $600.00 = $600.00). All amounts are properly formatted to two decimal places, and the structure aligns with the expected JSON output.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Kimi K3 · Moonshot26.8s · 1,126 out | 9.6s · 432 out | 37.5s · 525 out
Reasoning · 1,018 tokens
We need answer exactly one fenced JSON code block no other. Need calculate benefit adjudication for Claim 1.
Let's parse task. Plan Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Member accumulators before Claim1: member deductible credited YTD 1500.00; member OOPM credited 5400.00; family deductible 1500; family OOPM 5400.
Claim1: 2026-05-14 Inpatient admission, in-network. Billed 34960, allowed 18400.
Need adjudicate. Plan deductible individual in-network 1500 embedded. Member deductible already met (1500 credited equals individual deductible). Family deductible 1500 credited but family threshold 3000; however embedded means individual can satisfy on own. Member has met individual deductible, so for this member deductible satisfied. Deductible applied on final claim = 0. No copay for inpatient admission listed. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Member OOPM individual in-network 6000. Current OOPM 5400. Coinsurance amount = 20% of allowed 18400 = 3680.00. But OOPM remaining = 6000 - 5400 = 600. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% for remainder. Need apply member cost share up to OOPM. The claim allowed 18400 after deductible. Member coinsurance before OOPM would be 3680, but only 600 until OOPM. Member responsibility = 600 (all coinsurance? It is coinsurance portion capped by OOPM). Plan pays allowed - member resp = 17800. Need component fields: deductible_applied 0.00, copay_amount 0.00, coinsurance_amount? The coinsurance portion of final claim. Since member responsibility 600 is coinsurance (after deductible) limited by OOPM. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00, not 3680. Plan_paid=17800. member_responsibility=600. deductible_applied=0. ending_member_deductible=1500.00 (already met; no additional deductible; can accumulators exceed threshold? The deductible credited YTD remains 1500. Even though claim subject to coinsurance no deductible. In general once deductible met, accumulator stays at 1500, not add allowed amounts. Need ending_member_oopm = 5400 + 600 = 6000.00. Note family OOPM not asked. Check whether OOPM max is individual in-network 6000. Member OOPM credited YTD 5400. There is family OOPM 12000, embedded? Plan document says family OOPM but not explicit embedded for OOPM. It says once a member reaches OOPM plan pays 100%. It lists individual and family. In accumulator intro says OOPM ceiling on member cost share; once reached plan pays 100% for covered in-network services. For a member under family plan, if family OOPM reached maybe plan pays for all? Here family OOPM 5400 not near 12000. Individual member OOPM hits 6000. Good.
Need consider ER copay waived if inpatient admission? Not relevant, service is inpatient admission not ER. No copay for inpatient; subject to deductible/coinsurance. Good.
Need output JSON only fenced. Values numbers with two decimals? JSON numbers can be 600.00 but JSON numeric literal with trailing zeros is valid? JSON number syntax allows fraction with digits; 600.00 valid. It will parse as 600.0 but representation okay. Need include all required keys exactly. No extra keys. Ensure member_responsibility + plan_paid = 18400: 600 + 17800 = 18400. deductible_applied+copay+coinsurance = 600? It doesn't explicitly require but components should sum to member responsibility; yes.
Need round half up at end. 18400*0.2=3680 exact. cap 600 exact.
Potential nuance: Member deductible credited YTD = 1500 equals individual deductible. Family deductible credited =1500. Because structure embedded, an individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. The phrase "whichever comes first" could mean the individual deductible is satisfied when either individual credits reach 1500 OR family total reaches 3000? Actually embedded deductible: each member has individual deductible; family deductible can be met by combined credits. For this member, individual threshold met. No deductible.
Potential nuance: OOPM accumulators include copays and deductible and coinsurance. Starting OOPM 5400. Member deductible 1500 likely included in OOPM. Remaining OOPM 600. Apply to coinsurance. Good.
Need final only code block. Done.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 326 tokens
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed 18400.00.
Member deductible already satisfied (1500.00 of 1500.00). Family deductible: 1500 of 3000, but embedded — individual satisfies on their own. Member's individual deductible met, so no deductible applies.
Coinsurance: 20% member of 18400 = 3680.00. Plan 80% = 14720.00.
But OOPM: member OOPM YTD 5400.00, individual in-network OOPM 6000.00. Room remaining: 600.00. Member coinsurance would be 3680, but capped at 600.00. So member pays 600.00, plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
Check: does the OOPM cap apply — member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% of allowed for remainder. The member's cost share on this claim is limited to remaining 600.00; plan pays the rest.
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Coinsurance portion of the final claim — the member's coinsurance is 600.00 (the capped amount). Yes, coinsurance_amount = 600.00.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 423 tokens
Let me work through this.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00, so deductible is satisfied)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (individual OOPM is 6000.00, so 600.00 remaining)
- Family deductible: 1500.00
- Family OOPM: 5400.00
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed 18400.00.
Deductible already satisfied (1500/1500). So no deductible applied.
Coinsurance: 20% member of allowed = 0.20 × 18400 = 3680.00.
But OOPM: member has 5400 credited, OOPM is 6000. Remaining OOPM room = 600.00. So member pays 600.00 coinsurance, then OOPM reached, plan pays the rest.
Member responsibility = 600.00. Plan paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
Copay: none for inpatient. Copay amount = 0.00.
Deductible applied = 0.00.
Coinsurance amount = 600.00 (the member's coinsurance portion actually paid).
Ending member deductible = 1500.00 (unchanged; copays don't credit deductible, and coinsurance doesn't credit deductible either — deductible credits come from deductible payments only). So 1500.00.
Ending member OOPM = 5400 + 600 = 6000.00.
Final answer fields:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 2.5 Pro · Google15.8s · 1,441 out | 15.7s · 1,455 out | 21.7s · 1,924 out
Reasoning · 1,318 tokens
Alright, let's break down this inpatient admission claim. My primary objective here is to determine the member's financial responsibility and the plan's payment for this specific service, ensuring it aligns with the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan benefits and the member's existing accumulators.
First, I need to establish the starting point. I'll look at the member's year-to-date (YTD) accumulators:
* Their individual deductible YTD is $1500.00.
* Their individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) YTD is $5400.00.
* The family deductible YTD is also $1500.00.
* The family OOPM YTD is $5400.00.
Next, I'll review the plan details for this member:
* The plan is the Bluebonnet PPO 1500.
* For an individual in-network, the deductible is $1500.00.
* The individual in-network OOPM is $6000.00.
* The coinsurance is set at 20% for the member and 80% for the plan.
* Crucially, this is an inpatient admission. The plan document indicates it's subject to deductible and coinsurance, and there isn't a specific copay mentioned for this type of service, unlike some outpatient or ER visits.
Now, I'll process the claim itself:
* It's for an inpatient admission on 2026-05-14, and it's an in-network service.
* The allowed amount for this service is $18,400.00.
Let's walk through the adjudication steps:
1. **Deductible:** The member's individual in-network deductible is $1500.00. Looking at their YTD accumulator, they've already met this ($1500.00). Therefore, *zero* dollars from this claim will go towards satisfying the deductible. `deductible_applied` = $0.00.
2. **Coinsurance:** Since the deductible is satisfied, the claim is now subject to coinsurance. The member's coinsurance responsibility is 20% of the allowed amount. This is calculated on the full allowed amount because the deductible has already been met. So, the potential coinsurance is $18,400.00 * 0.20 = $3680.00.
3. **Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM):** The individual in-network OOPM is $6000.00. Before this claim, the member had already accumulated $5400.00 towards their OOPM. This means they have $6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00 of remaining "room" in their OOPM.
Now, I compare the potential coinsurance ($3680.00) with the remaining OOPM room ($600.00). Since the potential coinsurance exceeds the OOPM room, the member's financial responsibility for this claim is capped at the remaining OOPM amount.
Therefore, the `member_responsibility` for this specific claim will be $600.00.
Let me clarify how this $600.00 breaks down:
* `deductible_applied`: $0.00 (as established).
* `copay_amount`: $0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission).
* `coinsurance_amount`: Since the OOPM capped the member's liability, the entire $600.00 that the member is responsible for *is* their coinsurance contribution. So, `coinsurance_amount` = $600.00.
* The total `member_responsibility` is $0.00 + $0.00 + $600.00 = $600.00, which correctly reflects the OOPM cap.
4. **Plan Paid:** The plan will cover the remaining portion of the allowed amount. This is calculated as: `plan_paid` = Allowed Amount - Member Responsibility = $18,400.00 - $600.00 = $17,800.00.
Finally, I need to update the accumulators to reflect the situation *after* this claim is adjudicated. Since this is the only claim being processed, these will be the ending accumulators:
* **Ending Member Deductible:** The initial deductible YTD was $1500.00, and $0.00 was applied from this claim. So, the `ending_member_deductible` is $1500.00.
* **Ending Member OOPM:** The initial OOPM YTD was $5400.00, and the member's responsibility for this claim was $600.00. Therefore, the `ending_member_oopm` is $5400.00 + $600.00 = $6000.00. This signifies that the member has now met their individual out-of-pocket maximum for the year.
To summarize the required output fields:
* `member_responsibility`: $600.00
* `plan_paid`: $17,800.00
* `deductible_applied`: $0.00
* `copay_amount`: $0.00
* `coinsurance_amount`: $600.00
* `ending_member_deductible`: $1500.00
* `ending_member_oopm`: $6000.00
Everything aligns logically. The member's cost share is entirely driven by the OOPM cap, and the coinsurance is the mechanism through which that OOPM cost is applied for this specific service. The plan picks up the rest, and the accumulators are updated to reflect the member reaching their OOPM.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,332 tokens
Alright, let's break down this inpatient admission claim. My primary task here is to adjudicate a single claim for an inpatient admission, applying the member's benefit plan rules and their current accumulated year-to-date balances.
Here's my thought process for reaching the final adjudication:
First, I need to establish the member's starting point. This involves reviewing their existing accumulators before this claim is processed:
* **Member Deductible YTD:** They've already met $1500.00 of their individual deductible.
* **Member OOPM YTD:** They've already contributed $5400.00 towards their individual out-of-pocket maximum.
* **Family Deductible YTD:** For family purposes, $1500.00 has been met.
* **Family OOPM YTD:** Similarly, $5400.00 of the family OOPM has been met.
Next, I'll dive into the specifics of the plan document for the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan, focusing on the benefits relevant to this inpatient admission.
* The service is an **in-network inpatient admission**.
* The plan's **in-network individual deductible is $1500.00**.
* The **in-network individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) is $6000.00**.
* After the deductible is met, the plan structure dictates **20% coinsurance for the member and 80% for the plan**.
* Crucially, the plan document doesn't specify a separate copay for inpatient admissions; it falls under the standard deductible and coinsurance framework.
* An important detail: **Copays, if they existed for this service, would not apply towards the deductible, but they *would* count towards the OOPM**. However, since there's no copay, this point is moot for this specific adjudication.
Now, I'll analyze the claim itself, which is for an inpatient admission on 2026-05-14, with an allowed amount of $18,400.00.
The adjudication process begins:
1. **Deductible Application:**
* The member's individual in-network deductible is $1500.00.
* Looking at their YTD accumulators, they have *already* met their $1500.00 deductible.
* Therefore, **no portion of this claim's allowed amount will be applied to the deductible**. The `deductible_applied` for this claim is $0.00.
2. **Copay Assessment:**
* As established from the plan document, there is no specific copay for inpatient admissions.
* So, the `copay_amount` for this claim is $0.00.
3. **Coinsurance Calculation:**
* Since the deductible is satisfied, coinsurance will apply to the full allowed amount.
* The member's coinsurance responsibility is 20%.
* The potential coinsurance amount would be 20% of $18,400.00, which is $3680.00.
4. **Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) Consideration:**
* The individual in-network OOPM is $6000.00.
* The member has already accumulated $5400.00 towards this OOPM.
* This means they have $6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00 remaining before they reach their OOPM limit for the year.
* Now, I need to compare the calculated coinsurance ($3680.00) with the remaining OOPM amount ($600.00).
* The member's responsibility for this claim (the coinsurance) is capped at the remaining OOPM amount.
* Therefore, the member will only be responsible for $600.00 of the coinsurance. This is the `coinsurance_amount` that will be applied to this claim.
* Once this $600.00 is paid, the member will have successfully met their individual OOPM for the year ($5400.00 + $600.00 = $6000.00).
5. **Finalizing Claim Amounts:**
* `deductible_applied`: $0.00 (as the deductible was already met)
* `copay_amount`: $0.00 (no copay for this service)
* `coinsurance_amount`: $600.00 (limited by the remaining OOPM)
* **Member Responsibility:** This is the sum of deductible applied, copay, and coinsurance: $0.00 + $0.00 + $600.00 = **$600.00**.
* **Plan Paid:** This is the allowed amount minus the member's responsibility: $18,400.00 - $600.00 = **$17,800.00**.
* I'll do a quick check: Member Responsibility ($600.00) + Plan Paid ($17,800.00) = $18,400.00, which matches the allowed amount. Everything is consistent.
6. **Calculating Ending Accumulators:**
* **Ending Member Deductible:** Starting deductible ($1500.00) + Deductible applied from this claim ($0.00) = **$1500.00**. (The deductible remains met.)
* **Ending Member OOPM:** Starting OOPM ($5400.00) + Member responsibility applied to OOPM from this claim ($600.00) = **$6000.00**. (The member has now reached their OOPM.)
Based on this comprehensive analysis, the final adjudication details for this claim are established. I am confident in these figures and will now prepare the output.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,801 tokens
Alright, let's break down this inpatient admission claim. My primary task here is to adjudicate this single claim and figure out exactly how much the member owes and how much the plan will cover, all while keeping track of their accumulated benefits.
My plan of action is to methodically go through several steps:
First, I need to get a clear picture of the member's financial status *before* this claim even hits. That means I'll be looking at their Year-to-Date (YTD) progress on their deductible and their Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM). This gives me a baseline.
Next, I'll dive into the specifics of the claim itself. What kind of service is it? Is it in-network or out-of-network? And what's the total allowed amount for this service? This information is crucial for applying the right plan rules.
Then comes the core of the adjudication: applying the plan's rules. I'll be referencing the plan document to understand how inpatient admissions are treated. Specifically, I need to determine if a deductible applies, if there's a copay, and what the coinsurance responsibility is. The plan document mentions a copay rule that *can* apply to inpatient admissions if they stem from an ER visit, but this claim is stated as a direct inpatient admission, so I'll proceed with the standard deductible and coinsurance structure.
Once I know the plan rules, I'll calculate the member's cost-sharing obligations. This involves figuring out how much of their deductible still needs to be met, what any applicable copay would be, and then calculating the coinsurance on the remaining balance.
A critical part of this calculation is the OOPM. I need to see how much of the member's OOPM has already been met and how much is left. This acts as a ceiling for their total out-of-pocket expenses for the year. If my calculated cost-sharing exceeds the remaining OOPM, I'll cap the member's responsibility at that remaining OOPM amount.
After determining the member's responsibility for this specific claim, I'll then calculate the plan's payment by subtracting the member's responsibility from the allowed amount.
Finally, I'll update the member's YTD accumulators for both their deductible and OOPM based on the amounts applied from this claim. This ensures their benefit tracking is current for any future claims.
The end goal is to present all this information in a clear, structured output, typically a JSON object, detailing the member's responsibility, the plan's payment, and the updated accumulator values.
Let's walk through this with the provided numbers:
**Step 1: Understanding Where the Member Stands (Before Claim 1)**
* Their individual deductible YTD is $1500.00.
* Their individual OOPM YTD is $5400.00.
* The family deductible and OOPM are the same, but since this is an individual claim, I'll focus on the individual accumulators.
**Plan Rules Snapshot:**
* Individual in-network deductible: $1500.00
* Individual in-network OOPM: $6000.00
* Coinsurance (in-network, post-deductible): 20% for the member, 80% for the plan.
* Inpatient admissions are subject to deductible and coinsurance. No specific copay for this type of admission as it's not linked to an ER visit.
**Step 2: Examining the Claim Details (Claim 1)**
* Service: Inpatient admission, in-network.
* Allowed Amount: $18400.00.
**Steps 3 & 4: Applying Rules and Calculating Cost Sharing**
* **Deductible:** The member's individual deductible is $1500.00, and they've already met $1500.00 YTD. This means their deductible is *fully met*. So, no deductible will be applied to this claim.
* Deductible applied: $0.00
* **Copay:** As noted, this isn't an ER-driven inpatient admission, so there's no copay associated with this service type.
* Copay amount: $0.00
* **Coinsurance:** Since the deductible is met, coinsurance applies to the full allowed amount of $18400.00. The member's coinsurance rate is 20%.
* Potential member coinsurance: $18400.00 * 0.20 = $3680.00
* **OOPM Check:** Now I need to see if this calculated coinsurance hits the OOPM limit.
* Member's individual OOPM limit: $6000.00
* Member's OOPM already met YTD: $5400.00
* Remaining OOPM "room": $6000.00 - $5400.00 = $600.00
* The potential member coinsurance ($3680.00) is much higher than the remaining OOPM room ($600.00). This means the member's responsibility will be capped by the remaining OOPM.
* Therefore, the actual member cost share for this claim is limited to **$600.00**.
* **Breakdown of Member Cost Share for this Claim:**
* Deductible: $0.00
* Copay: $0.00
* Coinsurance: $600.00 (This is the amount that gets applied *before* hitting the OOPM limit. The remaining $3080.00 of potential coinsurance is absorbed by the OOPM reaching its cap.)
**Step 5: Determining Member and Plan Responsibility**
* **Member Responsibility:** This is the total cost share applied to the member, which is our capped $600.00 (all of which is coinsurance in this scenario).
* **Plan Paid:** This is the allowed amount minus the member's responsibility.
* Plan Paid: $18400.00 - $600.00 = **$17800.00**
**Step 6: Updating the Accumulators (After Claim 1)**
* **Ending Member Deductible:**
* Starting Deductible: $1500.00
* Deductible Applied on this Claim: $0.00
* Ending Deductible: $1500.00 + $0.00 = **$1500.00** (Still met)
* **Ending Member OOPM:**
* Starting OOPM: $5400.00
* Member Responsibility Applied to OOPM this Claim: $600.00 (which is the coinsurance amount applied)
* Ending OOPM: $5400.00 + $600.00 = **$6000.00** (The OOPM limit is now met)
**Step 7: Formatting the Output**
Based on these calculations, the final output for this claim would look like this:
* `member_responsibility`: 600.00
* `plan_paid`: 17800.00
* `deductible_applied`: 0.00
* `copay_amount`: 0.00
* `coinsurance_amount`: 600.00
* `ending_member_deductible`: 1500.00
* `ending_member_oopm`: 6000.00
I've reviewed the logic, and it holds up. The member's deductible was already met, so no deductible applied. The service type meant no copay. The potential coinsurance was calculated, but then capped by the remaining OOPM. The plan covers the rest. The accumulators are updated correctly to reflect the member hitting their OOPM limit. Everything is in order.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.2 · Z.ai4.4s · 806 out | 34.1s · 2,379 out | 6.2s · 601 out
Reasoning · 712 tokens
Let me adjudicate Claim 1.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00, so already met)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00)
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
Claim 1 — 2026-05-14
- Inpatient admission, in-network
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
Since the member deductible is already met (1500.00 credited, individual deductible is 1500.00), no more deductible applies.
Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan
Member coinsurance: 18400.00 × 20% = 3680.00
Plan paid: 18400.00 × 80% = 14720.00
But wait, we need to check OOPM. Member OOPM before claim: 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM: 6000.00.
Remaining before OOPM: 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
Member responsibility before hitting OOPM: 3680.00 (coinsurance, since deductible already met).
But only 600.00 of that counts toward OOPM before the OOPM is reached.
So:
- 600.00 of coinsurance is the member's responsibility, which brings OOPM to 6000.00.
- After OOPM is reached, plan pays 100% of the remaining allowed amount.
- Remaining allowed amount after the 600.00 member responsibility: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
Wait, let me think more carefully. The allowed amount is 18400.00. No deductible applies (already met). Coinsurance would be 20% member = 3680.00. But OOPM limits member responsibility.
Member OOPM before claim: 5400.00
OOPM cap: 6000.00
Remaining OOPM capacity: 600.00
So the member pays 600.00 (which counts toward OOPM), bringing OOPM to 6000.00.
The plan pays the rest: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
Let me verify: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓
Now for the breakdown:
- deductible_applied: 0.00 (deductible already met)
- copay_amount: 0.00 (inpatient admission, no copay specified for this)
- coinsurance_amount: This is tricky. The coinsurance would be 3680.00, but OOPM caps it at 600.00. So the member's coinsurance responsibility is 600.00.
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
Ending accumulators:
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (no change, deductible already met)
- Member OOPM: 6000.00 (5400.00 + 600.00)json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,261 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate final claim (only one). Need parse plan. Need be careful. Member accumulators before claim: member deductible YTD 1500.00 = individual in-network deductible threshold 1500.00, so member deductible already satisfied? For in-network individual deductible 1500. Yes credited equals threshold. OOPM individual in-network 6000, member OOP 5400, so not yet OOP max, remaining 600. Family ded 1500 of 3000, family OOP 5400 of 12000. Claim inpatient admission in-network allowed 18400. Need apply deductible? Since deductible already satisfied (1500 credited) before claim, no deductible applied? But check embedded family deductible: individual deductible on their own; if individual satisfied, plan pays per individual? Yes. In-network services after individual deductible satisfied subject to coinsurance 20%. But OOPM: member out-of-pocket remaining to individual OOP max 6000 = 600. Once reached, plan pays 100% allowed for covered services. Claim1 member cost share should be at least? Coinsurance 20% of 18400 = 3680, but OOPM ceiling stops at 600 remaining. Need account copay? Inpatient admission no copay listed; subject to deductible and coinsurance (emergency room waived if inpatient admission, but this is inpatient admission). Deductible applied 0 (already met). Copay amount 0. Coinsurance amount? If not at OOPM, coinsurance 20% of allowed = 3680. But member OOP before 5400, individual OOP max 6000, remaining 600. Member responsibility capped at 600. How allocate between coinsurance_amount and plan_paid? Member responsibility 600, plan paid 17800. Deductible applied 0, copay 0, coinsurance amount? Could be 600 (capped coinsurance) because OOPM cap limits coinsurance. Plan paid = allowed - member resp = 17800. ending member deductible 1500.00 (unchanged), ending member OOP 6000.00. Need ensure family OOP? not asked. But family OOP max 12000, family OOP 5400+600=6000? Not asked.
But let's examine if there is any subtlety with aggregate vs embedded deductible? The plan: individual deductible 1500, family 3000 embedded. Member deductible YTD 1500.00 equals individual threshold; family deductible 1500 of 3000. For embedded, an individual can satisfy individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Since member has 1500 individual satisfied, plan begins cost-sharing for this member. Deductible_applied for claim = 0 because no deductible remaining? But is deductible "balance" measured against individual threshold? Yes. In-network/out-of-network accumulate to single member deductible balance; threshold out-of-network is 3000. Since in-network, threshold 1500, balance 1500; satisfied. So no deductible applied.
But need maybe calculate plan paid and member responsibility with OOPM: Since member has OOP 5400, in-network individual OOP max 6000. Claim coinsurance 20% of allowed 18400 = 3680, but OOP max not reached before claim. Once a member reaches OOP maximum plan pays 100%. How exactly cap? Member pays coinsurance up to reaching OOPM; the remainder of allowed amount plan pays. Member responsibility = min(3680, 6000-5400) = 600. Plan paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800. Deductible 0, copay 0, coinsurance amount 600 (capped). Could some argue coinsurance amount is 3680, but member responsibility only 600 because plan pays extra? Usually coinsurance_amount field is member's coinsurance portion after cap, so 600. Need satisfy member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed amount 18400. 600 +17800 =18400. Good.
Need output exactly JSON with required keys. Numeric two decimals. No extra text. Key names exact. Let's ensure no "copay_amount" 0.00, "deductible_applied" 0.00, "coinsurance_amount" 600.00, "ending_member_deductible" 1500.00, "ending_member_oopm" 6000.00. Member responsibility 600.00, plan paid 17800.00.
Let's think about if copays credit OOPM. Already 5400 maybe includes copays; no matter. Deductible applied 0 but OOPM applies. If deductible not applied, coinsurance is only cost share. But OOPM cap: the member responsibility 600 credits to OOPM; no deductible credits, so OOPM ending 6000. Deductible ending unchanged 1500.
Double-check family deductible: Family deductible credited YTD 1500.00 < 3000. Does embedded structure mean an individual must meet individual deductible before plan pays for that individual, which has happened. If family ded not met, no effect? Plan says "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first." Actually "whichever comes first" maybe means if individual deductible satisfied, for that individual benefits begin; if family deductible (total family credits) reaches family amount before any individual? For embedded, individual satisfied at 1500, so plan pays for that member; family deductible not met. Good.
Could there be deductible applied even though accumulated threshold met but family deductible not met? No. The "single member deductible balance" is 1500. For in-network threshold 1500, met. Need not apply 1500 again. If family aggregate would require family 3000, but plan says embedded. Good.
Potential issue: OOPM individual in-network 6000. Member OOP credited 5400. Does deductible accumulator 1500 counts towards OOPM? It must; out-of-pocket max includes deductible and copays/coinsurance. Accumulator says OOP credited 5400, deductible credited 1500, so consistent. Remaining 600. Good.
But wait: the claim is inpatient admission, allowed amount 18400. If deductible already met, coinsurance 20% = 3680. However OOPM remaining 600. Member pays 600. Plan pays 17800. Plan paid > 80% due to OOP cap. Correct.
Need maybe report ending member deductible after all claims: 1500.00. If no deductible applied, same. If deductible had not been met, would be allowed amount deductible up to remaining. But no.
Could there be "deductible_applied" amount if claim amount applied to family deductible? Hmm, even if individual deductible met, should remaining allowed also credit family deductible? Deductible "credits" accumulate for family. But field asks deductible portion of claim—member's deductible cost share. Since individual met, member pays no deductible. But does the claim's allowed amount credit the family deductible without member paying? No, deductible credit is amount member pays at allowed rate before coinsurance. If no deductible cost share, no credit. Family deductible remains 1500. But if the plan were aggregate, maybe need pay 1500? But not.
Let's read plan: "Deductible: Individual (in-network) 1500; Family 3000; Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This means for an individual with 1500 credited, individual deductible is satisfied. Good.
No need mention rules. The task family doesn't ask rules. Required keys only. Use JSON block.
Need ensure no commentary before/after. Final exactly one fenced JSON block. They want "Reply with exactly one fenced JSON code block and nothing else." So final with ```json ... ```.
Let's ensure numbers: 17800.00 two decimals. Good.
But maybe plan_paid should be 14720? Let's see if OOP max ignored? If no OOP cap, member responsibility 3680, plan paid 14720, ending OOP 9080 > OOP max. But OOPM ceiling means once reached plan pays 100%. Member can't pay beyond. So 600 cap. Plan paid includes (80% coinsurance plan portion for part of claim before OOPM? Let's allocate: if member needs 600 to hit OOPM, plan pays remaining 17800. This includes plan coinsurance 80% of amount subject to coinsurance until OOP max, plus 100% after OOP. It is not simply 80% of 18400 = 14720; the OOP cap increases plan paid. Correct.
Potential nuance: OOPM is 6000 individual in-network. Member OOP "credited" 5400. But maybe family OOP max is 12000 and family OOP 5400, remaining? Individual OOPM has not been reached (5400 < 6000), so cap at 600. If family OOP max was 12000, remaining 6600; but individual OOPM can be reached before family? The plan says family OOPM 12000; but for PPO, individual OOP max embedded? It states "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100%..." with individual 6000, family 12000. Usually embedded OOPM: individual need not exceed 6000 even if family not at 12000. It says "Individual (in-network) 6000; Family (in-network) 12000." Not explicitly "embedded" for OOPM but "Once a member reaches..." The accumulators include family. We should use member OOP 5400 toward individual 6000, cap 600. If aggregate family OOPM, remaining 6600, but likely individual OOP max caps. The wording "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum" and "Individual (in-network) 6000" means each member. So 600. Good.
Could member deductible YTD 1500 and OOP YTD 5400: if OOP includes deductible, remaining 600. If not? But glossary OOPM includes deductible. Yes.
Let's consider if an inpatient admission might be subject to deductible even if deductible already met? No, no additional.
Let's see if there is an in-network per-service copay for inpatient? Not listed. So just deductible/coinsurance.
Now final. Ensure JSON valid.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 507 tokens
Let me work through Claim 1.
Starting accumulators:
- Member deductible credited: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited: 5400.00
Individual deductible (in-network) = 1500.00
Individual OOPM (in-network) = 6000.00
Member deductible is already satisfied at 1500.00.
Member OOPM is at 5400.00, which is below the 6000.00 individual OOPM.
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount = 18400.00
Since deductible is already satisfied (1500.00 >= 1500.00), no deductible applies.
Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan
Member coinsurance = 18400.00 * 0.20 = 3680.00
Plan paid = 18400.00 * 0.80 = 14720.00
But wait, need to check OOPM. Current OOPM = 5400.00. Individual OOPM = 6000.00.
Remaining before OOPM = 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
Member coinsurance would be 3680.00, but only 600.00 of that counts before hitting OOPM.
Once OOPM is reached, plan pays 100%.
So member responsibility = 600.00 (the remaining amount to hit OOPM)
Plan paid = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
Let me verify:
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (deductible already satisfied)
- Copay: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient)
- Coinsurance: would be 3680.00, but capped at 600.00 due to OOPM
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 17800.00
Ending accumulators:
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Opus 4.8 · Anthropic3.4s · 217 out | 2.9s · 218 out | 3.4s · 231 out
Member deductible already at 1500 (individual met). OOPM at 5400, individual OOPM 6000.
Coinsurance 20% of 18400 = 3680, but OOPM cap: remaining = 6000-5400 = 600.
Member pays 600.00, plan pays rest.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Member deductible already at 1500 (met). OOPM at 5400, individual OOPM 6000, so 600 remaining.
Coinsurance 20% of 18400 = 3680, but capped by OOPM remaining of 600.
Member pays 600.00, plan pays 17800.00.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Member deductible already at 1500.00 (met). OOPM at 5400.00, individual OOPM 6000.00, so 600.00 remaining.
Coinsurance 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00, but capped by OOPM remaining 600.00.
Member pays 600.00, plan pays 17800.00.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Sonnet 5 · Anthropic5.0s · 436 out | 4.9s · 462 out | 5.4s · 443 out
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic8.8s · 534 out | 7.7s · 474 out | 8.3s · 513 out
I need to adjudicate Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount 18400.00.
**Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):**
- Member deductible YTD: 1500.00 (individual deductible = 1500.00 → already fully satisfied)
- Member OOPM YTD: 5400.00 (individual OOPM = 6000.00 → 600.00 remaining)
**Adjudicating Claim 1:**
Since this is an inpatient admission (in-network), it is subject to deductible and coinsurance (no copay applies here; ER copay is waived for inpatient admission, and this is a direct inpatient claim).
**Deductible:** Member's individual deductible is already fully satisfied (1500.00 credited = 1500.00 threshold). Deductible applied = 0.00.
**Coinsurance phase:** After deductible, member pays 20% of allowed amount.
- 20% × 18400.00 = 3680.00 (member coinsurance before OOPM cap)
**OOPM check:** Member has 600.00 remaining before hitting the 6000.00 OOPM.
- Member's cost share is capped at 600.00.
- Member coinsurance = 600.00 (OOPM cap applies)
- Plan pays the rest: 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00
**Ending accumulators:**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (no change, already maxed)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}I need to adjudicate Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount 18400.00.
**Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00 → already fully satisfied)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 (individual OOPM is 6000.00 → 600.00 remaining)
**Adjudicating Claim 1:**
Since the individual deductible is already fully satisfied (1500.00 credited = 1500.00 threshold), no deductible applies.
Deductible applied: 0.00
Now apply coinsurance (in-network: 20% member / 80% plan):
- Member coinsurance = 20% × 18400.00 = 3680.00
But the member OOPM remaining = 6000.00 − 5400.00 = 600.00
The member's cost share is capped by the remaining OOPM: 600.00
So member pays 600.00 (coinsurance capped at OOPM), plan pays 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00
No copay applies to inpatient admission.
**Ending accumulators:**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged, already at max)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}I need to adjudicate Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount 18400.00.
**Starting accumulators:**
- Member deductible YTD: 1500.00 (individual deductible = 1500.00, so fully satisfied)
- Member OOPM YTD: 5400.00 (individual OOPM = 6000.00, so 600.00 remaining)
**Adjudicating Claim 1:**
The member's individual deductible is already fully satisfied (1500.00 credited against 1500.00 limit). So no deductible applies.
No copay applies to inpatient admission (not a listed copay service category).
Coinsurance applies: 20% member / 80% plan, in-network.
Member coinsurance on full allowed amount: 18400.00 × 20% = 3680.00
But the member's OOPM remaining = 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
So the member's cost share is capped at 600.00 (the OOPM cap).
- Deductible applied: 0.00
- Copay: 0.00
- Coinsurance: 600.00 (capped by OOPM)
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
**Ending accumulators:**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (no change, already at max)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Qwen3.7 Max · Alibaba14.1s · 836 out | 11.0s · 959 out | 12.9s · 988 out
Reasoning · 715 tokens
Let me analyze this claim step by step.
**Member Accumulators before Claim 1:**
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
**Claim 1:**
- Date: 2026-05-14
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
**Step 1: Check deductible status**
- Individual deductible: 1500.00
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- The individual deductible is fully satisfied (1500.00 >= 1500.00).
**Step 2: Check OOPM status**
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Remaining OOPM space: 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
**Step 3: Determine cost share for this claim**
- Service is inpatient admission, in-network.
- No special copay applies to inpatient admission (copays listed are for office visits, urgent care, ER, pharmacy).
- Since deductible is satisfied, coinsurance applies: 20% member / 80% plan.
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
**Step 4: Calculate coinsurance**
- Member coinsurance: 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00
- But member OOPM remaining space is only 600.00.
- So member pays only 600.00 (the amount needed to reach OOPM).
- Plan pays the rest: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
**Step 5: Breakdown of member responsibility**
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (deductible already satisfied)
- Copay amount: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission)
- Coinsurance amount: 600.00 (capped by OOPM)
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 17800.00
**Step 6: Update accumulators**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 = 1500.00
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
Let me verify: member_responsibility (600.00) + plan_paid (17800.00) = 18400.00 = allowed amount. ✓json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 838 tokens
Let me work through this claim adjudication step by step.
**Member Accumulators before Claim 1:**
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
**Claim 1 — 2026-05-14**
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
**Step 1: Check deductible status**
- Individual deductible: 1500.00
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- The individual deductible is fully satisfied (1500.00 >= 1500.00).
**Step 2: Check OOPM status**
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Remaining OOPM: 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
**Step 3: Calculate cost share**
- Service is in-network inpatient admission.
- No copay applies for inpatient admission (it's not listed as a copay service).
- Since deductible is satisfied, coinsurance applies: 20% member / 80% plan.
- Coinsurance on allowed amount: 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00
**Step 4: Apply OOPM cap**
- Member coinsurance would be: 3680.00
- Remaining OOPM space: 600.00
- Since 3680.00 > 600.00, the member only pays up to the OOPM limit.
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan pays the rest: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
**Step 5: Breakdown of member responsibility for final claim**
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (deductible was already met)
- Copay amount: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission)
- Coinsurance amount: 600.00 (capped by OOPM)
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 17800.00
**Step 6: Update accumulators**
- Member deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 = 1500.00
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
Let me double-check:
- member_responsibility (600.00) + plan_paid (17800.00) = 18400.00 = allowed amount ✓
- deductible_applied: 0.00 (already met) ✓
- copay_amount: 0.00 (inpatient admission has no copay listed) ✓
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00 (this is the coinsurance portion, capped by OOPM) ✓
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00 ✓
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00 ✓
All looks correct.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 867 tokens
Let me work through this claim adjudication step by step.
**Member Accumulators Before Claim 1:**
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
**Claim 1:**
- Date: 2026-05-14
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
**Step 1: Check deductible status**
- Individual deductible: 1500.00
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- The individual deductible is already met (1500.00 >= 1500.00).
**Step 2: Check OOPM status before this claim**
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Remaining to OOPM: 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00
**Step 3: Calculate cost share**
- Service is in-network inpatient admission.
- Deductible is met, so coinsurance applies.
- Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan (in-network)
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
- Full coinsurance amount: 18400.00 * 20% = 3680.00
**Step 4: Apply OOPM cap**
- Member OOPM remaining: 600.00
- Full coinsurance would be 3680.00, but member only has 600.00 left before hitting OOPM.
- So member pays 600.00 (coinsurance capped by OOPM), plan pays the rest.
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
**Step 5: Breakdown of member responsibility**
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (already met)
- Copay amount: 0.00 (inpatient admission is not a copay service)
- Coinsurance amount: 600.00 (capped by OOPM)
**Step 6: Update accumulators**
- Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (no change, already met, deductible credits don't increase beyond the threshold in a meaningful way - actually, let me think about this. The deductible is already at 1500.00. Since no deductible was applied to this claim, the deductible accumulator stays at 1500.00.)
- Ending member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
Let me double-check:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓ (equals allowed amount)
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Everything checks out.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.3 · Z.ai6.8s · 1,569 out | 3.2s · 274 out | 6.0s · 757 out
Reasoning · 1,475 tokens
Let me work through this claim carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500, plan year 2026.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
Claim 1 — 2026-05-14
- Inpatient admission, in-network
- Billed: 34960.00
- Allowed: 18400.00
Step 1: Deductible check.
Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00. Member deductible credited YTD is already 1500.00, so the individual deductible is already satisfied. Structure is EMBEDDED — individual deductible satisfied on its own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount (3000.00). Family deductible credited is 1500.00, but the individual member's deductible is satisfied (1500.00 credited). Since embedded, the individual deductible being satisfied means this member's services are no longer subject to deductible. The family deductible threshold doesn't block an individual member once their individual deductible is met (embedded means individual can satisfy on their own).
So the member's deductible balance is already at 1500.00 — the individual in-network threshold. Deductible applies 0.00 for this claim? Wait — deductible_applied is "the deductible portion of the FINAL claim". Since deductible is already satisfied, deductible_applied = 0.00.
Step 2: Coinsurance.
In-network coinsurance after deductible: 20% member / 80% plan.
Allowed amount: 18400.00.
Member coinsurance would be 20% × 18400.00 = 3680.00.
Step 3: OOPM check.
Individual in-network OOPM: 6000.00. Member OOP credited YTD: 5400.00. Remaining before OOPM: 600.00.
The member's cost share for this claim before OOPM cap: 3680.00. But the member can only pay up to the OOPM. Remaining headroom: 6000.00 − 5400.00 = 600.00.
So member responsibility = min(3680.00, 600.00) = 600.00. The OOPM caps it.
Once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services for remainder of plan year.
So:
- member_responsibility = 600.00
- plan_paid = 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00
- deductible_applied = 0.00
- copay_amount = 0.00 (inpatient admission — no copay listed; ER copay waived if results in admission, subject to deductible and coinsurance; inpatient admission has no copay in the schedule anyway)
- coinsurance_amount = 600.00?
Hmm, question: should coinsurance_amount be 600.00 (the amount actually charged as coinsurance, capped by OOPM) or 3680.00 (the uncapped coinsurance)? The contract says "coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". Since the member only pays 600.00 total and that's all coinsurance-driven (no copay, no deductible), the coinsurance portion actually applied to the member is 600.00. member_responsibility + plan_paid must equal allowed amount: 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00. ✓. And deductible (0) + copay (0) + coinsurance (600) = 600 = member_responsibility. That's consistent.
So coinsurance_amount = 600.00.
Step 4: Ending accumulators.
- ending_member_deductible: The deductible accumulator. Deductible applied was 0.00 (already satisfied), so it stays 1500.00. Hmm, but wait — could the family deductible credit matter? The member deductible credited stays at 1500.00. Family deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 (no deductible applied on this claim) = 1500.00. But "ending_member_deductible" is member deductible accumulator: 1500.00.
- ending_member_oopm: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00. Member has now reached the individual in-network OOPM of 6000.00.
So ending_member_oopm = 6000.00.
Let me double-check the embedded deductible logic. "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00 = individual in-network threshold. So the member's deductible is satisfied; no deductible applies to this claim. Even though family deductible is only at 1500.00 of 3000.00, embedded structure means this member's services aren't subject to deductible once their individual deductible is met. Correct.
Also note the deductible balance is a SINGLE balance across in-network and out-of-network; threshold measured against in-network threshold (1500.00) for in-network services. Balance 1500.00 ≥ 1500.00, satisfied. Yes.
OOPM: individual in-network 6000.00. Member OOP credited 5400.00. Cost share 3680.00 would exceed; capped at 600.00. After that, member at 6000.00 OOPM; plan pays 100% thereafter.
Everything checks:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Check sum: 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓
One more consideration: family OOPM is 12000.00; family credited 5400.00. Individual member reached their individual OOPM of 6000.00. The OOPM section says individual in-network 6000.00 and family 12000.00. Typically with embedded OOPM, once an individual hits the individual OOPM, that member's cost share stops even if family OOPM isn't met. The plan document says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." — "Once a member reaches" suggests per-member individual OOPM. So yes, member capped at 6000.00.
Final answer JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 181 tokens
Member deductible already at 1500.00 — individual in-network deductible satisfied. So deductible applied = 0. Coinsurance 20% member: 18400 × 0.20 = 3680.00. OOPM: 5400 + 3680 = 9080 > 6000 individual in-network OOPM. Once OOPM reached, plan pays 100%. Member pays up to OOPM: 6000 - 5400 = 600.00. Plan paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
Coinsurance_amount: 600.00 (capped by OOPM). Deductible 0, copay 0.
Ending deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged, coinsurance doesn't credit deductible). Ending OOPM: 6000.00.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 548 tokens
Let me work through this.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Individual in-network deductible 1500.00. Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 — so member has already met their individual deductible. OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM: 6000.00. So member has 600.00 remaining before OOPM.
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network. Billed 34960.00, allowed 18400.00.
Inpatient admission — no copay listed for inpatient admission itself (ER copay waived if admitted; this is an inpatient admission, subject to deductible and coinsurance). Deductible: already met (1500 credited, individual deductible 1500). So deductible applied = 0.00. Coinsurance 20% member of allowed amount.
20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00. But OOPM remaining is 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00. So member responsibility capped at 600.00. Coinsurance portion would be capped: coinsurance applied = 600.00 (the member pays 600.00, which is less than 3680.00). Plan pays 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Check OOPM: member OOPM accumulator after claim = 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00. Deductible accumulator remains 1500.00 (no deductible applied; coinsurance doesn't credit deductible).
Family OOPM: 5400 + 600 = 6000 family... but we only report member accumulators.
Required fields:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Member responsibility + plan paid = 600 + 17800 = 18400 = allowed amount. ✓
Coinsurance amount: the true coinsurance computed would be 3680.00 but the member's cost share is capped at 600.00 by the OOPM. The field asks "the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim" — the member's coinsurance portion after OOPM cap is 600.00. Since member_responsibility must equal sum of components presumably (600 = 0 + 0 + 600), coinsurance_amount should be 600.00.
Rounding: 3680.00 exact; capped at 600.00.
So answer:
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Qwen3.8 Max · Alibaba44.7s · 1,732 out | 32.0s · 1,582 out | 68.9s · 2,501 out
Reasoning · 1,611 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claim. Need think carefully.
We have plan doc. Member accumulators before claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Member OOP credited YTD = 5400.00
Family deductible credited =1500.00
Family OOP =5400.00
Claim 1 inpatient admission in-network, allowed 18400. Need member responsibility, plan paid, deductible applied, copay, coinsurance, ending member deductible, ending member OOPM.
Plan: individual in-network deductible 1500, already met (member deductible credited 1500). OOPM individual in-network 6000; member OOP credited 5400. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20%/80%. Inpatient admission no special copay? ER waived if admission but not relevant. So claim subject to deductible/coinsurance. Deductible already satisfied, so no deductible applied. Coinsurance 20% of allowed 18400 = 3680. But OOP accumulator 5400, OOPM 6000, remaining to OOPM =600. Once reached plan pays 100%. Need allocate member cost share limited by OOPM. Does member responsibility = 600, plan paid = allowed - member = 17800? Need consider coinsurance_amount field: coinsurance portion of final claim. Could be actual member coinsurance charged? But if OOPM caps, is coinsurance amount 600 or 3680? Required fields: deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount as portions of final claim; member_responsibility total final claim; plan_paid total final claim; member_responsibility + plan_paid must equal allowed. Components likely should sum to member_responsibility? It says deductible portion, copay portion, coinsurance portion of FINAL claim. If OOPM reduces member responsibility, the coinsurance portion actually assessed may be 600? Need infer. Typically after OOPM reached, plan pays 100; member cost share is zero beyond. If cost share calculated would be 3680 but member only pays until OOPM 600. The coinsurance portion of the final claim maybe 600 because only $600 coinsurance applied before OOPM reached. But could be 3680 coinsurance calculated, with plan paid 18400 - 600 =17800, and components sum 3680 not equal member_responsibility; no requirement they sum. But member_responsibility plus plan_paid equals allowed. They might expect coinsurance_amount = 600 as member coinsurance after OOPM cap? Let's analyze.
Task family: Adjudicate claims; each claim updates accumulators. member_responsibility is total for final claim; plan_paid; deductible_applied; copay_amount; coinsurance_amount. "Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply. member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." If member_responsibility=600 and plan_paid=17800. Deductible applied 0. Copay 0. Coinsurance? If coinsurance component that does not apply? It does apply, but member responsibility capped by OOPM. Could report coinsurance_amount = 600, the portion applied to member. Alternatively, if coinsurance_amount is calculated before OOPM: 3680, but member responsibility 600, then components don't sum to member responsibility; scoring might compare fields. Need decide expected convention.
Let's parse definitions: Coinsurance: member's percentage share of allowed after deductible. OOPM: ceiling on member cost share. Once reached, plan pays 100% of allowed for covered in-network services. So for claim straddling OOPM, member cost share is only up to ceiling. The coinsurance portion of final claim arguably is the member's coinsurance amount actually applied, capped. If asking component fields, likely they want deductible portion + copay portion + coinsurance portion = member_responsibility. Since they emphasize total plus plan equals allowed; they didn't state sum of components equals member responsibility but likely intended. For OOPM cap, if they wanted full calculated coinsurance then member_responsibility not equal components; odd. So coinsurance_amount = 600.
But let's ensure accumulators: Deductible credits? Member deductible already 1500; claim no deductible applied. Does allowed amount after deductible credit deductible? Deductible satisfied; no additional deductible. OOP credits: Copays always credit OOPM; deductible? Usually deductible credits OOPM? Plan doc says OOPM ceiling on member cost share; deductible is member cost share. It doesn't explicitly say deductible credits OOPM, but initial accumulator member OOP 5400 and deductible 1500 suggests includes deductible maybe. In claim, member pays coinsurance 600 until OOPM. So ending member OOP = 6000. Ending member deductible remains 1500. Plan pays 17800.
Need check family accumulators? Only one member? We only report member deductible/OOPM. Family may not matter. No key.
Potential nuance: In-network preventive? no. Inpatient no copay. Allowed amount 18400. Since member OOP already 5400, remaining 600. But coinsurance 20% = 3680. The first $600 of coinsurance hits OOPM; remaining $3080 paid by plan. Member responsibility 600. Plan paid 18400 - 600 = 17800. Deductible applied 0, copay 0, coinsurance 600. Ending member deductible 1500, ending member OOPM 6000.
Need format exactly one fenced JSON code block. Values two decimals. Could include numbers as 600.00? JSON numbers can't force two decimals? It says number with two decimal places. In JSON, 600.00 valid? JSON number can have fraction with trailing zeros, yes. Use 18400.00 etc. Ensure no commentary. Final only code block.
Double-check if member OOPM accumulator should be capped at 6000 exactly. Yes.
Could member responsibility include amounts above allowed? no in-network balance billing not member. Billed irrelevant.
Let's consider if deductible applied should be 0 because deductible already met. Yes.
Could plan paid be 18400? No because member hasn't reached OOPM before claim, pays 600. Then plan pays 17800.
Need maybe include "member_responsibility": 600.00, "plan_paid": 17800.00, "deductible_applied":0.00, "copay_amount":0.00, "coinsurance_amount":600.00, "ending_member_deductible":1500.00, "ending_member_oopm":6000.00.
Need ensure JSON keys exact. final.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,461 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claim. Need think carefully.
We have plan doc. Member accumulators before claim:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Family deductible = 1500.00
Family OOPM = 5400.00
Claim 1 inpatient admission in-network, billed 34960, allowed 18400.
Need required fields for FINAL claim (only claim): member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm.
Plan: individual in-network deductible 1500. Already member deductible credited 1500, so deductible satisfied. Coinsurance in-network 20% after deductible. OOPM individual in-network 6000; member OOP credited 5400. Need apply coinsurance up to remaining OOPM? The OOPM ceiling on member cost share; once reached plan pays 100% allowed. Copays and deductible? Deductible credits OOP? Usually yes? Document: Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM. It doesn't explicitly say deductible credits OOPM but out-of-pocket maximum ceiling on member cost share; typical deductible counts. Need infer? Accumulator member OOP credited 5400, deductible credited 1500. Maybe OOP includes deductible and coinsurance. We need determine. The plan doc says OOPM: ceiling on member cost share for plan year. Once reached, plan pays 100% allowed for covered in-network services. Premiums and non-covered never count. Copays always credit OOPM. It doesn't exclude deductible; likely deductible counts. Given initial member OOP 5400, deductible 1500 included maybe plus coinsurance 3900. For claim, deductible satisfied, coinsurance 20% of allowed = 3680. But remaining OOPM is 6000 - 5400 = 600. So member cost share capped at 600, plan pays allowed - 600 = 17800. Deductible applied 0. Copay 0. Coinsurance amount? Need component member responsibility: is coinsurance_amount 600 (capped amount) or full 3680 with OOPM? Required fields: deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount — component portions of final claim. Member_responsibility total = 600. To make components sum? Usually coinsurance_amount is member coinsurance actually charged (capped by OOPM), so 600. Plan paid 17800. Ending member deductible remains 1500 (no new deductible). Ending member OOPM 6000. Need ensure no copay for inpatient; ER copay waived if admission subject deductible/coinsurance. Inpatient likely no copay.
Need consider family accumulators? Single member? Only member. Ending member deductible = 1500. Ending member oopm = 6000. Could family also update? Not asked. Need values two decimals.
Check if member OOP credited 5400 before claim. If OOPM includes only in-network? Yes. Inpatient in-network allowed 18400. Since member has met deductible, normally coinsurance 20%=3680. OOP remaining 600. Member responsibility = 600. Plan pays 17800.
But need be careful: OOPM is individual in-network 6000. If member OOP credited 5400. Does deductible applied from prior claims count? Probably yes. If not, remaining OOP? Hmm doc: "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." It doesn't explicitly say deductible and coinsurance credit OOPM, but "out-of-pocket maximum ceiling on member cost share" means member cost share including deductible, coinsurance, copays. Yes.
Need output exactly fenced JSON. Ensure member_responsibility + plan_paid equals allowed 18400. 600+17800=18400.
Could there be coinsurance after OOPM? The claim crosses OOPM. Do we calculate coinsurance_amount as 600 (the portion of claim member paid as coinsurance) or 3680 (the amount that would have been coinsurance before cap) and then plan paid 17800? Required components: deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount. member_responsibility total 600. If coinsurance_amount 3680, member_responsibility wouldn't equal components. They didn't require components sum but likely should. They say member responsibility plus plan_paid must equal allowed. They say deductible portion, copay portion, coinsurance portion of final claim. If OOPM cap, portion of claim member pays as coinsurance is 600; the remaining 3080 is plan due to OOPM? Could be coinsurance_amount = 600.
Need final JSON only. Use numbers with two decimals? JSON numbers can be 600.00? JSON allows 600.00. Good.
Double-check: inpatient admission may trigger ER copay? Service is inpatient admission, not ER. No copay. Inpatient is subject to deductible/coinsurance. Deductible already satisfied. Good.
Need maybe "ending_member_oopm" after all claims = min(6000,5400+600)=6000. Deductible ending remains 1500. Family not asked.
Potential edge: family deductible structure embedded; family deductible credited 1500 but member deductible 1500. Not relevant. If family OOP? Not asked.
Need ensure no key extra. Exactly:
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
But consider if plan pays 100% after OOPM reached only after member pays 600; yes.
Need final only code block.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,380 tokens
We need answer user's task. Need produce final JSON only. Need adjudicate claim 1 given accumulators before claim. Need understand plan.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Family deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Family OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Plan: individual in-network deductible 1500, embedded. Member deductible balance 1500 satisfied. OOPM individual in-network 6000; member OOP credited 5400. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20%. Need final claim fields for Claim 1 only.
Claim 1 inpatient admission in-network allowed 18400. There is no specific copay for inpatient? Plan lists coinsurance after deductible. Inpatient admission likely subject to deductible and coinsurance. Deductible already satisfied. OOPM: member has 5400 credited, 600 left to reach 6000. For covered in-network services, member cost share counts toward OOPM. Since deductible satisfied, normally coinsurance 20% of allowed = 3680. But OOPM cap limits member cost share to remaining 600. Once reached plan pays 100% allowed for remainder. For this single claim, member responsibility = min(3680, 600) = 600. Plan paid = allowed 18400 - member 600 = 17800. Deductible applied? Since deductible already satisfied before claim, deductible portion for final claim = 0. Copay amount = 0. Coinsurance amount? Need component labels. Member responsibility is 600, plan paid 17800. The member cost share is due to coinsurance but capped by OOPM. Should coinsurance_amount be 600? The required fields: deductible_applied — deductible portion of final claim; copay_amount; coinsurance_amount. Since member_responsibility plus plan_paid equals allowed. If member responsibility 600, components should sum to member responsibility? Usually yes. Coinsurance portion is 600 (the amount applied as coinsurance up to OOPM). But there's nuance: coinsurance amount normally 20% = 3680, but OOPM reduces member liability. How to report coinsurance_amount? It asks coinsurance portion of FINAL claim, likely amount of member responsibility attributable to coinsurance. If OOPM cap applies, member pays 600 as coinsurance (or cost share) and rest plan pays. Could also report coinsurance_amount = 3680 and plan_paid 14720, member_responsibility 3680? But OOPM says once reached plan pays 100%. Before claim member has 5400 OOP, not yet reached. During claim, member cost share accumulates until reaches 600. For a claim processed in order, we cap at OOPM. So member responsibility 600.
Need ending_member_deductible after all claims: deductible credited remains 1500? Deductible credits usually allowed amounts subject to deductible. Here no deductible applied because already met. Does claim add to deductible? Deductible accumulator is amount credited toward deductible. It is already at threshold 1500. Could not exceed? Typically accumulator can be 1500 max? It says running total; once satisfied maybe remains 1500. If deductible applied 0, ending_member_deductible = 1500.00.
Ending_member_oopm after all claims: prior 5400 + member responsibility 600 = 6000.00. Does OOPM credit include coinsurance only? yes. Cap at 6000. Ending = 6000.
Family accumulators? Not asked ending family. Only member deductible/oopm. Claim is member? We only report member fields.
Need consider emergency room? No, inpatient admission. ER copay waived if admission and subject deductible/coinsurance. But this is inpatient admission itself. No copay.
Potential issue: OOPM family 12000, family credited 5400. But individual OOPM 6000. Member reaches individual OOPM; plan pays 100% for that member. Family OOPM not relevant for member unless aggregate? It says individual OOPM. Embedded? OOPM not explicitly embedded but "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum..." individual. So yes.
Need ensure money two decimals. JSON with numbers maybe 600.00 as number? JSON numbers can't force two decimals? They want number with two decimal places. We can output 600.0? JSON accepts 600.00? Yes JSON number can include fraction digits. Use 600.00. Ensure no extra keys. Required keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm.
Check sum: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 allowed. Good.
Could deductible_applied be 0 because deductible met. Yes.
Need only fenced JSON block. Ensure no commentary.
Double-check: The claim is inpatient admission in-network. There is no separate inpatient copay. Coinsurance after deductible. Member deductible satisfied. OOPM remaining 600. All allowed amount subject to coinsurance, but member only pays until OOPM. In real claims, may process line-by-line, but single claim allowed. The member responsibility for claim = 600. Coinsurance_amount = 600? If they expect "coinsurance portion" before OOPM? The fields likely want components of member responsibility; if OOPM reduces, component could be 600. Let's reason from output contract: "member_responsibility — member's total for FINAL claim; plan_paid — plan's total; deductible_applied — deductible portion; copay_amount — copay portion; coinsurance_amount — coinsurance portion." It doesn't explicitly say components sum to member_responsibility, but likely. member responsibility plus plan paid must equal allowed. If we put coinsurance_amount 3680, member_responsibility 600, components don't sum; also plan_paid 17800. But coinsurance portion of final claim could be calculated as 20% of allowed after deductible = 3680, then OOPM waiver 3080? There is no field for OOPM waiver. The only way to reconcile is coinsurance_amount = 600. Because the claim's coinsurance charged to member is capped. Plan paid includes 17800 (80% 14720 + 3080 due to OOPM). The "coinsurance portion" of member responsibility is 600. That seems correct.
Need maybe ending_member_deductible could become 1500 + 18400? Accumulator could track actual allowed expenses, not capped. "Accumulator: the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM." Deductible credited YTD 1500. If more allowed amounts after deductible, do they continue to accumulate? Usually deductible accumulator may track expenses applied to deductible, but once met, additional allowed amounts may not credit deductible. It says deductible: amount member pays at allowed rate before coinsurance begins. Since member pays no deductible, deductible applied 0. Ending_member_deductible likely 1500 not 19900. In benefit adjudication, accumulators often have deductible remaining, not total expenses. But they call credited year to date. Could credit all allowed amounts? "Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00" equals threshold. If they intended uncapped expense accumulator, would be 1500 before, and after claim maybe 19900? But deductible threshold is 1500. The field "ending_member_deductible" likely member deductible accumulator after all claims. If accumulator is running total of deductible credits, once deductible met no additional credits? Could still track total allowed applied? Need infer from harness. It says "Accumulator: the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM." Running total of deductible: amounts applied to deductible. If no deductible applied, remains. OOPM accumulator increments by member cost share that counts, capped at max? They likely expect ending_member_oopm = 6000 not 9080. So deductible should be capped at threshold or remain 1500. Since deductible applied 0, unchanged.
Need maybe OOPM credited prior includes 5400 from copays and coinsurance. This claim member responsibility 600, ending 6000. Good.
Potential family embedded deductible: individual deductible satisfied by member 1500; family deductible 1500. If family aggregate? It's embedded. Not relevant.
Need final JSON only. Ensure numeric with two decimals. JSON allows trailing .00. Use:
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Double-check if plan pays 100% once OOPM reached "for remainder of plan year." Within a claim, does it switch mid-claim? Usually yes; member cost share capped at OOPM. If claim is single allowed amount, member pays only remaining 600. Good.
Could they treat OOPM reached only after claim is fully processed, so entire coinsurance 3680 applies, then accumulator exceeds OOPM and maybe future claims no cost share? But wording "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% ... remainder of plan year." For a claim, if cost share would exceed, should prorate/cap. In payer adjudication, accumulators updated after claim; but if single claim pushes over, member responsibility should be limited to OOPM. Many tasks expect cap. The output contract specifically says member_responsibility plus plan_paid equals allowed; no separate over-max. It likely expects cap.
Need ensure no real privacy concerns.
Final only JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.6 Terra · OpenAI2.3s · 140 out | 2.6s · 153 out | 2.2s · 144 out
Reasoning · 42 tokens
**Understanding deductibles and out-of-pocket costs**
I need to make sure I understand the deductible, which is individual in this case. It looks like there’s a remaining out-of-pocket (OOP) balance of 600. The coinsurance claim is 3680, capped at 600. The plan amount appears to be 17800, but I see that the deductible remains unchanged, with an OOP max of 6000. I might need to put these figures into JSON format for better clarity. Let's ensure everything adds up correctly!json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 55 tokens
**Evaluating insurance specifics**
I'm looking at the insurance details here: we need to meet the embedded individual deductible, and the out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM) is remaining at 600. For inpatient services, there's a coinsurance of 20%, but it's capped at 600. The plan has a deductible of 17800, with a deductible ending at 1500 and an OOPM of 6000. It all seems a bit complicated, but I'm working through the specifics to clarify coverage.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 46 tokens
**Calculating insurance costs**
I need to clarify the details of the insurance plan. It looks like there's an individual deductible that has been reached, and out-of-pocket expenses are capped at $600. I'm seeing a coinsurance of 20%, but it's capped at $600 as well. The total plan amount seems to be $17,800, and there’s an end out-of-pocket maximum of $6,000 with a deductible of $1,500. Let's ensure I have this all accurately understood!json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.3 Flash · Z.ai11.2s · 995 out | 19.8s · 1,174 out | 30.1s · 1,086 out
Reasoning · 847 tokens
Let me work through this.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (individual in-network deductible is 1500.00, so the individual deductible is already satisfied)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00, so 600.00 remaining)
- Family deductible: 1500.00 of 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 5400.00 of 12000.00
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed 18400.00.
ER copay waived for inpatient admission — the service is inpatient admission, subject to deductible and coinsurance. Note: the plan document says "Emergency room — 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance". Here the claim itself is an inpatient admission, so no copay; subject to deductible and coinsurance.
Individual deductible: 1500.00 credited, threshold 1500.00 → satisfied. So no deductible applied.
Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan after deductible.
Member cost share: 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00.
But OOPM: individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00; member has 5400.00 credited. Remaining: 600.00. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% of allowed.
So member pays 600.00 (coinsurance capped at OOPM), plan pays 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00.
Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (no change; deductible was already met, and copays/coinsurance don't credit deductible... actually coinsurance payments typically don't credit deductible since deductible is already met anyway).
Ending member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00 (reached the max).
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: this is the coinsurance portion of the final claim. The member's coinsurance share would be 3680.00, but capped at OOPM to 600.00. The question: "coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". Hmm. The member responsibility components: deductible 0.00, copay 0.00, coinsurance... The sum of the components should presumably equal member_responsibility. 0 + 0 + 600 = 600 = member_responsibility. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00.
That's the sensible interpretation: the components sum to member responsibility. The coinsurance amount actually applied is 600.00 because of the OOPM cap.
Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (deductible accumulator unchanged — it was already at the individual max; also coinsurance doesn't credit deductible).
Ending member OOPM: 6000.00.
Let me double-check the embedded/family deductible: family deductible credited 1500.00 of 3000.00. Structure is embedded: individual satisfies on their own; family also satisfied once family credits reach family amount. The member's individual deductible is satisfied (1500.00 credited = 1500.00 individual). Under embedded structure, once the individual deductible is satisfied, the plan pays for that member even if family deductible isn't met. So deductible doesn't apply. Correct.
Also OOPM family: 5400.00 of 12000.00 — family OOPM not relevant here since member individual OOPM caps at 6000.00.
Final answer:
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,080 tokens
Let me work through this.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (individual in-network deductible is 1500.00, so member has met the individual deductible)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00, so member has 600 remaining)
- Family deductible: 1500.00 of 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 5400.00 of 12000.00
Claim 1 — Inpatient admission, in-network. Billed 34960.00, Allowed 18400.00.
Inpatient admission: the ER copay waiver rule applies to ER visits that result in inpatient admission. But this claim is just an inpatient admission — no ER copay mentioned anyway. Inpatient is subject to deductible and coinsurance.
Deductible: member has 1500.00 credited toward individual deductible of 1500.00. So the individual deductible is fully satisfied. No deductible applies to this claim.
Wait — but the plan structure is embedded. The member's individual deductible is satisfied (1500 of 1500). So coinsurance applies.
Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan on the allowed amount after deductible is satisfied. Allowed = 18400.00. Member coinsurance = 20% × 18400 = 3680.00.
But OOPM check: member OOPM credited = 5400.00; individual in-network OOPM = 6000.00. Remaining before hitting OOPM = 600.00. The member's coinsurance of 3680.00 would exceed the OOPM. The member pays up to the OOPM: 600.00, and once reached, plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered in-network services for the remainder of the plan year.
So member responsibility = 600.00 (stops at OOPM), plan paid = 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00.
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600 + 17800 = 18400. ✓
Deductible applied: 0.00 (deductible already satisfied).
Copay amount: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient).
Coinsurance amount: this is the coinsurance portion of the final claim. Hmm — the coinsurance calculated would be 3680.00, but the member's actual share is capped at 600.00 by the OOPM. What should "coinsurance_amount" be?
The fields: member_responsibility (600), plan_paid (17800), deductible_applied (0), copay_amount (0), coinsurance_amount (?).
Member responsibility = copay + coinsurance + deductible portions. If member responsibility is 600.00 and it comes from coinsurance that was capped, then the coinsurance portion of the member's responsibility is 600.00. The member only actually pays 600.00 in coinsurance; the rest is absorbed by the OOPM.
I think coinsurance_amount should be 600.00 — the portion of the final claim the member pays as coinsurance, which is capped at the OOPM. That keeps member_responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = 0 + 0 + 600 = 600. ✓
Alternatively, one could argue coinsurance_amount = 3680.00 as the raw coinsurance, but then member responsibility wouldn't decompose correctly. The decomposition constraint (member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed, and components summing to member responsibility) suggests coinsurance_amount = 600.00.
Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (no new deductible credits; copays don't credit deductible; inpatient deductible already satisfied).
Ending member OOPM: 5400 + 600 = 6000.00.
Wait — should I also consider family OOPM? Family OOPM in-network is 12000.00; family credited 5400.00. The member hits individual OOPM at 6000.00 first. Individual OOPM of 6000.00 — member reached it. The plan document says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." This refers to the member's own OOPM (individual, embedded presumably). The member's individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00. After this claim, member OOPM accumulator = 6000.00. Done.
Ending member deductible: 1500.00.
So:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Round to two decimals.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 992 tokens
Let me work through this.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00, so the individual deductible is already satisfied)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00, so not yet at OOPM)
- Family deductible credited: 1500.00 (family is 3000.00, embedded structure)
- Family OOPM credited: 5400.00 (family is 12000.00)
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed 18400.00.
Service type: Inpatient admission — not an office visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy, so no copay listed applies. The ER copay waiver doesn't matter here since it's already an inpatient admission. Inpatient admission is subject to deductible and coinsurance (standard). There's no specific copay for inpatient in the plan document, so cost share is deductible then coinsurance.
Deductible: member has 1500.00 credited, individual deductible is 1500.00 (in-network). Embedded: individual satisfies on own. Family deductible is 3000.00, family credited 1500.00. But embedded — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own. Member's individual deductible is already met (1500.00 credited = 1500.00 threshold). So deductible_applied = 0.00? Wait — the deductible accumulator is at the individual threshold already, so no further deductible applies for this member.
Hmm, but wait: family deductible is 3000.00, family credited 1500.00. Embedded structure: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Since the individual has satisfied their individual deductible (1500.00), the plan pays for this member regardless of family. So no deductible applied.
So cost share: coinsurance 20% of allowed after deductible = 20% × 18400.00 = 3680.00.
But check OOPM: member OOPM credited 5400.00, individual in-network OOPM 6000.00. Room left: 600.00. Copays and coinsurance credit OOPM. So member pays coinsurance up to 600.00 more, then OOPM is reached and plan pays 100%.
Coinsurance owed: 3680.00, but capped at 600.00 remaining OOPM. Member pays 600.00, reaching OOPM 6000.00. Plan pays 18400.00 − 600.00 = 17800.00.
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓
deductible_applied = 0.00
copay_amount = 0.00
coinsurance_amount = 600.00 (the actual coinsurance portion charged; capped by OOPM)
Hmm — is coinsurance_amount the calculated coinsurance (3680.00) or the actual charged (600.00)? The contract says member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount, and the components are parts of member responsibility. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00.
Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged; deductible was already satisfied, no further deductible applied).
Ending member OOPM: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00.
Wait — should the coinsurance also be capped by family OOPM? Family OOPM in-network is 12000.00, family credited 5400.00. Not relevant. Also embedded OOPM isn't explicitly stated as embedded, but family OOPM 12000 vs individual 6000 — either way not reached before this claim.
Also note: OOPM typically includes deductible + copays + coinsurance. The plan says copays always credit OOPM. Coinsurance obviously counts. Member OOPM at 5400.00 with deductible satisfied at 1500.00 — consistent (e.g., 1500 deductible + 3900 copays/coinsurance). Fine.
So final answer:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Kimi K2.6 · Moonshot159.6s · 5,816 out | 35.8s · 3,445 out | 26.1s · 4,337 out
Reasoning · 5,721 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate a single claim (Claim 1) based on the provided plan document and member accumulators.
Let me analyze the current state:
- Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Plan year: 2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
Claim 1:
- Date: 2026-05-14
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
Plan details:
- Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00
- Family in-network deductible: 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED — individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
- Individual in-network OOPM: 6000.00
- Family in-network OOPM: 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Emergency room: 400.00 copay, waived if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum.
- Preventive care: 100% if in-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share.
Now, let's determine the member's cost share for this inpatient admission.
Current accumulator:
- Member deductible: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00)
- Member OOPM: 5400.00 (individual OOPM is 6000.00)
Since this is an inpatient admission, in-network:
- It's subject to deductible and coinsurance (not a copay service).
- The member has already met the individual in-network deductible of 1500.00 (accumulator is 1500.00).
- Wait, let me re-read: "Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00". The individual deductible is 1500.00. So the deductible is fully satisfied.
Since deductible is satisfied, we move to coinsurance.
- In-network coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan.
- Allowed amount: 18400.00.
- Member coinsurance: 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00.
- Plan pays: 80% of 18400.00 = 14720.00.
Now check OOPM:
- Current member OOPM: 5400.00.
- Individual OOPM limit: 6000.00.
- Remaining OOPM capacity: 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00.
- The member's calculated responsibility is 3680.00 (coinsurance).
- But OOPM is 6000.00, and they have 5400.00 credited so far.
- However, the deductible is already met, so the 3680.00 would be coinsurance.
- Wait, does the deductible amount count toward OOPM? Usually yes, but let me check the plan document.
- The plan document says: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year."
- And "Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum."
- It doesn't explicitly state whether deductible counts toward OOPM, but in standard health insurance (and implied by "out-of-pocket maximum" and the accumulators being separate), the deductible typically counts toward OOPM. The accumulator names are "Member deductible credited year to date" and "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date" — they are tracked separately, but usually deductible counts toward OOPM. Let me check if the plan document says so explicitly.
- Actually, looking carefully: the plan document defines OOPM as "the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year." Deductible is member cost share. Coinsurance is member cost share. Copay is member cost share. So all of these should count toward OOPM.
- But the accumulators are given as separate values: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 5400.00. If deductible counts toward OOPM, and the member has paid 1500.00 deductible, then their total OOP should be at least 1500.00 plus whatever copays/coinsurance they've paid. The OOPM accumulator is 5400.00. This suggests that the OOPM accumulator already includes the deductible amount. So total member cost share YTD = 5400.00.
- The individual OOPM is 6000.00. So remaining OOPM = 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00.
- The member's calculated cost share for this claim would be 3680.00 (all coinsurance, since deductible is met).
- But wait, if the member only has 600.00 left before hitting OOPM, then they should only pay 600.00, and the plan pays the rest.
- Let me calculate:
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (already met)
- Coinsurance amount: normally 20% of 18400 = 3680.00
- But OOPM remaining: 6000 - 5400 = 600.00
- So member responsibility should be capped at 600.00.
- Plan pays: 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
- Or, plan pays 80% (14720) plus the amount above OOPM? Actually, once OOPM is reached, plan pays 100%. So member pays 600.00, plan pays 17800.00.
- Then ending OOPM = 6000.00 (capped).
Wait, but I need to be careful. Is the OOPM accumulator inclusive of deductible or separate? The prompt says:
"Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00"
"Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00"
In many systems, the OOPM accumulator tracks all cost sharing (deductible + copay + coinsurance). If the member has 1500.00 deductible and 5400.00 OOPM, and if OOPM includes deductible, then the member has paid 5400.00 total, of which 1500.00 was deductible. That leaves 3900.00 in copays/coinsurance.
But I need to check the plan document for explicit language. The plan document says:
"Deductible: the amount a member pays at the allowed rate before coinsurance begins."
"Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM): the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year. Once reached, the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered in-network services. Premiums and non-covered services never count toward it."
"Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum."
This implies that deductible also credits the OOPM, because OOPM is the ceiling on member cost share, and deductible is member cost share. The fact that copays explicitly credit OOPM doesn't mean deductible doesn't; it's just emphasizing that copays don't credit deductible but do credit OOPM.
However, the accumulator values are separate. This could mean:
Option A: OOPM accumulator is total member cost share (including deductible). So 5400.00 is the total.
Option B: OOPM accumulator is separate from deductible and only tracks copays/coinsurance. So total member cost share = 1500 + 5400 = 6900, which would already exceed the 6000 OOPM. That can't be right because if total is already 6900, they would have hit OOPM at 6000. So Option B is impossible unless the plan allows OOPM to be exceeded by a single claim that pushed it over, but even then, starting at 6900 > 6000 makes no sense.
Wait, let me reconsider. If the OOPM accumulator is separate and does NOT include deductible, and the member has 5400.00 in copays/coinsurance, plus 1500.00 deductible = 6900.00 total. But the individual OOPM is 6000.00. This would mean they already exceeded the OOPM, which contradicts the plan document (plan should pay 100% once reached). Unless the plan's OOPM accumulator is tracked as "copays/coinsurance only" and the deductible is separate, but the plan language says OOPM is the ceiling on member cost share. So if they've paid 6900, they've exceeded 6000.
Unless... the family OOPM is 12000, but individual is 6000. The accumulators show family OOPM also at 5400.00. So the member hasn't exceeded individual OOPM.
Actually, maybe the OOPM accumulator of 5400.00 includes the deductible of 1500.00. That would make sense: total cost share = 5400.00, of which 1500.00 was deductible. Then remaining OOPM = 6000 - 5400 = 600.00.
But wait, if the OOPM accumulator is 5400.00 and includes deductible, then non-deductible cost share so far is 3900.00.
Let me check if there is any other interpretation. The prompt says "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00". In health plan systems, the OOP accumulator almost always includes the deductible. The fact that there's a separate deductible accumulator is for tracking the deductible balance specifically (e.g., how much of the deductible is met), while the OOP accumulator tracks total OOP spending. So yes, 5400.00 likely includes the 1500.00 deductible.
Actually, wait. Let me look at the wording again: "Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00" and "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00". If the OOP included deductible, why track both? Because you need to know if the deductible is met (for coinsurance purposes) AND you need to know total OOP (for OOPM purposes). The deductible accumulator tells you the deductible is met. The OOP accumulator tells you total OOP is 5400.00.
So:
- Deductible remaining: 1500 - 1500 = 0.00
- OOPM remaining: 6000 - 5400 = 600.00
Claim 1:
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
- Deductible phase: already met, so 0.00 deductible applied.
- Coinsurance phase: 20% of 18400 = 3680.00.
- But member only has 600.00 OOPM remaining.
- So member pays 600.00.
- This 600.00 is coinsurance (since deductible is already met).
- Plan pays 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Wait, but what about the coinsurance amount field? The task says:
"coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim"
If OOPM caps the coinsurance, then the coinsurance portion is 600.00? Or is it the calculated 3680.00 before OOPM? The member responsibility is the actual amount the member pays. The components should add up: deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = member_responsibility.
So:
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00 (inpatient admission is not a copay service)
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00 (the actual coinsurance paid, capped by OOPM)
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged)
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00 (5400 + 600)
But wait, is there any chance that the OOPM accumulator of 5400 does NOT include the deductible? Let's reconsider.
If OOPM accumulator does NOT include deductible:
- Total OOP = deductible + copays/coinsurance = 1500 + 5400 = 6900.
- This exceeds the 6000 individual OOPM.
- That would mean the member already hit OOPM and should pay nothing.
- But the accumulators show member OOPM at 5400, which would be under 6000 if it's separate.
- However, if total OOP is 6900 > 6000, then they should have stopped paying at 6000. The fact that they have 5400 in the OOP accumulator (separate) suggests the system tracks them separately, but then how do you know when OOPM is hit? You'd have to add them. But if you add them, they're already over. So that interpretation leads to a contradiction.
Unless... the deductible is 1500 and OOPM is 5400, and the OOPM is aggregate or something else. No, the individual OOPM is 6000.
Let me think about whether the family OOPM matters. Family OOPM is 12000. Family OOP credited is 5400. Since individual OOPM is embedded (like the deductible), the individual OOPM applies first. "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum..." — so it's individual.
Another angle: The prompt says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance." This is about deductible, not OOPM. For OOPM, it just says individual and family amounts.
Given that 5400 < 6000, and the member has paid 1500 deductible, if the OOPM accumulator excludes deductible, then total cost share is 6900 which exceeds 6000. Since the plan says once reached plan pays 100%, the member should not have paid more than 6000. So the only consistent interpretation is that the 5400 OOPM accumulator includes the 1500 deductible.
Wait, actually, there's another possibility: Maybe the member has paid 1500 deductible and 5400 in copays/coinsurance, but the OOPM is 6000, and somehow the system let them pay 6900 because of a timing issue or because the OOPM wasn't enforced? No, that doesn't make sense for a synthetic adjudication problem. The problem should be consistent.
Therefore, the OOPM accumulator of 5400.00 must be the total member cost share YTD, including the deductible. So remaining OOPM is 600.00.
Let me verify: Deductible met? Yes (1500/1500).
Coinsurance: 20% of 18400 = 3680.
OOPM remaining: 6000 - 5400 = 600.
Member pays min(3680, 600) = 600.
Plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800.
Now, what is the "coinsurance_amount"? Is it the full 3680.00 that would have been coinsurance, or the actual 600.00 paid?
The instructions say: "coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim"
And "deductible_applied — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim"
And "copay_amount — the copay portion of the FINAL claim"
And "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim."
Also: "deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = member_responsibility" presumably? The instructions don't explicitly say that, but it's implied by "portion".
Actually, the instructions don't explicitly say those three must sum to member responsibility, but logically they should. The deductible_applied is the amount applied to deductible (0.00). The copay_amount is 0.00. The coinsurance_amount is the portion of the member responsibility attributable to coinsurance. Since the member pays 600.00 and it's all because of the coinsurance rate (but capped by OOPM), I think the coinsurance_amount should be 600.00. The OOPM cap is a limit on the total, but the portion is still coinsurance.
Alternatively, some might argue that coinsurance_amount is 3680.00 and then there's an OOPM adjustment, but the task only asks for those three components. There's no key for "oopm_adjustment". So to make the numbers consistent, coinsurance_amount must be the actual coinsurance paid: 600.00.
Similarly, if there were deductible and coinsurance, and OOPM capped it, you'd have to allocate. But here deductible is 0, so it's simple.
So:
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Wait, let me double-check: Is inpatient admission subject to deductible and coinsurance? Yes.
Is there any copay for inpatient? No, the plan document lists specific copays (primary care, specialist, urgent care, emergency room, generic retail pharmacy). Inpatient admission is not listed, so it's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
Is the allowed amount 18400? Yes.
Billed charge is irrelevant for member cost share (basis of payment says calculated from allowed amount).
One more thing: The plan says "Emergency room: 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance." This is about the ER visit itself. But the current claim is "Inpatient admission, in-network", not an ER visit. So that rule doesn't apply directly, though it's good to note that inpatient admissions are subject to deductible and coinsurance.
Wait, let me re-read the service: "Inpatient admission, in-network". This is the admission itself. It's not an ER visit. So standard deductible/coinsurance applies.
Let me also consider if the deductible accumulator being at 1500.00 means the deductible is fully met. Yes, individual in-network deductible is 1500.00.
Could the family deductible matter? Family deductible is 3000.00, family credited is 1500.00. But since it's embedded and the individual deductible is met, the family deductible doesn't matter for this member's coinsurance. However, does the family OOPM matter? Family OOPM is 12000, family credited is 5400. Individual OOPM is 6000. Since individual OOPM is lower and embedded, individual OOPM is the cap.
Wait, are OOPMs also embedded? The plan says for deductible: "Structure: EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." It doesn't explicitly say OOPM is embedded, but typically in plans with embedded deductibles, the OOPM is also embedded. The document says: "Individual (in-network) 6000.00; Family (in-network) 12000.00". It doesn't explicitly state the embedding for OOPM, but in standard insurance, if deductible is embedded, OOPM usually is too. Also, "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum..." implies individual OOPM triggers 100% plan payment for that member.
If OOPM were aggregate (not embedded), then the family OOPM of 12000 would have to be met before any member gets 100%. But the language says "Once a member reaches..." which strongly suggests individual OOPM applies per member. So we use individual OOPM 6000.
So my calculation holds:
- Member OOPM before claim: 5400.00
- Individual OOPM limit: 6000.00
- Remaining: 600.00
- Claim allowed: 18400.00
- Deductible: already met, so 0 applied.
- Coinsurance: 20% of 18400 = 3680.00
- But capped at remaining OOPM: 600.00
- Member pays 600.00
- Plan pays 17800.00
- Ending OOPM: 6000.00
One more check: Does the plan pay 100% once OOPM is reached? Yes. So for this claim, the member pays 600 to reach OOPM, and the plan pays the rest: 18400 - 600 = 17800.
Actually, wait. If the member's OOPM was 5400 before the claim, and they pay 600, that brings them to exactly 6000. So they hit the OOPM exactly. The plan pays the remainder.
What if the OOPM accumulator is exclusive of deductible? Then total cost share = 1500 + 5400 = 6900 > 6000. That would mean they already exceeded OOPM. But the prompt gives 5400 as the OOP accumulator. If it's exclusive, they should have stopped paying earlier. Since the problem is well-posed, the OOP accumulator must be inclusive. I will proceed with that.
But I want to be absolutely sure. Let me think about standard health plan accumulator conventions. Usually:
- Deductible accumulator: amount met toward deductible
- OOP accumulator: amount met toward OOPM (includes deductible, copays, coinsurance)
These are often displayed separately because you need to know both. The deductible accumulator shows how much of the deductible is met. The OOP accumulator shows how much of the OOPM is met. The OOP accumulator is always >= deductible accumulator (assuming all cost share counts). Here, 5400 >= 1500, so that's consistent.
So yes, 5400 includes the 1500.
Therefore:
- Deductible applied: 0.00
- Copay: 0.00
- Coinsurance: 600.00
- Member responsibility: 600.00
- Plan paid: 17800.00
- Ending deductible: 1500.00
- Ending OOPM: 6000.00
Let me verify the math: 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00. Yes.
Now, are there any other rules?
- Preventive care? No, inpatient admission is not preventive.
- In-network? Yes.
- Allowed amount is the basis. Billed charge is irrelevant.
I think that's it.
Wait, one more thing. The plan says "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." This is just emphasizing. Deductible credits are separate.
Also, the prompt says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." This claim is in-network, so we measure against 1500.00. The balance is 1500.00, so it's met.
Everything looks consistent.
Final answer:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
```
Wait, I should make sure about formatting. It says "Report every dollar amount as a plain number with two decimal places and no currency symbol". In JSON, numbers are just numbers. So 600.00 is fine as a number? Actually in JSON, 600.00 is just 600 if it's a number type. But the instructions say "plain number with two decimal places". Usually in these tasks, they json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,352 tokens
We need to adjudicate Claim 1 based on the plan document and accumulators.
First, parse the plan details:
- Plan year 2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31.
- Deductible individual in-network: 1500.00.
- Deductible family in-network: 3000.00.
- Structure: EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
- Out-of-network individual deductible: 3000.00.
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. (This means for in-network, the threshold is 1500 individual; for OON it's 3000, but they share the same balance. However for in-network, the individual threshold is 1500.)
- Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM):
- Individual in-network: 6000.00
- Family in-network: 12000.00
- Individual out-of-network: 12000.00
- Once reached, plan pays 100%.
- Member cost share:
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan.
- Coinsurance after deductible, out-of-network: 40% member / 60% plan.
- Primary care office visit: 30.00 copay.
- Specialist office visit: 60.00 copay.
- Urgent care: 75.00 copay.
- Emergency room: 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance.
- Generic retail pharmacy: 15.00 copay.
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum.
- Preventive care: In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share are paid at 100% of the allowed amount and are not subject to deductible, coinsurance, or copay.
- Basis of payment: Member cost share is calculated from the ALLOWED amount. Amounts billed above allowed are not member's responsibility for in-network.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
Claim 1:
- Date: 2026-05-14
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
We need to compute:
- member_responsibility
- plan_paid
- deductible_applied
- copay_amount
- coinsurance_amount
- ending_member_deductible (after claim)
- ending_member_oopm (after claim)
Since it's in-network inpatient admission, not a primary/specialist/urgent care/ER/pharmacy, so no copay. The service is subject to deductible and coinsurance (in-network). Preventive care doesn't apply to inpatient admission.
Member deductible YTD before claim: 1500.00. Individual in-network deductible is 1500.00. So the member has already met the individual in-network deductible. Therefore, for this claim, deductible_applied = 0.00.
Now, cost sharing after deductible: 20% member coinsurance on allowed amount. Allowed amount = 18400.00. Member coinsurance = 0.20 * 18400.00 = 3680.00.
We must also check OOPM. Member OOPM YTD before claim: 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00. So the member has remaining OOPM = 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00.
The member's cost share for this claim would normally be 3680.00 (coinsurance). However, OOPM caps the total member cost share for the year. So the member can only be charged up to the remaining OOPM.
Remaining OOPM before claim = 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00.
Since the member's calculated cost share (3680.00) exceeds the remaining OOPM (600.00), the member's responsibility is limited to 600.00. The plan pays the rest.
But we need to allocate between deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount. Deductible is 0. Copay is 0. Coinsurance is the portion of cost sharing after deductible. However, because OOPM limits total member responsibility, we need to determine how much of the allowed amount is paid by member and plan.
Let's carefully compute:
Allowed amount = 18400.00.
Deductible applied = 0 (already met).
Base member cost after deductible = 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00.
Remaining OOPM before claim = 600.00.
Since base member cost (3680.00) > remaining OOPM (600.00), member responsibility = 600.00.
Plan paid = Allowed - member responsibility = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Now we need to report the components:
- deductible_applied = 0.00
- copay_amount = 0.00
- coinsurance_amount = ?
What is the "coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim"? In typical adjudication, coinsurance is calculated after deductible, but then OOPM limits total member responsibility. How to split the 600.00 member responsibility among deductible, copay, coinsurance? Deductible is 0. Copay is 0. So all 600.00 would be considered the coinsurance portion? Or do we calculate the coinsurance amount as the lesser of the calculated coinsurance and the remaining OOPM? Usually, the coinsurance portion is the portion of the claim that is subject to coinsurance, but when OOPM is reached, the coinsurance is effectively capped.
Let's think: The member responsibility is composed of deductible + copay + coinsurance. Since there is no deductible or copay, the member responsibility is entirely coinsurance (subject to OOPM). So coinsurance_amount = 600.00. However, is there a scenario where we report the calculated pre-OOPM coinsurance (3680.00) and then the OOPM limits it? The prompt says: "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." Also: "deductible_applied — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim", "copay_amount — the copay portion of the FINAL claim", "coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim".
In many adjudication systems, the coinsurance amount is the coinsurance that actually applies to the claim, i.e., after OOPM. But let's see if the plan document says anything about OOPM application order. It doesn't explicitly state, but standard practice: Deductible first, then coinsurance, then OOPM caps total cost share. Since the deductible is already met, the member pays coinsurance until OOPM is reached. So the member would pay coinsurance equal to the lesser of (20% of allowed) and (remaining OOPM). Since remaining OOPM (600) < 3680, the coinsurance amount is 600.00. The plan pays the rest.
Thus:
- member_responsibility = 600.00
- plan_paid = 17800.00
- deductible_applied = 0.00
- copay_amount = 0.00
- coinsurance_amount = 600.00
- ending_member_deductible = 1500.00 (unchanged, since deductible already met and no new deductible applied)
- ending_member_oopm = 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00
Wait: Does the ending OOPM cap at 6000.00? Yes. The member OOPM YTD was 5400.00, plus 600.00 = 6000.00, which equals the individual in-network OOPM.
But is the OOPM individual or family? The member accumulators show member OOPM and family OOPM. The plan has individual OOPM 6000 and family 12000. The member's OOPM YTD is 5400. Since the claim is in-network, the relevant cap is individual in-network OOPM = 6000. The family OOPM is 12000. Since it's an embedded plan, the individual OOPM applies to the member. So the member's cost share cannot exceed 6000. After this claim, the member reaches 6000. So future claims would be paid 100% by the plan.
Let's double-check: Does the family OOPM matter? The family OOPM credited YTD is 5400. The family OOPM is 12000. So not near it. But the individual OOPM is what matters here.
Now, let's consider if the OOPM applies before or after deductible. The member has already met the deductible. So only coinsurance applies. OOPM limits total member responsibility. So the calculation seems correct.
But is there any nuance about the OOPM and how it's applied? For example, some systems might say: First apply deductible, then coinsurance, then OOPM. The OOPM limits the sum of deductible, copays, and coinsurance. Since deductible is already met, and no copay, the coinsurance is limited by OOPM. So coinsurance_amount = min(calculated_coinsurance, remaining_OOPM) = 600.00.
What about the ending_member_deductible? Since no deductible was applied, it remains at 1500.00. The prompt says "ending_member_deductible — member deductible accumulator after all claims". Since the member had already credited 1500.00, and nothing changes, it's 1500.00.
Check if there is any family deductible embedded consideration. Family deductible credited YTD is 1500.00. Family deductible is 3000.00. But since the member's individual deductible is already met, the claim is not subject to deductible. The family deductible doesn't add any extra limitation because the individual deductible is satisfied. So fine.
Thus the answer should be:
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Wait, I need to verify that the OOPM includes the member responsibility from this claim. Member OOPM YTD before claim = 5400. Member responsibility = 600. Ending = 6000. Yes.
Is there any rule that says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." This means the member's deductible balance is 1500. For an in-network service, the threshold is 1500. For OON, it's 3000. Since the service is in-network, threshold is 1500. Already met. So no deductible applied.
One more thing: The claim is an inpatient admission. There is no mention of any copay for inpatient admission. The ER copay is waived if results in inpatient admission, but this is an inpatient admission itself, not an ER visit. So no copay.
Are there any other cost sharing rules? Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member. So 20% of 18400 = 3680. But limited by OOPM.
Is there any possibility that the OOPM is applied to the whole family? The member accumulator is "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date". That is the individual member's OOP. The plan document says individual OOPM is 6000. So the member's OOPM is 5400. The family OOPM is 12000. The member's individual OOPM is what caps their cost share. So yes.
Let's verify the math:
- Allowed: 18400.00
- Deductible remaining: 0 (since 1500 met)
- Coinsurance: 20% * 18400 = 3680.00
- Remaining OOPM: 6000 - 5400 = 600.00
- Member pays min(3680, 600) = 600.00
- Plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800.00
- Ending OOPM = 5400 + 600 = 6000.00
- Ending deductible = 1500.00
All looks correct.
Let's consider if any rounding is needed. All numbers are exact to two decimals. No rounding issues.
One might ask: Should the coinsurance_amount be reported as 3680.00 and then plan_paid be 14720.00 and then OOPM adjustment of some kind? But the required keys do not include an OOPM adjustment field. The keys are: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm. The sum of deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount should equal member_responsibility? Or at least, the coinsurance_amount should reflect the portion attributed to coinsurance in the final claim. Since the member responsibility is 600.00 and there is no deductible or copay, the entire 600.00 is the coinsurance portion (as limited by OOPM). If we reported coinsurance_amount as 3680.00, that would exceed member_responsibility, which would be inconsistent. So it must be 600.00.
Another nuance: Some systems might say that once OOPM is reached, the remaining amount is plan liability, and the member's coinsurance is effectively reduced. So the "coinsurance portion" is the reduced amount. I think 600.00 is correct.
Double-check if there is any "preventive care" or other exception for inpatient admission? No.
Double-check if inpatient admission might be subject to a copay? The plan document lists copays for primary care, specialist, urgent care, ER, generic pharmacy. No copay for inpatient admission. So 0.
Thus final JSON is as above.
One more check: The prompt says "Member cost share is always calculated from the allowed amount". Yes. "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." Not relevant here. "Out-of-pocket maximum... Once reached, the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." This claim is the one that reaches the OOPM. So for this claim, the plan pays 100% of allowed amount above the member's responsibility. Actually, the plan pays the rest. After this claim, future claims are paid 100% by plan. So correct.
Wait: The OOPM is a ceiling on member cost share for the plan year. Once reached, the plan pays 100% for covered in-network services. So for this claim, the member pays up to the remaining OOPM, and the plan pays the rest. Yes.
Thus answer is correct.
I will produce exactly the JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}We need to adjudicate Claim 1 for member with accumulators before claim.
Plan document: Bluebonnet PPO 1500.
Plan year 2026.
Deductible: Individual in-network 1500.00. Family in-network 3000.00. Structure: EMBEDDED. So individual satisfies individual deductible on their own. Also family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Out-of-network individual 3000.00. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Wait: The plan says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." So member has one deductible balance that gets credited from both in-network and out-of-network services. The threshold is measured against the appropriate limit depending on network status. Since it's embedded, individual has own threshold (1500 in-network, 3000 out-of-network). Family threshold also exists (3000 in-network). The wording is a bit tricky but we can parse.
OOPM: Individual in-network 6000. Family in-network 12000. Individual out-of-network 12000. Once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed amount.
Member cost share: Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan. Out-of-network: 40% member / 60% plan.
Copays for primary care, specialist, urgent care, ER, generic pharmacy. Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the OOPM.
Preventive care: 100% allowed.
Basis: cost share from allowed amount.
Given accumulators as of moment before Claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
Member OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
Family OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
Service: Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed amount: 18400.00. Billed charge irrelevant for cost share (allowed amount governs).
We need to determine how much deductible applies, how much coinsurance, copay, etc. No copay for inpatient admission in this plan (copays listed are for office, urgent, ER, pharmacy). Inpatient admission would be subject to deductible and coinsurance.
We need to know if the deductible has been met. Member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00. Individual in-network deductible is 1500.00. So the member has met the individual in-network deductible (assuming all prior credits were in-network; we don't know but the balance is 1500.00). Since structure is embedded, individual deductible is satisfied on its own. So before this claim, member deductible balance is at least 1500.00. Since individual threshold is 1500.00, the member has satisfied the deductible. Therefore for this in-network claim, deductible does not apply (or applies 0). But wait, is there any remaining deductible? The accumulator is exactly 1500.00. That equals individual in-network deductible. So it's met. No deductible left.
But need to consider family deductible? Family deductible is 3000.00. Family credited is 1500.00. So family not met. However embedded means individual can satisfy on own. So member has met deductible.
Now OOPM: Member OOP credited YTD is 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM is 6000.00. So member has 6000 - 5400 = 600.00 remaining before hitting OOPM.
Claim allowed amount is 18400.00. Since deductible is met, coinsurance applies: 20% member = 3680.00. But member only has 600.00 left before OOPM. So coinsurance would be capped by OOPM.
We need to calculate member responsibility. Let's compute without OOPM cap: deductible 0, coinsurance 20% of 18400 = 3680.00. But OOP remaining is 600.00. So member responsibility cannot exceed 600.00 (assuming no other components). Then plan pays the rest: 18400 - 600 = 17800.00. But wait, OOPM applies to member cost share. Once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed amount. So the member pays 600.00, plan pays 17800.00. Does the member hit OOPM exactly? Yes, 5400 + 600 = 6000. So after claim, ending member_oopm = 6000.00.
But we need to check if any deductible is applied. Deductible is already met, so deductible_applied = 0.00. Copay_amount = 0.00 (no copay for inpatient). Coinsurance_amount = technically the pre-cap coinsurance is 3680.00, but because OOPM caps member responsibility, the actual coinsurance portion paid by member is 600.00? Or should we say coinsurance_amount is 600.00 because that's the portion that is coinsurance after OOPM? Usually when OOPM caps, the member responsibility is limited to remaining OOPM. The breakdown might attribute it to coinsurance (since that's the cost-share type that would have applied). The prompt asks for "coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". Since the member is only paying because of coinsurance (deductible is met, no copay), the entire member responsibility is the coinsurance portion, capped by OOPM. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00. Or is it 3680.00? The question: member_responsibility is total for final claim. It must equal deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount (in typical breakdown). Since member_responsibility = 600.00, and the other two are 0, coinsurance_amount should be 600.00. Let's verify standard benefit adjudication: If OOPM caps the coinsurance, the member's coinsurance is limited to the remaining OOPM. So the coinsurance portion of the claim is $600.00. That seems correct.
But wait, maybe we need to consider that the family deductible is not met, but that doesn't matter because embedded individual deductible is met. However, we need to be careful: The plan says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." This suggests that the member deductible balance is 1500.00, and for an in-network service, the threshold is the in-network individual deductible (1500). For out-of-network, the threshold is 3000. So the member has met in-network deductible. Good.
Now what about the family? Embedded means individual can satisfy on own. So member is past deductible. Correct.
Now check OOPM: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." The member OOP credited YTD is 5400.00. The individual OOPM is 6000.00. So remaining is 600.00.
We need to calculate ending accumulators. Ending member deductible: 1500.00 (no change, since no deductible applied). Ending member oopm: 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00.
Family accumulators: Family deductible credited YTD was 1500.00. Since this claim doesn't apply to deductible, family deductible remains 1500.00 (but the question only asks for ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm, not family). The required fields are for member only. So ending_member_deductible = 1500.00.
Wait, but does the deductible accumulator increase by 0? Yes.
Thus:
member_responsibility = 600.00
plan_paid = 17800.00
deductible_applied = 0.00
copay_amount = 0.00
coinsurance_amount = 600.00
ending_member_deductible = 1500.00
ending_member_oopm = 6000.00
Let's double-check: Is there any chance that the deductible is not met because the member's deductible credited YTD is exactly 1500.00, but maybe some of that was out-of-network? The plan says in-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a single member deductible balance. The amount above (i.e., 3000 out-of-network) is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. For in-network, threshold is 1500. So if the balance is 1500, the in-network deductible is satisfied. Even if some credits were out-of-network, they still count to the single balance. So yes, satisfied.
But is there a nuance with family? The family deductible is 3000, family credited 1500. The member's individual deductible is 1500. With embedded, once any individual reaches 1500, their own deductible is satisfied. So this member is satisfied.
Now check if inpatient admission might have a copay? The plan lists copays for primary care, specialist, urgent care, emergency room, generic pharmacy. Inpatient admission is not listed. So no copay.
Is the emergency room copay waived if visit results in inpatient admission? This claim is an inpatient admission. It might have started as ER, but the claim is for inpatient admission. So no ER copay applies.
Could there be a per-admission copay not listed? Plan document only lists office visits, urgent care, ER, pharmacy. So we assume deductible+ coinsurance for inpatient.
Thus the answer is as above.
But let's be thorough: Allowed amount 18400.00. Member responsibility before OOPM cap: 20% of 18400 = 3680.00. Remaining OOPM: 6000 - 5400 = 600.00. So member pays 600.00. Plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
Does the plan pay 80% of allowed? Without OOPM, plan would pay 80% of 18400 = 14720.00, member pays 3680.00. But OOPM caps member at 600.00, so plan pays the rest 17800.00, which is more than 80%. That's correct.
Now, what about family OOPM? Family OOPM is 12000. Family OOP credited is 5400. The claim adds 600 to member OOP, which also credits family OOP. So family OOP becomes 6000. Still below 12000. But we don't need to report family.
Check rounding: All are whole dollars, no issues.
Double-check output format: JSON object with exactly the required keys.
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Wait, is "member_responsibility" the total member responsibility for the final claim? Yes. So 600.00.
One more nuance: The prompt says "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." This doesn't affect our calculation because no copay.
Also, "In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share..." Not applicable.
One potential issue: Is the deductible accumulator before claim exactly 1500.00, meaning the deductible is fully met, so no deductible applied? Yes.
But could the member have a remaining deductible if the prior credits were all out-of-network and the threshold for in-network is lower? Wait, the wording: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." Actually, re-read that sentence: "Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network."
Interpretation: There is a single member deductible balance. When the service is in-network, the balance is measured against the in-network threshold (1500). When the service is out-of-network, the balance is measured against the out-of-network threshold (3000). So if the balance is 1500, and the service is in-network, the deductible is met. If the service were out-of-network, the deductible would not be met until balance reaches 3000.
But what if the prior credits were in-network? The accumulator doesn't specify in-network vs out-of-network. It just says "Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00". Since we have no further breakdown, we must take it as the single balance. For in-network service, compare to 1500. So met.
Even if some were out-of-network, they still count. So balance is 1500. Good.
One more nuance: "Embedded deductible: an individual deductible inside a family deductible; the individual amount can be satisfied on its own." The family deductible credited is also 1500. Since it's embedded, the family amount doesn't need to be met for this member. But what if the member is the only one in the family? We don't know. But the embedded nature means individual satisfaction is independent.
Is there any scenario where the member has not met the deductible because the family is aggregate? No, the plan says structure is EMBEDDED.
Thus, calculation stands.
Let's verify if any part of the claim should be applied to deductible because of some detail about inpatient admissions. Some plans have a deductible per admission. But nothing in the plan says that. So standard deductible applies.
Therefore final answer is the JSON.
Wait, just to be absolutely sure: Could the plan require that after deductible is met, the plan pays 80% and member 20%. Yes. So coinsurance is 20% of allowed = 3680.00. Remaining OOPM is 600.00. So cap applies to member responsibility. Thus member pays 600.00. Plan pays 17800.00.
Now check if the OOPM accumulator includes deductible. The member OOP credited YTD is 5400. The deductible credited is 1500. Since OOPM includes deductible (in typical plans, OOPM includes deductible and coinsurance and copays). The prompt says "Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM): the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year." Deductible is member cost share. Copays are member cost share. Coinsurance is member cost share. So OOP accumulator likely includes all of these. The prior YTD OOP is 5400, which is more than the deductible 1500, so prior OOP includes coinsurance/copays from earlier claims. So remaining OOP is indeed 600.
But what about this claim: Does the deductible portion count toward OOPM? The plan does not explicitly say, but standard is that deductible counts toward OOPM. However, for this claim, deductible_applied is 0. So only coinsurance counts.
Now, a subtlety: If the member hits OOPM exactly, does plan pay 100% for the remainder of that claim? Usually yes, but here the OOPM cap limits member responsibility to remaining OOPM. The entire member responsibility is 600. So plan pays the rest. There is no "after OOPM is reached within the same claim" because the cap applies to the whole claim. The member pays exactly the remaining OOPM. So plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800.
If the claim were such that the member responsibility without cap would cross the OOPM, then the member pays up to OOPM and plan pays the rest. For the remaining amount above OOPM, plan pays 100%. But here the member responsibility without cap (3680) is more than remaining OOPM (600), so cap applies to the whole responsibility. Plan pays the rest.
Thus numbers are correct.
Double-checking that the JSON keys are exactly as required:
- "member_responsibility"
- "plan_paid"
- "deductible_applied"
- "copay_amount"
- "coinsurance_amount"
- "ending_member_deductible"
- "ending_member_oopm"
Values are numbers with two decimal places. E.g., 600.00. Wait, the allowed amount had decimals: 18400.00. So 600.00 is okay. Should we write 600.00 or 600.0? The instruction: "Report every dollar amount as a plain number with two decimal places and no currency symbol, thousands separator, or trailing text: 1234.50, not $1,234.50 and not "1234.5 dollars"." So 600.00.
But note that in JSON, numbers can be represented as 600 or 600.00. JSON spec doesn't preserve trailing zeros. But the grader likely parses as numbers or strings. The instruction says "plain number with two decimal places". Usually in these harnesses, they might expect a number type, in which case 600.00 is just 600 in JSON. However, many harnesses accept either, but the example shows 1234.50 as a number. In JSON, if you write 600.00 it's identical to 600. The grader might compare numeric values. If it compares strings, it might look for two decimal places. But JSON number types don't hold trailing zeros. The prompt says "The keys required in that object are given by the task. Include every required key. ... Every value is a number with two decimal places. Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply." Since JSON doesn't distinguish 600 from 600.00, it's fine. But to be safe, I should format as numbers. Some systems might use a parser that reads floats. I will just write the numeric values.
One more check: Is there any family accumulator update needed for ending_member_deductible? No, the key is ending_member_deductible. It stays at 1500.00.
Wait, is there any chance that the member's deductible accumulator should be the credited amount, and since no deductible was applied, it stays 1500.00? Yes.
What if the plan's embedded deductible means that the family deductible also accumulates when individual accumulates? Yes, but we don't need family.
Consider if the member might be part of a family where another member has also contributed to family deductible. Family deductible credited YTD is 1500.00, same as member. So perhaps the member is the only one. But irrelevant.
Now, I will produce the final JSON.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Wait, but is plan_paid 17800.00? 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00. Yes.
One more thought: Could there be a scenario where the OOPM is calculated on allowed amount minus deductible? No, OOPM is ceiling on member cost share. Member cost share includes deductible, copay, coinsurance. So the cap is on the sum. Here deductible is 0, so cap is on coinsurance.
Thus, final answer.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100DeepSeek V4 Pro · DeepSeek18.8s · 1,258 out | 19.2s · 1,289 out | 20.0s · 970 out
Reasoning · 1,160 tokens
We are given a plan document "Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (synthetic)". The plan year is 2026. We have a member's accumulators as of before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
Now we adjudicate Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, billed 34960.00, allowed 18400.00.
We need to determine member responsibility, plan paid, deductible applied, copay amount, coinsurance amount, and ending accumulators after the claim.
Plan details:
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00. So the member has already met the deductible? The member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00, which equals the individual deductible. So the deductible is already satisfied. Thus, for this claim, deductible applied should be 0.00, because there is no remaining deductible. But wait: family deductible is 3000.00, and family deductible credited is 1500.00, so the family deductible is not yet met. However, the structure is EMBEDDED. Embedded means an individual satisfies their individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first. Since the individual already met their individual deductible (1500.00), the member has satisfied their deductible, so for this member, the deductible is done. The family deductible threshold doesn't add additional requirement for this individual because the embedded structure means if individual meets individual, they're good. So no more deductible for this member.
- Coinsurance after deductible: in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Since deductible is met, cost sharing will be coinsurance only, unless a copay applies. For inpatient admission, what is the cost share? The plan document lists copays for office visits, urgent care, ER, but not for inpatient admission. So there is no copay specified for inpatient. So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance. Since deductible met, coinsurance applies.
- But we need to check OOP maximum: Individual OOP max (in-network) is 6000.00. Current member OOP credited is 5400.00. So the remaining OOP is 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00. That means the member should not pay more than 600.00 in cost share before the plan pays 100%. Coinsurance would be 20% of allowed amount = 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00. But that would exceed the remaining OOP. So the member's coinsurance amount will be limited to 600.00, and then the plan pays the rest.
- Copay: none for this service, so copay_amount = 0.00.
- Deductible_applied: 0.00 because deductible already met.
- Coinsurance_amount: Actually, we need to compute the member responsibility. Since OOP max caps the member's total cost share. The member's allowed amount cost share before OOPM: coinsurance 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00. But the maximum the member can pay additionally is 600.00 to reach the OOPM. So the member will pay 600.00, which consists entirely of coinsurance (since no copay, no deductible). So coinsurance_amount = 600.00, and then after that, the plan pays everything else. So member_responsibility = 600.00. plan_paid = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
- Then update accumulators: member deductible remains 1500.00 (no additional deductible applied), so ending_member_deductible = 1500.00. Member OOP credited: start 5400.00, add 600.00, becomes 6000.00. So ending_member_oopm = 6000.00. Family deductible: no change, remains 1500.00. Family OOP: start 5400.00, add 600.00, becomes 6000.00. But note: Family OOP max is 12000.00, so after this claim, family OOP is 6000.00. But the member's individual OOP is maxed out.
So the required keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm.
All amounts to two decimal places.
Thus:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00 (already met, no change)
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Double-check: The claim is an inpatient admission, in-network. Are there any copay for inpatient? No. So correct. The OOPM cap ensures member only pays up to OOPM. Since they had 5400, they need exactly 600 to hit 6000. So coinsurance capped at 600. The plan pays the remaining allowed amount. All good.
Now output JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,192 tokens
We are given member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00 (so individual deductible is fully satisfied, as individual in-network deductible is 1500.00)
- Member OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00 (OOPM individual in-network is 6000.00, so remaining OOPM before hitting cap is 6000 - 5400 = 600.00)
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD: 5400.00
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount = 18400.00.
Since member deductible is already satisfied (1500.00 reached), the claim goes to coinsurance. Coinsurance is 20% member / 80% plan after deductible. There's no copay for inpatient admission (not listed as having a copay; only copays are for office visits, urgent care, ER, pharmacy). So member responsibility = 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00. Plan pays 80% = 14720.00.
However, we must check OOPM. Member OOPM before claim: 5400.00. OOPM cap individual in-network: 6000.00. Remaining to cap: 600.00. Since coinsurance amount 3680.00 exceeds remaining OOPM, the member should only pay up to the OOPM cap, then plan pays 100% of the remainder. So member responsibility = 600.00 (the amount to reach OOPM), and plan pays the rest: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00. But we need to verify OOPM rules: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." So after this claim, OOPM will be maxed out. But we need to allocate the deductible and coinsurance portions correctly. Since deductible is already fully satisfied, there is no deductible applied on this claim. But we need to break down member responsibility into deductible, copay, coinsurance components. According to the output keys: "deductible_applied" — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; "copay_amount"; "coinsurance_amount". For Claim 1, deductible_applied = 0.00 (since already met). Copay_amount = 0.00. Coinsurance_amount? The member would have paid 3680.00 in coinsurance if not for OOPM, but due to OOPM cap, only 600.00 is actually paid. That 600.00 is still coinsurance? It's the portion of coinsurance that fits within the OOPM. So coinsurance_amount should be 600.00. Then member_responsibility total = 600.00. Plan_paid = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Accumulator updates:
- Member deductible: remains 1500.00 (no change, since no deductible applied)
- Member OOPM: adds 600.00, so becomes 6000.00 (hits cap exactly)
- Family deductible: was 1500.00, no change because deductible already met; but does this claim's member cost share count towards family deductible? Family deductible is embedded, and credits are accumulated. Since individual deductible is already met, any further deductible would be 0, so no family deductible credit. Actually, family deductible is also 3000.00. The claim's deductible portion is 0, so family deductible stays at 1500.00.
- Family OOPM: adds 600.00, becomes 6000.00 (still below the family OOPM cap of 12000.00, but that's fine).
But we need to report ending accumulators: ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm. The member deductible remains 1500.00, member OOPM becomes 6000.00.
Thus output:
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 600.00
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Double-check: The coinsurance after deductible is 20%, but OOPM cap limits it. The plan document says copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum. It doesn't explicitly say coinsurance credits OOPM, but obviously it does because it's member cost share. The accumulators given show member OOPM credited 5400.00, which suggests prior claims. So this claim's member responsibility of 600.00 should be added.
One nuance: Does the OOPM cap apply per claim or after the calculation? Yes, plan pays 100% once OOPM reached. So if the member had 5400.00 OOPM, and the allowed amount is 18400.00, the coinsurance portion at 20% would be 3680.00, but that would push OOPM to 9080.00, exceeding 6000.00. So the member only pays 600.00, and the plan pays the rest. The remaining 3080.00 of the coinsurance is covered by the plan, so plan pays 14720.00 (80% of allowed) + 3080.00 = 17800.00. Yes.
Thus final output.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 873 tokens
We are given a plan document and member accumulators before Claim 1, and then a single claim (Claim 1). We need to adjudicate it. Since there's only one claim listed, we need to report for "the FINAL claim listed", which is Claim 1.
Plan details:
- In-network individual deductible: $1,500. Member deductible credited YTD is $1,500, so deductible is fully met.
- Coinsurance after deductible: 20% member / 80% plan for in-network.
- Member OOPM YTD: $5,400. Individual OOPM is $6,000. So member has $600 left before hitting OOPM.
- Claim: Inpatient admission, in-network, allowed $18,400. No mention of ER or other cost shares. This is an inpatient admission, so likely subject to deductible and coinsurance. Since deductible is already met, we apply coinsurance: member 20% of allowed = $3,680. But OOPM balance is $600. So member responsibility should be limited to $600 (to reach OOPM), and plan pays the rest. Wait: OOPM is $6,000, YTD OOP is $5,400. Remaining = $600. So for this claim, member pays $600, plan pays $18,400 - $600 = $17,800. But we need to break down into components: deductible applied, copay, coinsurance. Since no copay, and deductible is already satisfied, the member responsibility would typically be coinsurance up to OOPM limit. So we'd have coinsurance_amount = $600? Or perhaps we calculate coinsurance as 20% of allowed = $3,680, then reduce to $600 because OOPM caps it. Then deducting $600 from OOPM reaches $6,000. So coinsurance_amount would be $600, but the actual member responsibility is $600. So we can set coinsurance_amount = 600.00. Deductible_applied = 0.00 (since deductible already met). Copay_amount = 0.00. Plan_paid = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Ending member deductible remains 1500.00 (no change). Ending member OOPM becomes 6000.00 (5400 + 600). Family accumulators: Family deductible credited YTD is 1500.00; this claim doesn't add to deductible, so it stays 1500.00. Family OOPM: YTD 5400, add 600 = 6000.00. But family OOPM is 12000.00, so not maxed. So ending family OOPM = 6000.00. Ending member OOPM = 6000.00.
But careful: The plan says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." So after this claim, OOPM is reached. That's fine.
Now output JSON. Keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm.
So:
member_responsibility: 600.00
plan_paid: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
deductible_applied: 0.00 (since deductible already fully satisfied, no new deductible applied)
copay_amount: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission)
coinsurance_amount: The coinsurance applied before OOPM cap would be 3680.00, but due to OOPM, it's limited to 600.00. So coinsurance_amount: 600.00 (the actual coinsurance amount applied to this claim).
ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600 + 17800 = 18400, which equals allowed amount. Good.
So answer.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Haiku 4.5 · Anthropic26.1s · 1,978 out | 20.6s · 1,623 out | 36.6s · 2,843 out
Reasoning · 1,865 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
First, let me understand the member accumulators at the start:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member out-of-pocket credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family out-of-pocket credited YTD: 5400.00
The member's individual deductible is 1500.00, and they've already satisfied 1500.00 YTD. So the individual deductible is fully met.
The member's individual out-of-pocket maximum (in-network) is 6000.00, and they've already hit 5400.00 YTD. So they have 6000.00 - 5400.00 = 600.00 remaining before hitting the OOPM.
Now for Claim 1:
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
Member cost share for in-network after deductible is 20% coinsurance / 80% plan.
Since the member has already satisfied their individual deductible (1500.00 out of 1500.00), the deductible applied to this claim should be 0.00.
The member is subject to 20% coinsurance on the allowed amount of 18400.00.
Coinsurance would be: 18400.00 × 0.20 = 3680.00
However, the member only has 600.00 remaining in their OOPM before hitting the maximum. So the member's cost share is capped at 600.00.
Let me verify:
- Deductible applied: 0.00 (already satisfied)
- Copay: 0.00, since this is an inpatient admission rather than a copay-based service
- Coinsurance would normally be 3680.00, but with only 600.00 left before the OOPM cap, that's what the member owes
- Total member responsibility: 600.00, which pushes them exactly to their OOPM
- Plan pays the remainder: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
Checking the running totals: deductible stays at 1500.00 (unchanged), and OOPM goes from 5400.00 YTD to 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00, meaning the member has now fully met their out-of-pocket maximum.
500.00 (unchanged), OOPM hits 6000.00 (5400 + 600).
Re-reading the task—it asks for specific fields tied to the final claim listed, plus ending accumulators across all claims: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount for that claim, then ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm overall.
With only Claim 1 in scope, it's the final claim by default. Starting point: deductible already satisfied (1500.00 of 1500.00), OOPM at 5400.00.
For Claim 1—an inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount 18400.00, no copay applicable. Deductible is already met, so 0.00 applies here, leaving the full 18400.00 subject to coinsurance at 20%.
Coinsurance before OOPM cap: 3680.00. But OOPM remaining is only 600.00 (6000.00 - 5400.00), so coinsurance is capped at 600.00.
No copay for inpatient admission, so member owes 600.00 total. Plan pays 17800.00.
Ending accumulators: deductible stays 1500.00, OOPM reaches the max at 6000.00.
Now confirming my understanding of how individual OOPM
This claim brings the member's accumulated OOPM exactly to the 6000.00 limit—meaning they're now fully covered for the rest of the benefit period.
Final numbers:
- member_responsibility: 600.00
- plan_paid: 17800.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 600.00
- ending_member_deductible: 1500.00
- ending_member_oopm: 6000.00
This all checks out.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,510 tokens
Let me carefully work through this claim adjudication step by step.
**Member Status as of immediately before Claim 1:**
- Member deductible credited: 1500.00 (individual deductible is 1500.00, so fully satisfied)
- Member out-of-pocket credited: 5400.00 (individual OOPM is 6000.00)
- Family deductible credited: 1500.00 (family deductible is 3000.00)
- Family out-of-pocket credited: 5400.00 (family OOPM is 12000.00)
**Claim 1 Details:**
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
**Analysis:**
1. **Is this a preventive service?** No, inpatient admission is not listed as preventive care.
2. **Does this service have a specific copay?**
- Looking at the copay list: Primary care office visit (30.00), Specialist office visit (60.00), Urgent care (75.00), Emergency room (400.00), Generic retail pharmacy (15.00)
- Inpatient admission is not listed, so it's not subject to a copay. It's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
3. **Deductible application:**
- The member's individual deductible has already been credited with 1500.00, which equals the individual deductible threshold of 1500.00
- Therefore, the member's individual deductible has been fully satisfied
- No deductible applies to this claim
- deductible_applied = 0.00
4. **Coinsurance:**
- This is in-network, so the coinsurance is 20% member / 80% plan
- Since the deductible is fully met, coinsurance applies against the entire allowed amount of 18400.00
- Member share: 18400.00 × 0.20 = 3680.00
- Plan share: 18400.00 × 0.80 = 14720.00
5. **Checking against the out-of-pocket max:**
- Member's OOPM stands at 5400.00, with a threshold of 6000.00, leaving only 600.00 of room
- The calculated member coinsurance of 3680.00 exceeds this remaining capacity, so only 600.00 can actually be charged to the member
Once that 600.00 pushes OOPM to its cap, the plan absorbs the remainder — 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
So member_responsibility = 600.00 (all coinsurance, no deductible or copay), plan_paid = 17800.00. Check: 600.00 + 17800.00 = 18400.00 ✓
Ending deductible stays at 1500.00, ending OOPM becomes 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00, hitting the individual max exactly. Since this is the only claim, these ending accumulator values reflect the state after this single claim.
p: 18400.00 × 0.20 = 3680.00, but OOPM remaining is only 600.00 (6000.00 - 5400.00), so member coinsurance caps at 600.00.
Plan pays: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00
Member responsibility: 600.00 (all coinsurance, no deductible or copay)
Ending deductible: 1500.00, ending OOPM: 6000.00 — matches what I calculated.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,730 tokens
Let me carefully analyze this claim adjudication task.
GIVEN INFORMATION:
- Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Plan year: 2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31
- Current date: 2026-09-02
- Task: Adjudicate claims in order and report fields for Claim 1
MEMBER ACCUMULATORS (before Claim 1):
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member out-of-pocket credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family out-of-pocket credited YTD: 5400.00
CLAIM 1 (2026-05-14):
- Service: Inpatient admission, in-network
- Network: In-network
- Billed charge: 34960.00
- Allowed amount: 18400.00
Now let me work through the benefit calculation:
**Step 1: Identify applicable cost-share rules**
- This is an inpatient admission (in-network)
- The plan document doesn't specify a separate deductible or copay for inpatient admissions
- Therefore, it's subject to the standard in-network coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do not apply to inpatient admissions (no copay listed for inpatient)
- Cost share is calculated from the allowed amount: 18400.00
**Step 2: Check deductible status**
Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00
The member has already satisfied the individual in-network deductible (1500.00 credited = 1500.00 required).
However, let me check if there's a family deductible consideration:
Family deductible (in-network) is 3000.00, with 1500.00 credited YTD, leaving 1500.00 remaining. Given the embedded structure, an individual satisfies deductible on their own once they hit 1500.00, regardless of family total. Since this member already reached their individual threshold, the deductible is fully met for them — the family remaining balance doesn't block this member from moving straight to coinsurance.
So deductible applied to this claim: 0.00
Checking OOPM: individual in-network max is 6000.00, with 5400.00 already credited, leaving 600.00 remaining before hitting the cap.
With deductible already met, coinsurance kicks in at 20% member / 80% plan. On the allowed amount of 18400.00, that's normally 3680.00 member responsibility — but this exceeds the remaining OOPM of 600.00, so the member's payment is capped at 600.00.
Plan payment: 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00. This claim pushes the member to their OOPM, with 600.00 applied and 0.00 toward deductible.
After this claim: deductible YTD stays 1500.00 (already satisfied, no change), OOPM YTD becomes 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00 — the individual OOPM has now been reached.
Double-checking: since deductible YTD equals the individual deductible limit of 1500.00, no additional deductible applies here, so deductible_applied remains 0.00 for this claim.
Coinsurance would normally be 18400.00 × 20% = 3680.00, but only 600.00 of OOPM room remains, so member cost share is capped at 600.00. Plan pays 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
So: member_responsibility = 600.00, plan_paid = 17800.00, deductible_applied = 0.00, copay_amount = 0.00, coinsurance_amount = 600.00, ending_member_deductible = 1500.00, ending_member_oopm = 6000.00.
Now I need to verify exactly which JSON keys are required for reporting this claim's results.
I just need to work through Claim 1's numbers directly:
- member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount from Claim 1's adjudication
- ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm are the accumulators after processing it
Claim 1: inpatient admission, in-network, allowed amount 18400.00. Starting deductible credited 1500.00, OOPM credited 5400.00. In-network individual deductible is 1500.
Since 1500.00 is already fully satisfied, deductible_applied = 0.00, remaining deductible = 0.00. Inpatient has no copay, so copay_amount = 0.00.
For coinsurance: OOPM in-network is 6000.00, with 5400.00 already credited, leaving only 600.00 remaining. Coinsurance is 20/80 split, so 18400.00 × 20% = 3680.00 before applying the OOPM cap — but only 600.00 room remains before hitting the OOPM.
So coinsurance_amount = 600.00, member responsibility = 600.00, and plan_paid = 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00.
Post-claim: deductible stays at 1500.00, OOPM becomes 5400.00 + 600.00 = 6000.00 (fully met).
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
```
(3680.00, 600.00) = 600.00, since only 600.00 remains before hitting the OOPM cap.
So coinsurance owed is capped at 600.00, plan pays 18400.00 - 600.00 = 17800.00, and the member's OOPM accumulator hits its max of 6000.00 while deductible stays at 1500.00. That all checks out.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}67Qwen3.8 Flash · Alibaba21.9s · 1,196 out | 8.8s · 608 out | 23.7s · 1,082 out
Reasoning · 1,076 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate Claim 1. Let's parse plan.
Member accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Member OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
- Family deductible credited YTD: 1500.00
- Family OOP credited YTD: 5400.00
Individual in-network deductible 1500, so member deductible already satisfied. Inpatient admission in-network. No ER copay mention; service is inpatient admission, not ER office visit? It says inpatient admission, in-network. Not preventive. Allowed 18400. Coinsurance after deductible in-network: 20% member / 80% plan. Member deductible applied 0. Coinsurance = 18400*0.20 = 3680. But OOP max individual in-network = 6000. Current member OOP credited 5400. OOPM ceiling: plan pays 100% covered in-network services after member reaches OOP max. We must apply to cost share. Member coinsurance amount would be 3680, but remaining OOP to max is 600.00. So member responsibility limited to 600.00? Need ending member OOP = 6000.00. Plan paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800. Does deductible applied 0, copay 0, coinsurance amount? Required field coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of final claim. If member's cost share limited by OOPM, what is coinsurance_amount? They ask member_responsibility plus plan_paid equals allowed. Components: deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount. If coinsurance would be 3680 but capped by OOPM so member pays only 600. Do we report coinsurance_amount as 600 or 3680? Need infer. "the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim" and member_responsibility plus plan_paid = allowed. Usually coinsurance amount reported as member coinsurance applied, after OOP max, which is 600. But could be calculated coinsurance before OOP cap? Need careful.
Fields: member_responsibility total for final claim, plan_paid total for final claim, deductible_applied deductible portion of final claim, copay_amount copay portion, coinsurance_amount coinsurance portion. Since coinsurance portion of member responsibility after OOPM is 600. Because OOP cap limits member responsibility; plan pays remainder including non-covered member coinsurance? The plan_paid should 17800. deductible_applied 0. copay_amount 0. coinsurance_amount 600. ending_member_deductible after all claims? Field says ending member deductible. It likely asks member deductible accumulator after all claims. Deductible credited was 1500, no deductible applied. So 1500. ending_member_oop: after Claim1 member OOP reaches max 6000.00.
Need consider if inpatient admission results from ER visit waived? The claim is Inpatient admission, not ER. No copay.
Allowed vs billed: use allowed.
Family accumulators not asked? Only member. If individual OOP max 6000, family OOP max 12000. Since member reaches individual max, plan pays 100% for member. Need maybe family? Not requested.
Could there be plan year 2026 and Claim 1 final. Yes.
Need output exactly JSON block. Ensure values numbers two decimals. Could JSON numbers as 600.00. JSON can't enforce? Yes include two decimal places? Numeric literals can have .00. Need no strings.
Double-check: Member deductible credited YTD equals 1500. For in-network service threshold 1500. Deductible satisfied. Coinsurance 20% on allowed. OOP credit 5400. If OOP max counts cost share including coinsurance and copays, deductible also likely? It says member out-of-pocket credited year to date. Once reaches max plan pays 100% covered in-network. So remaining 600. Plan pays excess coinsurance. So member responsibility 600.
Question asks required fields for Claim 1 only: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oop.
Maybe ending_member_deductible means after all claims, which is Claim1 only. 1500.
What if OOP max cap applies at claim level: member max responsibility = min(3680, 600)=600. coinsurance amount maybe 600. Good.
Need ensure no additional keys. Final JSON only.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oop": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": null,
"ok": false,
"present": false
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 487 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate Claim 1 final claim. Need calculate.
Plan Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Individual deductible 1500 in-network. Member deductible credited YTD before claim = 1500. Family deductible 1500 (family deductible 3000, embedded; but individual satisfied). OOP individual credited 5400, OOPM individual 6000. Service inpatient admission, in-network. Claim: billed 34960, allowed 18400. Need member responsibility final claim, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm.
Adjudicate: member already met deductible (YTD credited 1500 = individual threshold), so deductible_applied=0.00 for claim. No copay for inpatient. Coinsurance after deductible: in-network 20% member of allowed? But OOPM cap: member OOP credited YTD 5400, individual OOPM 6000, remaining OOP = 600. Member coinsurance would be 20% of 18400 = 3680. But capped at remaining OOP 600, so member responsibility = 600, plan_paid = 17800. Does coinsurance amount reported = coinsurance portion of final claim, likely capped amount? Yes 600. deductible_applied 0, copay 0. Ending member deductible remains 1500 (no deductible applied). Ending member OOPM = 5400 + 600 = 6000. Family OOP? Not asked. Plan pays 100% after OOPM reached? On claim, only pay up to OOPM member. If OOPM reached during claim, plan pays rest. Need ensure if in-network. The plan document says once a member reaches OOPM plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services remainder. So correct.
Could there be inpatient ER waiver? Not applicable (admission itself inpatient). Allowed amount basis billed charges not member. Need exact two decimal numbers. JSON only.
json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 961 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate single claim. Need carefully parse plan doc. Member accumulators before Claim 1: member deductible credited YTD 1500, family deductible credited YTD 1500, member OOP 5400, family OOP 5400. Claim 1: inpatient admission, in-network, allowed 18400. Need member responsibility, plan paid, deductible applied, copay amount, coinsurance amount, ending member deductible, ending member OOP.
Key question: cost share for inpatient admission? Plan document lists office visit copays and ER copay waived if inpatient admission; subject to deductible/coinsurance. It doesn't explicitly give inpatient admission benefit cost share besides coinsurance after deductible in-network 20/80. Preventive not. In-network allowed amount. Deductible: individual 1500 in-network, member already has 1500 credited, so deductible satisfied. Family deductible 3000? Structure embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. But for single member? The plan has individual deductible 1500. Once individual deductible satisfied, coinsurance begins for that member regardless family? Embedded deductible means individual can satisfy own deductible; likely yes, plan pays after individual deductible, not waiting for family. So deductible_applied for Claim 1 is 0.00 because accumulators already at 1500. Need check OOPM: individual OOP cap 6000 in-network. Member OOP credited YTD 5400 before claim. Remaining OOP max = 600. For in-network covered services after deductible, coinsurance 20% = 3680. But OOP max caps member cost share at 600. Once reached, plan pays 100% remainder. So member_responsibility = 600? Need decide if claim crosses cap and whether coinsurance amount is 600 (applied to OOP) or normal 3680 with plan paid 14720? The required coinsurance_amount likely coinsurance portion of final claim = 600. Copay_amount 0. deductible_applied 0. plan_paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800. Ending member deductible = 1500.00. Ending member OOP = 6000.00.
Need ensure deductible applied if there's inpatient admission and ER waived? Claim is inpatient admission, not ER. But no deductible because already met. Could some rules apply? Let's inspect plan: ER copay waived if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case visit is subject to deductible/coinsurance. Claim 1 is inpatient admission itself. No copay specified. So coinsurance.
Potential nuance: If OOPM is reached during claim, plan pays 100 for remainder, so coinsurance capped. Need output plain number with two decimals. JSON numbers? Can output numeric 600.0? Requirement: every value number with two decimal places. In JSON, 600.00 okay. They may parse. Need no extra.
Double-check if family OOP cap? Member individual OOP max 6000. family 12000. For one member, individual cap relevant. If family deductible not met? Individual embedded says individual deductible satisfied on own. So no deductible.
Could there be need to credit deductible from claim because deductible_applied? Starting credited 1500 exactly threshold. Usually if amount already meets deductible, additional deductible not applied. So 0.
Could starting member deductible credited 1500 but family deductible threshold 3000 and no other member? If the service is for a single member under family plan? The individual deductible 1500 embedded means once member has 1500 credited, cost sharing for that member switches to coinsurance, irrespective family. Yes.
Need final JSON block only. Ensure keys exactly. Use numbers with two decimal places? JSON cannot enforce trailing zeros? It can: 600.00, 0.00. Include all fields. Member responsibility plus plan paid equal allowed: 600+17800=18400. Ending member deductible 1500. Ending member oop 6000. Good.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}67GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI3.7s · 171 out | 2.8s · 173 out | 1.7s · 201 out
Reasoning · 95 tokens
**Calculating costs and claims**
I need to calculate the deductible, which is already $1,500 for the individual. There's no copay for inpatient care, and the allowed coinsurance of 20% equals $3,680. The out-of-pocket limit prior was $5,400, but with the $3,680 added, it caps at $6,000, so the member's responsibility is only $600. The plan pays $17,800. The final claim, including both member and plan amounts, totals $18,400. I'll ensure it's in JSON format.json{"member_responsibility":600.00,"plan_paid":17800.00,"deductible_applied":0.00,"copay_amount":0.00,"coinsurance_amount":600.00,"ending_member_deductible":1500.00,"ending_member_oopm":6000.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 73 tokens
**Calculating healthcare costs**
I need to do some calculations here. The deductible is already at the $1500 threshold, which is satisfied. For inpatient care, there’s no copay, but there’s a 20% coinsurance. The out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM) is $5400, and there’s still $6000 to reach it. With the coinsurance amount being $3680, it seems like I’m still below the plan amount of $14720. The ending deductible is $1500, and the out-of-pocket amount is $9080. I'll need to focus on getting the exact JSON keys too.json{
"member_responsibility": 3680.00,
"plan_paid": 14720.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 3680.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 9080.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 3680,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 14720,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 3680,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 9080,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}67DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek140.6s · 4,745 out | 22.6s · 1,303 out | 173.8s · 4,420 out
Reasoning · 4,653 tokens
We need answer JSON with fields for claim1. Need adjudicate. Need plan details. Need understand accumulators before claim: member deductible credited 1500, member OOP 5400, family deductible 1500, family OOP 5400. Plan: individual deductible 1500, family 3000, embedded? "Embedded — an individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever first." OOP max individual 6000, family 12000. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to single member balance? The text: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is threshold..." Need apply.
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed 18400. Billed 34960 irrelevant. Need cost sharing: Inpatient admission likely subject to deductible and coinsurance? Not listed as copay. Emergency room has copay waived if admission, then subject to deductible and coinsurance. Inpatient admission likely hospital service, subject to deductible then coinsurance after deductible. Need determine member's deductible remaining and OOP. Member deductible credited YTD 1500 equals individual deductible 1500, so individual deductible satisfied? Family deductible credited 1500, family deductible 3000, not satisfied at family level. But embedded: individual satisfies own deductible, so this member's deductible satisfied? Need because plan individual deductible 1500, and member has credited 1500, so deductible for this member is met. But family deductible not met? Need family OOP? Need check OOP max: member OOP credited 5400, individual OOP max 6000, remaining 600. Family OOP credited 5400, family OOP max 12000, not met. Embedded? OOP? Plan says OOP max individual 6000, family 12000. Need determine if member has satisfied individual OOP? 5400 < 6000, so not met, remaining 600. Need cost sharing: Allowed 18400. Since deductible met (member), no deductible applied? But family deductible? Wait plan has individual deductible and family deductible. With embedded individual deductible, for a single member on family plan, once individual's deductible satisfied, their covered services don't require further deductible until family deductible satisfied? Let's parse: "Deductible: Individual (in-network) 1500; Family (in-network) 3000; Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This means each individual has own 1500 deductible; after one individual meets 1500, they are done with deductible, but family deductible of 3000 must be met by total family before all family members? In embedded, individual deductible is embedded within family deductible. Once family deductible is met via aggregate, all members no longer deductible. But individual who met own deductible no deductible for rest of year even if family not met. Yes, this member has met individual deductible (1500). So no deductible on claim? Need maybe family deductible? Since family deductible not met, but embedded means individual satisfied, so no deductible for this individual. However the member's accumulated individual deductible = 1500; claim allowed 18400 will not add to deductible because amount applied to deductible? Actually allowed amount applied to deductible? Deductible is already met, so no deductible applied. But accumulators: member deductible credited remains 1500? It says "credited year to date" includes amounts applied to deductible? If no new deductible, remains 1500. Family deductible remains? Since claim no deductible, family deductible not increased? But wait if service is subject to deductible and member deductible already met, the allowed amount is not applied to deductible, so family deductible doesn't increase. However if the family deductible is embedded, amounts applied to one individual's deductible count toward family deductible. Here no amount applied because member's deductible already satisfied. So family deductible remains 1500? But maybe for family deductible, even though individual met, no more deductible for individual; family deductible still unmet for others. The family deductible credits are only increases from actual deductible amounts incurred by members whose individual deductible not met. So remains 1500.
Then after deductible, coinsurance: in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Allowed 18400. Member coinsurance = 20% * 18400 = 3680. But OOP max remaining? Member OOP credited 5400, individual OOP max 6000, remaining 600. Copays count OOP? Yes copays always credit OOP. Coinsurance counts OOP. So member pays coinsurance up to remaining OOP max: min(3680, 600) = 600. But wait plan pays rest? Need determine member responsibility = coinsurance 3680 capped by OOP max at 600? Since member OOP already 5400, OOP max 6000, so member pays 600, plan pays allowed - member responsibility? Also no deductible. Plan pays 18400 - 600 = 17800. But need consider? The allowed amount 18400, member responsibility = 600 due to OOP max, plan pays 17800. But coinsurance portion? The "coinsurance_amount" field perhaps the coinsurance amount before OOP? Need determine required fields: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending member deductible, ending member oop. Need define "coinsurance_amount" maybe amount of coinsurance applied to claim? Could be the member's coinsurance cost after coinsurance, not reduced by OOP? Need infer from previous tasks? We need report fields for Claim 1. Typically: deductible_applied amount applied to deductible; copay_amount; coinsurance_amount (amount paid by member as coinsurance after deductible, may be adjusted by OOP max? Hmm).
Let's reason from plan adjudication. The "member_responsibility" is total member owes for claim (deductible + copay + coinsurance) after benefit limits, not including amounts not allowed? Since in-network, no balance billing. So member responsibility = amount paid by member from allowed, after OOP max cap? OOP max caps member's total cost sharing for covered services. If member is at 5400 and max 6000, additional cost sharing limited to 600. Thus member responsibility = 600. Plan pays allowed - member responsibility = 17800. But need report "coinsurance_amount" maybe 3680? The total coinsurance incurred before OOP cap maybe 3680, but member responsibility is 600 due to OOP max. Need decide.
Need check whether OOP max already 5400 includes prior deductible? OOP max includes deductible? Typically yes. Here member deductible credited 1500, OOP credited 5400, so OOP includes deductible and other copays/coinsurance. OOP max 6000, remaining 600. So yes.
Could there be a family OOP max? Family OOP credited 5400, family max 12000, not met. But for individual embedded OOP max, individual's OOP max is 6000. If family OOP not met, but individual OOP max is 6000 and member already 5400, member's benefits cap at individual OOP max. Need no issue.
Need maybe all family member's OOP counts toward family OOP and individual? "Family (in-network) 12000" but embedded? It says "Out-of-pocket maximum Individual (in-network) 6000, Family (in-network) 12000" structure? It only said embedded for deductible, not OOP? But likely OOP has individual/family max too. There may be embedded? Need not.
Need apply deductible? The service is inpatient admission, not emergency? No copay. It says "Inpatient admission, in-network" likely subject to deductible and coinsurance. The plan document does not explicitly state inpatient admission cost sharing except general coinsurance after deductible. It says "Coinsurance after deductible, in-network 20% member / 80% plan." So yes.
Need consider "Emergency room ... 400 copay, WAIVED if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to deductible and coinsurance." Inpatient admission is not ER, no copay. So no copay.
Need quantify ending accumulators. Since no deductible applied, member deductible credited remains 1500? But wait member OOP increases by 600 to 6000. Family OOP? If member's OOP increases by 600, family OOP credited increases from 5400 to 6000? Usually family OOP is aggregate of all members' OOP; yes since member incurred 600 cost sharing, family OOP increases by 600 to 6000. But plan has family OOP max 12000; so family OOP after claim = 6000. Need report ending_member_oop? The task says "ending_member_deductible" and "ending_member_oop" maybe for the member? It asks "member's year-to-date accumulators" and "member deductible", "member OOP". So ending member OOP = previous 5400 + member responsibility? But if member responsibility is capped at 600, and all 600 counts OOP, ending member OOP = 6000. Ending member deductible = 1500 (unchanged). Family? Not asked? It asks "member deductible" not family; but plan has family maybe not asked. The output fields only "ending_member_deductible" and "ending_member_oop" (singular member). So no family. But if family OOP? Not required. We can ignore.
Need maybe ending member deductible should be 1500 or 3000? "Member deductible credited year to date 1500" initially. Since no additional deductible applied, remains 1500. But if individual deductible is satisfied, maybe the "member deductible" accumulator should not exceed individual deductible? It remains 1500.
Need "deductible_applied" for claim = 0.00 because deductible already met. But wait if family deductible not met and this is embedded individual, maybe for this individual no deductible. If not embedded? If family deductible applied before individual? But it says embedded, individual satisfies own. So no deductible. If the member's individual deductible was credited 1500, yes.
Need "copay_amount" = 0.00.
Need "coinsurance_amount": tricky. It might be the amount the member owes as coinsurance before OOP max is applied? Could be min? Let's examine output field names: "member_responsibility" "plan_paid" "deductible_applied" "copay_amount" "coinsurance_amount" "ending_member_deductible" "ending_member_oop". Usually in these tasks, coinsurance_amount is the amount applied as coinsurance (member cost share) for this claim, not necessarily paid by member because OOP max may reduce? But they ask member_responsibility separately; if OOP max caps total, member_responsibility would be <= sum(deductible + copay + coinsurance). The coinsurance_amount might be "the coinsurance portion of the allowed amount after deductible" before OOP max, i.e., 3680. But then member_responsibility should be the actual member pays (600) after OOP max, and plan_paid = allowed - member_responsibility (17800). But then sum deductible+copay+coinsurance (0+0+3680) exceeds member_responsibility (600), inconsistency if those are components of member responsibility. Alternatively coinsurance_amount could be the amount after OOP max applied, i.e., 600, so sum 0+0+600 = 600 = member_responsibility. But is that "coinsurance_amount"? It would be less than 20% coinsurance because OOP max. Need figure expected from previous similar datasets. In health insurance, claim-level "coinsurance amount" is typically the amount the member owes for coinsurance, possibly capped by OOP max? If OOP max caps total, the specific service still accrues coinsurance but the member's liability is capped; for reporting, the applied coinsurance to claim might be the amount that counts toward OOP, which is 600 if OOP max remaining. But if you later reconcile, OOP max remaining after claim = 0, so all additional cost sharing after that is paid by plan. For this claim, the allowed 18400, 20% would be 3680, but only 600 of it is paid by member because OOP max reached; the remaining 3080 is paid by plan in addition to 80%? Plan pays 80% of 18400 = 14720 if coinsurance 3680; but if member only pays 600, plan pays 17800, which equals 14720 + 3080. So the "coinsurance amount" as a component of member responsibility should be 600 (actual member coinsurance after OOP). But if "coinsurance_amount" means the calculated coinsurance before OOP max, it would be 3680, not matching member_responsibility sum.
Need infer from output fields "member_responsibility" "plan_paid" likely must satisfy member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed amount. Yes, allowed 18400. If plan_paid = 17800, member = 600. Then sum deductible_applied+copay_amount+coinsurance_amount should equal member_responsibility? Usually yes. So need set coinsurance_amount = 600, not 3680. But is the 600 all "coinsurance"? There is no copay/deductible. So member responsibility = coinsurance_amount = 600. Plan_paid = allowed - 600 = 17800. Deductible_applied=0, copay=0. But is there a possibility that OOP max has not been reached because "member out-of-pocket credited 5400" might include the 1500 deductible? Yes OOP max includes deductible. 5400+600=6000. Claim allowed 18400, coinsurance 3680, but only 600 paid by member; coinsurance_amount field could be 3680 and member_responsibility 600; plan_paid = 14720? Wait if plan pays 80% of allowed = 14720, and member pays 3680, but because OOP max, member only pays 600, the provider is paid allowed 18400: 600 from member + 17800 from plan. The plan's payment includes both its 80% share 14720 and the portion of member's coinsurance waived due to OOP max 3080. So plan_paid should be 17800, not 14720. The "coinsurance_amount" in the claim adjudication might represent the amount of coinsurance for which the member is responsible after applying OOP max, i.e., 600. But in a system, the claim line might have "coinsurance" as 3680 and "patient responsibility" after OOP 600, and "plan paid" 17800; the difference is a "write-off" or "OOP max adjustment"? However allowed amount is paid fully by plan+member; if member responsibility less than calculated coinsurance, plan pays more. The output likely uses "coinsurance_amount" as the "amount the member owes in coinsurance" after all adjustments? But then not equal to 20% if OOP max. Need see instructions: "Member cost share is calculated from ALLOWED amount... Coinsurance after deductible ... 20% member / 80% plan ... Once a member reaches OOP max the plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services for remainder." So after OOP max reached, coinsurance is 0, but because not reached until partway through claim, the first 600 of allowed cost share is member, then plan pays rest. The "coinsurance_amount" for claim could be the member's coinsurance cost = 600 (because the remaining 3080 is not member cost share due to OOP max). But would the "coinsurance amount" be 600? Yes.
Need maybe calculate exactly: OOP remaining = 6000 - 5400 = 600. Applied coinsurance = min(3680, 600) = 600. Then ending member OOP = 6000. Then plan pays allowed - member responsibility = 18400 - 600 = 17800.
Need consider "member deductible credited year to date = 1500" already exactly at individual deductible. Some plans if deductible met, no coinsurance? No coinsurance still.
Need maybe family deductible? For family plan, if family deductible not met but individual met, perhaps there is no individual deductible remaining, but after individual deductible met, perhaps coinsurance applies immediately. Allowed 18400, coinsurance 3680. But maybe if family deductible not met, even after individual deductible met, there is a "family deductible" that must be met before coinsurance begins for all family members? Let's parse structure carefully: "Deductible Individual (in-network) ................. 1500.00 Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00 Structure ... EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This is standard embedded deductible: family deductible 3000, each individual deductible 1500. For a particular member, their deductible is satisfied when their own claims reach 1500 OR when family total reaches 3000. Here member's own claims reached 1500, so yes no deductible. The family deductible still not met for other members, but this member's deductible satisfied. So no deductible.
Need maybe "out-of-network" not relevant.
Need maybe "Inpatient admission" might have "room and board" subject to "copay"? No.
Need maybe "Allowed amount 18400" but billed 34960; member not responsible for excess because in-network. So no.
Need output JSON exactly with keys. Need include all required fields. Could include "coinsurance_amount": 600.00. Need round half up to cent. Need plan_paid 17800.00. Need ending_member_oop 6000.00. Need ending_member_deductible 1500.00. Need member_responsibility 600.00. Need deductible_applied 0.00. Need copay_amount 0.00. Need perhaps "coinsurance_amount" 600.00. But let's verify if maybe member responsibility should be 3680 and OOP max caps overall? Wait the member's OOP max is 6000 and they already have 5400. So yes member only pays 600 additional. But if the claim includes coinsurance 3680, the member would exceed max by 3080; the plan would pay 17800. The member responsibility after OOP max is 600.
Need maybe "plan_paid" should be 18400 * 80% = 14720 if OOP max not considered? No, if member pays 3680, plan pays 14720, total 18400. But with OOP max, member pays 600, so plan pays 17800. "Once a member reaches OOP max the plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services for remainder of plan year." Since the member reaches max partway through this claim, plan pays all remaining allowed amount for this claim beyond the 600 needed to reach max. The plan pays 17800. Good.
Need maybe "ending_member_oop" after claim should be min(6000, 5400 + member_responsibility) = 6000. But if coinsurance_amount is calculated as 600, then 5400+600=6000. If coinsurance_amount 3680, OOP would be 9080, but capped? Accumulator would cap at 6000? Usually accumulator stops at max, so ending OOP = 6000. But the OOP increment is 600. So yes.
Need maybe "ending_member_deductible" after claim should be 1500 because no deductible. But if allowed amount 18400 and deductible already met, no. yes.
Need maybe "family deductible credited" not asked. If asked? no.
Need maybe "member deductible" initial 1500 equals individual deductible; some might consider if individual deductible satisfied, the member's accumulator could be "1500" still; if family deductible also? no.
Need provide JSON only.
Let's craft with 2 decimals.
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oop": 6000.00
}
Need check if "coinsurance_amount" should be "3680.00" instead. Let's think more.
Suppose output fields need reflect claim adjudication components before accumulators? In many previous tasks, "member_responsibility" equals sum of deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount. If coinsurance_amount 600, sum = 600. Good. If coinsurance_amount 3680, sum = 3680 but member_responsibility 600 would not match. Unless plan_paid not equal allowed - member. But instructions: "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." It doesn't explicitly say member_responsibility equals sum of components; but likely. They asked for "coinsurance_amount" may be "The portion of the claim paid by member as coinsurance, after any OOP max". I'd use 600.
Need maybe "plan_paid" should be 18400 - 600 = 17800.00. Good.
Let's final. {
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oop": 6000.00
}Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": null,
"ok": false,
"present": false
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,194 tokens
We need to adjudicate Claim 1 only? The user says "Report the required fields for Claim 1." But the task family says "adjudicate the claims in order. Each claim updates the accumulators that the next claim is measured against." And then lists one claim. So we need to output for the final claim listed, which is Claim 1. The required keys are for the final claim. So we compute for Claim 1.
Given accumulators before Claim 1:
- Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00 (already met individual in-network deductible of 1500)
- Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00 (out-of-pocket max is 6000)
- Family deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
- Family OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Claim 1: Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed amount = 18400.00.
Service: Inpatient admission. There's no copay mentioned for inpatient. It's subject to deductible and coinsurance. The member has already satisfied the full individual deductible (1500). So no deductible applied on this claim. Coinsurance applies: 20% member after deductible. But need to check OOPM. Member has already accumulated 5400 toward OOPM. OOPM individual in-network is 6000. So member has 6000 - 5400 = 600 remaining before hitting OOPM. The coinsurance amount would be 20% of 18400 = 3680. But the member will only pay until OOPM is reached. So member responsibility = min(20% of allowed, remaining OOPM) = min(3680, 600) = 600. After that, plan pays the rest? The plan pays allowed - member responsibility = 18400 - 600 = 17800. But note: once OOPM is reached, plan pays 100% of allowed. So member pays 600, reaching OOPM exactly at 6000. Then the rest is covered. So member_responsibility = 600.00, plan_paid = 17800.00.
Deductible applied: 0.00 (already met)
Copay amount: 0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission)
Coinsurance amount: the coinsurance portion of the final claim. The coinsurance is 20% of allowed = 3680, but only 600 was actually paid by member because OOPM cap. The coinsurance amount field likely represents the amount of coinsurance that was applied (i.e., the member's coinsurance liability before OOPM consideration? Or the actual amount that counts as coinsurance? Typically in adjudication, coinsurance amount is the product of coinsurance rate times allowed, but capped by OOPM. The member responsibility is limited. But the coinssurance amount field is the coinsurance portion of the member's cost share. It should reflect the actual member liability for coinsurance. Since the OOPM caps the total cost share, the coinsurance paid is 600. But we need to know what the task expects. Let's think.
In many claims adjudication systems, they compute gross charges, then deductible, then coinsurance (after deductible), then apply OOPM to limit total member cost share. The member's responsibility is the sum of deductible + copay + coinsurance, capped at OOPM remaining. The fields: deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount are components. They likely should reflect the actual amounts that apply to the claim before OOPM cap? Or after cap? Typically, when OOPM is reached, the coinsurance amount for that claim may be reduced to the amount that brings the member to OOPM. The question is what the "coinsurance_amount" key means. Looking at the JSON keys: "deductible_applied" number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; "copay_amount" — the copay portion; "coinsurance_amount" — the coinsurance portion. These are components of member_responsibility. The sum of these should equal member_responsibility? Possibly. The instructions say: member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount. But they don't explicitly say that member_responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount. However, logically it should. So if member_responsibility is 600, and deductible and copay are 0, then coinsurance_amount should be 600. So we set coinsurance_amount = 600.00.
But note: the coinsurance rate is 20% of 18400 = 3680. But due to OOPM, only 600 is collected. The coinsurance amount is the actual member coinsurance liability, capped. So 600.
Check OOPM accumulation: After this claim, member OOPM credited YTD = previous 5400 + member_responsibility 600 = 6000. Ending member OOPM = 6000.00.
Member deductible after all claims: already 1500, no change, so ending member deductible = 1500.00.
Family deductible and OOPM are not in the output keys, only member deductible and member OOPM.
So output:
member_responsibility = 600.00
plan_paid = 17800.00
deductible_applied = 0.00
copay_amount = 0.00
coinsurance_amount = 600.00
ending_member_deductible = 1500.00
ending_member_oopm = 6000.00
Double-check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 600 + 17800 = 18400 = allowed. Good.
Thus final JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 4,323 tokens
We need answer required fields for Claim 1. Need process plan. Need understand accumulators before claim: member deductible credited YTD 1500.00, member OOP credited 5400.00, family deductible credited 1500, family OOP 5400. Claim: inpatient admission, in-network, allowed 18400. Need apply benefits. Plan: deductible individual in-network 1500, family 3000. Embedded? "Family deductible ... embedded — an individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first." Need out-of-pocket max individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Inpatient admission? No copay? It is not office/urgent/ER. So subject to deductible and coinsurance. Preventive not relevant.
Need calculate member responsibility for claim, plan paid, deductible applied, copay, coinsurance, ending accumulators.
Important: Accumulators before claim: deductible credited 1500 for member? "Member deductible credited year to date ... 1500.00" Family deductible credited 1500. That means member has already met individual deductible (1500) because individual deductible is 1500. Since deductible credited to member = 1500, no remaining deductible for individual? Family deductible has total 3000, family credited 1500, so remaining family deductible 1500. Embedded: an individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Need interpret. If member has satisfied individual deductible, then for this member, deductible is satisfied? But family deductible not yet overall? In embedded individual deductibles, once one individual meets individual deductible, that individual's covered services are no longer subject to deductible? However family deductible may continue accumulating until family total reaches family amount; after family deductible met, all family members no longer deductible. But if individual deductible met, that individual's services after that are not subject to deductible even before family deductible met? Need standard: Embedded individual deductible: each individual has own deductible; once one member meets individual deductible, that member's services subject only to coinsurance, until family deductible met? Actually in family plans with embedded individual deductible, once an individual satisfies their individual deductible, their remaining covered services don't require deductible, but other members may still. Family deductible is ceiling; once total family out-of-pocket deductible credits reach family amount, all members are considered deductible satisfied. So here member's individual deductible already met before claim, so no deductible should be applied to this claim? But family deductible total is 3000, family accumulated 1500. The claim contributes to family deductible? Usually amounts applied to deductible count toward both individual and family deductible. If member already has individual deductible met, applying more deductible for same member would exceed individual deductible? But family deductible could still require that member to continue paying deductible until family deductible is met? Wait with embedded individual deductibles, individual deductible is the maximum deductible that individual must pay, not family. The family deductible is aggregate max but not separate; once individual met, no further deductible for that individual, even if family not met? Let me recall: A plan with embedded individual deductibles: "The family deductible is the maximum amount of deductible that all family members contribute; individual embedded deductible means no individual pays more than the individual deductible. The family deductible is reached when the sum of all individual deductibles met? Actually if one member meets individual deductible, deductible waived for that member for rest of year, but other members continue until each satisfies individual deductible or family deductible is satisfied. Family deductible can be satisfied by accumulated expenses of all members; once family deductible is met, all members' deductibles are satisfied. So yes, individual member with individual deductible met no longer pays deductible, even if family deductible not met. But what about family accumulator? It might still count their allowed costs toward family deductible even though no deductible applied? Need common: "Amounts paid toward embedded individual deductibles count toward family deductible. Once family deductible is met, all family members have deductible met." If an individual has met individual deductible, future claims by that individual are not applied to deductible, so they don't count toward family deductible? Hmm in insurance, once an individual deductible is satisfied, their subsequent claims may still count toward family out-of-pocket? Let's reason.
We need answer based on provided plan document. It states:
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................. 1500.00
Family (in-network) ...................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
This explicitly: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." For Claim 1, member deductible credited YTD = 1500, so individual deductible already satisfied. So on this claim, no deductible should be applied? But family deductible credited = 1500, not family satisfied. But "whichever comes first" means for individual, individual satisfied; for family, not yet. For this member, individual satisfied, so no more deductible for them. Total family credits maybe includes the 1500 already, and this claim's allowed amount could be counted as family credit? But if no deductible applied to claim, does it count toward family deductible? The plan says "total family credits" not "deductible payments"? It says "once total family credits reach family amount" likely deductible credits—amounts applied to deductible by all members. If this claim has 0 applied to deductible, no family credit. But if individual already met, no credit.
However, there is also member OOP credited YTD = 5400. Individual OOP max in-network = 6000. So member has already paid 5400 toward OOP. This claim will incur coinsurance 20% of allowed amount (after deductible, but no deductible). 20% of 18400 = 3680. Member coinsurance = 3680. After adding to OOP = 5400 + 3680 = 9080. But individual OOP max is 6000. Need apply OOP max: Once member reaches OOP max, plan pays 100% allowed. Since member OOP before claim is 5400, remaining OOP max = 6000 - 5400 = 600. So member responsibility limited to 600 (coinsurance). But also copay? no. So member pays 600, plan pays 17800 (18400 - 600). But wait copays? no. Additionally need account for family OOP max? Family OOP max 12000; family OOP credited 5400 before claim. The claim additional member OOP 600 could push family OOP to 6000? Still under 12000. But if individual OOP max reached, no more cost share. So member responsibility = 600.
Need determine deductible applied on claim: likely 0 because individual deductible already met. Coinsurance amount: 600? or 3680 before OOP? The claim's coinsurance portion? The question asks "copay_amount" and "coinsurance_amount" as portions of final claim. We need report "copay" and "coinsurance" perhaps amounts applied. For claim, before OOP max, member's cost sharing consists of coinsurance 3680, but because OOP max caps it to 600, the actual coinsurance paid is 600? Need define: "coinsurance_amount" probably actual amount of coinsurance for this service after deductible and OOP maximum? Need figure from typical adjudication output. We need report:
member_responsibility: total member pays for claim
plan_paid: total plan pays
deductible_applied: amount of claim applied to deductible
copay_amount: copay amount
coinsurance_amount: coinsurance amount
ending_member_deductible: member deductible accumulator after claim
ending_member_oopm: member OOP accumulator after claim
Need include. Need think about accumulators after claim. Member deductible remains 1500 if no deductible applied. If claim had applied deductible? Since deductible already satisfied, no change. Member OOP before 5400, after applying member responsibility? Usually OOP accumulates all member cost sharing including deductible, copay, coinsurance, but excludes premiums and non-covered. Here member pays 600 coinsurance; so OOP after = 6000. But wait before claim OOP = 5400, includes 1500 deductible? deductible credited equals 1500, OOP 5400. So after claim, member OOP capped at 6000. So ending member OOPM = 6000. Family OOP before 5400, after claim? The claim's member OOP 600 applied to family? Usually family OOP accumulates all covered expenses paid by any member. Family OOP after = 5400 + 600 = 6000. But also family deductible? before family deductible 1500, no change. But need also family OOP max 12000; not reached. So family OOP = 6000. However if individual OOP max reached, plan pays 100% for rest; family OOP accum maybe stops for that member? OOP max reached for individual, no more cost sharing; family OOP still includes 600. So after claim 6000.
Need maybe plan pays 17800. But check deductible? If no deductible applied, plan pays allowed minus member responsibility = 18400-600=17800. But if plan pays 80% after deductible normally = 14720, but member OOP cap increases plan pay to 17800. Yes.
Need consider if the claim should first apply remaining deductible due to family deductible? Some might argue member's deductible credited YTD 1500 equals individual deductible, so satisfied. But family deductible 3000 not satisfied. Under embedded, "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own" means individual not subject to deductible. However, the member has "deductible credited" 1500, but the family deductible has credited 1500 too. Maybe the same member is the only member and family deductible not yet met? But if family plan has one individual? The plan's family deductible may still apply to the whole family; if individual deductible is met, the individual's remaining claim subject to coinsurance; family deductible does not require more from that individual. So no deductible.
Need maybe member OOP before claim: "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400" includes already met OOP max? 5400 less than 6000. So remaining 600. Yes.
Need answer JSON. But let's be thorough: Need maybe calculate "deductible_applied": 0.00. "copay_amount": 0.00. "coinsurance_amount": 600.00? Or should coinsurance amount be 3680.00 and member_responsibility = 600.00 due to OOP max? Question asks "coinsurance_amount" as "the coinsurance portion of the final claim." In claims adjudication, if OOP max limits amount paid by member, the coinsurance amount applied is the actual amount after limitation? Let's examine.
Glossary says:
- Deductible: amount member pays at allowed rate before coinsurance begins. Copays do not apply to deductible unless...
- Coinsurance: member's percentage share of allowed amount after deductible satisfied.
- Copay: flat per-service member amount.
- OOPM: ceiling on member cost share for plan year. Once reached, plan pays 100% of allowed for covered services.
So in a claim, if OOP max reached partway through the claim, the members cost share percentage would normally be 20% of allowed (3680), but because remaining OOP max is 600, the member only pays 600 of coinsurance; the rest is paid by plan due to OOP max. The "coinsurance amount" could be the amount of coinsurance calculated before OOP max? The field "coinsurance_amount" in output likely means amount of the claim that is classified as member coinsurance. In many claim records, total member liability includes deductible + copay + coinsurance; if OOP max reduces, the coinsurance column might be 600 (actual amount patient owes as coinsurance). But the "plan_paid" then includes the difference (coinsurance amount not collected due to OOP max). Need know what expected in this benchmark? Usually from prompt examples? "deductible_applied", "copay_amount", "coinsurance_amount" are components of member_responsibility. They sum to member_responsibility? Not necessarily if member_responsibility limited? Actually if member_responsibility includes all cost sharing, then deductible_applied + copay + coinsurance = member_responsibility. If coinsurance calculated 3680 but member pays 600 due to OOP max, then sum would be 3680, not 600, and remaining 3080 would be paid by plan as "OOP max adjustment" not shown. But prompt only asks these fields, no "OOP adjustment" field. Thus likely coinsurance_amount should equal actual coinsurance after OOP limit (600), so sum equals member responsibility. Need verify.
Let's search memory: In previous tasks, they want adjudicate claims with accumulators. If OOP max caps, they might ask "coinsurance_amount" as amount member owes after OOP. Usually they compute:
- allowed amount
- deductible applied (remaining deductible)
- then coinsurance = (allowed - deductible) * member coinsurance
- if member out-of-pocket before + deductible + coinsurance > OOP max, reduce coinsurance so total = OOP max remaining.
- member_responsibility = deductible + copay + coinsurance.
- plan_paid = allowed - member_responsibility.
So coinsurance_amount = capped coinsurance amount, not raw. Therefore 600.
Need also consider "deductible_applied" maybe 0. If there was remaining individual deductible 0. But family deductible? We choose 0.
Let's double-check accumulators before claim: deductible credited YTD 1500, OOP credited 5400. Maybe "member deductible credited year to date" indicates that this member has incurred 1500 of deductible but also because individual deductible is 1500, the individual deductible is "satisfied". If the claim is for this same member. Yes.
Need maybe use "family deductible credited year to date" = 1500, so family deductible remaining = 1500. But if the member is not the only member, the family deductible might still apply to claim even if individual deductible satisfied? Let's revisit embedded plan language: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." It doesn't explicitly say that once individual deductible is satisfied, no further deductible applies to that individual while family deductible not satisfied. But that is how embedded works. It says "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own" meaning each individual has own deductible. Once they satisfy it, no more individual deductible. Family deductible is "also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first." It doesn't say all individual deductible obligations stop only at family. So yes.
Need maybe "member out-of-pocket credited YTD 5400" includes 1500 deductible; OOP max 6000. Remaining OOP max 600. The claim's allowed 18400, coinsurance 20% = 3680. Because remaining OOP max 600, member pays only 600. But should the claim first apply any remaining deductible? no. So member responsibility 600. Ending OOP max: 6000. Plan pays 17800. Need perhaps "deductible_applied" = 0? But if family deductible still has 1500 remaining, should claim apply to family deductible? If we did apply 1500 to family deductible, member would pay deductible 1500 plus coinsurance after deductible? But individual deductible already satisfied, that would exceed individual max, not allowed? Let's test alternative: Maybe because family deductible credited 1500, the family deductible remains 1500. The claim has allowed 18400, so apply 1500 to family deductible, then member pays 1500 deductible, then coinsurance 20% of 16900 = 3380, total 4880. But OOP max remaining 600, so member responsibility capped 600. Then deductible_applied maybe 1500? But if cap reduces? Actually if OOP max caps, member pays 600 total, but how to allocate deductible vs coinsurance? Usually deductible still counts toward OOP but if OOP max reached before full coinsurance, the member doesn't pay full deductible? Wait if OOP max remaining is 600 and deductible is 1500, they would only pay 600 of deductible, not the full 1500; but deductibles are cumulative and if individual deductible was already met, no.
If family deductible applied 1500 but OOP max caps at 600, then member wouldn't actually satisfy the family deductible, creating weird carryover? But in true benefits, family deductible would be satisfied by allowed amounts even if paid by plan due to OOP max? OOP max and deductible separate; if OOP max reached, plan pays all further cost sharing including deductible; but the deductible may still be considered met? Actually deductible is a type of cost sharing; once OOP max reached, member no longer pays deductible but the plan may still process the claim applying deductible to accumulators? In claim systems, when OOP max is reached, the remaining deductible may not be charged but the deductible accumulator might be increased? There are complex rules. But here individual deductible already met, so no need.
Let's consider if OOP max is individual in-network 6000 and OOP before 5400. The claim's allowed 18400; after no deductible, coinsurance 3680. We cap member share at 600. So plan pays 17800. The "coinsurance_amount" after cap 600. But if "member_responsibility" = 600, and "plan_paid" = 17800, sum allowed. Good.
Need maybe "copay_amount" 0 because inpatient not copay; no copay.
Need "ending_member_deductible": Since member deductible already 1500 and no change, 1500.00. "ending_member_oopm": 6000.00. Also maybe "family deductible" fields? Not asked but perhaps "ending_member_deductible" only individual? Prompt says "ending_member_deductible" and "ending_member_oopm" singular member. So yes.
Need perhaps "member_deductible credited" before claim 1500 and "family deductible credited" 1500. But if claim has no deductible applied, family deductible accumulator remains 1500. But not asked. Could include if asked? No.
Need ensure JSON numeric values with 2 decimals.
Let's craft final JSON:
{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Need maybe "plan_paid" should be 14720? Wait if no OOP max, plan pays 80% of 18400 = 14720, member coinsurance 3680. But OOP max reduces member to 600, so plan pays 17800. The extra 3080 is paid by plan because OOP max. So yes 17800.
Let's think if OOP max "Once a member reaches OOP max the plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services for remainder of plan year." Before claim, member OOP 5400, not reached. During claim, the member would reach at 600 of cost sharing. For the portion beyond 600, plan pays 100. So total plan pay = 18400 - 600 = 17800. No issue.
Need maybe "member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400" includes the 1500 deductible? If it includes deductible, after claim no deductible applied so member OOP + 600 = 6000. Yes.
Let's produce.json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}33Hunyuan 4 · Tencent208.7s · 12,000 out | 197.8s · 10,479 out | 241.4s · 12,000 out
Reasoning · 12,000 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claim. Let's parse task.
We have Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Plan year 2026. Accumulators before Claim1:
Member deductible credited YTD 1500.00
Member OOPM credited YTD 5400.00
Family deductible credited YTD 1500.00
Family OOPM credited YTD 5400.00
Claim1: 2026-05-14, Inpatient admission, in-network. Billed 34960, Allowed 18400.
Need compute final claim? There is only one claim listed, so final claim is Claim1. Required fields for the final claim. Need compute for Claim1: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied (deductible portion of final claim), copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm. Strict: member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed amount of final claim (18400.00). Also components: deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount should equal member_responsibility? Wait, for services subject to deductible and coinsurance, member responsibility is deductible portion (applied to remaining deductible) plus coinsurance after deductible. Copay if applicable. For inpatient admission in-network, what cost share? No specific copay listed for inpatient admission. Plan document: Primary care 30, Specialist 60, Urgent care 75, Emergency room 400 copay waived if results in inpatient admission, in which case visit subject to deductible and coinsurance. But this claim is Inpatient admission itself, not emergency room visit. Inpatient admission is a covered service; cost share? No copay specified. It is in-network, not preventive. So subject to deductible and coinsurance (20% after deductible in-network). Need check if member already met deductible? Accumulators before claim: Member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00. Individual in-network deductible is 1500.00. So member has already satisfied individual deductible? The credited YTD equals 1500.00, meaning deductible met? Since deductible threshold is 1500.00, credited 1500.00 means satisfied. Wait there is also family deductible 3000. Embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Member deductible credited 1500; family deductible credited 1500. Since individual credits reached 1500, individual deductible is satisfied for member. So for in-network services, deductible should be fully met; remaining deductible to apply is 0 for this member. Since in-network and out-of-network credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance, measured against threshold based on network? Let's read: Deductible Individual (in-network) 1500, Family (in-network) 3000, Structure EMBEDDED — individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Out-of-network (individual) 3000. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Interpretation: There is a single member deductible balance. For in-network services, the threshold is the in-network individual deductible (1500) or family (3000)? Actually "Individual (in-network) 1500, Family (in-network) 3000". Structure embedded. Since single balance accumulates in and out-of-network credits, but threshold depends on network? It says: "The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." Wait "The amount above" refers to Out-of-network (individual) 3000? Let's parse original:
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
So "The amount above" likely refers to "Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00"? Actually sentence after: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." It might mean the out-of-network individual deductible 3000 is the threshold measured when service is OON. For in-network, thresholds are in-network individual 1500/family 3000. But single balance means if member uses OON services, credits count toward same balance, but when an OON service is provided, you compare balance to 3000 (not 1500) to decide if OON deductible satisfied? Hmm. However here service is in-network. Accumulated balance is 1500. For in-network, threshold is individual 1500 / family 3000 embedded. Member deductible credited = 1500, which equals individual in-network deductible. So the individual deductible is satisfied. Therefore no deductible applies to this in-network claim. Also family embedded: family credits 1500 < family 3000, but individual satisfied, so member's own deductible satisfied. The plan pays according to coinsurance after deductible for in-network: 20% member / 80% plan. Since deductible is met, coinsurance on allowed amount: member pays 20% of 18400 = 3680. Plan pays 80% = 14720. But need check OOPM: Member OOPM credited YTD is 5400. Individual in-network OOPM is 6000. Remaining OOPM before claim = 6000 - 5400 = 600. If member responsibility would be 3680 coinsurance, that exceeds remaining OOPM of 600, so member responsibility is capped at 600 (the amount needed to reach OOPM). Once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% for remainder. Wait, out-of-pocket maximum: Individual (in-network) 6000. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered services for remainder of plan year. So need compute member cost share subject to OOPM. Copays credit OOPM. Deductible? Actually deductible payments count toward OOPM? Typically yes, deductible and coinsurance count toward OOPM. The glossary: Out-of-pocket maximum: ceiling on member cost share for plan year. Once reached, plan pays 100% of allowed amount for covered in-network services. Premiums and non-covered services never count. Member cost share includes deductible, coinsurance, copays. Accumulator "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400". That means YTD member has paid 5400 toward OOPM (including previous deductible/coins/copays). Remaining to OOPM = 600. For this claim, before OOPM, cost share: deductible applied 0 (met), copay 0, coinsurance 3680. But because OOPM remaining is 600, the member responsibility total for claim is limited to 600. The plan pays the rest: allowed 18400 - 600 = 17800. Need verify: member_responsibility = 600.00. plan_paid = 17800.00. Sum = 18400. Good.
But need be careful: Does the coinsurance amount field represent the coinsurance portion of final claim before OOPM limitation, or the actual member paid coinsurance after OOPM cap? The required keys: "deductible_applied" number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; "copay_amount" number — the copay portion of the FINAL claim; "coinsurance_amount" number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim. The instruction: "Every value is a number with two decimal places. Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply. member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." It says member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal allowed amount. It doesn't explicitly say deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = member_responsibility, but logically they are the portions of member responsibility? Wait: In typical adjudication, member responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount. But if OOPM limits member responsibility, then the portions might need to reflect the actual applied amounts, perhaps the coinsurance amount is the amount of coinsurance that counts toward OOPM and is paid by member, which would be capped at remaining OOPM? Let's think.
The fields:
- member_responsibility: member's total for the final claim.
- plan_paid: plan's total for the final claim.
- deductible_applied: deductible portion of the final claim.
- copay_amount: copay portion of the final claim.
- coinsurance_amount: coinsurance portion of the final claim.
- ending_member_deductible: accumulator after all claims.
- ending_member_oopm: accumulator after all claims.
They ask for components of the final claim. If OOPM cap applies, the member's responsibility is 600. How is that 600 composed? Since deductible is already met (0 applied), copay is 0, the only cost share before OOPM is coinsurance. The coinsurance calculated is 3680, but member only pays 600 because of OOPM. Is the "coinsurance_amount" the calculated coinsurance (3680.00) or the actual member paid coinsurance (600.00)? Need infer from similar tasks. Typically in benefit adjudication, when OOPM limits, the member responsibility is the cost share up to OOPM, and the plan pays the remainder. The breakdown: deductible_applied is amount of claim applied to deductible (0). Copay_amount is copay charged (0). Coinsurance_amount is the coinsurance amount after deductible, but not to exceed OOPM? Actually coinsurance is a percentage of allowed; the member's liability for coinsurance on the claim is 3680, but because of OOPM, the member pays only 600 and the plan pays the other 3080 of the coinsurance portion? Wait plan paid would be 14720 (80%) plus the 3080 coinsurance portion not paid by member due to OOPM = 17800. Let's decompose allowed 18400:
- Plan base 80% = 14720
- Member 20% = 3680 (coinsurance)
But OOPM cap: member OOP accumulator before = 5400, max 6000. The member can only incur 600 more out-of-pocket. So of the 3680 member coinsurance, 600 is paid by member, and 3080 is paid by plan (because OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed for remainder? Actually once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed amount. The sequence: as the claim processes, the first 600 of member cost share brings OOPM to 6000. After that, plan pays 100% of the remaining allowed amount for the claim? Let's see: Allowed 18400. The member cost share if no OOPM: 0 ded + 0 copay + 3680 coins = 3680. The plan would pay 14720. But OOPM remaining before claim = 600. So the member pays 600. For the rest of the claim's allowed amount (18400 - 600 = 17800), plan pays. That means plan pays 17800, which is 14720 base + 3080 additional (the coinsurance amount above OOPM). So the coinsurance portion of the final claim that is member's responsibility is 600? Or the coinsurance_amount field is the "coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim" - maybe it means the amount of the claim that is coinsurance (i.e., 3680.00) regardless of who pays it? But the phrase "coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim" in context of member cost share components? Let's review task description:
"Required JSON keys:
"member_responsibility" number — the member's total for the FINAL claim listed
"plan_paid" number — the plan's total for the FINAL claim listed
"deductible_applied" number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim
"copay_amount" number — the copay portion of the FINAL claim
"coinsurance_amount" number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim
"ending_member_deductible" number — member deductible accumulator after all claims
"ending_member_oopm" number — member out-of-pocket accumulator after all claims
Every value is a number with two decimal places. Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply. member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim."
It says "deductible portion", "copay portion", "coinsurance portion". Usually member_responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount. They didn't say "member paid coinsurance" but "coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". In many adjudication logics, the coinsurance amount is the member's coinsurance liability for the claim, before applying OOPM? Wait, but OOPM is an accumulator across claims. If member responsibility is capped, then member_responsibility is 600. If coinsurance_amount were 3680, then deductible_applied (0) + copay_amount (0) + coinsurance_amount (3680) = 3680, which does NOT equal member_responsibility (600). The instructions do not state that those three components sum to member_responsibility, only that member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed. However, logically deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount are parts of member cost share? Let's examine: The member responsibility total is what member owes. That total consists of deductible, copay, coinsurance. But if OOPM limits, the amount the member actually owes for coinsurance is reduced. Does the "coinsurance portion of the final claim" refer to the calculated coinsurance (the 20% of allowed after deductible) or the actual member-owed coinsurance (600)? The term "coinsurance amount" in Explanation of Benefits often is the amount charged as coinsurance, but if OOPM is reached, the member may owe less and the plan pays the rest; the EOB still may show coinsurance amount as the calculated amount and then "OOP maximum" adjustment? Need think of typical payer adjudication.
Let's search memory: In similar tasks (maybe from Parity harness), when OOPM remains less than cost share, the member_responsibility equals remaining OOPM, plan_paid = allowed - member_responsibility. The component fields (deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount) are the amounts of those types that were applied to the claim before OOPM? Actually the adjudication steps:
1. Determine if service subject to deductible. Since deductible met, deductible_applied = 0.
2. Determine copay: none for inpatient, copay_amount = 0.
3. Determine coinsurance: allowed * 20% = 3680. This is the coinsurance amount for the claim. But then check OOPM: member OOP accumulator + member responsibility (deductible_applied + copay + coinsurance?) cannot exceed OOPM. The member responsibility before OOPM is 3680. Accumulator before is 5400, OOPM max 6000. So allowed OOP increase = 600. Thus member_responsibility = 600. The coinsurance_amount could be reported as 3680? Then the increase in OOPM would be min(member responsibility, remaining OOPM) = 600. The ending_member_oopm = 6000. Ending_member_deductible remains 1500 (since no deductible applied; still 1500, max satisfied). But if coinsurance_amount is 3680 and member_responsibility is 600, then the sum of components is 3680. This is okay if fields are independent: coinsurance_amount is the coinsurance calculated on the claim (the portion of allowed that is coinsurance, i.e., 20% of 18400 = 3680), not necessarily what member pays. But the key description says "the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". The coinsurance portion of the claim is indeed 3680 (the part of the allowed amount that is subject to coinsurance, as opposed to deductible or copay). Wait no: In a claim with no deductible and no copay, the entire allowed amount is split into plan paid and member coinsurance. The "coinsurance portion" could mean the portion of the claim allocated to coinsurance (i.e., member's 20% share before OOPM) which is 3680. The "plan_paid" would then be 14720 if no OOPM. But because of OOPM, plan_paid is 17800, meaning plan paid part of the coinsurance portion. Then "coinsurance_amount" as a component of the claim's cost sharing might be 3680, but "member_responsibility" is 600. However, if coinsurance_amount is 3680, then deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = 3680, which is the total cost share before OOPM. The OOPM reduces the member responsibility but not the coinsurance portion? That seems contradictory: the coinsurance portion is a member cost share category; if plan pays part of it, it's no longer member coinsurance paid.
Let's parse "deductible_applied - the deductible portion of the FINAL claim". If the deductible is met and no deductible dollars are applied to this claim, deductible_applied = 0. Yes. "copay_amount - the copay portion of the FINAL claim": if a copay applies, it's the copay amount. For inpatient admission, no copay. "coinsurance_amount - the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim": The coinsurance portion of the claim is the amount of allowed after deductible that is subject to coinsurance? Actually the coinsurance rate is applied to the allowed amount after deductible. The resulting member coinsurance is 3680. But if member hits OOPM, the member does not pay that full coinsurance. Yet the "coinsurance portion" of the claim as a classification might be the amount of the claim that falls into the coinsurance category (i.e., 18400 - deductible_applied (0) - copay (0) = 18400? Wait no: The coinsurance is a percentage of allowed, not a separate portion of allowed. The plan pays 80%, member 20%. So the "coinsurance portion" could refer to the member's 20% share = 3680, and the plan's 80% is not coinsurance portion, it's plan paid. So the claim splits into: deductible_applied (0) + copay_amount (0) + coinsurance_amount (3680) + plan_paid_base (14720) = 18400. When OOPM hits, plan_paid becomes 17800, which is 14720 + 3080 of the coinsurance_amount. So the coinsurance_amount as the member-share category remains 3680, but the actual member paid is 600. Is the "coinsurance_amount" the member-share category or the member-paid coinsurance? The description: "coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". In prior similar tasks I've seen (maybe synthetic), they ask for "coinsurance_amount" as the amount of member cost share attributed to coinsurance, after any OOPM? Wait, they also ask for "member_responsibility". If coinsurance_amount were the member-paid coinsurance, then member_responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount. The task didn't state that equation but it's natural. Let's test: Suppose a claim with deductible not met: Allowed 1000, member ded remaining 500, coins 20% after ded. Adjudication: Deductible applied = 500, remaining 500 subject to 20% coins = 100 member coins, plan pays 400. Member responsibility = 600. Components: deductible_applied 500 + copay 0 + coinsurance_amount 100 = 600 = member_responsibility. That works. If OOPM cap: remaining OOPM 50. Then member responsibility = 50. How would components be? Deductible_applied maybe 500? Wait if deductible not met, deductible is applied first. Deductible payments count toward OOPM. If remaining OOPM is 50, and deductible remaining is 500, then member responsibility limited to 50? But deductible must be satisfied before coinsurance. The member would pay 50 toward deductible, leaving 450 deductible unpaid? Actually no, if OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed for remainder, so deductible is considered satisfied? Let's not go there. In our case deductible is met, so only coinsurance.
If OOPM remaining 600 and coinsurance calculated 3680, the member pays 600, all of which is coinsurance (since no ded/copay). So the member-paid coinsurance is 600. The coinsurance category (calculated) is 3680. Which one is "coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim"? "portion of the claim" sounds like how the allowed amount is divided. The portion that is coinsurance is the member's 20% = 3680? But then plan paid is the other portion (80% = 14720) plus maybe extra. Yet they require member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed. If coinsurance_amount = 3680 and plan_paid = 17800, then deductible_applied (0) + copay (0) + coinsurance_amount (3680) + plan_paid (17800) = 21480, not allowed. So components plus plan_paid do not equal allowed; only member_responsibility + plan_paid [empty response]Grader detail
json{
"reason": "response did not contain parseable JSON"
}Reasoning · 10,380 tokens
We need answer with only JSON code block. Need adjudicate Claim 1. Let's parse carefully.
We have plan document Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Synthetic. Plan year 2026. Member accumulators as of moment before Claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Family deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Family OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Claim 1: 2026-05-14. Service: Inpatient admission, in-network. Network in-network. Billed 34960.00 Allowed 18400.00.
Need final claim member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_member_deductible, ending_member_oopm. Every value number two decimals. member_responsibility + plan_paid = allowed amount final claim = 18400.00. Wait there is only one claim? Task says Report required fields for Claim 1. It says adjudicate claims in order, each updates accumulators. There is only Claim 1, so final claim is Claim 1. Required fields include ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm after all claims (only Claim 1). So we compute.
Need understand benefit structure.
Given accumulators before Claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00. Individual in-network deductible = 1500.00. Family in-network = 3000.00. Structure embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above (1500 in-network, 3000 OON) is the threshold that balance is measured against when service is out-of-network. Hmm.
Member out-of-pocket credited YTD = 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM = 6000.00. Family in-network OOPM = 12000.00. Individual out-of-network OOPM = 12000.00. Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100% allowed for covered services remainder.
Cost share: Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan. Out-of-network 40/60. Copays etc. Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM. Preventive care in-network preventive required covered without cost share paid 100% allowed not subject deductible/coins/copay. Basis: cost share from allowed; billed above allowed not member responsibility for in-network.
Service is Inpatient admission, in-network. Allowed amount 18400.00. It's not preventive. It's inpatient admission. Need apply cost share. Inpatient admission is not an office visit, urgent care, ER, pharmacy. It likely subject to deductible and coinsurance. Wait is there any special rule? Plan document mentions Emergency room copay waived if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case visit subject to deductible and coinsurance. That's for ER. For inpatient admission itself, standard deductible/coinsurance applies? Let's read: "Emergency room ... 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance". This claim is "Inpatient admission, in-network". It is not an emergency room visit; it's an inpatient admission. So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance. Inpatient facility services typically subject to deductible and coinsurance (20% after deductible for in-network). There's no separate copay for inpatient admission listed. So cost sharing: deductible first (remaining deductible), then coinsurance 20% of allowed? Let's calculate.
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00. In-network individual deductible = 1500.00. Accumulator already equals the individual in-network deductible threshold. The single member deductible balance is 1500.00. The threshold measured against when service is out-of-network is 3000. But for in-network, threshold maybe 1500 (individual in-network) or family? Let's parse.
Plan: Deductible: Individual (in-network) 1500.00; Family (in-network) 3000.00. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Interpretation: There is one deductible balance for the member (combining in-network and out-of-network credited amounts). For in-network services, the deductible threshold is the individual in-network amount? Or family? Actually embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. The member deductible balance is a single balance. Member's individual in-network deductible is 1500. If the member has met 1500 in deductible credits (from any network? but for in-network services, the relevant threshold is individual in-network 1500; for out-of-network services, the relevant threshold is out-of-network individual 3000 measured against the single balance). Since the service is in-network, the deductible threshold the balance is measured against is the in-network individual deductible of 1500.00 (or maybe family? Let's carefully evaluate embedded family: Since family deductible credited YTD is 1500.00, family in-network deductible is 3000.00. Family not satisfied (1500<3000). But embedded means individual can satisfy individual deductible on their own. The member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00, which equals individual in-network deductible 1500.00. Therefore the member has satisfied their individual deductible. So for this in-network claim, the remaining deductible is 0.00. Deductible applied for this claim = 0.00 (since already met). Then coinsurance applies: after deductible, in-network coinsurance 20% member / 80% plan. But we must check OOPM: Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM = 6000.00. Remaining OOPM before hitting max = 6000 - 5400 = 600.00. The member's cost share for the claim after deductible is 20% of allowed amount? Wait coinsurance is percentage of allowed amount after deductible is satisfied. Since deductible already satisfied before claim, the entire allowed amount is subject to coinsurance (since no deductible remaining). In-network coinsurance member share = 20% of 18400.00 = 3680.00. Plan pays 80% = 14720.00. But member OOPM remaining is 600.00. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% of allowed for remainder of year. So the member's responsibility is limited by remaining OOPM: the member pays min(coinsurance amount, remaining OOPM) = min(3680.00, 600.00) = 600.00. Then plan pays the rest of allowed: allowed 18400.00 - member responsibility 600.00 = 17800.00. However we also need to consider: Deductible applied portion for final claim: since deductible already met, deductible_applied = 0.00. Copay_amount = 0.00 (no copay for inpatient admission). Coinsurance_amount: what is the coinsurance portion of the final claim? The task asks: "coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". We need decide how to report coinsurance_amount when OOPM limits member responsibility. Is coinsurance_amount the calculated coinsurance before OOPM limit, or the actual member paid coinsurance portion? Let's analyze.
The required keys:
- member_responsibility: member's total for final claim (after all limits) = 600.00.
- plan_paid: plan's total for final claim = 17800.00.
- deductible_applied: deductible portion of final claim = 0.00.
- copay_amount: copay portion = 0.00.
- coinsurance_amount: coinsurance portion of final claim. Is this the amount of member responsibility attributable to coinsurance? Or the nominal coinsurance computed as 20% of allowed after deductible? The instructions: "deductible_applied number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; copay_amount number — the copay portion of the FINAL claim; coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". And "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." Also "Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply." We need ensure components sum? Typically member_responsibility = deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount? Let's check: In benefit adjudication, member responsibility equals sum of deductible, copay, coinsurance (unless OOPM limits? Actually OOPM is a cap on total member cost share, but the accumulator includes deductible, copay, coinsurance. The components of the final claim: deductible applied + copay + coinsurance = member responsibility? Let's test. If OOPM remains 600, member pays 600. How is that 600 composed? It could be all coinsurance (since no deductible/copay remaining). The claim's nominal coinsurance is 3680, but because OOPM max is reached after 600 of cost share, the member only pays 600. The plan pays 17800. The coinsurance portion of the final claim that the member is responsible for is 600.00, because that's the amount of member cost share due to coinsurance after applying OOPM limit? Or is coinsurance_amount the "coinsurance portion" before OOPM limiting, i.e., 3680.00, and then member_responsibility is 600.00, which would not equal sum of components (0+0+3680=3680 !=600). The instruction says member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal allowed amount. It does not explicitly say member_responsibility = deductible + copay + coinsurance. But typical components should sum to member_responsibility? Let's read carefully: "member_responsibility number — the member's total for the FINAL claim listed; plan_paid number — the plan's total for the FINAL claim listed; deductible_applied number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; copay_amount number — the copay portion of the FINAL claim; coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim". And "Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply." The phrase "portion of the FINAL claim" could mean the amount of the allowed amount that was allocated to deductible, copay, coinsurance as member cost share. Since OOPM limits total member cost share, the actual member cost share categories: Deductible portion: amount of allowed applied to deductible and paid by member (here 0 because deductible already met). Copay portion: 0. Coinsurance portion: the amount of allowed that the member pays as coinsurance, but capped by OOPM? Actually when OOPM is reached, plan pays 100% of allowed for remainder. So the member's cost share for the claim stops once OOPM reached. The remaining allowed is paid 100% by plan, not as coinsurance. So the coinsurance portion that the member actually pays is limited to the remaining OOPM. Because after member pays 600, they have hit OOPM. The plan pays the remaining 17800 at 100%, which is not "coinsurance" (plan share) but the plan's payment after OOPM. In terms of "portion of the final claim", the 600 is the member's coinsurance portion (the only member cost share category applicable). The 3080 of nominal coinsurance that would have been member responsibility is not paid by member because OOPM reached; plan pays it as part of the 100% after OOPM. So the coinsurance_amount (member's coinsurance) is 600.00. Let's verify with typical adjudication logic.
Let's simulate:
Allowed = 18400.00.
Beginning accumulators: Deductible met = 1500/1500 (in-network individual). So remaining deductible = 0.
OOPM remaining = 6000 - 5400 = 600.
Charge: Inpatient admission, in-network. No copay. Deductible satisfied. So member coinsurance = 20% * 18400 = 3680. But member OOPM remaining is 600. So member pays 600 (applied to coinsurance and counts toward OOPM). Plan pays remaining 17800. After claim, member OOPM credited = 5400 + 600 = 6000 (reached max). Deductible accumulator remains 1500 (no additional deductible applied; already at individual in-network threshold). Wait the single member deductible balance: Does it increase when the member pays cost share? Deductible credits are the amount of allowed applied to deductible. Since remaining deductible before claim is 0 (already met individual in-network deductible), the deductible applied for this claim is 0. So ending member deductible accumulator remains 1500.00. Ending member OOPM accumulator = 6000.00 (since reached max). But let's check if family accumulators matter? We only report ending_member_deductible and ending_member_oopm (member individual accumulators). The task says ending_member_deductible number — member deductible accumulator after all claims; ending_member_oopm number — member OOPM accumulator after all claims. So we need member individual accumulators, not family. They gave family accumulators maybe to test understanding of embedded: family deductible credited 1500 (not satisfied family 3000). But individual is satisfied. Since embedded, individual satisfied on own. The member's single deductible balance is 1500. For in-network service threshold 1500 satisfied. After claim, since no deductible applied, ending member deductible = 1500.00. Ending member OOPM = 6000.00 (because 5400 + 600 = 6000). Wait OOPM credited YTD before claim = 5400. Member pays 600, so OOPM credited becomes 6000. Does OOPM accumulator include copays, deductible, coinsurance? Yes, out-of-pocket maximum is ceiling on member cost share. Member cost share = deductible + copay + coinsurance (and perhaps other cost share). For this claim, member responsibility = 600 (coinsurance). It credits OOPM. So ending OOPM = 5400 + 600 = 6000. It reaches the individual in-network OOPM of 6000. After that, plan pays 100% for remainder of year, but no more claims. Good.
But wait: Could there be an out-of-network OOPM threshold? Service is in-network, individual in-network OOPM = 6000. Reached. Good.
Let's double-check deductible status and OOPM. The Plan says: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." The OOPM is 6000 individual in-network. Before claim, OOPM credited 5400. Remaining 600. So member pays 600. After that, plan pays 100%. Yes.
Now, is the plan paid amount for final claim = allowed - member_responsibility = 18400 - 600 = 17800.00. Is that the plan's total? Let's check: Before OOPM, plan would pay 80% of 18400 = 14720, member 3680. But because member OOPM remaining 600, the plan pays the other 3080 that would have been member coinsurance, in addition to its 14720? Actually plan payment: The plan's responsibility for the allowed amount before OOPM: 80% = 14720. Member responsibility = 20% = 3680. But due to OOPM, member only pays 600. The plan pays the remaining 3080 of the member's coinsurance as well, because once OOPM reached plan pays 100% of allowed. So plan total = 14720 + 3080 = 17800. Yes. Alternatively, allowed 18400 - member 600 = 17800. Good.
Now, what about deductible_applied? Is it 0.00? Let's ensure "deductible_applied" means the portion of the final claim's allowed amount that was applied to the deductible (i.e., member paid toward deductible). Since the deductible was already satisfied by prior credits (1500), the remaining deductible is 0, so none of the allowed is applied to deductible. Thus 0.00.
But wait: The member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00, which is the single member deductible balance. The threshold for in-network is 1500. So remaining = 0. However, there is a family deductible credited YTD = 1500, family in-network deductible = 3000. Embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Since individual satisfied, the member's deductible is satisfied. So for this member's claim, no deductible. Good.
Now, check if there is any nuance with "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." This sentence is slightly confusing: They list Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00. Then they say credits accumulate to a single member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. Wait "The amount above" refers to Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00? Let's parse: Under Deductible section:
- Individual (in-network) ...... 1500.00
- Family (in-network) ......... 3000.00
- Structure ................... EMBEDDED ...
- Out-of-network (individual) . 3000.00
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Actually "The amount above" could refer to "Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00" being the threshold measured against when service is out-of-network. For in-network service, the threshold is the in-network individual 1500 (for member) or family? Let's read: "Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00; Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00; Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first. Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network."
So single member deductible balance combines IN and OON amounts credited. For an in-network service, the threshold the balance is measured against is the in-network individual deductible (1500) or family? Since the member is an individual within a family? They gave family deductible credited YTD 1500. The family in-network deductible is 3000. Embedded means: individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. For this member, the individual in-network deductible is 1500. The member's single balance is 1500. The individual threshold is met. So the member's deductible is satisfied for in-network services. If the service were out-of-network, the threshold measured against the same single balance would be 3000 (OON individual), so remaining OON deductible would be 1500 (since balance 1500 < 3000). But not relevant.
Thus deductible remaining before claim = max(0, 1500 - 1500) = 0 for in-network. Yes.
Now OOPM: Individual (in-network) 6000; Family (in-network) 12000; Individual (out-of-network) 12000. Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100% for covered services remainder. Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400. This is the individual OOPM accumulator? They gave "Member out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00" and "Family out-of-pocket credited year to date 5400.00". So member individual OOPM credited = 5400, family = 5400. Since service in-network, the OOPM threshold is individual in-network 6000. Remaining = 600. After claim, member OOPM = 6000 (reached). Good.
Now check: Copays always credit OOPM, but not deductible. No copay here. Deductible amounts credit OOPM? Usually deductible counts toward OOPM. The document doesn't explicitly say, but out-of-pocket maximum is ceiling on member cost share; member cost share includes deductible, coinsurance, copays. So yes, deductible credits OOPM. The accumulators: Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400. This already includes previous deductible and coinsurance etc. Remaining to OOPM is 600.
Now, one more nuance: The member responsibility is 600. But is there any separate "coinsurance_amount" that should be 3680.00? Let's inspect the exact wording and typical payer adjudication fields. In many claims adjudication outputs, there are fields:
- Deductible amount: the amount json{
"member_responsibility": 600.00,
"plan_paid": 17800.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 600.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 6000.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 17800,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 600,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 6000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 12,000 tokens
We need answer JSON only with required keys. Need adjudicate claim 1 given accumulators before claim 1.
Let's parse plan and rules.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (synthetic). Plan year 2026. Per plan year.
Deductible:
Individual in-network 1500. Family in-network 3000. Structure embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network individual 3000.
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
OOPM:
Individual in-network 6000. Family in-network 12000. Individual out-of-network 12000.
Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100% allowed for covered services for remainder of plan year.
Member cost share:
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
Coinsurance after deductible, out-of-network: 40/60
Primary care office visit 30 copay; Specialist 60; Urgent care 75; ER 400 copay waived if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case visit subject to deductible and coinsurance. Generic retail 15.
Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
Preventive care: in-network preventive required covered w/o cost share paid at 100% allowed, not subject to deductible/coins/copay.
Basis: cost share from allowed, billed above not member responsibility for in-network.
We have member accumulators before claim 1:
Member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
Family deductible credited YTD = 1500.00
Family OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00
We need adjudicate Claim 1 only? It says CLAIMS (adjudicate in order listed). Only Claim 1 listed. Required fields: report for FINAL claim listed, which is Claim 1. Ending member deductible and OOPM accumulators after all claims (only claim 1). Need compute member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount for final claim, and ending accumulators.
Let's examine Claim 1: 2026-05-14. Service: Inpatient admission, in-network. Network in-network. Billed 34960. Allowed 18400.00. It's an inpatient admission (inpatient facility?). No copay applicable (not office visit, not ER? It's inpatient admission, in-network). There is mention ER copay waived if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case visit subject to deductible and coinsurance. But this service is "Inpatient admission, in-network" not ER visit. So we apply deductible and coinsurance. Since in-network, member deductible individual threshold 1500. The member deductible credited YTD is 1500.00. Important: Deductible structure embedded. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. For in-network services, threshold is individual in-network? The plan says Individual (in-network) 1500; Family (in-network) 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first. Then "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." Wait need interpret carefully: It likely means member has one deductible balance that combines INN and OON credits. For OON, the threshold is 3000 (out-of-network individual). For INN, the threshold is 1500? The sentence: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." The "amount above" could refer to the out-of-network individual amount 3000? It says out-of-network (individual) 3000. So if service is OON, measure against 3000. If INN, threshold is individual in-network 1500? But it's a single balance. Usually embedded deductible: you have an individual deductible and family deductible. Here they say in-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a single member deductible balance. Since both individual and family? Let's parse:
Deductible section:
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Hmm: "The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." "above" could be the immediately preceding "Out-of-network (individual) 3000.00". So single member deductible balance combined; if service is OON, apply OON threshold 3000. For INN service, presumably apply the INN individual threshold (1500) or family rules? It says Structure EMBEDDED for the in-network? Actually the embedded structure described after family (in-network). Then out-of-network individual. Then the single balance note.
We have member deductible credited YTD = 1500.00. That equals the individual in-network deductible. Since claim is in-network, the member has already satisfied the individual in-network deductible (1500). Also family deductible credited YTD = 1500.00, which is less than family in-network 3000. With embedded, an individual satisfies individual deductible on their own. Since member deductible balance is 1500, the individual deductible is met. Therefore for this in-network inpatient admission, deductible remaining? Individual satisfied. But wait, single member deductible balance is 1500. Is it also measured against family? No, family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach 3000. Here family credited is 1500, not yet 3000. But embedded means individual can satisfy on own; once member's individual deductible of 1500 is met, no more deductible for that member for in-network? In an embedded deductible, typically each family member has an individual deductible embedded within family deductible; when a member meets their individual deductible, plan begins paying coinsurance for that member even if family deductible not met. Since this is an individual member? We are adjudicating for a member (the accumulators are member). We also have family accumulators, but individual satisfied. So for this in-network service, deductible_applied should be 0.00 because member deductible already met (1500 credited, threshold 1500). But need check if there is a remaining deductible due to combined single balance and out-of-network? Since service is in-network, we use in-network threshold? Let's verify.
If service is in-network, member deductible balance is 1500. The individual in-network deductible is 1500. It's satisfied. So no deductible applies. However, note: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." This means if the service were OON, we would compare the single balance (1500) to 3000, so remaining OON deductible would be 1500. But for INN, we compare to 1500, and it's exactly met. So deductible_applied = 0.00. Good.
Now OOPM: Member OOPM credited YTD = 5400.00. Individual in-network OOPM = 6000.00. Family in-network OOPM = 12000.00. Out-of-network individual OOPM = 12000. The member hasn't reached 6000 individual in-network OOPM yet (5400). So the member still has 6000 - 5400 = 600.00 of OOPM remaining before plan pays 100%? Wait: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." The OOPM is a ceiling on member cost share. Deductible, coinsurance, copays count toward OOPM. For this claim, after deductible (0), member coinsurance is 20% of allowed (since in-network, coinsurance after deductible). Allowed = 18400.00. 20% = 3680.00. But member OOPM remaining is 600.00. So the member's cost share (coinsurance) for this claim cannot exceed the remaining OOPM? We need compute member responsibility for final claim: member responsibility is the member's total for the final claim listed. It should be the amount member owes for this claim, but limited by OOPM? The plan pays 100% of allowed once OOPM reached. So member pays until OOPM is reached, then plan pays 100% for rest of that claim (and remainder of year). Let's compute.
Before claim: Member OOPM credited = 5400.00. Individual INN OOPM = 6000.00. Remaining OOPM = 600.00.
Claim allowed 18400. Deductible applied = 0 (already met). Copay = 0 (inpatient admission, not a copay service). Coinsurance amount before OOPM limit: 20% of allowed after deductible = 0.20 * 18400 = 3680.00. Since remaining OOPM is 600.00, the member's responsibility for cost share on this claim is capped at 600.00. Actually the member responsibility for the claim equals the amount applied to OOPM: first, any deductible? Deductible also counts toward OOPM? The glossary: Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM): the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year. Deductible: amount member pays at allowed before coinsurance. Deductible is member cost share and should count toward OOPM? In typical plans, deductible counts toward OOPM. The plan document: "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." It doesn't explicitly say deductible credits OOPM, but by definition OOPM is ceiling on member cost share, which includes deductible, coinsurance, copays. The glossary says: "Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM): the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year. Once reached, the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered in-network services. Premiums and non-covered services never count toward it." And "Deductible: the amount a member pays at the allowed rate before coinsurance begins." It doesn't say deductible doesn't count; deductible is a member payment, thus counts toward OOPM. Also accumulator: "Accumulator: the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM." So deductible accumulator is separate from OOPM accumulator; amounts credited to deductible also credit OOPM? In standard adjudication, the member's payment for deductible is applied to both deductible and OOPM accumulators. Here we have two accumulators: member deductible credited YTD and member out-of-pocket credited YTD. They are both 1500 and 5400 respectively before claim. Wait if deductible credited YTD is 1500, and OOPM credited YTD is 5400, then OOPM already includes the 1500 deductible? Let's check: If the member had satisfied deductible of 1500, and had other cost share (coinsurance/copays) totaling 3900 more, OOPM = 5400. That's plausible: OOPM includes deductible amounts already. At start, deductible accumulator =1500, OOPM accumulator=5400. The OOPM is larger, so it includes the 1500 deductible plus 3900 other. Yes. So remaining OOPM to reach 6000 is 600. This 600 can be satisfied by further deductible (none) or coinsurance/copay. Since deductible already met, only coinsurance.
Thus for this claim, member responsibility = 600.00 (the remaining OOPM). Once member pays 600.00, OOPM accumulator becomes 6000.00 (reached). The plan then pays 100% of remaining allowed for this claim and future. So plan_paid for this claim = allowed - member_responsibility = 18400 - 600 = 17800.00. Wait need check: The plan pays 80% coinsurance normally on the 18400 after deductible: plan pays 80% = 14720.00, member 20%=3680. But because OOPM cap, member only pays 600, plan pays the rest: 17800. Yes.
But we must be careful: The claim's coinsurance amount before OOPM is 3680. The OOPM remaining is 600. So member responsibility = 600. The deductible applied = 0.00. Copay = 0.00. Coinsurance amount field: The required key "coinsurance_amount" number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim. How to report when OOPM limits? Is coinsurance_amount the portion of the claim that is coinsurance, i.e., the amount of member cost share attributed to coinsurance before/after OOPM? Usually in these benefit adjudication tasks, the components (deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount) should sum to member_responsibility? Let's read task: "member_responsibility number — the member's total for the FINAL claim listed; plan_paid number — the plan's total for the FINAL claim listed; deductible_applied number — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; copay_amount number — the copay portion of the FINAL claim; coinsurance_amount number — the coinsurance portion of the FINAL claim; ... Every value is a number with two decimal places. Use 0.00, not null, for a component that does not apply. member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim."
It says deductible_applied is the deductible portion of the final claim; copay portion; coinsurance portion. Does this mean the actual amounts of the claim that were allocated to deductible, copay, coinsurance (i.e., cost share categories), which together constitute member_responsibility (and maybe plan_paid?). The member responsibility is what member owes; the components of member responsibility are deductible, copay, coinsurance. Typically, deductible + copay + coinsurance = member_responsibility (if no OOPM limit or if OOPM limit just caps coinsurance). However, when OOPM is reached mid-claim, the member responsibility is capped. The "coinsurance portion" might be the amount of the claim that would be coinsurance but is limited to remaining OOPM? Or is it the full coinsurance calculated (3680.00) while member_responsibility is 600? Let's think.
The output contract says: "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount of the final claim." It does not explicitly say deductible_applied + copay_amount + coinsurance_amount = member_responsibility. But logically, the components are the portions of member responsibility. Let's search memory: In similar Parity tasks, when OOPM limits, the member responsibility is the amount applied to OOPM, and the coinsurance_amount is the actual coinsurance that the member pays (i.e., limited by OOPM). Because the "coinsurance portion of the final claim" means how much of the final claim's member cost share came from coinsurance. If OOPM remaining is 600, the member coinsurance payment is 600 (since no deductible/copay), and after that plan pays 100%. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00, deductible_applied = 0, copay = 0, member_responsibility = 600.00. Plan paid = 18400 - 600 = 17800.00.
But wait: There's also the concept that the OOPM ceiling applies to member cost share; once OOPM reached, plan pays 100% of allowed. The member's out-of-pocket for the claim is the sum of deductible, copay, and coinsurance actually paid by member. Since deductible and copay are zero, the coinsurance actually paid by member is the member responsibility, which is 600. So coinsurance_amount = 600.00. The full 20% coinsurance before cap is 3680, but the member does not pay 3680; the plan pays the excess because of OOPM. So coinsurance_amount should be 600, not 3680. Let's verify with typical EOB: If allowed is 1000, coinsurance 20% = 200, but OOPM remaining is 50, then member owes 50 (coinsurance), plan pays 950. The EOB would show coinsurance amount $50 (or maybe $200 with "OOP max reached, you owe $50"?) Actually on an EOB, the coinsurance amount might be $200, then other reductions (OOP max) reduce patient responsibility to $50? Let's recall standard 835/837 or EOB: The claim lines show allowed 1000, deductible 0, coinsurance 200, and then "out-of-pocket maximum" or "stop loss" adjustment? The plan paid amount is 800 normally, but with OOP max, plan pays 950 and patient responsibility 50. The coinsurance field might still be 200, with a separate "OOP maximum" adjustment? However, in this simplified harness, the required fields are only deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, and member_responsibility. And "member_responsibility plus plan_paid must equal the allowed amount". If we set coinsurance_amount = 3680 (full coinsurance portion), deductible 0, copay 0, then member_responsibility would have to be 600 (since plan_paid = 17800, allowed 18400, member_responsibility = 600). But then deductible+copay+coinsurance = 3680, which is not equal to member_responsibility. Is that allowed? The task didn't say they must sum to member_responsibility, but it said "deductible_applied — the deductible portion of the FINAL claim; copay_amount — the copay portion; coinsurance_amount — the coinsurance portion". If member_responsibility is 600, the portion of the claim that is coinsurance (i.e., the member's coinsurance cost share) is 600, because the member's responsibility is entirely coinsurance (no deductible/copay). The remaining 3080 of the calculated coinsurance is not member responsibility; it's plan responsibility due to OOPM. The "coinsurance portion of the final claim" could be interpreted as the portion of the allowed amount that is subject to coinsurance? Wait no, "deductible portion of the final claim" means the amount of the claim's allowed amount that was applied to the deductible. "copay portion" is flat. "coinsurance portion" is the amount of the claim that is coinsurance (member's share). If OOPM caps, the coinsurance portion paid by member is capped. The rest is plan responsibility. In many benefit calculators, the "coinsurance amount" is the member coinsurance after applying OOPM limit. Because member responsibility = deductible + copay + coinsurance (patient responsibility). If OOPM reached, you don't pay more coinsurance. So the coinsurance amount is the remaining OOPM.
Let's test with another scenario: Suppose allowed 18400, deductible remaining 0, OOPM remaining 10000 (so not capped). Coinsurance 20% = 3680. Member responsibility = 3680 (all coinsurance). Plan paid = 14720. Then deductible 0, copay 0, coinsurance 3680, member_responsibility 3680. Sum matches. Now if OOPM remaining is 600, member responsibility = 600, plan paid = 17800. To keep sum of components equal to member_responsibility, coinsurance = 600. That seems right.
But we need check if any deductible is applied because of the family deductible? Wait member individual satisfied, but is there a family deductible that hasn't been satisfied? Embedded structure: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This means for a family plan, there are two ways to satisfy: either the individual meets their embedded individual deductible, or the family as a whole meets the family deductible. If one member meets individual, that member's deductible is considered satisfied, and the plan starts paying for that member. The family deductible accumulator continues to accumulate; when total family credits reach family amount, then... all members? Actually typical embedded: each member has individual deductible (e.g., 1500) and family deductible (3000). No member can pay more than their individual deductible; once a member's individual deductible is met, they are done with deductible. Also, the family deductible is met when the sum of all family members' deductible credits reaches the family amount; at that point, no family member has any deductible remaining (even if an individual hasn't met their own). But here indiv[empty response]Grader detail
json{
"reason": "response did not contain parseable JSON"
}0DeepSeek V3.2 · DeepSeek2.6s · 96 out | 3.8s · 96 out | 2.6s · 98 out
json{
"member_responsibility": 0.00,
"plan_paid": 18400.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 0.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 5400.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 18400,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 5400,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 0.00,
"plan_paid": 18400.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 0.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 5400.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 18400,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 5400,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 3680.00,
"plan_paid": 14720.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 3680.00,
"ending_member_deductible": 1500.00,
"ending_member_oopm": 9080.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 600,
"got": 3680,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 17800,
"got": 14720,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 600,
"got": 3680,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_deductible",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_member_oopm",
"want": 6000,
"got": 9080,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}