One member exhausts an individual deductible while the family is short
Generated from the Parity family benefits engine (src/tasks/benefits-engine.ts). Gold is the oracle's output over 4 claims and 3 members. Embedded structure: the subscriber crosses 1,500 on their own and moves to coinsurance while the other two are still paying full freight against a family deductible that has not been met.
Field mean
91.7
across 28 models
Models scoring 100
23
of 28
Models scoring 0
1
of 28
What the model was given
PLAN DOCUMENT — Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (synthetic)
Plan year: 2026-01-01 through 2026-12-31. All amounts are per plan year.
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member
deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured
against when the service is out-of-network.
Out-of-pocket maximum
Individual (in-network) ................ 6000.00
Family (in-network) .................... 12000.00
Individual (out-of-network) ............ 12000.00
Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the
allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year.
Member cost share
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network ......... 20% member / 80% plan
Coinsurance after deductible, out-of-network ..... 40% member / 60% plan
Primary care office visit ........................ 30.00 copay
Specialist office visit .......................... 60.00 copay
Urgent care ...................................... 75.00 copay
Emergency room ................................... 400.00 copay, WAIVED if the visit results in an inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to the deductible and coinsurance
Generic retail pharmacy .......................... 15.00 copay
Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum.
Preventive care
In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share are
paid at 100% of the allowed amount and are not subject to the deductible,
coinsurance, or a copay.
Basis of payment
Member cost share is calculated from the ALLOWED amount. Amounts billed above
the allowed amount are not the member's responsibility for in-network services.FAMILY ACCUMULATORS as of the moment before Claim 1
A (subscriber) deductible 1180.00 out-of-pocket 1180.00
B (spouse) deductible 260.00 out-of-pocket 260.00
C (child) deductible 0.00 out-of-pocket 0.00
Family total deductible 1440.00 out-of-pocket 1440.00
CLAIMS (adjudicate in the order listed; each claim updates the accumulators the next is measured against)
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)
Service ......... Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 4144.00
Allowed amount .. 2240.00
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)
Service ......... Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 703.00
Allowed amount .. 380.00
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)
Service ......... Outpatient surgery, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 5365.00
Allowed amount .. 2900.00
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)
Service ......... Follow-up imaging, in-network
Network ......... In-network
Billed charge ... 1184.00
Allowed amount .. 640.00
Report the components for Claim 4, and the ending accumulators for every member and for the family.
Required keys for this item:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount,
ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a (for A (subscriber))
ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b (for B (spouse))
ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c (for C (child))
ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopmjson{
"kind": "fields",
"tolerance": 0.011,
"fields": {
"member_responsibility": 128,
"plan_paid": 512,
"deductible_applied": 0,
"copay_amount": 0,
"coinsurance_amount": 128,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528,
"ending_deductible_c": 380,
"ending_oopm_c": 380
}
}Every model's answer
Sorted by score. Open a row for the response and, where the vendor exposes it, the reasoning behind it.
100Gemini 3.7 Flash · Google15.1s · 2,787 out | 16.7s · 2,412 out | 27.3s · 3,229 out
Reasoning · 2,550 tokens
**Analyzing Plan Mechanics**
I'm currently dissecting the plan's structure, specifically focusing on how deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums interact with in-network coinsurance. The initial step involves mapping the individual and family INN deductible and OOPM figures provided.
**Updating Accumulators**
I've processed the first claim, applying the in-network coinsurance logic and updating Member A's individual deductible and out-of-pocket accumulators. I'm now verifying the family-level impact.
**Calculating Member Costs**
I've now processed Claim 2 for Member C, applying the deductible logic and updating both individual and family accumulators. I am currently evaluating Claim 3 for Member B, which involves a more substantial outpatient surgery expense.
**Applying Deductible Logic**
I've completed the calculations for Member B's outpatient surgery claim, carefully applying the deductible and coinsurance rules. This has updated both individual and family accumulators, notably satisfying the overall family deductible. I'm now preparing to process the next claim involving Member A.
**Calculating Coinsurance Liability**
I've determined the coinsurance for the latest imaging claim. Since deductibles are met, I've calculated the 20% coinsurance on the allowed amount, adding it to individual and family OOP accumulators. The member's responsibility is now clear for this service.
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,175 tokens
**Analyzing Plan Details**
I'm now meticulously dissecting the plan's financial parameters. My focus is on the individual and family deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums, alongside the co-insurance structure.
**Calculating Deductible Impact**
I've begun applying the first claim, focusing on how the outpatient endoscopy affects individual and family deductibles. It appears the subscriber's deductible is now met, and I'm calculating the remaining responsibility.
**Applying Third Claim**
I've processed the third claim, focusing on the spouse's outpatient surgery. The family deductible has now been fully met with this claim, and I'm calculating the co-insurance and out-of-pocket impact.
**Applying Fourth Claim**
I have now processed the fourth claim, for the subscriber's follow-up imaging. Since the individual and family deductibles are met, only coinsurance applies. I'm updating the accumulators and calculating the remaining out-of-pocket maximums.
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,993 tokens
**Analyzing Plan Details**
I'm currently dissecting the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan. My focus is on understanding the in-network deductible and out-of-pocket maximums for both individual and family coverage. I'll be tracing each claim against these parameters.
**Calculating Deductible Contributions**
I've calculated the deductible application for the first claim, applying the lower remaining individual deductible. Coinsurance has been factored in, and member responsibility determined. The out-of-pocket maximums are being monitored.
**Applying Deductible Remainder**
I've processed the second claim, applying the remaining family deductible, and updated all accumulators. Now I'm starting on the third claim, determining how the remaining family deductible is applied to the outpatient surgery service, and then calculating coinsurance.
**Finalizing Deductible Application**
I've completed the calculations for claim three, determining the coinsurance and member responsibility, and verified it against OOPM limits. All accumulators have been updated. Now I'm initiating claim four, a follow-up imaging service for the subscriber. Since the family deductible is met, I'm proceeding directly to coinsurance application.
**Updating Accumulators**
I have finalized the calculations for claim four, confirming member responsibility and plan payment. All accumulators have been updated post-claim 4, reflecting the current state of deductibles and OOPMs for all individuals and the family unit. My next step is to meticulously verify the output fields against these updated totals.
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.5 · OpenAI7.2s · 695 out | 13.3s · 1,033 out | 7.3s · 653 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 854 tokens
**Formatting JSON Numbers**
I’m thinking about how to format the numbers correctly in JSON. It seems each dollar amount should be represented as a plain number with two decimal places, like 128.00. JSON allows for decimal fractions, which is good to keep in mind. I want to ensure I'm using the exact keys for the relevant components, like deductible_applied, copay_amount, and coinsurance. I'll finalize the output as a JSON code block with these numbers formatted properly.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.6 Sol · OpenAI5.8s · 484 out | 6.1s · 472 out | 7.3s · 529 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 293 tokens
**Considering numeric formats**
I'm thinking about JSON and how it handles numeric values. Specifically, 128.00 is technically acceptable because it retains the decimal portion. I wonder how important those decimals are in certain contexts. I think it’s good to use numbers with decimals when precision matters. This is an interesting detail to keep in mind when formatting numeric data in JSON, especially if it relates to specific calculations or financial data.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 350 tokens
**Considering JSON output requirements**
I usually find that harnesses expect strings, especially for plain amounts and JSON formatting. The output needs to be valid JSON, with values likely like "128.00". Previous tasks showed that amounts were often strings to keep decimals intact. Here, the instruction says to use plain numbers with two decimal places, without any symbols. So, in JSON, "128.00" is a valid number, and I need to ensure I output it as the numeric value 128.00.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Grok 4.6 · xAI29.5s · 1,976 out | 24.1s · 1,708 out | 26.6s · 2,036 out
Reasoning · 1,789 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims in order and report for Claim 4 specifically, plus ending accumulators.
Claim 4 — A (subscriber), Follow-up imaging, INN, allowed 640.00
Remaining individual deductible: 1500 - 1500 = 0.00
Remaining family deductible: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00
Embedded deductible applied: 0.00 (no remaining individual deductible)
Remaining allowed after deductible: 640.00
Coinsurance 20%: 128.00
Member responsibility: 128.00
Plan paid: 512.00
A deductible: 1500.00
A OOPM: 1884.00 + 128 = 2012.00
B deductible: 1120.00
B OOPM: 1528.00
C deductible: 380.00
C OOPM: 380.00
Family deductible: 3000.00
Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128 = 3920.00
Claim 4 components:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,536 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims and report for Claim 4 and ending accumulators.
Claim 4 components:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending accumulators:
- A: ending_d 1500.00, ending_oopm 2012.00
- B: ending_d 1120.00, ending_oopm 1528.00
- C: ending_d 380.00, ending_oopm 380.00
- Family: ending_d 3000. 00, ending_oopm 3920.json{"member_responsibility": 128.00, "plan_paid": 512.00, "deductible_applied": 0.00, "copay_amount": 0.00, "coinsurance_amount": 128.00, "ending_deductible_a": 1500.00, "ending_oopm_a": 2012.00, "ending_deductible_b": 1120.00, "ending_oopm_b": 1528.00, "ending_deductible_c": 380.00, "ending_oopm_c": 380.00, "ending_family_deductible": 3000.00, "ending_family_oopm": 3920.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,864 tokens
The user wants me to adjudicate claims in order and report for Claim 4 plus ending accumulators.
Claim 4 components:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00 ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00 ending_oopm_b: 1656.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00 ending_oopm_c: 508.00
ending_family_deductible: 3000.00 ending_family_oopm: 3920.json{"member_responsibility": 128.00, "plan_paid": 512.00, "deductible_applied": 0.00, "copay_amount": 0.00, "coinsurance_amount": 128.00, "ending_deductible_a": 1500.00, "ending_oopm_a": 2012.00, "ending_deductible_b": 1120.00, "ending_oopm_b": 1528.00, "ending_deductible_c": 380.00, "ending_oopm_c": 380.00, "ending_family_deductible": 3000.00, "ending_family_oopm": 3920.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Grok 4.5 · xAI16.4s · 1,309 out | 15.3s · 1,225 out | 20.6s · 1,505 out
Reasoning · 1,122 tokens
The problem is about adjudicating claims for a health plan. I need to process claims in order and update accumulators.
Claim 4 components:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00 ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00 ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00 ending_oopm_c: 380.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,053 tokens
The problem is about adjudicating claims for a health plan. I need to process claims in order and update accumulators.
Claim 4 components:
member_responsibility: 640.00
plan_paid: 0.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 0.json{"member_responsibility": 128.00, "plan_paid": 512.00, "deductible_applied": 0.00, "copay_amount": 0.00, "coinsurance_amount": 128.00, "ending_deductible_a": 1500.00, "ending_oopm_a": 2012.00, "ending_deductible_b": 1120.00, "ending_oopm_b": 1528.00, "ending_deductible_c": 380.00, "ending_oopm_c": 380.00, "ending_family_deductible": 3000.00, "ending_family_oopm": 3920.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,333 tokens
The problem is about adjudicating claims for a health plan. I need to process claims in order and report for Claim 4 and ending accumulators.
Claim 4 components:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.json{"member_responsibility": 128.00, "plan_paid": 512.00, "deductible_applied": 0.00, "copay_amount": 0.00, "coinsurance_amount": 128.00, "ending_deductible_a": 1500.00, "ending_oopm_a": 2012.00, "ending_deductible_b": 1120.00, "ending_oopm_b": 1528.00, "ending_deductible_c": 380.00, "ending_oopm_c": 380.00, "ending_family_deductible": 3000.00, "ending_family_oopm": 3920.00}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google28.1s · 3,700 out | 19.8s · 2,021 out | 42.6s · 5,166 out
Reasoning · 3,464 tokens
**Adjudicating Health Claims: A Step-by-Step Analysis**
Alright, I need to process four claims in sequence and then present specific details. My primary focus will be on Claim 4, including its constituent parts, and then provide the final accumulator balances for each member (A, B, and C) and the family as a whole.
Here are the core plan details I'm working with:
* Individual Deductible (in-network): $1500.00
* Family Deductible (in-network): $3000.00
* Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) (in-network): $6000.00
* Family OOPM (in-network): $12000.00
* Coinsurance (in-network): 20% member, 80% plan
And these are the starting accumulator balances:
* Member A: Deductible $1180.00, OOPM $1180.00
* Member B: Deductible $260.00, OOPM $260.00
* Member C: Deductible $0.00, OOPM $0.00
* Family: Deductible $1440.00, OOPM $1440.00
Now, let's walk through each claim:
**Claim 1 (Member A):**
* Date: 2026-06-02
* Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
* Allowed amount: $2240.00
I first calculate the remaining deductible amounts:
* Member A's deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $1180.00 = $320.00
* Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $1440.00 = $1560.00
The deductible applied is the lesser of the allowed amount, the member's remaining deductible, or the family's remaining deductible. In this case, it's $320.00 (min($2240.00, $320.00, $1560.00)).
After the deductible, the remaining allowed amount is $2240.00 - $320.00 = $1920.00.
Coinsurance applies to this remaining amount: $1920.00 * 20% = $384.00.
So, Member A's total cost share is $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00.
I also check Member A's OOPM. Their remaining OOPM is $6000.00 - $1180.00 = $4820.00. Since $704.00 is well within this limit, the full cost share applies.
The plan pays $2240.00 (allowed) - $704.00 (member share) = $1536.00.
Let's update the accumulators after Claim 1:
* Member A: Deductible $1180.00 + $320.00 = $1500.00; OOPM $1180.00 + $704.00 = $1884.00
* Member B: Deductible $260.00; OOPM $260.00 (unchanged)
* Member C: Deductible $0.00; OOPM $0.00 (unchanged)
* Family: Deductible $1440.00 + $320.00 = $1760.00; OOPM $1440.00 + $704.00 = $2144.00
**Claim 2 (Member C):**
* Date: 2026-06-11
* Service: Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
* Allowed amount: $380.00
Member C's deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $0.00 = $1500.00
Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $1760.00 = $1240.00
The deductible applied is min($1500.00, $1240.00, $380.00) = $380.00.
Since the entire allowed amount was applied to the deductible, the remaining allowed amount is $0.00, and coinsurance is $0.00.
Member C's total cost share is $380.00 (deductible).
Member C's OOPM remaining: $6000.00 - $0.00 = $6000.00. $380.00 is within this.
The plan pays $380.00 - $380.00 = $0.00.
Updating accumulators after Claim 2:
* Member A: Deductible $1500.00; OOPM $1884.00 (unchanged)
* Member B: Deductible $260.00; OOPM $260.00 (unchanged)
* Member C: Deductible $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00; OOPM $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00
* Family: Deductible $1760.00 + $380.00 = $2140.00; OOPM $2144.00 + $380.00 = $2524.00
**Claim 3 (Member B):**
* Date: 2026-06-27
* Service: Outpatient surgery, in-network
* Allowed amount: $2900.00
Member B's deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $260.00 = $1240.00
Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $2140.00 = $860.00
The deductible applied is min($1240.00, $860.00, $2900.00) = $860.00. This amount goes towards the family deductible.
Remaining allowed after deductible: $2900.00 - $860.00 = $2040.00.
Coinsurance applies: $2040.00 * 20% = $408.00.
Member B's total cost share: $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1268.00.
Member B's OOPM remaining: $6000.00 - $260.00 = $5740.00. $1268.00 is within this.
The plan pays: $2900.00 - $1268.00 = $1632.00.
Updating accumulators after Claim 3:
* Member A: Deductible $1500.00; OOPM $1884.00 (unchanged)
* Member B: Deductible $260.00 + $860.00 = $1120.00; OOPM $260.00 + $1268.00 = $1528.00
* Member C: Deductible $380.00; OOPM $380.00 (unchanged)
* Family: Deductible $2140.00 + $860.00 = $3000.00; OOPM $2524.00 + $1268.00 = $3792.00
Crucially, the family deductible is now fully met.
**Claim 4 (Member A):**
* Date: 2026-07-15
* Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network
* Allowed amount: $640.00
Member A's deductible remaining: $0.00 (Individual met $1500.00, Family met $3000.00).
Family deductible remaining: $0.00.
Deductible applied: $0.00.
Remaining allowed amount: $640.00.
Coinsurance applies: $640.00 * 20% = $128.00.
Member A's total cost share: $128.00 (coinsurance).
Member A's OOPM remaining: $6000.00 - $1884.00 = $4116.00. $128.00 is within this.
The plan pays: $640.00 - $128.00 = $512.00.
Now, to provide the requested details for Claim 4 and the final accumulator balances:
**Claim 4 Components:**
* member_responsibility: $128.00
* plan_paid: $512.00
* deductible_applied: $0.00
* copay_amount: $0.00 (No copay applicable for this service type per my understanding of the plan benefits not explicitly listed with a copay.)
* coinsurance_amount: $128.00
**Final Accumulator Balances:**
* ending_deductible_a: $1500.00
* ending_oopm_a: $1884.00 (from C1) + $128.00 (from C4) = $2012.00
* ending_deductible_b: $1120.00
* ending_oopm_b: $1528.00
* ending_deductible_c: $380.00
* ending_oopm_c: $380.00
* ending_family_deductible: $3000.00 (fully met)
* ending_family_oopm: $3792.00 (from C1-C3) + $128.00 (from C4) = $3920.00
A quick double-check of the math confirms these figures. The individual deductibles are $1500, $1120, and $380. The family deductible hit $3000 after Claim 3. Member A's OOPM increased by $128 for Claim 4, bringing their total to $2012. The family OOPM also increased by that $128, totaling $3920. Everything aligns.
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,785 tokens
**Navigating the Deductible and Out-of-Pocket Maximums: A Thought Process**
Okay, let's break down these claims. I've got a plan with a $1,500 individual deductible and a $3,000 family deductible, which is embedded. The individual out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM) is $6,000, and the family OOPM is $12,000. Coinsurance in-network is a flat 20%.
Before these claims, my accumulators looked like this:
* **A:** $1,180 met on deductible, $1,180 met on OOPM.
* **B:** $260 met on deductible, $260 met on OOPM.
* **C:** $0 met on deductible, $0 met on OOPM.
* **Family:** $1,440 met on deductible, $1,440 met on OOPM.
**Claim 1 – 2026-06-02 – A (Outpatient endoscopy, In-network, $2240 Allowed)**
First, I need to figure out how much of A's individual deductible is left. They had $1,180 met, so $1,500 - $1,180 = $320 is remaining. The family deductible also has a remaining balance: $3,000 - $1,440 = $1,560. Since $320 is less than $1,560, I'll apply $320 towards A's individual deductible.
After applying the deductible, the remaining allowed amount is $2,240 - $320 = $1,920. Now, I need to factor in the 20% coinsurance. That's 20% of $1,920, which comes out to $384.
The total member cost for this claim is the deductible amount plus the coinsurance: $320 + $384 = $704. A's OOPM is well over this amount, so I don't need to worry about hitting that limit yet.
Let's update the accumulators:
* **A:** Deductible: $1,180 + $320 = $1,500 (met!). OOPM: $1,180 + $704 = $1,884.
* **B:** No change: $260 deductible, $260 OOPM.
* **C:** No change: $0 deductible, $0 OOPM.
* **Family:** Deductible: $1,440 + $320 = $1,760. OOPM: $1,440 + $704 = $2,144.
**Claim 2 – 2026-06-11 – C (Diagnostic lab panel, In-network, $380 Allowed)**
For C, their individual deductible is still $1,500. The family deductible now has $3,000 - $1,760 = $1,240 remaining. The allowed amount for this claim is $380. Since $380 is less than the remaining family deductible, I'll apply the full $380 towards the family deductible. This $380 also contributes to C's individual deductible as it's the first claim for them.
The remaining allowed amount is $380 - $380 = $0. So, the member cost share is just the $380 deductible.
Updating the accumulators:
* **A:** No change: $1,500 deductible, $1,884 OOPM.
* **B:** No change: $260 deductible, $260 OOPM.
* **C:** Deductible: $0 + $380 = $380. OOPM: $0 + $380 = $380.
* **Family:** Deductible: $1,760 + $380 = $2,140. OOPM: $2,144 + $380 = $2,524.
**Claim 3 – 2026-06-27 – B (Outpatient surgery, In-network, $2900 Allowed)**
Now for B. They have $1,500 - $260 = $1,240 of their individual deductible remaining. The family deductible has $3,000 - $2,140 = $860 remaining. The rule here is that the lesser of the individual or family remaining deductible gets applied. So, $860 is applied. This $860 contributes to both B's individual deductible and the family deductible.
The remaining allowed amount is $2,900 - $860 = $2,040. Now, the 20% coinsurance applies: 20% of $2,040 is $408.
The total member cost share for this claim is the deductible amount plus the coinsurance: $860 + $408 = $1,268.
Let's update the accumulators:
* **A:** No change: $1,500 deductible, $1,884 OOPM.
* **B:** Deductible: $260 + $860 = $1,120. OOPM: $260 + $1,268 = $1,528.
* **C:** No change: $380 deductible, $380 OOPM.
* **Family:** Deductible: $2,140 + $860 = $3,000 (met!). OOPM: $2,524 + $1,268 = $3,792.
I'm re-checking my logic on Claim 3's deductible application. B had $1,240 of their individual deductible left, and the family deductible had $860 remaining. The plan says an individual satisfies their deductible, and the family deductible is satisfied when the total family credits reach the family amount, *whichever comes first*. In this case, the family deductible was met at $860. So, B applies $860 towards their deductible, and this brings the family deductible to its maximum. My total family credits calculation confirms this: A (1500) + B (260+860=1120) + C (380) = 3000. This looks correct.
**Claim 4 – 2026-07-15 – A (Follow-up imaging, In-network, $640 Allowed)**
For A, their individual deductible is already met ($1,500). The family deductible is also met ($3,000). Therefore, no deductible is applied to this claim ($0 deductible applied). The remaining allowed amount is $640.
The 20% coinsurance applies: 20% of $640 is $128. The total member cost share is $128.
Now I update A's OOPM and the family OOPM:
* A's OOPM after this claim: $1,884 + $128 = $2,012.
* Family OOPM after this claim: $3,792 + $128 = $3,920.
Let me just quickly verify the components of this claim:
* Member responsibility: $128.00 (this is the coinsurance).
* Plan paid: $640.00 - $128.00 = $512.00.
* Deductible applied: $0.00.
* Copay amount: $0.00.
* Coinsurance amount: $128.00.
And the final accumulator state:
* **A:** Deductible: $1,500.00. OOPM: $2,012.00.
* **B:** Deductible: $1,120.00. OOPM: $1,528.00.
* **C:** Deductible: $380.00. OOPM: $380.00.
* **Family:** Deductible: $3,000.00. OOPM: $3,920.00.
Everything seems to add up correctly. The logic flow for applying deductibles and then coinsurance, with both individual and family limits in play, has been followed.
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 4,930 tokens
**Adjudicating Claims for the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 Plan**
Alright, so I'm looking at a series of claims for a family on the "Bluebonnet PPO 1500" plan for the 2026 plan year. I need to meticulously track how these claims impact their deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums, considering both individual and family limits, and the plan's 20% coinsurance.
First, I've got the plan parameters clear:
* Individual Deductible (INN): $1500.00
* Family Deductible (INN): $3000.00 (with an embedded structure, meaning a member's contribution counts towards both their individual and the family deductible, and the lesser of the remaining individual or family need dictates how much deductible is applied at a given moment).
* Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM - INN): $6000.00
* Family OOPM (INN): $12000.00
* Coinsurance (INN): 20% for the member, 80% for the plan.
* Important note: Copays don't apply to deductibles but *do* apply to the OOPM. All calculations are based on the ALLOWED amount.
Now, let's check the starting accumulators *before* any of these claims roll in:
* Member A (Subscriber): Deductible $1180.00, OOP $1180.00
* Member B (Spouse): Deductible $260.00, OOP $260.00
* Member C (Child): Deductible $0.00, OOP $0.00
* Family Totals: Deductible $1440.00, OOP $1440.00
**Claim 1: Outpatient Endoscopy for Member A (Subscriber)**
* **Service:** Outpatient endoscopy, in-network.
* **Billed:** $4144.00, **Allowed:** $2240.00.
* **Deductible Calculation:**
* Member A's individual deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $1180.00 = $320.00.
* Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $1440.00 = $1560.00.
* The amount applied to the deductible is the *lesser* of these two, so $320.00. This satisfies Member A's individual deductible fully.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:**
* Allowed amount remaining after deductible: $2240.00 - $320.00 = $1920.00.
* Member's coinsurance (20%): 0.20 \* $1920.00 = $384.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A: New Ded = $1180.00 + $320.00 = $1500.00; New OOP = $1180.00 + $704.00 = $1884.00.
* Family: New Ded = $1440.00 + $320.00 = $1760.00; New OOP = $1440.00 + $704.00 = $2144.00.
* **Plan Paid:** $2240.00 (Allowed) - $704.00 (Member Responsibility) = $1536.00.
**Claim 2: Diagnostic Laboratory Panel for Member C (Child)**
* **Service:** Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network.
* **Billed:** $703.00, **Allowed:** $380.00.
* **Deductible Calculation:**
* Member C's individual deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $0.00 = $1500.00.
* Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $1760.00 (after Claim 1) = $1240.00.
* The amount applied to the deductible is $380.00, as it's less than both remaining individual and family needs. This fully satisfies the family deductible requirement for this service.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:**
* Allowed amount remaining after deductible: $380.00 - $380.00 = $0.00.
* Member's coinsurance: $0.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** $380.00 (deductible).
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member C: New Ded = $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00; New OOP = $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00.
* Family: New Ded = $1760.00 + $380.00 = $2140.00; New OOP = $2144.00 + $380.00 = $2524.00.
* **Plan Paid:** $380.00 (Allowed) - $380.00 (Member Responsibility) = $0.00.
**Claim 3: Outpatient Surgery for Member B (Spouse)**
* **Service:** Outpatient surgery, in-network.
* **Billed:** $5365.00, **Allowed:** $2900.00.
* **Deductible Calculation:**
* Member B's individual deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $260.00 = $1240.00.
* Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $2140.00 (after Claim 2) = $860.00.
* The amount applied to the deductible is the *lesser* of these two, which is $860.00. This means the family deductible is now fully met ($2140.00 + $860.00 = $3000.00). Member B's individual deductible has $1240.00 - $860.00 = $380.00 remaining unmet.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:**
* Allowed amount remaining after deductible: $2900.00 - $860.00 = $2040.00.
* Member's coinsurance (20%): 0.20 \* $2040.00 = $408.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1268.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member B: New Ded = $260.00 + $860.00 = $1120.00; New OOP = $260.00 + $1268.00 = $1528.00.
* Family: New Ded = $2140.00 + $860.00 = $3000.00 (Family Deductible met!); New OOP = $2524.00 + $1268.00 = $3792.00.
* **Plan Paid:** $2900.00 (Allowed) - $1268.00 (Member Responsibility) = $1632.00.
**Claim 4: Follow-up Imaging for Member A (Subscriber)**
* **Service:** Follow-up imaging, in-network.
* **Billed:** $1184.00, **Allowed:** $640.00.
* **Deductible Calculation:**
* Member A's individual deductible remaining: $1500.00 - $1500.00 (after Claim 1) = $0.00.
* Family deductible remaining: $3000.00 - $3000.00 (after Claim 3) = $0.00.
* Deductible applied: $0.00, since both individual and family deductibles are met.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:**
* Allowed amount remaining after deductible: $640.00 - $0.00 = $640.00.
* Member's coinsurance (20%): 0.20 \* $640.00 = $128.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** $0.00 (deductible) + $128.00 (coinsurance) = $128.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A: New Ded = $1500.00 + $0.00 = $1500.00; New OOP = $1884.00 + $128.00 = $2012.00.
* Family: New Ded = $3000.00 + $0.00 = $3000.00; New OOP = $3792.00 + $128.00 = $3920.00.
* **Plan Paid:** $640.00 (Allowed) - $128.00 (Member Responsibility) = $512.00.
**Final Summary of Claim 4 Components:**
* member\_responsibility: 128.00
* plan\_paid: 512.00
* deductible\_applied: 0.00
* copay\_amount: 0.00
* coinsurance\_amount: 128.00
**Final Member and Family Accumulators:**
* **Member A:**
* ending\_deductible\_a: 1500.00
* ending\_oopm\_a: 2012.00
* **Member B:**
* ending\_deductible\_b: 1120.00
* ending\_oopm\_b: 1528.00
* **Member C:**
* ending\_deductible\_c: 380.00
* ending\_oopm\_c: 380.00
* **Family Totals:**
* ending\_family\_deductible: 3000.00
* ending\_family\_oopm: 3920.00
Here's the final breakdown in the requested JSON format:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Opus 5 · Anthropic8.8s · 814 out | 9.2s · 850 out | 10.1s · 921 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 3 Flash · Google81.6s · 13,300 out | 88.9s · 14,082 out | 46.7s · 7,492 out
Reasoning · 13,063 tokens
**Processing Health Claims Under the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 Plan**
Alright, let's walk through this. I've got the details for the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan, and I need to figure out how claims are adjudicated, paying close attention to deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums (OOPM), and coinsurance, especially with the embedded structure.
Here's the plan's structure as I understand it:
* **Individual Deductible (In-network):** $1,500.00
* **Family Deductible (In-network):** $3,000.00 (Embedded)
* **Individual OOPM (In-network):** $6,000.00
* **Family OOPM (In-network):** $12,000.00
* **Coinsurance (In-network):** 20% member / 80% plan
* **Copays:** PCP ($30), Specialist ($60), Urgent Care ($75), ER ($400), Generic Pharmacy ($15). These do *not* credit the deductible but *do* credit the OOPM.
* **Preventive care:** No cost share.
* **Adjudication Order:** Claims must be processed sequentially.
The key to this is the embedded deductible structure. It means an individual's deductible counts towards their own $1,500 individual deductible, but it also contributes to the overall family deductible of $3,000. Once the family deductible is met, the plan starts covering its share (coinsurance) for everyone, even if their individual deductibles aren't fully satisfied.
Let's track the accumulators for each member (A, B, C) and the family, starting with their initial contributions before these claims:
* **Member A:** Deductible $1,180.00, OOPM $1,180.00
* **Member B:** Deductible $260.00, OOPM $260.00
* **Member C:** Deductible $0.00, OOPM $0.00
* **Family:** Deductible $1,440.00 ($1180 + $260 + $0), OOPM $1,440.00
Now, let's process each claim in order:
**Claim 1: Outpatient endoscopy (in-network) for Member A**
* Allowed Amount: $2,240.00
* Member A's individual deductible remaining: $1,500.00 - $1,180.00 = $320.00
* Family deductible remaining: $3,000.00 - $1,440.00 = $1,560.00
* Deductible Applied: The lesser of the remaining allowed amount ($2,240.00), Member A's remaining individual deductible ($320.00), and the family remaining deductible ($1,560.00). This is $320.00. Member A's individual deductible is now satisfied.
* Remaining Allowed Amount (subject to coinsurance): $2,240.00 - $320.00 = $1,920.00
* Coinsurance (20%): $1,920.00 * 0.20 = $384.00
* Member A's total responsibility for this claim: $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00
* Plan Paid: $2,240.00 - $704.00 = $1,536.00
* **New Accumulators for Member A:**
* Deductible: $1,180.00 + $320.00 = $1,500.00 (Satisfied)
* OOPM: $1,180.00 + $704.00 = $1,884.00
* **New Family Accumulators:**
* Deductible: $1,440.00 + $320.00 = $1,760.00
* OOPM: $1,440.00 + $704.00 = $2,144.00
**Claim 2: Diagnostic laboratory panel (in-network) for Member C**
* Allowed Amount: $380.00
* Member C's individual deductible remaining: $1,500.00 - $0.00 = $1,500.00
* Family deductible remaining: $3,000.00 - $1,760.00 = $1,240.00
* Deductible Applied: The lesser of the allowed amount ($380.00), Member C's remaining individual deductible ($1,500.00), and the family remaining deductible ($1,240.00). This is $380.00.
* Remaining Allowed Amount (subject to coinsurance): $380.00 - $380.00 = $0.00
* Coinsurance: $0.00
* Member C's total responsibility for this claim: $380.00 (deductible)
* Plan Paid: $380.00 - $380.00 = $0.00
* **New Accumulators for Member C:**
* Deductible: $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00
* OOPM: $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00
* **New Family Accumulators:**
* Deductible: $1,760.00 + $380.00 = $2,140.00
* OOPM: $2,144.00 + $380.00 = $2,524.00
**Claim 3: Outpatient surgery (in-network) for Member B**
* Allowed Amount: $2,900.00
* Member B's individual deductible remaining: $1,500.00 - $260.00 = $1,240.00
* Family deductible remaining: $3,000.00 - $2,140.00 = $860.00
* Deductible Applied: The lesser of the allowed amount ($2,900.00), Member B's remaining individual deductible ($1,240.00), and the family remaining deductible ($860.00). This is $860.00. This application of $860.00 causes the family deductible to be met ($2,140.00 + $860.00 = $3,000.00).
* Remaining Allowed Amount (subject to coinsurance): $2,900.00 - $860.00 = $2,040.00
* Coinsurance (20%): $2,040.00 * 0.20 = $408.00
* Member B's total responsibility for this claim: $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1,268.00
* Plan Paid: $2,900.00 - $1,268.00 = $1,632.00
* **New Accumulators for Member B:**
* Deductible: $260.00 + $860.00 = $1,120.00
* OOPM: $260.00 + $1,268.00 = $1,528.00
* **New Family Accumulators:**
* Deductible: $2,140.00 + $860.00 = $3,000.00 (Satisfied)
* OOPM: $2,524.00 + $1,268.00 = $3,792.00
**Claim 4: Follow-up imaging (in-network) for Member A**
* Allowed Amount: $640.00
* Member A's individual deductible: Already met ($1,500.00).
* Family deductible: Already met ($3,000.00).
* Deductible Applied: $0.00.
* Copay: Not applicable for imaging services as per the plan's copay structure.
* Coinsurance (20%): $640.00 * 0.20 = $128.00
* Member A's total responsibility for this claim: $128.00 (coinsurance)
* Plan Paid: $640.00 - $128.00 = $512.00
* **New Accumulators for Member A:**
* OOPM: $1,884.00 + $128.00 = $2,012.00
* **New Family Accumulators:**
* OOPM: $3,792.00 + $128.00 = $3,920.00
**Final Accumulator Summary:**
* **Member A:**
* Ending Deductible: $1,500.00
* Ending OOPM: $2,012.00
* **Member B:**
* Ending Deductible: $1,120.00
* Ending OOPM: $1,528.00
* **Member C:**
* Ending Deductible: $380.00
* Ending OOPM: $380.00
* **Family:**
* Ending Deductible: $3,000.00
* Ending OOPM: $3,920.00
And for the final output, specifically for the last processed claim (Claim 4 for Member A):
* member\_responsibility: 128.00
* plan\_paid: 512.00
* deductible\_applied: 0.00
* copay\_amount: 0.00
* coinsurance\_amount: 128.00
* ending\_deductible\_a: 1500.00
* ending\_oopm\_a: 2012.00
* ending\_deductible\_b: 1120.00
* ending\_oopm\_b: 1528.00
* ending\_deductible\_c: 380.00
* ending\_oopm\_c: 380.00
* ending\_family\_deductible: 3000.00
* ending\_family\_oopm: 3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 13,847 tokens
**My Thought Process on Processing These Health Insurance Claims**
Alright, let's break down these claims systematically. I've got the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan details in front of me, and I need to track member responsibility and accumulator balances through a series of in-network services.
First, I'll establish the core plan parameters:
* Individual Deductible (In-network): $1,500.00
* Family Deductible (In-network): $3,000.00 (Embedded)
* In-network Coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan
* Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM): $6,000.00 (In-network)
* Family OOPM: $12,000.00 (In-network)
I also note that copays don't count towards the deductible but *do* count towards the OOPM. Preventive services are 100% covered. Emergency room has a $400 copay, waived if inpatient.
Now, let's look at the family's starting point:
* Subscriber A: Ded $1,180.00, OOPM $1,180.00
* Spouse B: Ded $260.00, OOPM $260.00
* Child C: Ded $0.00, OOPM $0.00
* Family: Ded $1,440.00, OOPM $1,440.00
Okay, this gives me my baseline accumulators for each individual and the family.
**Claim 1: Member A - Outpatient endoscopy (In-network)**
* Allowed Amount: $2,240.00
* Member A's current deductible remaining: $1,500 - $1,180 = $320.00
* Family's current deductible remaining: $3,000 - $1,440 = $1,560.00
* The deductible applied to this claim will be the *lesser* of the remaining individual need ($320) or family need ($1,560). So, $320.00 is applied to the deductible.
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $2,240.00 (Allowed) - $320.00 (Deductible) = $1,920.00
* Member A's coinsurance: 20% of $1,920.00 = $384.00
* Total Member Responsibility (Claim 1): $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00
* Plan Paid (Claim 1): $2,240.00 - $704.00 = $1,536.00
* Updating accumulators for Member A:
* Deductible: $1,180.00 + $320.00 = $1,500.00 (Individual Deductible Met)
* OOPM: $1,180.00 + $704.00 = $1,884.00 (Still well below $6,000)
* Updating family accumulators:
* Deductible: $1,440.00 + $320.00 = $1,760.00
* OOPM: $1,440.00 + $704.00 = $2,144.00
**Claim 2: Member C - Diagnostic laboratory panel (In-network)**
* Allowed Amount: $380.00
* Member C's current deductible remaining: $1,500.00 (as C started at $0)
* Family's current deductible remaining: $3,000 - $1,760 = $1,240.00
* The deductible applied will be the lesser of: the allowed amount ($380), C's remaining individual deductible ($1,500), or the family's remaining deductible ($1,240). The $380 allowed amount is the smallest, so that's what's applied to the deductible.
* Deductible Applied: $380.00
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $380.00 - $380.00 = $0.00
* Total Member Responsibility (Claim 2): $380.00 (deductible)
* Plan Paid (Claim 2): $0.00
* Updating accumulators for Member C:
* Deductible: $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00
* OOPM: $0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00
* Updating family accumulators:
* Deductible: $1,760.00 + $380.00 = $2,140.00
* OOPM: $2,144.00 + $380.00 = $2,524.00
**Claim 3: Member B - Outpatient surgery (In-network)**
* Allowed Amount: $2,900.00
* Member B's current deductible remaining: $1,500 - $260 = $1,240.00
* Family's current deductible remaining: $3,000 - $2,140 = $860.00
* The deductible applied will be the lesser of: Member B's remaining individual ($1,240) or the family's remaining ($860). The family remainder of $860 is the limiting factor.
* Deductible Applied: $860.00
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $2,900.00 (Allowed) - $860.00 (Deductible) = $2,040.00
* Member B's coinsurance: 20% of $2,040.00 = $408.00
* Total Member Responsibility (Claim 3): $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1,268.00
* Plan Paid (Claim 3): $2,900.00 - $1,268.00 = $1,632.00
* Updating accumulators for Member B:
* Deductible: $260.00 + $860.00 = $1,120.00
* OOPM: $260.00 + $1,268.00 = $1,528.00 (Still below $6,000)
* Updating family accumulators:
* Deductible: $2,140.00 + $860.00 = $3,000.00 (Family Deductible MET)
* OOPM: $2,524.00 + $1,268.00 = $3,792.00
**Claim 4: Member A - Follow-up imaging (In-network)**
* Allowed Amount: $640.00
* Member A's current deductible: $1,500.00 (already met in Claim 1). So, $0.00 deductible applied.
* Family's current deductible: $3,000.00 (already met in Claim 3). So, $0.00 deductible applied.
* Deductible Applied: $0.00
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $640.00 - $0.00 = $640.00
* Member A's coinsurance: 20% of $640.00 = $128.00
* Total Member Responsibility (Claim 4): $0.00 (deductible) + $128.00 (coinsurance) = $128.00
* Plan Paid (Claim 4): $640.00 - $128.00 = $512.00
* Updating accumulators for Member A:
* Deductible: $1,500.00 (no change)
* OOPM: $1,884.00 (from before) + $128.00 = $2,012.00 (Still below $6,000)
* Updating family accumulators:
* Deductible: $3,000.00 (no change)
* OOPM: $3,792.00 (from before) + $128.00 = $3,920.00 (Still below $12,000)
**Final Accumulators and Claim Summary:**
After processing all four claims, here are the final accumulator balances and the outcome for the last claim (Claim 4):
* **Member Responsibility for Claim 4:** $128.00
* **Plan Paid for Claim 4:** $512.00
* **Deductible Applied for Claim 4:** $0.00
* **Copay Amount for Claim 4:** $0.00 (Imaging services don't typically have a copay unless specified, and this one doesn't)
* **Coinsurance Amount for Claim 4:** $128.00
* **Ending Deductible for Member A:** $1,500.00
* **Ending OOPM for Member A:** $2,012.00
* **Ending Deductible for Member B:** $1,120.00
* **Ending OOPM for Member B:** $1,528.00
* **Ending Deductible for Member C:** $380.00
* **Ending OOPM for Member C:** $380.00
* **Ending Family Deductible:** $3,000.00
* **Ending Family OOPM:** $3,920.00
I've reviewed the calculations multiple times, particularly the application of the embedded deductible and the sequence of how individual and family balances are affected. The math holds up, and the rules for how deductibles and OOPMs are met and updated have been applied consistently.
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 7,255 tokens
**My Thought Process on Bluebonnet PPO 1500 Embedded Deductible Plan for Plan Year 2026**
Alright, let's break down this Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan, focusing on the 2026 plan year and its embedded deductible structure. I'm looking at the in-network benefits here, with an individual deductible of $1500 and a family deductible of $3000. The individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum (OOPM) is $6000, and the family OOPM is $12000. Coinsurance is set at 20% for the member after the deductible is met. A crucial detail is that copays (which don't apply to these specific services, but it's good to note) credit the OOPM, not the deductible. The "embedded" structure means an individual's deductible can be met on its own, or the family deductible can be met by the sum of individual contributions.
Now, let's walk through these specific claims and update the accumulators step-by-step.
**Claim 1: Outpatient Endoscopy for Member A (Allowed Amount: $2240)**
* **Deductible Application:** I first check Member A's individual deductible. They've already contributed $1180, leaving a remainder of $1500 - $1180 = $320. Then, I look at the family deductible. The family has contributed $1440 so far, leaving a remainder of $3000 - $1440 = $1560. Since A's individual remainder ($320) is less than the family's remainder ($1560), the deductible applied to this claim is $320.
* **Remaining Amount for Coinsurance:** After applying the deductible, the remaining allowed amount is $2240 - $320 = $1920.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:** Member A is responsible for 20% of this remaining amount: $1920 * 0.20 = $384.
* **Total Member Responsibility:** Member A's total responsibility for this claim is the deductible amount plus the coinsurance: $320 + $384 = $704.
* **OOPM Check:** Member A's OOPM remainder was $6000 - $1180 = $4820. Their total cost share for this claim ($704) is well within this limit.
* **Plan Paid:** The plan covers the rest: $2240 (Allowed) - $704 (Member Responsibility) = $1536.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A: Deductible is now $1180 + $320 = $1500 (individual deductible met). OOPM is now $1180 + $704 = $1884.
* Family: Deductible is now $1440 + $320 = $1760. OOPM is now $1440 + $704 = $2144.
**Claim 2: Diagnostic Laboratory Panel for Member C (Allowed Amount: $380)**
* **Deductible Application:** Member C's individual deductible remainder is $1500 - $0 = $1500. The family deductible remainder is $3000 - $1760 = $1240. Since the allowed amount ($380) is less than both remainders, the full $380 is applied to the deductible. I'll apply it to the family deductible first as that's the constraint here.
* **Remaining Amount for Coinsurance:** $380 - $380 = $0. No coinsurance applies.
* **Total Member Responsibility:** Member C's responsibility is $380 (deductible).
* **Plan Paid:** $380 (Allowed) - $380 (Member Responsibility) = $0.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member C: Deductible is now $0 + $380 = $380. OOPM is now $0 + $380 = $380.
* Family: Deductible is now $1760 + $380 = $2140. OOPM is now $2144 + $380 = $2524.
**Claim 3: Outpatient Surgery for Member B (Allowed Amount: $2900)**
* **Deductible Application:** Member B's individual deductible remainder is $1500 - $260 = $1240. The family deductible remainder is $3000 - $2140 = $860. The lesser of these two is $860, so $860 is applied to the deductible. This amount contributes to the family deductible, bringing it to $2140 + $860 = $3000, which means the family deductible is now met.
* **Remaining Amount for Coinsurance:** $2900 (Allowed) - $860 (Deductible Applied) = $2040.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:** Member B is responsible for 20% of this: $2040 * 0.20 = $408.
* **Total Member Responsibility:** Member B's total responsibility is $860 (deductible) + $408 (coinsurance) = $1268.
* **OOPM Check:** Member B's OOPM remainder was $6000 - $260 = $5740. Their total cost share for this claim ($1268) is well within this limit.
* **Plan Paid:** $2900 (Allowed) - $1268 (Member Responsibility) = $1632.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member B: Deductible is now $260 + $860 = $1120. OOPM is now $260 + $1268 = $1528.
* Family: Deductible is now $2140 + $860 = $3000 (family deductible met). OOPM is now $2524 + $1268 = $3792.
**Claim 4: Follow-up Imaging for Member A (Allowed Amount: $640)**
* **Deductible Application:** Member A's individual deductible was met in Claim 1 ($1500). The family deductible was met in Claim 3 ($3000). Therefore, no deductible applies to this claim. Deductible applied = $0.
* **Remaining Amount for Coinsurance:** $640 - $0 = $640.
* **Coinsurance Calculation:** Member A is responsible for 20% of this: $640 * 0.20 = $128.
* **Total Member Responsibility:** Member A's responsibility for this claim is $128.
* **OOPM Check:** Member A's OOPM remainder was $6000 - $1884 = $4116. Their cost share for this claim ($128) is well within this.
* **Plan Paid:** $640 (Allowed) - $128 (Member Responsibility) = $512.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A: Deductible remains $1500. OOPM is now $1884 + $128 = $2012.
* Family: Deductible remains $3000. OOPM is now $3792 + $128 = $3920.
**Final Claim Components (Claim 4 - Member A):**
* member_responsibility: 128.00
* plan_paid: 512.00
* deductible_applied: 0.00
* copay_amount: 0.00
* coinsurance_amount: 128.00
**Final Accumulators (End of Claims):**
* ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
* ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
* ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
* ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
* ending_deductible_c: 380.00
* ending_oopm_c: 380.00
* ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
* ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
I've reviewed the embedded deductible logic, the application of deductibles and coinsurance based on individual and family contributions, and confirmed that the OOPM limits are not exceeded. The calculations seem to hold up, and the accumulators accurately reflect the cost sharing across all members and the family unit.
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Kimi K3 · Moonshot36.1s · 2,412 out | 80.3s · 1,704 out | 47.5s · 1,817 out
Reasoning · 1,848 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
- Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
- OOPM individual in-network: 6000.00; Family: 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
- Member cost share from allowed amount.
- These claims are not copay services (endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging) — they're subject to deductible and coinsurance. No copay.
Starting accumulators before Claim 1:
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
Claim 1 — A, 2026-06-02, outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00.
A's deductible remainder (individual): 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
Under embedded, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Lesser = 320.00.
So deductible applied = min(320, allowed) = 320.00.
After deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00 subject to coinsurance 20% = 384.00.
Member responsibility = 320 + 384 = 704.00.
Plan paid = 2240 - 704 = 1536.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOPM before = 1180. Adding 704 = 1884. Well below 6000. Family OOPM 1440 + 704 = 2144, below 12000. Fine.
After Claim 1:
- A: deductible = 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (satisfied). OOPM = 1180 + 704 = 1884.00.
- Family: deductible = 1440 + 320 = 1760.00. OOPM = 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
- B unchanged: ded 260, oopm 260.
- C unchanged: 0, 0.
Claim 2 — C, 2026-06-11, diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380.00.
C's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00.
Lesser = 1240.00 (family remainder). So C's deductible applied = min(1240, allowed 380) = 380.00.
Wait — under embedded structure, the member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. The family remainder is 1240, individual remainder is 1500. Lesser is 1240. So the amount of deductible credit C can receive before being considered satisfied... Actually, let me think about how this works.
The deductible applied to this claim: C pays at allowed rate until deductible satisfied. The deductible remaining for C is the lesser of individual remainder (1500) and family remainder (1240) = 1240. Since allowed (380) < 1240, the entire 380 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied = 380.00. Coinsurance = 0. Member responsibility = 380.00. Plan paid = 0.
After Claim 2:
- C: deductible = 0 + 380 = 380.00. OOPM = 0 + 380 = 380.00.
- Family: deductible = 1760 + 380 = 2140.00. OOPM = 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Claim 3 — B, 2026-06-27, outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00.
B's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00.
Lesser = 860.00 (family remainder). So B's deductible applied = min(860, 2900) = 860.00.
After deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00. Coinsurance 20% = 408.00.
Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00.
Plan paid = 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00.
Check OOPM limits: B OOPM before = 260. After adding 1268 = 1528. Below 6000. Family OOPM before = 2524. After = 3792. Below 12000. Fine.
After Claim 3:
- B: deductible = 260 + 860 = 1120.00. OOPM = 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
- Family: deductible = 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (satisfied). OOPM = 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
Note: family deductible now satisfied (3000). Also B's individual deductible is 1120 (not satisfied on its own), but family is satisfied, so for subsequent claims deductible is met for everyone.
Claim 4 — A, 2026-07-15, follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
A's individual deductible: 1500 satisfied already. Family deductible: 3000 satisfied. So deductible applied = 0.
Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.00.
Member responsibility = 128.00. Plan paid = 640 - 128 = 512.00.
Copay = 0 (not a copay service). Deductible applied = 0. Coinsurance amount = 128.00.
Check OOPM: A OOPM before = 1884. After = 1884 + 128 = 2012.00. Below 6000. Family OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920.00. Below 12000.
After Claim 4:
- A: deductible = 1500.00, OOPM = 2012.00.
- B: deductible = 1120.00, OOPM = 1528.00.
- C: deductible = 380.00, OOPM = 380.00.
- Family: deductible = 3000.00, OOPM = 3920.00.
Wait — let me double-check the family deductible accumulator. The family deductible accumulates credits. After Claim 3, family deductible = 2140 + 860 = 3000. Claim 4 has no deductible applied, so family deductible stays 3000. Good.
Let me verify the deductible_applied reporting for Claim 4: 0.00. copay_amount: 0.00. coinsurance_amount: 128.00.
member_responsibility + plan_paid = 128 + 512 = 640 = allowed. Good.
Now let me reconsider the embedded logic statement: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This is from the task family rules. So for each claim, the deductible remaining for that member = min(individual remainder, family remainder). That's what I used.
Claim 1: A individual remainder = 1500-1180 = 320. Family remainder = 3000-1440 = 1560. min = 320. Applied 320. Good.
Claim 2: C individual remainder = 1500. Family remainder = 1560-320 = 1240. min = 1240. Allowed 380 < 1240, so 380 applied. Good.
Claim 3: B individual remainder = 1240. Family remainder = 1240 - 380 = 860. min = 860. Applied 860. Good — family deductible now exactly 3000.
Everything consistent.
Ending accumulators:
- ending_deductible_a = 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a = 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b = 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b = 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c = 380.00
- ending_oopm_c = 380.00
- ending_family_deductible = 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm = 3920.00
Let me double check OOPM math:
A: start 1180. Claim1 member resp 704 → 1884. Claim4 member resp 128 → 2012. ✓
B: start 260. Claim3 member resp 1268 → 1528. ✓
C: start 0. Claim2 member resp 380 → 380. ✓
Family OOPM: 1180+260+0 = 1440 start. +704 = 2144. +380 = 2524. +1268 = 3792. +128 = 3920. ✓ Also equals sum of members: 2012+1528+380 = 3920. ✓
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 + 380 + 860 = 3000. ✓ Sum of member deductibles: 1500+1120+380 = 3000. ✓
Coinsurance claim 3: 2040 × 0.20 = 408.00 exactly. Claim 1: 1920 × 0.20 = 384.00. Claim 4: 640 × 0.20 = 128.00. All exact.
No OOPM is reached, so no 100% payment kicks in.
Format numbers with two decimals, plain numbers. The required keys list copay_amount — 0.00 since no copay service. deductible_applied — 0.00.
Output JSON only.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,520 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00
- Family in-network deductible: 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED — individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
- Individual OOPM in-network: 6000.00
- Family OOPM: 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays don't credit deductible; copays credit OOPM.
Starting accumulators:
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Embedded structure: A member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Deductible credits go to both member's own accumulator and family accumulator.
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A
- Outpatient endoscopy, in-network. No copay applies (it's not an office visit/urgent care/ER/pharmacy). Subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- Allowed: 2240.00
- A's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
- Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
- Deductible applied: lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) = 320.00
- After deductible: A's individual deductible = 1180 + 320 = 1500 (met). Family deductible = 1440 + 320 = 1760.
- Remaining allowed: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00
- Coinsurance: 20% of 1920 = 384.00 member; 80% = 1536.00 plan.
- Member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
- Plan paid: 1536.00
- A's OOP: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
- Family OOP: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
After Claim 1:
- A: ded 1500 (met), OOP 1884.00
- B: ded 260, OOP 260
- C: ded 0, OOP 0
- Family: ded 1760, OOP 2144.00
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C
- Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network. Subject to deductible/coinsurance (no copay category).
- Allowed: 380.00
- C's individual remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500
- Family remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240
- Deductible applied: lesser of 1500 and 1240 = 380 (limited by allowed amount, 380 < both). So 380.00.
- C's ded: 0 + 380 = 380. Family ded: 1760 + 380 = 2140.
- Remaining allowed: 0. Coinsurance: 0.
- Member responsibility: 380.00. Plan paid: 0.00.
- C's OOP: 0 + 380 = 380. Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
After Claim 2:
- A: ded 1500, OOP 1884.00
- B: ded 260, OOP 260
- C: ded 380, OOP 380
- Family: ded 2140, OOP 2524.00
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B
- Outpatient surgery, in-network. Deductible + coinsurance.
- Allowed: 2900.00
- B's individual remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240
- Family remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860
- Deductible applied: lesser of 1240 and 860 = 860.00 (embedded — family remainder caps).
- B's ded: 260 + 860 = 1120. Family ded: 2140 + 860 = 3000 (family deductible met).
- Remaining allowed: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
- Coinsurance: 20% = 408.00 member; 80% = 1632.00 plan.
- Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00
- Plan paid: 1632.00
- B's OOP: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
After Claim 3:
- A: ded 1500, OOP 1884.00
- B: ded 1120, OOP 1528.00
- C: ded 380, OOP 380
- Family: ded 3000 (met), OOP 3792.00
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A
- Follow-up imaging, in-network. Allowed: 640.00
- A's individual remainder: 1500 - 1500 = 0. Family remainder: 3000 - 3000 = 0.
- Deductible applied: 0.00
- Coinsurance: 20% of 640 = 128.00 member; 80% = 512.00 plan.
- Member responsibility: 128.00
- Plan paid: 512.00
- Check OOPM: A's OOP before = 1884.00. After: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00. Under 6000, fine.
- Family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
Ending accumulators:
- A: ded 1500.00, OOP 2012.00
- B: ded 1120.00, OOP 1528.00
- C: ded 380.00, OOP 380.00
- Family: ded 3000.00, OOP 3920.00
Verify family OOP = sum of member OOPs: 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920. ✓
Family deductible = 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000. ✓
Claim 4 components:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
member_responsibility + plan_paid = 128 + 512 = 640 = allowed. ✓
Now output JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,628 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Individual deductible in-network: 1500.00
- Family deductible in-network: 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED — individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
- OOPM: individual in-network 6000.00; family in-network 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
- Member cost share calculated from allowed amount.
Embedded structure: A member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Meaning: a member's deductible is met when either their own individual deductible (1500) is met OR the family deductible (3000) is met.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A
Outpatient endoscopy, in-network. Allowed 2240.00.
A's deductible remainder: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
Embedded: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) → 320.
Deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining allowed: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00
Coinsurance 20%: 384.00
Member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
Plan paid: 1920 × 0.80 = 1536.00
Check: 704 + 1536 = 2240. ✓
After Claim 1:
- A deductible: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (met)
- A OOP: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
- Family deductible: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00
- Family OOP: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C
Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network. Allowed 380.00.
C's deductible remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240
Embedded: lesser of 1500 and 1240 → 1240. But claim is only 380.00, so deductible applied = 380.00.
Deductible applied: 380.00
Coinsurance: 0
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
After Claim 2:
- C deductible: 0 + 380 = 380.00
- C OOP: 0 + 380 = 380.00
- Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00
- Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B
Outpatient surgery, in-network. Allowed 2900.00.
B's deductible remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860
Embedded: lesser of 1240 and 860 → 860.
Deductible applied: 860.00
Remaining allowed: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
Coinsurance 20%: 408.00
Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00
Plan paid: 2040 × 0.80 = 1632.00
Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900. ✓
After Claim 3:
- B deductible: 260 + 860 = 1120.00
- B OOP: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
- Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (met)
- Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
Note: B's individual deductible is 1120, not met at individual level, but family deductible is now met (3000). Under embedded structure, once the family deductible is met, all members are treated as having met the deductible. So B's deductible is effectively satisfied via the family. But what do we report for ending_deductible_b? The accumulator balance is 1120.00. Hmm — the question asks for "ending accumulators". The accumulator is the running total of credits. B's deductible credits = 1120.00. Family = 3000.00.
Actually, let me think about what "ending_deductible" means — the accumulator total. I'll report the raw accumulator values: A 1500, B 1120, C 380, family 3000. Sum check: 1500+1120+380 = 3000. ✓ Good, that's consistent.
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A
Follow-up imaging, in-network. Allowed 640.00.
A's deductible: met (1500). Family deductible: met (3000). So no deductible.
Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.00
Member responsibility: 128.00
Plan paid: 512.00
Deductible applied: 0.00
Copay: 0.00 (imaging is not a copay service)
Coinsurance: 128.00
After Claim 4:
- A deductible: 1500.00
- A OOP: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
- Family deductible: 3000.00
- Family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
Ending accumulators:
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
For Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Check OOP sums: 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920. ✓
All numbers as strings or numbers? The instructions say "Numbers are plain, two decimal places". Looking at the output contract: dollar amounts as plain numbers with two decimals. In JSON, numbers like 1500.00 would be represented as 1500.00 (JSON allows it, though parsers read as 1500). To be safe, I could emit them as numbers with two decimals written literally: 1500.00. JSON supports that notation. Graders parse JSON, so 1500.00 → 1500.0. Either way. I'll write numbers with two decimal places in the JSON literal.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Gemini 2.5 Pro · Google39.2s · 4,552 out | 46.0s · 4,956 out | 47.4s · 5,530 out
Reasoning · 4,316 tokens
Alright, let's break this down. I've been tasked with processing four claims under the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan and reporting the final state of the family's accumulators, with a specific focus on the cost-sharing breakdown for the last claim. This requires a careful, step-by-step adjudication, tracking how each claim impacts the individual and family deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums.
First, I need to get a clear picture of the plan details and the starting point for our accumulators. The Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan has a $1500 individual/$3000 family deductible and a $6000 individual/$12000 family OOPM, with a 20% member coinsurance after the deductible is met. The plan is embedded, which is a crucial detail for how individual and family deductibles interact. Preventative care is 100% covered, but these claims are for diagnostics and treatment, so they won't be affected by that rule.
The initial accumulators show:
* **Member A (subscriber):** Deductible $1180.00, OOPM $1180.00. This means they have $320.00 left on their individual deductible ($1500 - $1180) and $4820.00 left on their OOPM ($6000 - $1180).
* **Member B (spouse):** Deductible $260.00, OOPM $260.00. They have $1240.00 left on their individual deductible ($1500 - $260) and $5740.00 left on their OOPM ($6000 - $260).
* **Member C (child):** Deductible $0.00, OOPM $0.00. They have their full $1500.00 individual deductible remaining and $6000.00 OOPM remaining.
* **Family:** Deductible $1440.00, OOPM $1440.00. This means the family has $1560.00 left on the family deductible ($3000 - $1440) and $10560.00 left on the family OOPM ($12000 - $1440).
Now, let's process each claim sequentially.
**Claim 1: Member A, Outpatient Endoscopy, $2240.00 Allowed Amount**
* Member A has $320.00 remaining on their individual deductible, and the family has $1560.00 remaining on the family deductible.
* Since the plan is embedded, Member A's individual deductible needs to be satisfied first. The amount applied to the deductible is the lesser of their remaining individual deductible ($320) and the remaining family deductible ($1560), which is $320.
* So, $320.00 is applied to Member A's deductible, bringing it to met ($1180 + $320 = $1500).
* The remaining amount is $2240.00 - $320.00 = $1920.00. This amount is subject to coinsurance.
* Member's coinsurance: $1920.00 * 0.20 = $384.00.
* Plan's coinsurance: $1920.00 * 0.80 = $1536.00.
* Total Member Responsibility for Claim 1: $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A: Deductible=$1500.00, OOPM=$1180.00 + $704.00 = $1884.00.
* Family: Deductible=$1440.00 + $320.00 = $1760.00, OOPM=$1440.00 + $704.00 = $2144.00.
**Claim 2: Member C, Diagnostic Lab, $380.00 Allowed Amount**
* Member C has $1500.00 remaining on their individual deductible. The family now has $3000 - $1760 = $1240.00 remaining on the family deductible.
* The lesser of Member C's individual remaining deductible ($1500) and the family remaining deductible ($1240) is $1240. However, the claim amount ($380) is less than both.
* The full $380.00 is applied to the deductible. Since it's less than the family deductible remaining, it applies to the family deductible and Member C's individual deductible.
* Deductible Applied: $380.00.
* No remaining amount for coinsurance.
* Total Member Responsibility for Claim 2: $380.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member C: Deductible=$0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00, OOPM=$0.00 + $380.00 = $380.00.
* Family: Deductible=$1760.00 + $380.00 = $2140.00, OOPM=$2144.00 + $380.00 = $2524.00.
**Claim 3: Member B, Outpatient Surgery, $2900.00 Allowed Amount**
* Member B has $1500 - $260 = $1240.00 remaining on their individual deductible. The family now has $3000 - $2140 = $860.00 remaining on the family deductible.
* The amount applied to the deductible is the lesser of Member B's individual remaining ($1240) and the family remaining ($860), which is $860.00.
* This $860.00 is applied to the deductible. Crucially, this action *meets* the family deductible ($2140 + $860 = $3000). Once the family deductible is met, coinsurance applies to all members, regardless of their individual deductible status.
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $2900.00 - $860.00 = $2040.00.
* Member's coinsurance: $2040.00 * 0.20 = $408.00.
* Plan's coinsurance: $2040.00 * 0.80 = $1632.00.
* Total Member Responsibility for Claim 3: $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1268.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:**
* Member B: Deductible=$260.00 + $860.00 = $1120.00, OOPM=$260.00 + $1268.00 = $1528.00.
* Family: Deductible=$2140.00 + $860.00 = $3000.00 (MET), OOPM=$2524.00 + $1268.00 = $3792.00.
**Claim 4: Member A, Follow-up Imaging, $640.00 Allowed Amount**
* At this point, the family deductible is met. Member A's individual deductible was already met in Claim 1.
* Since the family deductible is met, all charges are now subject to coinsurance only. No deductible is applied to this claim.
* Remaining amount for coinsurance: $640.00.
* Member's coinsurance: $640.00 * 0.20 = $128.00.
* Plan's coinsurance: $640.00 * 0.80 = $512.00.
* Total Member Responsibility for Claim 4: $128.00.
* **Reportable values for Claim 4:**
* `member_responsibility`: 128.00
* `plan_paid`: 512.00
* `deductible_applied`: 0.00
* `copay_amount`: 0.00 (as this service doesn't involve a copay)
* `coinsurance_amount`: 128.00
* **Final Accumulator Updates:**
* Member A:
* `ending_deductible_a`: $1500.00 (already met)
* `ending_oopm_a`: $1884.00 (from Claim 1) + $128.00 (from Claim 4) = $2012.00.
* Member B:
* `ending_deductible_b`: $1120.00 (from Claim 3)
* `ending_oopm_b`: $1528.00 (from Claim 3)
* Member C:
* `ending_deductible_c`: $380.00 (from Claim 2)
* `ending_oopm_c`: $380.00 (from Claim 2)
* Family:
* `ending_family_deductible`: $3000.00 (met in Claim 3)
* `ending_family_oopm`: $3792.00 (from Claims 1-3) + $128.00 (from Claim 4) = $3920.00.
So, to summarize, I've walked through each claim, applying the deductible and coinsurance rules according to the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan's embedded structure. The key turning point was Claim 3, which met the family deductible, shifting subsequent claims entirely to coinsurance for all members. For Claim 4, Member A incurred $128.00 in member responsibility, entirely due to coinsurance, and the family's accumulators reflect the full impact of these four claims.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 4,720 tokens
Okay, I've worked through the adjudication process for these four claims based on the provided "Bluebonnet PPO 1500" plan details and the starting accumulator values. My thought process was to meticulously follow the plan's cost-sharing rules, especially considering the embedded deductible structure and the crucial point that copays do not count towards the deductible but *do* count towards the out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM).
Here's how I approached it, step-by-step:
1. **Deconstructing the Plan:** First, I thoroughly understood the "Bluebonnet PPO 1500" plan. This involved noting the in-network individual and family deductibles ($1500/$3000) and OOPMs ($6000/$12000). The "embedded" nature of the deductible means an individual's deductible is met when they hit $1500, OR when the family hits $3000. This is a key distinction. I also noted the 20% member / 80% plan coinsurance applies *after* the deductible is met, and that preventive care is fully covered. The critical rule about copays not crediting the deductible but crediting the OOPM was flagged for careful application.
2. **Establishing Baseline Accumulators:** I took the initial accumulator values provided for each family member (Member A, Member B, Member C) and for the family as a whole. This gave me the starting point for tracking all costs.
* Member A (Subscriber): Deductible $1180.00, OOPM $1180.00
* Member B (Spouse): Deductible $260.00, OOPM $260.00
* Member C (Child): Deductible $0.00, OOPM $0.00
* Family Total: Deductible $1440.00 ($1180 + $260 + $0), OOPM $1440.00 ($1180 + $260 + $0)
3. **Adjudicating Claim 1 (Member A):** This claim was for an outpatient endoscopy with an allowed amount of $2240.00.
* **Deductible Application:** Member A still needed $1500 - $1180 = $320.00 for their individual deductible. The family deductible needed $3000 - $1440 = $1560.00. Since the allowed amount ($2240) exceeded the individual deductible need, the full $320.00 was applied to Member A's individual deductible.
* **Coinsurance:** After applying $320.00 to the deductible, $2240 - $320 = $1920.00 remained. Member A's individual deductible was now met. The plan's 20% coinsurance applied to this remaining amount: $1920 * 0.20 = $384.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** The total Member A paid was $320.00 (deductible) + $384.00 (coinsurance) = $704.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:** Member A's deductible was now met ($1180 + $320 = $1500). Their OOPM increased by $704.00 to $1180 + $704 = $1884.00. The family deductible increased by $320 to $1440 + $320 = $1760.00, and the family OOPM increased by $704 to $1440 + $704 = $2144.00.
4. **Adjudicating Claim 2 (Member C):** This was a diagnostic lab test with an allowed amount of $380.00.
* **Deductible Application:** Member C's individual deductible was $0.00, and their OOPM was $0.00. The family deductible needed $3000 - $1760 = $1240.00. The family OOPM needed $12000 - $2144 = $9856.00. For Member C, the relevant deductible to apply against would be the lesser of their remaining individual deductible ($1500) and the remaining family deductible ($1240). This is $1240. Since the allowed amount ($380) was less than this family deductible threshold, the entire $380.00 was applied towards the *family* deductible.
* **Coinsurance:** No coinsurance applied as the allowed amount was fully absorbed by the deductible.
* **Member Responsibility:** $380.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:** Member C's deductible increased by $380 to $0 + $380 = $380.00, and their OOPM also increased by $380 to $0 + $380 = $380.00. The family deductible increased by $380 to $1760 + $380 = $2140.00, and the family OOPM increased by $380 to $2144 + $380 = $2524.00.
5. **Adjudicating Claim 3 (Member B):** This claim was for outpatient surgery with an allowed amount of $2900.00.
* **Deductible Application:** Member B needed $1500 - $260 = $1240.00 for their individual deductible. The family deductible needed $3000 - $2140 = $860.00. Following the embedded rule, Member B would pay towards the lesser of their remaining individual deductible and the remaining family deductible, which is $860.00. Since the allowed amount ($2900) exceeded this, $860.00 was applied to the deductible.
* **Impact on Family Deductible:** Applying $860.00 brought the family deductible to $2140 + $860 = $3000.00. The family deductible was now met.
* **Coinsurance:** With the family deductible met, the remaining allowed amount ($2900 - $860 = $2040.00) was subject to the 20% coinsurance: $2040 * 0.20 = $408.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** Total Member B paid was $860.00 (deductible) + $408.00 (coinsurance) = $1268.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:** Member B's deductible increased by $860 to $260 + $860 = $1120.00 (note: their individual deductible is not fully met, but the family deductible is). Their OOPM increased by $1268 to $260 + $1268 = $1528.00. The family deductible was now met at $3000.00, and the family OOPM increased by $1268 to $2524 + $1268 = $3792.00.
6. **Adjudicating Claim 4 (Member A) - The Target Claim:** This was for follow-up imaging with an allowed amount of $640.00.
* **Deductible Application:** At this point, Member A's individual deductible was already met ($1500.00 on Claim 1), and the family deductible was also met ($3000.00 on Claim 3). Therefore, no portion of this claim's allowed amount applied to any deductible. $0.00 deductible applied.
* **Coinsurance:** The entire allowed amount of $640.00 was subject to the 20% coinsurance: $640 * 0.20 = $128.00.
* **Member Responsibility:** The total Member A paid was $0.00 (deductible) + $128.00 (coinsurance) = $128.00.
* **Plan Paid:** $640.00 (allowed) - $128.00 (member responsibility) = $512.00.
* **Accumulator Updates:** Member A's OOPM increased by $128.00 to $1884 + $128 = $2012.00. All other individual and family deductibles remained unchanged as they were already met or at their previous post-Claim 3 values. The family OOPM increased by $128 to $3792 + $128 = $3920.00.
7. **Finalizing and Reporting:** I compiled the specific financial details for Claim 4 and the final accumulator values for all family members, ensuring they matched the calculations from step 6. I've double-checked that the logic applied aligns with the plan rules.
This detailed breakdown allowed me to arrive at the requested outputs with confidence.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 5,294 tokens
Alright, let's break down this adjudication process. My task is to review four claims, determine the financial responsibilities for the members and the plan, and then provide the final accumulator balances for each family member and the family as a whole. I've got the Bluebonnet PPO 1500 plan details right here, and I'll work through each claim chronologically, updating the accumulators as I go.
**Claim 1: Member A (Subscriber) - Outpatient Endoscopy**
First off, for Member A's endoscopy, I need to see how much of their individual deductible and the family deductible has already been met. Before this claim, Member A had $1180 towards their $1500 individual deductible, leaving $320. The family had $1440 towards their $3000 deductible, leaving $1560. The allowed amount for the service is $2240.
Since Member A's remaining individual deductible ($320) is less than the family's remaining deductible ($1560), I'll apply $320 of the allowed amount to Member A's individual deductible first. This satisfies their individual deductible ($1180 + $320 = $1500).
Now, I've got $2240 (allowed) - $320 (deductible applied) = $1920 remaining for coinsurance. With a 20% member coinsurance, Member A is responsible for $1920 * 0.20 = $384.
So, Member A's total responsibility for this claim is $320 (deductible) + $384 (coinsurance) = $704. The plan will pay $2240 (allowed) - $704 (member responsibility) = $1536.
After this claim, Member A's deductible accumulator is now $1500 (met), and their OOPM accumulator is $1180 (initial) + $704 (responsibility) = $1884. The family's deductible accumulator increases by $320 to $1760, and their OOPM accumulator increases by $704 to $2144. Member B and C's accumulators remain unchanged for now.
**Claim 2: Member C (Child) - Diagnostic Laboratory Panel**
Next, Member C had a lab panel costing $380 allowed. Member C's individual deductible is $1500, and they've met $0 so far, so they have $1500 remaining. The family's deductible is $3000, and after Claim 1, it's at $1760, leaving $1240 remaining.
The amount to be applied to the deductible is the lesser of the allowed amount ($380), Member C's remaining individual deductible ($1500), and the family's remaining deductible ($1240). In this case, it's the allowed amount of $380. This $380 will be applied to the family deductible.
Since the entire allowed amount is applied to the deductible, there's $0 left for coinsurance. Member C's responsibility for this claim is $380. The plan pays $0.
Now, for the accumulators: Member C's deductible accumulator goes from $0 to $380, and their OOPM accumulator also goes from $0 to $380. The family deductible accumulator increases by $380 to $1760 + $380 = $2140, and their OOPM accumulator increases by $380 to $2144 + $380 = $2524. Member A and B's accumulators are unaffected.
**Claim 3: Member B (Spouse) - Outpatient Surgery**
Here's a significant one: Member B had outpatient surgery with an allowed amount of $2900. Member B has $260 towards their $1500 individual deductible, leaving $1240. The family deductible is $3000, and after Claim 2, it's at $2140, leaving $860 remaining.
This is where the embedded deductible structure comes into play. The amount to be applied to the deductible is the lesser of the member's remaining individual deductible ($1240) and the family's remaining deductible ($860). So, $860 will be applied to the deductible. This $860 also satisfies the remaining family deductible, bringing it to $2140 + $860 = $3000 (met). Since the family deductible is met, all individual deductibles are considered met for the rest of the year.
Now, for coinsurance: $2900 (allowed) - $860 (deductible applied) = $2040 subject to coinsurance. With 20% coinsurance, Member B is responsible for $2040 * 0.20 = $408.
Member B's total responsibility for this claim is $860 (deductible) + $408 (coinsurance) = $1268. The plan pays $2900 (allowed) - $1268 (member responsibility) = $1632.
Accumulator updates: Member B's deductible accumulator increases by $860 to $260 + $860 = $1120. Their OOPM accumulator increases by $1268 to $260 + $1268 = $1528. The family deductible is now met at $3000. The family OOPM accumulator increases by $1268 to $2524 + $1268 = $3792. Member A and C's accumulators are unchanged.
**Claim 4: Member A (Subscriber) - Follow-up Imaging**
Finally, Member A had follow-up imaging with an allowed amount of $640. Critically, both Member A's individual deductible and the family deductible were met in previous claims. Therefore, no deductible applies here, and `deductible_applied` is $0.
The entire $640 is subject to coinsurance. Member A's responsibility is $640 * 0.20 = $128. There's no copay for this service.
So, Member A's member responsibility for this claim is $128. The plan pays $640 (allowed) - $128 (member responsibility) = $512.
Updating the accumulators: Member A's deductible remains $1500 (met). Their OOPM accumulator increases by $128 to $1884 + $128 = $2012. The family deductible remains $3000 (met). The family OOPM accumulator increases by $128 to $3792 + $128 = $3920. Member B and C's accumulators are unchanged.
**Final Summary of Financial Details for Claim 4:**
* `member_responsibility`: $128.00
* `plan_paid`: $512.00
* `deductible_applied`: $0.00
* `copay_amount`: $0.00
* `coinsurance_amount`: $128.00
**Final Accumulator Values for All Family Members:**
* **Member A (subscriber):**
* `ending_deductible_a`: $1500.00
* `ending_oopm_a`: $2012.00
* **Member B (spouse):**
* `ending_deductible_b`: $1120.00
* `ending_oopm_b`: $1528.00
* **Member C (child):**
* `ending_deductible_c`: $380.00
* `ending_oopm_c`: $380.00
* **Family:**
* `ending_family_deductible`: $3000.00
* `ending_family_oopm`: $3920.00
It looks like everything has been processed correctly according to the plan rules and the adjudication steps.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.2 · Z.ai18.4s · 3,026 out | 65.1s · 3,251 out | 36.4s · 4,182 out
Reasoning · 2,343 tokens
Let me work through these claims carefully.
Initial accumulators:
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
Individual deductible: 1500.00
Family deductible: 3000.00
Individual OOPM: 6000.00
Family OOPM: 12000.00
Embedded structure: individual satisfies at 1500, family at 3000, whichever first.
Claim 1 — A — Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00
No copay specified for outpatient endoscopy, so it's deductible + coinsurance.
A deductible remaining: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
Under embedded, A's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) = 320.
Deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00
Coinsurance 20% member: 1920 * 0.20 = 384.00
Plan pays: 1920 * 0.80 = 1536.00
Member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
Check: 704 + 1536 = 2240 ✓
Update A: deductible = 1500.00, OOPM = 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
Family: deductible = 1440 + 320 = 1760.00, OOPM = 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
Claim 2 — C — Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380.00
No copay for lab, so deductible + coinsurance.
C deductible remaining: 1500 - 0 = 1500.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00
Embedded: lesser of 1500 and 1240 = 1240.00
Deductible applied: 1240.00
Remaining: 380 - 1240 = negative, so actually all 380 goes to deductible.
Wait, allowed is 380, deductible available is 1240, so all 380 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 380.00
Remaining: 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Plan paid: 0.00
Member responsibility: 380.00
Update C: deductible = 0 + 380 = 380.00, OOPM = 0 + 380 = 380.00
Family: deductible = 1760 + 380 = 2140.00, OOPM = 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
Claim 3 — B — Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00
No copay, deductible + coinsurance.
B deductible remaining: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00
Embedded: lesser of 1240 and 860 = 860.00
Deductible applied: 860.00
After deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
Coinsurance 20%: 2040 * 0.20 = 408.00
Plan pays: 2040 * 0.80 = 1632.00
Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00
Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900 ✓
Update B: deductible = 260 + 860 = 1120.00, OOPM = 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
Family: deductible = 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (family deductible met!), OOPM = 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
Now family deductible is satisfied (3000.00). What does this mean for individual deductibles?
Under embedded structure, once family deductible is met, all family members' deductibles are considered satisfied. So A, B, C individual deductibles are all met.
Wait, let me re-read the plan: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
So the family deductible being satisfied means all members have met their deductible. Let me check: A is at 1500 (individual met), B is at 1120, C is at 380.
After family deductible is met, do B and C's individual deductibles get marked as satisfied? Yes, because the family deductible is satisfied, so all members have met their deductible threshold.
So after Claim 3:
- A: deductible = 1500.00 (met), OOPM = 1884.00
- B: deductible = 1120.00 but family deductible met... hmm
Actually, let me think about what "ending_deductible" means. It's the accumulator value. Under embedded, once the family deductible is satisfied, all members' deductibles are satisfied. But the accumulator tracks how much has been credited.
The question is whether B's individual deductible accumulator shows 1120 or 1500. Since the family deductible is met, B's deductible is considered satisfied. But the accumulator itself - does it jump to 1500?
I think the accumulator tracks actual credits. But for benefit purposes, once family deductible is met, the member's deductible is satisfied. The ending deductible for reporting purposes would be the actual credited amount, but since family is met, it's satisfied.
Actually, let me reconsider. The accumulator tracks the running total of deductible credits. It doesn't artificially jump. But when family deductible is met, subsequent claims for any member don't require deductible. So the ending_deductible values should reflect actual credits:
- A: 1500.00
- B: 1120.00
- C: 380.00
- Family: 3000.00
But wait, the question says "ending accumulators for every member and for the family." So it's asking for the accumulator values. I'll report actual credited amounts.
Claim 4 — A — Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00
No copay for imaging, so deductible + coinsurance.
A's individual deductible is met (1500.00). Family deductible is met (3000.00).
So no deductible applies.
Deductible applied: 0.00
Coinsurance 20%: 640 * 0.20 = 128.00
Plan pays: 640 * 0.80 = 512.00
Member responsibility: 128.00
Check: 128 + 512 = 640 ✓
Update A: deductible stays 1500.00, OOPM = 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
Family: deductible stays 3000.00, OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
Ending accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Wait, I need to double-check whether after the family deductible is met, individual deductible accumulators should be reported as their actual credits or as "satisfied" (i.e., 1500). Let me think about this more carefully.
The plan says embedded structure. Once the family deductible (3000) is met, all family members' deductibles are satisfied. But the actual dollar credits to each member's individual deductible accumulator are what they are. The accumulator tracks credits, not satisfaction status. So I'll report actual credited amounts.
Actually, I want to reconsider. In many plan admin systems, once the family deductible is met, individual deductibles are marked as met (capped at individual level). But the accumulator still shows actual credits. I'll go with actual credits.
Let me verify OOPM: no one is near OOPM limits (individual 6000, family 12000), so no OOPM issues.
Final answer for Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Wait, I should double check Claim 3. B's individual deductible is 1500. B starts at 260. Family remaining is 860. So B can credit 860 to deductible (the family cap), but B's individual remainder is 1240. The lesser is 860. So B's deductible goes from 260 to 1120. That's correct.
But after family deductible is met, B's individual deductible is considered satisfied even though B only has 1120 credited. So for Claim 4 (which is for A, not B), this doesn't matter. But the ending_deductible_b should be 1120.00 (actual credits) or 1500.00 (satisfied)?
I'll go with actual accumulator credits: 1120.00. The accumulator tracks what's been credited, not the satisfaction status. The family deductible at 3000.00 shows it's met.
Hmm, but actually let me reconsider. Some systems would report B's deductible as 1500 (capped at individual amount) because the family deductible being met means the individual deductible is met. But the credits are only 1120.
I think the safest interpretation is that the accumulator tracks actual credits. The family deductible being met is what matters for benefit determination. So ending_deductible_b = 1120.00.
Let me also double-check Claim 1 more carefully.
Claim 1: A, allowed 2240. A deductible starts at 1180, individual remaining = 1500-1180 = 320. Family remaining = 3000-1440 = 1560. Lesser = 320. Deductible applied = 320. After deductible: 2240-320 = 1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384. Plan = 1536. MR = 704.
A: deductible 1180+320 = 1500, OOPM 1180+704 = 1884. Family: deductible 1440+320 = 1760, OOPM 1440+704 = 2144. ✓
Claim 2: C, allowed 380. C deductible 0, individual remaining 1500. Family remaining 3000-1760 = 1240. Lesser = 1240. But allowed is only 380, so deductible applied = 380. After deductible: 0. Coinsurance 0. Plan 0. MR = 380.
C: deductible 0+380 = 380, OOPM 0+380 = 380. Family: deductible 1760+380 = 2140, OOPM 2144+380 = 2524. ✓
Claim 3: B, allowed 2900. B deductible 260, individual remaining 1500-260 = 1240. Family remaining 3000-2140 = 860. Lesser = 860. Deductible applied = 860. After deductible: 2900-860 = 2040. Coinsurance 20% = 408. Plan = 1632. MR = 1268.
B: deductible 260+860 = 1120, OOPM 260+1268 = 1528. Family: deductible 2140+860 = 3000, OOPM 2524+1268 = 3792. ✓
Family deductible is now met (3000). All individual deductibles are satisfied.
Claim 4: A, allowed 640. A's deductible met (individual 1500, family 3000). Deductible applied = 0. Coinsurance 20% = 128. Plan = 512. MR = 128.
A: deductible stays 1500, OOPM 1884+128 = 2012. Family: deductible stays 3000, OOPM 3792+128 = 3920. ✓
All checks pass. Let me finalize.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,031 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
Initial accumulators before Claim 1:
- A (subscriber): deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B (spouse): deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C (child): deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
Family OOPM (in-network): 12000.00
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)
- Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2240.00
- No copay listed for outpatient endoscopy, so it's subject to deductible and coinsurance
A's deductible before: 1180.00
A's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
Under embedded structure, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder (320.00) and family remainder (1560.00). So 320.00 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining after deductible: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% member = 384.00, 80% plan = 1536.00
Member responsibility: 320.00 (deductible) + 384.00 (coinsurance) = 704.00
Plan paid: 1536.00
Check: 704.00 + 1536.00 = 2240.00 ✓
A's deductible after Claim 1: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00 (individual deductible satisfied)
A's OOPM after Claim 1: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
Family deductible after Claim 1: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
Family OOPM after Claim 1: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
Wait, let me think about the family deductible. The plan says "the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount." So the family deductible accumulator tracks total family deductible credits.
Family deductible after Claim 1: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)
- Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
- Allowed amount: 380.00
- No copay listed for diagnostic laboratory, so subject to deductible and coinsurance
C's deductible before: 0.00
C's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 0.00 = 1500.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00
Under embedded structure, C's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder (1500.00) and family remainder (1240.00). So 1240.00 goes to deductible?
Wait, let me reconsider. The embedded deductible rule says "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
So the individual deductible is 1500.00 and the family deductible is 3000.00. Under embedded structure, each member has their own individual deductible of 1500.00, but the family as a whole has a deductible of 3000.00. The individual can satisfy their deductible on their own at 1500.00, OR the family deductible is satisfied when total family credits reach 3000.00.
But the question is: when does the plan start paying for a specific member? Under embedded structure, the plan starts paying for a member when EITHER:
1. That member's individual deductible is satisfied (1500.00), OR
2. The family deductible is satisfied (3000.00 total family credits)
So for C, the amount that goes to deductible is the lesser of:
- C's individual remaining: 1500.00
- Family remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00
So C pays 1240.00 toward deductible? But the allowed amount is only 380.00, which is less than 1240.00.
So the full 380.00 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 380.00
Remaining after deductible: 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
Check: 380.00 + 0.00 = 380.00 ✓
C's deductible after Claim 2: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
C's OOPM after Claim 2: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family deductible after Claim 2: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
Family OOPM after Claim 2: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)
- Outpatient surgery, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2900.00
- No copay listed for outpatient surgery, so subject to deductible and coinsurance
B's deductible before: 260.00
B's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 260.00 = 1240.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 2140.00 = 860.00
Under embedded structure, B's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder (1240.00) and family remainder (860.00). So 860.00 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 860.00
Remaining after deductible: 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% member = 408.00, 80% plan = 1632.00
Member responsibility: 860.00 (deductible) + 408.00 (coinsurance) = 1268.00
Plan paid: 1632.00
Check: 1268.00 + 1632.00 = 2900.00 ✓
B's deductible after Claim 3: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
Wait, but if the family deductible is now satisfied (2140 + 860 = 3000), does that mean B's individual deductible is also considered satisfied? Let me re-read the plan document.
"Structure: EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
So the family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach 3000.00. After Claim 3, family deductible credits = 2140 + 860 = 3000.00. So the family deductible is now satisfied.
But for the accumulator reporting, B's individual deductible would be 260 + 860 = 1120.00. The individual deductible is 1500, so B hasn't met their individual deductible on their own, but the family deductible is now met, so going forward the plan pays coinsurance for all family members.
Actually, let me reconsider. Under embedded deductibles, once the family deductible is met, all family members are considered to have met their deductible. But the accumulator tracks the actual amount paid. Let me think about what "ending_deductible" means - it's the running total of deductible credits for that member.
So B's deductible accumulator: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
B's OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
Family deductible: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00 (family deductible satisfied!)
Family OOPM: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
Now, after the family deductible is met, for subsequent claims, the deductible is 0 and only coinsurance applies (unless OOPM is met).
Wait, but the task says "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So once the family remainder is 0, the deductible applied would be 0 (since the lesser of individual remainder and 0 is 0).
Let me continue with Claim 4.
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)
- Follow-up imaging, in-network
- Allowed amount: 640.00
- No copay listed for follow-up imaging, so subject to deductible and coinsurance
A's deductible before: 1500.00 (individual deductible already met)
Family deductible: 3000.00 (family deductible already met)
So no deductible applies.
Deductible applied: 0.00
Remaining: 640.00
Coinsurance: 20% member = 128.00, 80% plan = 512.00
Member responsibility: 0.00 (deductible) + 128.00 (coinsurance) = 128.00
Plan paid: 512.00
Check: 128.00 + 512.00 = 640.00 ✓
A's deductible after Claim 4: 1500.00 (no change)
A's OOPM after Claim 4: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Wait, let me recalculate A's OOPM.
After Claim 1: A's OOPM = 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
After Claim 4: A's OOPM = 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Family OOPM after Claim 4: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
Let me also verify all the ending accumulators:
A (subscriber):
- Deductible: 1500.00 (met after Claim 1, no change from Claim 4)
- OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 (Claim 1) + 128.00 (Claim 4) = 2012.00
B (spouse):
- Deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
- OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
C (child):
- Deductible: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
- OOPM: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family total:
- Deductible: 1440.00 + 320.00 (Claim 1) + 380.00 (Claim 2) + 860.00 (Claim 3) + 0.00 (Claim 4) = 3000.00
- OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 (Claim 1) + 380.00 (Claim 2) + 1268.00 (Claim 3) + 128.00 (Claim 4) = 3920.00
Let me verify:
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 + 380 + 860 + 0 = 3000.00 ✓
Family OOPM: 1440 + 704 + 380 + 1268 + 128 = 3920.00
Let me double-check by summing individual OOPMs:
A: 1180 + 704 + 128 = 2012.00
B: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
C: 0 + 380 = 380.00
Total: 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920.00 ✓
And for deductible:
A: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00
B: 260 + 860 = 1120.00
C: 0 + 380 = 380.00
Total: 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000.00 ✓
Great, everything checks out.
For Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Let me make sure about the keys. The required keys are:
- member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount
- ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a
- ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b
- ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c
- ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm
All values:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,937 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
**Initial Accumulators (before Claim 1):**
- A (subscriber): deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B (spouse): deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C (child): deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
**Plan parameters:**
- Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00
- Family in-network deductible: 3000.00
- Structure: Embedded
- Individual in-network OOPM: 6000.00
- Family in-network OOPM: 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays don't credit deductible, copays credit OOPM.
**Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
- Allowed: 2240.00
- No copay listed for this service type (not a primary care visit, specialist visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy). So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- A's deductible before: 1180.00, individual deductible 1500.00, so A has 320.00 remaining on individual deductible.
- Family deductible before: 1440.00, family deductible 3000.00, so family has 1560.00 remaining.
Under embedded structure, individual deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Individual remainder = 1500 - 1180 = 320. Family remainder = 3000 - 1440 = 1560. Lesser = 320.
So deductible applied = 320.00.
After deductible: A's deductible = 1500.00, family deductible = 1440 + 320 = 1760.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% member = 1920 * 0.20 = 384.00, plan = 1920 * 0.80 = 1536.00
Member responsibility = 320 + 384 = 704.00
Plan paid = 1536.00
Check: 704 + 1536 = 2240. ✓
OOPM update:
- A OOPM before: 1180.00. A OOPM after = 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
- Family OOPM before: 1440.00. Family OOPM after = 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
- Individual OOPM limit: 6000, Family: 12000. Not reached.
**Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
- Service: Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
- Allowed: 380.00
- No copay for lab panels specifically. Subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- C's deductible before: 0.00, individual deductible 1500.00, so C has 1500.00 remaining.
- Family deductible before: 1760.00, family deductible 3000.00, so family has 1240.00 remaining.
- Embedded: individual remainder = 1500, family remainder = 1240. Lesser = 1240.
- So deductible applied = 1240.00 (capped by family remainder).
- After: C's deductible = 1240.00, family deductible = 1760 + 1240 = 3000.00 (family deductible met).
- Remaining allowed: 380 - 1240 = negative... wait, that can't be right.
Wait, the allowed is 380, so the deductible applied can't exceed 380.
Deductible applied = min(380, 1240) = 380.00.
After: C's deductible = 0 + 380 = 380.00, family deductible = 1760 + 380 = 2140.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 380 - 380 = 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00 member, 0.00 plan.
Member responsibility = 380.00, plan paid = 0.00.
Check: 380 + 0 = 380. ✓
OOPM update:
- C OOPM before: 0.00. C OOPM after = 0 + 380 = 380.00
- Family OOPM before: 2144.00. Family OOPM after = 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
**Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)**
- Service: Outpatient surgery, in-network
- Allowed: 2900.00
- No copay for outpatient surgery specifically. Subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- B's deductible before: 260.00, individual deductible 1500.00, so B has 1240.00 remaining.
- Family deductible before: 2140.00, family deductible 3000.00, so family has 860.00 remaining.
- Embedded: individual remainder = 1240, family remainder = 860. Lesser = 860.
- So deductible applied = min(2900, 860) = 860.00.
- After: B's deductible = 260 + 860 = 1120.00, family deductible = 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (family deductible met).
- Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
- Now, individual deductible for B: B has 1120, individual is 1500. B hasn't met individual deductible yet. But family deductible is met. Under embedded structure... hmm.
Let me think about this more carefully. The plan says: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
So the individual deductible is 1500, and the family deductible is 3000. When the family deductible is met (total family credits reach 3000), does that mean all family members have their deductibles satisfied?
The wording "whichever comes first" suggests that either the individual deductible is met on their own OR the family deductible is met. Once the family deductible is met, all members' deductibles are considered satisfied.
So after Claim 3, family deductible = 3000.00, which means the family deductible is satisfied. This means for subsequent claims, there's no deductible to apply (the family deductible is met).
But wait, for B specifically: B's individual deductible is 1120. The family deductible is now 3000 (met). Under embedded, the individual deductible is satisfied when either their individual deductible is met OR the family deductible is met. Since the family deductible is met, B's deductible is also considered satisfied for future claims.
Actually, let me reconsider. The embedded structure means:
- An individual's deductible is met when their individual credits reach 1500 OR the family total reaches 3000.
So for Claim 3 itself:
- B's individual remainder before claim: 1500 - 260 = 1240
- Family remainder before claim: 3000 - 2140 = 860
- Lesser = 860
- Deductible applied = min(860, 2900) = 860
After Claim 3:
- B's deductible = 1120, but family deductible is 3000 (met). So B's deductible is considered satisfied because family deductible is met.
- Family deductible = 3000 (met).
For Claim 3:
- Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
- Coinsurance: 20% member = 2040 * 0.20 = 408.00, plan = 2040 * 0.80 = 1632.00
- Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00
- Plan paid = 1632.00
- Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900. ✓
OOPM update:
- B OOPM before: 260.00. B OOPM after = 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
- Family OOPM before: 2524.00. Family OOPM after = 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
- Individual OOPM limit 6000, family 12000. Not reached.
**Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network
- Allowed: 640.00
- No copay for imaging specifically. Subject to deductible and coinsurance.
- A's deductible before Claim 4: 1500.00 (met in Claim 1)
- Family deductible before Claim 4: 3000.00 (met in Claim 3)
Since both A's individual deductible and the family deductible are met, no deductible applies.
- Deductible applied = 0.00
- Remaining allowed after deductible: 640.00
- Coinsurance: 20% member = 640 * 0.20 = 128.00, plan = 640 * 0.80 = 512.00
- Member responsibility = 0 + 128 = 128.00
- Plan paid = 512.00
- Check: 128 + 512 = 640. ✓
OOPM update:
- A OOPM before: 1884.00. A OOPM after = 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
- Family OOPM before: 3792.00. Family OOPM after = 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
**Ending Accumulators:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
Wait, should B's deductible be 1120 or 1500? The family deductible is met (3000), so under embedded structure, B's deductible is considered satisfied. But the accumulator value... hmm.
The question asks for "ending_deductible_b" which I think is the running total of deductible credits for B. B has accumulated 1120 in deductible credits. But the family deductible is met, so for future claims B wouldn't pay deductible.
I think the ending deductible accumulator is the running total of what B has paid toward their deductible. That's 1120.00. But since the family deductible is met, this value effectively doesn't matter for future claims.
Actually, let me reconsider. The accumulator is "the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible." So it's the total deductible credits accumulated. For B, that's 260 (initial) + 860 (Claim 3) = 1120.00.
But wait - once the family deductible is met, does B's individual deductible get marked as "satisfied" even though B hasn't personally paid 1500? The plan document says: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
This means: the individual deductible is satisfied when EITHER (a) the individual's own credits reach 1500, OR (b) the family total reaches 3000. For B, the family total has reached 3000, so B's deductible is satisfied.
But the accumulator tracks the actual credits. B's deductible accumulator would be 1120.00 (the amount B has actually paid toward deductible). However, since the family deductible is met, B's deductible is considered satisfied.
I think the ending deductible value should reflect the actual credits accumulated. So:
- B deductible = 1120.00
But hmm, in many plan systems, once the family deductible is met, the individual deductible is marked as met (set to the individual deductible amount). But the question asks for the "ending_deductible" which is the accumulator. I think it's the running total.
Let me just go with the running totals:
- A: deductible 1500.00 (met individual deductible)
- B: deductible 1120.00 (hasn't met individual deductible, but family deductible is met)
- C: deductible 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00 (met)
Actually, I need to think about this differently. The accumulator is the running total of deductible credits. It doesn't get "capped" at the individual deductible amount necessarily. But for A, the individual deductible is 1500, and A has paid exactly 1500 (1180 initial + 320 from Claim 1). So A's deductible = 1500.00.
For B, the individual deductible is 1500, but B has only paid 1120 toward it (260 initial + 860 from Claim 3). However, the family deductible is met. I'll report B's deductible as 1120.00.
For C, C has paid 380 (0 initial + 380 from Claim 2). C's deductible = 380.00.
Family deductible = 3000.00 (met).
**Final Answer for Claim 4:**
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Let me double-check all calculations.
**Claim 1 — A:**
- Before: A ded 1180, OOPM 1180; Family ded 1440, OOPM 1440
- Allowed: 2240
- A individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 1180 = 320
- Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560
- Lesser: 320
- Deductible applied: 320
- After deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920
- Coinsurance 20%: 1920 * 0.20 = 384 (member), 1920 * 0.80 = 1536 (plan)
- Member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704
- Plan paid: 1536
- After: A ded = 1180 + 320 = 1500, A OOPM = 1180 + 704 = 1884
- Family ded = 1440 + 320 = 1760, Family OOPM = 1440 + 704 = 2144
**Claim 2 — C:**
- Before: C ded 0, OOPM 0; Family ded 1760, OOPM 2144
- Allowed: 380
- C individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500
- Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240
- Lesser: 1240
- Deductible applied: min(1240, 380) = 380
- After deductible: 380 - 380 = 0
- Coinsurance: 0
- Member responsibility: 380
- Plan paid: 0
- After: C ded = 0 + 380 = 380, C OOPM = 0 + 380 = 380
- Family ded = 1760 + 380 = 2140, Family OOPM = 2144 + 380 = 2524
**Claim 3 — B:**
- Before: B ded 260, OOPM 260; Family ded 2140, OOPM 2524
- Allowed: 2900
- B individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240
- Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860
- Lesser: 860
- Deductible applied: min(860, 2900) = 860
- After deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040
- Coinsurance 20%: 2040 * 0.20 = 408 (member), 2040 * 0.80 = 1632 (plan)
- Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268
- Plan paid: 1632
- After: B ded = 260 + 860 = 1120, B OOPM = 260 + 1268 = 1528
- Family ded = 2140 + 860 = 3000, Family OOPM = 2524 + 1268 = 3792
**Claim 4 — A:**
- Before: A ded 1500, OOPM 1884; Family ded 3000, OOPM 3792
- Allowed: 640
- A individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 1500 = 0
- Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 3000 = 0
- Deductible applied: 0
- After deductible: 640
- Coinsurance 20%: 640 * 0.20 = 128 (member), 640 * 0.80 = 512 (plan)
- Member responsibility: 128
- Plan paid: 512
- After: A ded = 1500, A OOPM = 1884 + 128 = 2012
- Family ded = 3000, Family OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920
All checks pass. Let me finalize.
Ending accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Opus 4.8 · Anthropic9.4s · 882 out | 8.6s · 777 out | 12.0s · 1,140 out
Claim 1 — A, allowed 2240.00.
A ded 1180, individual remaining 320. Family remaining = 3000-1440=1560. Lesser=320.
Deductible applied 320. A ded→1500. Family ded→1760.
Remaining allowed after ded: 2240-320=1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384.
Member: 320+384=704. Plan=1536.
A oop 1180+704=1884. Family oop 1440+704=2144.
Claim 2 — C, allowed 380.
C ded 0, individual remaining 1500. Family remaining=3000-1760=1240. Lesser=380.
Deductible applied 380. C ded→380. Family ded→2140.
Member 380, plan 0.
C oop 0+380=380. Family oop 2144+380=2524.
Claim 3 — B, allowed 2900.
B ded 260, individual remaining 1240. Family remaining=3000-2140=860. Lesser=860.
Deductible applied 860. B ded→260+860=1120. Family ded→2140+860=3000 (family satisfied).
Remaining allowed: 2900-860=2040. Coinsurance 20%=408.
Member 860+408=1268. Plan=1632.
B oop 260+1268=1528. Family oop 2524+1268=3792.
Family deductible now satisfied (3000). So for subsequent claims no deductible.
Claim 4 — A, allowed 640.
Family deductible satisfied → no deductible applies. A's own OOP not reached.
Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.
Member 128, plan 512.
A ded stays 1500. A oop 1884+128=2012.
Family ded stays 3000. Family oop 3792+128=3920.
Ending accumulators:
A ded 1500, oop 2012.
B ded 1120, oop 1528.
C ded 380, oop 380.
Family ded 3000, oop 3920.
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Claim 1 — A: allowed 2240. A ded 1180, individual remainder 320, family remainder 1560. Lesser = 320. Deductible applied 320.
Remaining allowed after ded: 2240-320=1920 at 20% = 384 coinsurance.
A ded: 1180+320=1500. A oop: 1180+320+384=1884.
Family ded: 1440+320=1760. Family oop: 1440+704=2144.
Claim 2 — C: allowed 380. C ded 0, individual remainder 1500, family remainder 3000-1760=1240. Lesser=380. All deductible.
C ded: 380. C oop: 380.
Family ded: 1760+380=2140. Family oop: 2144+380=2524.
Claim 3 — B: allowed 2900. B ded 260, individual remainder 1240, family remainder 3000-2140=860. Lesser=860. Deductible applied 860 → family deductible met.
After ded: 2900-860=2040 at 20%=408.
B ded: 260+860=1120. B oop: 260+860+408=1528.
Family ded: 2140+860=3000. Family oop: 2524+1268=3792.
Claim 4 — A: family deductible met (3000). A individual deductible also met (1500). So no deductible.
Allowed 640 at 20% = 128 coinsurance.
Check A oop: 1884, remainder to 6000 fine. Family oop 3792, fine.
Member resp 128, plan paid 512.
A ded: 1500. A oop: 1884+128=2012.
Family ded: 3000. Family oop: 3792+128=3920.
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Let me work through each claim.
**Claim 1 — A, allowed 2240.00, in-network**
A deductible: 1180, individual remainder = 320. Family remainder = 3000-1440=1560. Lesser = 320.
Deductible applied = 320.00. A ded → 1500, family ded → 1760.
Remaining allowed = 2240-320 = 1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384.00. Plan = 1536.00.
Member = 320+384 = 704.00.
A OOPM: 1180+704 = 1884. Family OOPM: 1440+704 = 2144.
A ded=1500, family ded=1760.
**Claim 2 — C, allowed 380.00**
C individual remainder = 1500. Family remainder = 3000-1760=1240. Lesser=380.
Deductible applied = 380.00 (all to deductible).
C ded → 380, family ded → 2140.
Member = 380.00, plan = 0.
C OOPM: 380. Family OOPM: 2144+380 = 2524.
**Claim 3 — B, allowed 2900.00**
B individual remainder = 1500-260 = 1240. Family remainder = 3000-2140=860. Lesser = 860.
Deductible applied = 860.00.
B ded → 260+860 = 1120. Family ded → 2140+860 = 3000 (family deductible satisfied).
Remaining allowed = 2900-860 = 2040. Coinsurance 20% = 408.00. Plan = 1632.00.
Member = 860+408 = 1268.00.
B OOPM: 260+1268 = 1528. Family OOPM: 2524+1268 = 3792.
Family deductible now satisfied → for subsequent claims, family deductible met means no member deductible? Under embedded, family deductible satisfied means plan pays for all members' deductible portion. So Claim 4 has no deductible.
**Claim 4 — A, allowed 640.00**
Family deductible satisfied (3000). So no deductible applies.
Check OOPM: A OOPM 1884, individual OOPM 6000 not reached. Family OOPM 3792 < 12000.
Coinsurance 20% = 128.00. Plan = 512.00.
Deductible applied = 0. Copay = 0. Coinsurance = 128.00.
Member = 128.00.
A OOPM: 1884+128 = 2012. Family OOPM: 3792+128 = 3920.
A ded stays 1500.
**Ending accumulators:**
- A: ded 1500, OOPM 2012
- B: ded 1120, OOPM 1528
- C: ded 380, OOPM 380
- Family: ded 3000, OOPM 3920
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic19.1s · 1,468 out | 19.7s · 1,354 out | 20.1s · 1,468 out
I'll work through each claim sequentially, tracking all accumulators.
**Starting accumulators:**
- A: ded=1180.00, oopm=1180.00
- B: ded=260.00, oopm=260.00
- C: ded=0.00, oopm=0.00
- Family: ded=1440.00, oopm=1440.00
Individual ded limit=1500, Family ded limit=3000, Individual OOPM=6000, Family OOPM=12000
---
**Claim 1 — A, outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed=2240.00**
No copay (not a listed copay service). Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
A's remaining individual deductible: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
A applies 320.00 to deductible (satisfies individual deductible).
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 1920 = 384.00 member
Plan pays coinsurance portion: 80% × 1920 = 1536.00
Member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
Plan paid: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00
A accumulators after Claim 1:
- ded: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (maxed)
- oopm: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
Family accumulators after Claim 1:
- ded: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00
- oopm: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
---
**Claim 2 — C, diagnostic lab, in-network, allowed=380.00**
No copay. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
C's remaining individual deductible: 1500 - 0 = 1500.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00
C can apply up to min(1500, 1240) = 1240 toward deductible, but allowed is only 380, so all 380 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 380.00
Remaining: 0 → no coinsurance.
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
C accumulators after Claim 2:
- ded: 0 + 380 = 380.00
- oopm: 0 + 380 = 380.00
Family accumulators after Claim 2:
- ded: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00
- oopm: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
---
**Claim 3 — B, outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed=2900.00**
No copay. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
B's remaining individual deductible: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00
B applies min(1240, 860) = 860.00 to deductible (family deductible is the binding constraint; family deductible satisfied).
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 2040 = 408.00 member
Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00
Plan paid: 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00
B accumulators after Claim 3:
- ded: 260 + 860 = 1120.00
- oopm: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
Family accumulators after Claim 3:
- ded: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (maxed)
- oopm: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
---
**Claim 4 — A, follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed=640.00**
No copay. Family deductible is satisfied (3000). A's individual deductible is also satisfied (1500). So entire allowed amount goes to coinsurance.
A's OOPM remaining: 6000 - 1884 = 4116.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 640 = 128.00 member
Plan pays: 80% × 640 = 512.00
Member responsibility: 128.00 (within OOPM)
Plan paid: 512.00
A accumulators after Claim 4:
- ded: 1500.00
- oopm: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
Family accumulators after Claim 4:
- ded: 3000.00
- oopm: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}I need to adjudicate each claim in order, tracking accumulators carefully.
**Starting accumulators:**
- A: ded=1180.00, oopm=1180.00
- B: ded=260.00, oopm=260.00
- C: ded=0.00, oopm=0.00
- Family: ded=1440.00, oopm=1440.00
Individual ded limit=1500, Family ded limit=3000, Individual OOPM=6000, Family OOPM=12000
---
**Claim 1 — A (subscriber), Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed=2240.00**
No copay for this service. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
A's remaining deductible: 1500-1180=320.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000-1440=1560.00
A can satisfy their individual deductible with 320.00.
Deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240.00-320.00=1920.00
Check A's OOPM remaining: 6000-1180=4820.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 1920.00=384.00
Member responsibility: 320.00+384.00=704.00
Plan paid: 2240.00-704.00=1536.00
A after Claim 1: ded=1500.00, oopm=1180+704=1884.00
Family: ded=1440+320=1760.00, oopm=1440+704=2144.00
---
**Claim 2 — C (child), Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed=380.00**
No copay. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
C's remaining individual deductible: 1500-0=1500.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000-1760=1240.00
Under embedded structure, C's deductible credit is limited to the lesser of individual remainder (1500) and family remainder (1240). Family is the binding constraint here — but C can still only apply up to what's needed. Allowed=380.00, which is less than both, so all 380.00 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied: 380.00
Coinsurance: 0 (deductible not yet satisfied)
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
C after Claim 2: ded=380.00, oopm=380.00
Family: ded=1760+380=2140.00, oopm=2144+380=2524.00
---
**Claim 3 — B (spouse), Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed=2900.00**
B's remaining individual deductible: 1500-260=1240.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000-2140=860.00
Under embedded: B can satisfy at most the family remainder=860.00 before family is met (since family remainder < individual remainder).
Deductible applied to B: 860.00 (satisfies family deductible completely)
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900.00-860.00=2040.00
B's OOPM remaining: 6000-260=5740.00
Family OOPM remaining: 12000-2524=9476.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 2040.00=408.00
Member responsibility: 860.00+408.00=1268.00
Plan paid: 2900.00-1268.00=1632.00
B after Claim 3: ded=260+860=1120.00, oopm=260+1268=1528.00
Family: ded=2140+860=3000.00, oopm=2524+1268=3792.00
---
**Claim 4 — A (subscriber), Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed=640.00**
Family deductible is now satisfied (3000.00). A's individual deductible is already satisfied (1500.00). No deductible applies.
No copay for imaging.
Coinsurance: 20% of 640.00=128.00
A's OOPM remaining: 6000-1884=4116.00 (well above 128)
Member responsibility: 128.00
Plan paid: 640.00-128.00=512.00
A after Claim 4: ded=1500.00, oopm=1884+128=2012.00
Family: ded=3000.00, oopm=3792+128=3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}I need to adjudicate each claim in order, tracking accumulators carefully.
**Starting accumulators:**
- A: ded=1180.00, oop=1180.00
- B: ded=260.00, oop=260.00
- C: ded=0.00, oop=0.00
- Family: ded=1440.00, oop=1440.00
Individual ded limit=1500, Family ded limit=3000, Individual OOPM=6000, Family OOPM=12000
---
**Claim 1 — A — Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed=2240.00**
No copay for this service type. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
A's remaining individual ded = 1500 - 1180 = 320.00
Family remaining ded = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00
A needs to satisfy 320.00 toward deductible (individual limit reached first).
Deductible applied = 320.00
Remaining after deductible = 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: member pays 20% of 1920.00 = 384.00
Member responsibility = 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00
Plan paid = 2240.00 - 704.00 = 1536.00
A's OOPM check: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00 < 6000. No cap hit.
Update accumulators:
- A: ded=1500.00, oop=1884.00
- Family: ded=1440+320=1760.00, oop=1440+704=2144.00
---
**Claim 2 — C — Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed=380.00**
No copay listed for lab. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
C's remaining individual ded = 1500 - 0 = 1500.00
Family remaining ded = 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00
C can satisfy at most min(1500, 1240) = 1240 toward deductible, but allowed=380, so all 380 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied = 380.00
Coinsurance = 0 (entire amount consumed by deductible)
Member responsibility = 380.00
Plan paid = 0.00
C's OOPM: 0 + 380 = 380.00
Family OOPM: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
Family ded: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00
C ded: 380.00
---
**Claim 3 — B — Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed=2900.00**
No copay. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
B's remaining individual ded = 1500 - 260 = 1240.00
Family remaining ded = 3000 - 2140 = 860.00
B satisfies min(1240, 860) = 860.00 toward deductible (family limit is the binding constraint).
Deductible applied = 860.00
Remaining = 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: member pays 20% × 2040 = 408.00
Member responsibility = 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00
Plan paid = 2900.00 - 1268.00 = 1632.00
B's OOPM: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00 < 6000. No cap.
Family ded: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 ✓ (family deductible now satisfied)
Family OOPM: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
B ded: 260 + 860 = 1120.00
---
**Claim 4 — A — Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed=640.00**
Family deductible is satisfied (3000). A's individual deductible is satisfied (1500). So A pays only coinsurance.
Copay = 0 (imaging has no copay listed)
Deductible applied = 0.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 640 = 128.00
Member responsibility = 128.00
A's OOPM check: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00 < 6000. No cap.
Plan paid = 640.00 - 128.00 = 512.00
Family OOPM: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
**Ending accumulators:**
- A: ded=1500.00, oop=2012.00
- B: ded=1120.00, oop=1528.00
- C: ded=380.00, oop=380.00
- Family: ded=3000.00, oop=3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Qwen3.7 Max · Alibaba90.5s · 5,305 out | 42.0s · 3,912 out | 31.3s · 2,772 out
Reasoning · 5,080 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
**Plan Document Summary:**
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
- Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Family OOPM (in-network): 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the OOPM.
**Starting Accumulators:**
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
---
**Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2240.00
A's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
Under embedded structure, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 320.00
- Family remainder: 1560.00
- Lesser: 320.00
So deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining allowed: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 1920.00 = 384.00
Plan pays: 80% of 1920.00 = 1536.00
Member responsibility: 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00
Plan paid: 1536.00
Check: 704.00 + 1536.00 = 2240.00 ✓
Update accumulators for A:
- A deductible: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00 (satisfied)
- A OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
Update family:
- Family deductible: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
- Family OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
---
**Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
- Service: Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
- Allowed amount: 380.00
C's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 0.00 = 1500.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00
Under embedded structure, C's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 1500.00
- Family remainder: 1240.00
- Lesser: 1240.00
Wait, but C's individual deductible is 1500.00. The family remainder is 1240.00. Under embedded, the individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own. But the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount.
Let me re-read: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
And from the rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So C's deductible applied = lesser of 1500.00 and 1240.00 = 1240.00
Wait, but that doesn't fully satisfy C's individual deductible. C would still have 1500.00 - 1240.00 = 260.00 remaining on their individual deductible. But the family deductible is now satisfied.
Actually, let me re-read: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So the amount applied to C's deductible is 1240.00. But wait - the family remainder is 1240.00, so the family deductible becomes satisfied. But C's individual deductible still has 260.00 remaining.
Hmm, but once the family deductible is satisfied, does that mean all members' deductibles are considered satisfied? Let me think about this more carefully.
In an embedded deductible structure:
- Each member has an individual deductible.
- The family has a family deductible.
- Once a member's individual deductible is met, that member's services are covered (subject to coinsurance) even if the family deductible isn't met.
- Once the family deductible is met, ALL members' deductibles are considered satisfied.
So when the family deductible is satisfied, C's deductible is also considered satisfied.
Wait, but the rule says: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So the deductible credit applied is 1240.00 (the lesser). This satisfies the family deductible (1760.00 + 1240.00 = 3000.00). And since the family deductible is now satisfied, C's individual deductible is also considered satisfied.
Actually, I need to think about what "deductible applied" means here. The allowed amount is 380.00. The deductible that can be applied is the lesser of C's individual remainder (1500.00) and family remainder (1240.00), which is 1240.00. But the allowed amount is only 380.00, so the deductible applied can't exceed 380.00.
Wait, the deductible applied is the amount of the allowed amount that goes toward the deductible. So:
- Deductible applied = min(allowed amount, individual remainder, family remainder)
- = min(380.00, 1500.00, 1240.00)
- = 380.00
So deductible applied: 380.00
Remaining allowed: 380.00 - 380.00 = 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Plan pays: 0.00
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
Update accumulators for C:
- C deductible: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
- C OOPM: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
Update family:
- Family deductible: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
- Family OOPM: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
---
**Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)**
- Service: Outpatient surgery, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2900.00
B's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 260.00 = 1240.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 2140.00 = 860.00
Deductible applied = min(2900.00, 1240.00, 860.00) = 860.00
Wait, so the deductible applied is 860.00. This satisfies the family deductible (2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00). And since the family deductible is satisfied, B's individual deductible is also considered satisfied.
Remaining allowed: 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 2040.00 = 408.00
Plan pays: 80% of 2040.00 = 1632.00
Member responsibility: 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00
Plan paid: 1632.00
Check: 1268.00 + 1632.00 = 2900.00 ✓
Update accumulators for B:
- B deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
Wait, but the family deductible is now satisfied. Does B's individual deductible get marked as satisfied?
Hmm, let me re-read the rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
I think the key question is: when the family deductible is satisfied, are all individual deductibles considered satisfied?
In typical embedded deductible structures, yes - once the family deductible is met, all family members are treated as having met their deductibles.
But the accumulator tracking might still show the actual amount credited. Let me think about what the "ending_deductible" means. I think it represents the running total of deductible credits, not whether it's "satisfied."
Actually wait, let me re-read: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share."
So the accumulators just track the running totals. The deductible accumulator for B would be 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00.
But wait - if the family deductible is satisfied, then for future claims, B's deductible is considered satisfied (because the family deductible is met). So B's effective deductible remaining is 0, even though the accumulator shows 1120.00.
For the purpose of reporting ending_deductible_b, I think it should be the accumulator value: 1120.00.
Actually, let me reconsider. The problem says "ending_deductible_b" - this is the accumulator value. Let me just track the accumulators.
Update accumulators for B:
- B deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
- B OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
Update family:
- Family deductible: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
---
**Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network
- Allowed amount: 640.00
Now, the family deductible is satisfied (3000.00). A's individual deductible is also satisfied (1500.00).
So deductible applied: 0.00
Remaining allowed: 640.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 640.00 = 128.00
Plan pays: 80% of 640.00 = 512.00
Member responsibility: 0.00 + 128.00 = 128.00
Plan paid: 512.00
Check: 128.00 + 512.00 = 640.00 ✓
Update accumulators for A:
- A deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 = 1500.00
- A OOPM: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Update family:
- Family deductible: 3000.00 + 0.00 = 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
---
**Summary for Claim 4:**
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
**Ending Accumulators:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Wait, let me double-check the family OOPM.
Starting family OOPM: 1440.00
Claim 1 (A): +704.00 → 2144.00
Claim 2 (C): +380.00 → 2524.00
Claim 3 (B): +1268.00 → 3792.00
Claim 4 (A): +128.00 → 3920.00
Check: A OOPM + B OOPM + C OOPM = 2012.00 + 1528.00 + 380.00 = 3920.00 ✓
Let me also double-check the family deductible.
Starting family deductible: 1440.00
Claim 1 (A): +320.00 → 1760.00
Claim 2 (C): +380.00 → 2140.00
Claim 3 (B): +860.00 → 3000.00
Claim 4 (A): +0.00 → 3000.00
Check: A deductible + B deductible + C deductible = 1500.00 + 1120.00 + 380.00 = 3000.00 ✓
Everything checks out.
Let me re-verify Claim 1 more carefully:
A's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
Deductible applied = min(2240.00, 320.00, 1560.00) = 320.00
Remaining: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 1920.00 = 384.00
Plan: 80% × 1920.00 = 1536.00
Member: 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00
Check: 704.00 + 1536.00 = 2240.00 ✓
A deductible: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00
A OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
Family deductible: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
Family OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
Claim 2:
C's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 0.00 = 1500.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00
Deductible applied = min(380.00, 1500.00, 1240.00) = 380.00
Remaining: 380.00 - 380.00 = 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Plan: 0.00
Member: 380.00
Check: 380.00 + 0.00 = 380.00 ✓
C deductible: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
C OOPM: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family deductible: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
Family OOPM: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
Claim 3:
B's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 260.00 = 1240.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 2140.00 = 860.00
Deductible applied = min(2900.00, 1240.00, 860.00) = 860.00
Remaining: 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 2040.00 = 408.00
Plan: 80% × 2040.00 = 1632.00
Member: 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00
Check: 1268.00 + 1632.00 = 2900.00 ✓
B deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
B OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
Family deductible: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00
Family OOPM: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
Claim 4:
A's individual deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1500.00 = 0.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 3000.00 = 0.00
Deductible applied = min(640.00, 0.00, 0.00) = 0.00
Remaining: 640.00 - 0.00 = 640.00
Coinsurance: 20% × 640.00 = 128.00
Plan: 80% × 640.00 = 512.00
Member: 0.00 + 128.00 = 128.00
Check: 128.00 + 512.00 = 640.00 ✓
A deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 = 1500.00
A OOPM: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Family deductible: 3000.00 + 0.00 = 3000.00
Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
Everything looks correct.
Now let me verify the required keys:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
All good. Let me format the JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,687 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
**Plan Details:**
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
- Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Family OOPM (in-network): 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the OOPM.
**Starting Accumulators:**
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
---
**Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2240.00
- No copay applies (not a PCV, specialist, urgent care, ER, or generic Rx)
A's deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
Under embedded structure, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 320.00
- Family remainder: 1560.00
- Lesser: 320.00
So deductible applied = 320.00
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 1920.00 = 384.00
Member responsibility: 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00
Plan paid: 2240.00 - 704.00 = 1536.00
A's new deductible: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00 (satisfied)
A's new OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
Family deductible: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
Family OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
**Accumulators after Claim 1:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family: deductible 1760.00, OOPM 2144.00
---
**Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
- Service: Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
- Allowed amount: 380.00
- No copay applies
C's deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 0.00 = 1500.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00
Under embedded structure, C's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 1500.00
- Family remainder: 1240.00
- Lesser: 1240.00
Wait, but the family remainder is 1240.00. So C can apply up to 1240.00 to deductible? No, let me re-read the rule.
"Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So deductible applied = min(1500.00, 1240.00) = 1240.00
Wait, that doesn't seem right. Let me think again. The family deductible is 3000.00. The family has accumulated 1760.00. The family remainder is 1240.00.
So C can apply 380.00 to deductible? No, C's allowed amount is 380.00, and the deductible can absorb up to min(1500.00, 1240.00) = 1240.00.
Since 380.00 < 1240.00, the entire 380.00 goes to deductible.
Deductible applied = 380.00
Remaining after deductible: 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
C's new deductible: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
C's new OOPM: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family deductible: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
Family OOPM: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
**Accumulators after Claim 2:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 2140.00, OOPM 2524.00
---
**Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)**
- Service: Outpatient surgery, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2900.00
- No copay applies
B's deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 260.00 = 1240.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 2140.00 = 860.00
Under embedded structure, B's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 1240.00
- Family remainder: 860.00
- Lesser: 860.00
So deductible applied = 860.00
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 2040.00 = 408.00
Member responsibility: 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00
Plan paid: 2900.00 - 1268.00 = 1632.00
B's new deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
B's new OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
Family deductible: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00 (satisfied!)
Family OOPM: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
**Accumulators after Claim 3:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3792.00
---
**Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)**
- Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network
- Allowed amount: 640.00
- No copay applies
A's deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1500.00 = 0.00 (already satisfied)
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 3000.00 = 0.00 (already satisfied)
Deductible applied = 0.00
Remaining after deductible: 640.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 640.00 = 128.00
Member responsibility: 0.00 + 128.00 = 128.00
Plan paid: 640.00 - 128.00 = 512.00
A's new deductible: 1500.00 (no change)
A's new OOPM: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Family deductible: 3000.00 (no change)
Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
**Accumulators after Claim 4:**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Let me double-check everything.
Claim 1: A, allowed 2240.00
- Deductible applied: min(320, 1560) = 320.00
- Coinsurance: 20% * (2240 - 320) = 20% * 1920 = 384.00
- Member: 320 + 384 = 704.00
- Plan: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00
- A ded: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 ✓
- A OOPM: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00 ✓
- Fam ded: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00 ✓
- Fam OOPM: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00 ✓
Claim 2: C, allowed 380.00
- C ded remaining: 1500.00
- Fam ded remaining: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00
- Deductible applied: min(1500, 1240, 380) = 380.00
Wait, the deductible applied should be the lesser of (individual remainder, family remainder) but also capped at the allowed amount.
min(380, min(1500, 1240)) = min(380, 1240) = 380.00
- Coinsurance: 20% * (380 - 380) = 0.00
- Member: 380.00
- Plan: 0.00
- C ded: 0 + 380 = 380.00 ✓
- C OOPM: 0 + 380 = 380.00 ✓
- Fam ded: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00 ✓
- Fam OOPM: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00 ✓
Claim 3: B, allowed 2900.00
- B ded remaining: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00
- Fam ded remaining: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00
- Deductible applied: min(2900, min(1240, 860)) = min(2900, 860) = 860.00
- Coinsurance: 20% * (2900 - 860) = 20% * 2040 = 408.00
- Member: 860 + 408 = 1268.00
- Plan: 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00
- B ded: 260 + 860 = 1120.00 ✓
- B OOPM: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00 ✓
- Fam ded: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 ✓
- Fam OOPM: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00 ✓
Claim 4: A, allowed 640.00
- A ded remaining: 1500 - 1500 = 0.00
- Fam ded remaining: 3000 - 3000 = 0.00
- Deductible applied: 0.00
- Coinsurance: 20% * 640 = 128.00
- Member: 128.00
- Plan: 640 - 128 = 512.00
- A ded: 1500.00 ✓
- A OOPM: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00 ✓
- Fam ded: 3000.00 ✓
- Fam OOPM: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00 ✓
Everything checks out. Let me format the output.
For Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending accumulators:
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,547 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
**Initial Accumulators:**
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
**Plan Details:**
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
- Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Family OOPM (in-network): 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the OOPM.
**Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
- Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2240.00
- No copay applies (this is not a PCV, specialist, urgent care, ER, or generic pharmacy)
- Subject to deductible and coinsurance
A's individual deductible: 1180.00 met, needs 1500.00, so 320.00 remaining
Family deductible: 1440.00 met, needs 3000.00, so 1560.00 remaining
Under embedded structure, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 320.00
- Family remainder: 1560.00
- Lesser: 320.00
So deductible applied: 320.00
Remaining allowed: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 1920.00 = 384.00
Member responsibility: 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00
Plan paid: 2240.00 - 704.00 = 1536.00
Update accumulators:
- A deductible: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00 (met!)
- A OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
- Family deductible: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
- Family OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
**Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
- Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network
- Allowed amount: 380.00
- No copay applies
- Subject to deductible and coinsurance
C's individual deductible: 0.00 met, needs 1500.00, so 1500.00 remaining
Family deductible: 1760.00 met, needs 3000.00, so 1240.00 remaining
Under embedded structure, C's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 1500.00
- Family remainder: 1240.00
- Lesser: 1240.00
So deductible applied: 380.00 (the full allowed amount, since 380 < 1240)
Wait, the deductible applied is the lesser of the allowed amount and the deductible remainder.
- Allowed: 380.00
- Deductible remainder (lesser of individual and family): min(1500.00, 1240.00) = 1240.00
- Deductible applied: min(380.00, 1240.00) = 380.00
Remaining allowed: 380.00 - 380.00 = 0.00
Coinsurance: 0.00
Member responsibility: 380.00
Plan paid: 0.00
Update accumulators:
- C deductible: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
- C OOPM: 0.00 + 380.00 = 380.00
- Family deductible: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
- Family OOPM: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
**Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)**
- Outpatient surgery, in-network
- Allowed amount: 2900.00
- No copay applies
- Subject to deductible and coinsurance
B's individual deductible: 260.00 met, needs 1500.00, so 1240.00 remaining
Family deductible: 2140.00 met, needs 3000.00, so 860.00 remaining
Under embedded structure, B's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
- Individual remainder: 1240.00
- Family remainder: 860.00
- Lesser: 860.00
So deductible applied: min(2900.00, 860.00) = 860.00
Remaining allowed: 2900.00 - 860.00 = 2040.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 2040.00 = 408.00
Member responsibility: 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00
Plan paid: 2900.00 - 1268.00 = 1632.00
Update accumulators:
- B deductible: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
- B OOPM: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
- Family deductible: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00 (met!)
- Family OOPM: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
Now, the family deductible is met. This means for future claims, the family remainder is 0.
**Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)**
- Follow-up imaging, in-network
- Allowed amount: 640.00
- No copay applies
- Subject to deductible and coinsurance
A's individual deductible: 1500.00 met (already satisfied in Claim 1)
Family deductible: 3000.00 met (already satisfied in Claim 3)
Since A's individual deductible is already met, no deductible applies.
Deductible applied: 0.00
Remaining allowed: 640.00
Coinsurance: 20% of 640.00 = 128.00
Member responsibility: 0.00 + 128.00 = 128.00
Plan paid: 640.00 - 128.00 = 512.00
Update accumulators:
- A deductible: 1500.00 + 0.00 = 1500.00
- A OOPM: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
- Family deductible: 3000.00 + 0.00 = 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
Let me double check all accumulators:
**After Claim 1 (A):**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family: deductible 1760.00, OOPM 2144.00
**After Claim 2 (C):**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 2140.00, OOPM 2524.00
**After Claim 3 (B):**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 1884.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3792.00
**After Claim 4 (A):**
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Let me verify Claim 4 numbers:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- member_responsibility + plan_paid = 128.00 + 512.00 = 640.00 ✓ (equals allowed amount)
All looks correct. Let me format the output.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.3 · Z.ai15.1s · 2,741 out | 11.1s · 3,454 out | 14.9s · 2,731 out
Reasoning · 2,149 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500
- Individual in-network deductible: 1500.00
- Family in-network deductible: 3000.00
- Embedded structure: an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
- OOPM individual in-network: 6000.00; family: 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays don't credit deductible; copays credit OOPM.
- Member cost share calculated from allowed amount.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber), Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00.
A's deductible remainder (individual): 1500 - 1180 = 320.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00.
Under embedded structure, A's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Lesser is 320.00.
So deductible applied: 320.00. A's remaining cost share after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00 subject to 20% coinsurance.
Coinsurance = 20% × 1920 = 384.00.
Member responsibility = 320 + 384 = 704.00. Plan paid = 2240 - 704 = 1536.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP was 1180. After adding 704, A OOP = 1884.00. Under 6000, fine.
Update accumulators:
- A deductible: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (individual deductible satisfied).
- A OOP: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00.
- Family deductible: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00.
- Family OOP: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child), diagnostic lab, in-network, allowed 380.00.
C's individual deductible: 0 used, remainder 1500.00. Family remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00. Lesser = 1240.00.
Deductible applied: min(380, 1240) = 380.00. C pays full 380.00 as deductible. Coinsurance = 0.
Member responsibility = 380.00. Plan paid = 0.00.
Update:
- C deductible: 0 + 380 = 380.00. C OOP: 0 + 380 = 380.00.
- Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00. Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse), outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00.
B's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00. Family remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00. Embedded: lesser of individual remainder and family remainder = 860.00.
So B's deductible credit on this claim: 860.00 (the family deductible caps B's deductible credit; effectively the family deductible becomes satisfied).
Wait — under embedded deductible rules: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." So B needs 1240 to satisfy individual, but family only needs 860 more to reach 3000. Once family deductible is met, no further deductible applies to anyone. So B's deductible applied on this claim: min(allowed 2900, needed...) Actually the deductible applied is the amount of cost share that goes to deductible: B would pay toward deductible until either individual (1240) or family (860) remainder is exhausted. Since family remainder (860) < individual remainder (1240), B pays 860 toward deductible. After that, family deductible is satisfied (3000), so no more deductible for anyone. But B's individual deductible (1500) is NOT yet satisfied for B... wait, B has 260 + 860 = 1140. Under embedded, once family deductible is met, the plan begins paying — typically, once the family deductible is satisfied, all family members' services are covered (subject to coinsurance) even if individual deductibles aren't met. The plan document says: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." So the effective deductible threshold for B is min(individual remaining path, family path). The family deductible is satisfied at 860 more. So B's deductible applied = 860.
Then remaining allowed: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00 subject to 20% coinsurance = 408.00.
Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan paid = 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00.
OOPM check: B OOP was 260; +1268 = 1528.00. Under 6000, fine. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
Update:
- B deductible: 260 + 860 = 1120.00. Hmm, but should B's deductible accumulator show 1120 even though family deductible is met? The accumulator is the running YTD total of deductible credits. B's deductible credit total = 1120.00. Family deductible total = 3000.00 (satisfied).
- B OOP: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
- Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00.
- Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber), follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
Now, A's individual deductible was satisfied (1500) after Claim 1. Family deductible also satisfied (3000) after Claim 3. Either way, no deductible applies to Claim 4.
Deductible applied: 0.00.
Copay: none (imaging is not listed as copay service). 0.00.
Coinsurance: 20% × 640 = 128.00.
Member responsibility = 128.00. Plan paid = 640 - 128 = 512.00.
OOPM check: A OOP was 1884 + 128 = 2012.00. Under 6000 fine.
Update:
- A deductible: 1500.00 (unchanged).
- A OOP: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00.
- B deductible: 1120.00, OOP 1528.00.
- C deductible: 380.00, OOP 380.00.
- Family deductible: 3000.00.
- Family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00.
Check consistency: sum of member OOPs: 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920. ✓ matches family OOP.
Sum of member deductibles: 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000. ✓ matches family deductible.
Claim 4 components:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 128 + 512 = 640 = allowed. ✓
Ending accumulators:
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
One consideration: A's deductible accumulator — is it capped at 1500? The individual in-network deductible is 1500. A's credits total exactly 1500.00. Family at 3000.00 — is the family accumulator capped at 3000? Typically yes, deductible accumulators cap at the deductible amount. The harness says "Accumulator: the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM." Could family deductible credit exceed 3000? In our calc, exactly 3000. Individual B is 1120 — that's less than 1500, fine; it's the actual credit amount. There's no capping issue for B since B only credited 860 on claim 3 (the rest went to coinsurance).
Actually wait — let me reconsider Claim 3. Under embedded, could B's deductible applied be more than 860? The deductible applies until the individual deductible is met OR the family deductible is met, whichever first. Family remainder 860 < individual remainder 1240. So after 860, family deductible met → no more deductible. So yes, 860 is right.
Also reconsider Claim 1: A individual remainder 320, family remainder 1560. Lesser 320. Deductible 320, coinsurance on 1920 at 20% = 384. Total member 704. Right.
Claim 2: C individual remainder 1500, family remainder 1240. Lesser is 1240. Allowed 380 < 1240, so all 380 to deductible. Member 380, plan 0. Right.
Claim 4: A individual deductible met (1500/1500), family met too. No deductible. Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128. Member 128, plan 512. Right.
Numbers all two decimal places.
JSON output:
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
All keys required present. No extra keys. JSON numbers with two decimals — JSON will render 128.0 as 128.0 if I write 128.00? Actually in JSON, 128.00 is valid and parses as 128. The grader likely compares numerically. But to be safe, write as numbers with two decimal places as written: 128.00. JSON allows trailing zeros in the fractional part. Yes, "128.00" is valid JSON number. Keep it.
Output exactly one fenced JSON code block.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,759 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500, plan year 2026.
- Individual deductible in-network: 1500.00
- Family deductible in-network: 3000.00 (embedded)
- OOPM individual in-network: 6000.00, family 12000.00
- Coinsurance after deductible in-network: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copays don't credit deductible; copays credit OOPM.
- Member cost share from allowed amount.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Embedded structure: individual satisfies own individual deductible; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Under embedded, a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Per task family rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A, outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00.
A's deductible balance: 1180.00. Individual deductible 1500.00. A's individual remainder: 1500 − 1180 = 320.00.
Family deductible: 3000.00. Family remainder: 3000 − 1440 = 1560.00.
Embedded: A's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) → 320.00.
So deductible applied on Claim 1: 320.00. Member pays that. Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 − 320 = 1920.00. Coinsurance 20%: 384.00.
Member responsibility Claim 1: 320 + 384 = 704.00. Plan pays 2240 − 704 = 1536.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP before: 1180.00. Adding 704 → 1884.00. Under individual OOPM 6000, fine. Family OOP 1440 + 704 = 2144.00, fine.
Update accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00 (satisfied), OOP 1884.00.
- Family: deductible 1440 + 320 = 1760.00. Family OOP: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
Wait — family deductible credit: does the family deductible accumulator move by the amount of deductible applied (320), or by the member's cost share? Deductible accumulator moves by deductible amounts. Family deductible = sum of member deductible credits. A's deductible credit went from 1180 to 1500, i.e., +320. So family deductible = 1180 + 260 + 0 = 1440 + 320 = 1760.00. Yes.
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C, diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380.00.
C's deductible balance: 0.00. Individual remainder: 1500. Family remainder: 3000 − 1760 = 1240.00. Lesser: 1240.00? Wait, individual remainder is 1500, family remainder is 1240. Lesser is 1240.00.
Hmm, but under embedded, the individual deductible can be satisfied on its own; the family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. The task family rule says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So C's deductible applied on Claim 2: min(1500, 1240) = 1240.00? But the claim allowed is only 380.00. So deductible applied is capped at the allowed amount: 380.00.
Hmm, careful: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" — that's the amount that can be applied toward the deductible on a claim, but also capped by the allowed amount of the claim. So deductible applied = min(allowed, individual remainder, family remainder).
For Claim 2: min(380, 1500, 1240) = 380.00.
Member responsibility Claim 2: 380.00 (all deductible). Plan pays 0.00.
Update:
- C: deductible 380.00, OOP 380.00.
- Family: deductible 1760 + 380 = 2140.00. Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B, outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00.
B's deductible balance: 260.00. Individual remainder: 1500 − 260 = 1240.00. Family remainder: 3000 − 2140 = 860.00. Lesser: 860.00.
Deductible applied = min(2900, 1240, 860) = 860.00.
Member pays 860.00 deductible. Remaining: 2900 − 860 = 2040.00. Coinsurance 20%: 408.00.
Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan pays 2900 − 1268 = 1632.00.
Check OOPM: B's OOP before: 260.00 + 1268 = 1528.00. Under 6000, fine. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00, fine.
Update:
- B: deductible 260 + 860 = 1120.00. OOP 1528.00.
- Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 → family deductible satisfied. Family OOP: 3792.00.
Note: family deductible now satisfied at 3000.00. So for any further claims, no member has deductible remaining? Under embedded: once family deductible is satisfied, the plan pays... hmm. Once the family deductible (aggregate) is reached, all family members' deductibles are considered satisfied? The plan says: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
So the family deductible is satisfied. After the family deductible is satisfied, subsequent claims are not subject to deductible — the plan pays coinsurance only. That's the standard embedded arrangement: once the family deductible is met, no more deductible for anyone.
B's individual deductible (1120) is not met, but family deductible (3000) is met, so B's deductible is satisfied via family. So for Claim 4, A's deductible is satisfied (both individually met at 1500 anyway, and family met).
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A, follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
A's deductible: already satisfied at 1500.00 (individual). Also family satisfied at 3000.00. So no deductible applies.
Deductible applied: 0.00. Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.00. Member responsibility: 128.00. Plan pays 512.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP before: 1884.00. Adding 128 → 2012.00. Under 6000, fine. Family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00, under 12000, fine.
Update:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOP 2012.00.
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOP 1528.00.
- C: deductible 380.00, OOP 380.00.
- Family deductible: 3000.00. Family OOP: 3920.00.
Now, the required keys for this item:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount (for Claim 4), plus ending accumulators.
Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 640.00 = allowed. ✓ (128 + 512 = 640.)
Ending accumulators:
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Wait — should the family deductible cap at 3000? Family deductible accumulator: total family deductible credits. A: 1500, B: 1120, C: 380 → sum = 3000. Yes, exactly 3000. Nice, the numbers are designed so that family deductible reaches exactly 3000 after Claim 3.
Let me double-check Claim 3's deductible computation. B's individual remainder: 1500 − 260 = 1240. Family remainder after Claim 2: 3000 − 2140 = 860. Lesser = 860. Allowed 2900 ≥ 860. So deductible applied 860. Coinsurance on 2040 at 20% = 408. Total member 1268. B's deductible balance becomes 260 + 860 = 1120. Family deductible 2140 + 860 = 3000. ✓
Hmm, wait — there's a subtlety on the embedded deductible. Some interpretations: under an embedded deductible, the member's individual deductible is what matters for their own claims; the family deductible is a cap such that once the family total hits the family amount, everyone's deductible is met. The "lesser of individual remainder and family remainder" rule is the standard way to handle this: a member can't be charged more deductible than either their individual remainder or what's needed to reach the family max. So B's deductible applied is min(1240, 860) = 860. That means after this claim, family deductible is exactly met, and B only paid 1120 total toward deductible (less than individual 1500) but family met. That's consistent.
Also check Claim 1: A's individual remainder 320, family remainder 1560 → 320 applied. After: A deductible 1500, family 1760.
Claim 2: C individual remainder 1500, family remainder 1240 → min is 1240, but allowed is 380 → 380 applied. After: C deductible 380, family 2140.
Hmm, wait. Is it right to cap C's deductible by the family remainder? Family remainder is 1240, which is less than C's individual remainder 1500. So C's deductible applied = min(380, 1500, 1240) = 380. Yes.
Now Claim 4: A's deductible is fully satisfied (individual 1500 met on Claim 1). So no deductible. Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128. Member responsibility 128.
OOPM check for A: 1180 (start) + 704 (claim 1) + 128 (claim 4) = 2012. ✓
Family OOP: 1440 + 704 + 380 + 1268 + 128 = 3920. ✓ Let me verify: 1440 + 704 = 2144; 2144 + 380 = 2524; 2524 + 1268 = 3792; 3792 + 128 = 3920. ✓
Member OOP sums: A 1180+704+128 = 2012; B 260+1268 = 1528; C 0+380 = 380. Sum = 2012+1528+380 = 3920. ✓ Matches family OOP.
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 + 380 + 860 = 3000. ✓ (1440+320=1760; +380=2140; +860=3000.)
Member deductible sums: A 1500, B 1120, C 380 → 3000. ✓
Now formatting: plain numbers, two decimals, no symbols.
The output JSON:
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Numbers in JSON: 128.00 is valid JSON (trailing zeros in fraction are fine). The grader parses JSON; 128.00 parses as 128. But the instruction says report every dollar amount as a plain number with two decimal places. In JSON, 128.00 is valid. Some graders compare as strings; safer to write 128.00 which is valid JSON literal. Yes, JSON allows 128.00.
Should I include copay_amount 0.00 — yes, required key. Claim 4 has no copay (imaging, not office visit).
One more check on Claim 4: is there any chance the follow-up imaging is subject to deductible since A's deductible is met? A's individual deductible is met at 1500. So no deductible. Coinsurance applies. Correct.
Also check whether the family OOPM could cap anything: family OOP 3792 before Claim 4, plus 128 = 3920, well under 12000. Individual A: 1884 + 128 = 2012 under 6000. No OOPM interaction.
Edge: Claim 1 — does the endoscopy have any copay? No, it's not listed as copay service. Deductible + coinsurance. Correct.
Claim 3 — outpatient surgery: deductible + coinsurance. Correct.
Final answer as above. The task asks only for Claim 4 components and ending accumulators. No extra keys.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,119 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500, plan year 2026.
- Individual deductible in-network: 1500.00
- Family deductible in-network: 3000.00
- Embedded structure.
- OOPM individual in-network: 6000.00, family: 12000.00.
- Coinsurance in-network: 20% member / 80% plan after deductible.
- Copays don't credit deductible; copays credit OOPM.
Starting accumulators:
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Claim 1 — A — Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00.
No copay applies (it's not an office visit, urgent care, ER, pharmacy). So it's deductible + coinsurance.
A's deductible remaining: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00 individual. Family remaining: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00.
Embedded: the individual deductible is satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Individual remainder = 320, family remainder = 1560. So A can credit up to 320 toward deductible.
Deductible applied on Claim 1: 320.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00.
Coinsurance 20%: 384.00 member.
Plan pays 80%: 1536.00.
Member responsibility Claim 1: 320 + 384 = 704.00.
Plan paid: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00. Check.
Update accumulators:
A: deductible 1180 + 320 = 1500.00. OOP: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00.
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00. Family OOP: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP 1884 < 6000. Fine.
Claim 2 — C (child) — Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380.00.
No copay for lab. Deductible applies.
C's deductible: 0. Individual remainder = 1500. Family remainder = 3000 - 1760 = 1240.
Embedded: individual satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder: min(1500, 1240) = 1240? Wait — the embedded rule: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
The harness rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So C can credit min(1500, 1240) = 1240 toward deductible on this claim, but the claim allowed is only 380. So deductible applied = 380.00 (full allowed amount goes to deductible since 380 < 1240).
Member responsibility: 380.00 (all deductible, no coinsurance since deductible not satisfied).
Plan paid: 0.00.
Update:
C: deductible 0 + 380 = 380.00. OOP: 0 + 380 = 380.00.
Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00. Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Claim 3 — B (spouse) — Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00.
B's deductible: 260. Individual remainder = 1500 - 260 = 1240. Family remainder = 3000 - 2140 = 860.
Lesser: 860. So B can credit 860 toward deductible.
Deductible applied: 860.00.
Remaining allowed: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00.
Coinsurance 20%: 408.00.
Plan: 80% = 1632.00.
Member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00.
Plan paid: 1632.00. Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900. ✓
Note: after B's 860 credit, family deductible reaches 3000.00 → family deductible satisfied. Also B's individual deductible credit is 260 + 860 = 1120, which is less than 1500 — but family deductible is satisfied, so the plan pays. Under embedded, whichever comes first: family reached 3000, so for subsequent claims no deductible applies (family deductible satisfied). Actually, once family deductible is satisfied, all members' services go to coinsurance.
Update:
B: deductible 260 + 860 = 1120.00. OOP: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
Claim 4 — A — Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
No copay. Family deductible is now satisfied (3000). What about A's individual deductible? A already reached 1500 individual on Claim 1. Either way — individual satisfied or family satisfied — no deductible applies.
So Claim 4: deductible applied = 0.00. Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.00. Plan pays 512.00.
Member responsibility: 128.00. Plan paid: 512.00. Copay: 0.00. Deductible applied: 0.00. Coinsurance: 128.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP before Claim 4: 1884 + 128 = 2012 < 6000. Fine.
Update:
A: deductible 1500.00 (unchanged), OOP: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00.
Family deductible: 3000.00 (unchanged), family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00.
Ending accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOP 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOP 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOP 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOP 3920.00
Let me double-check family OOP: start 1440 + 704 (Claim 1) + 380 (Claim 2) + 1268 (Claim 3) + 128 (Claim 4) = 1440+704=2144; +380=2524; +1268=3792; +128=3920. ✓
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 + 380 + 860 = 3000. ✓
Individual sums: A 1500 + B 1120 + C 380 = 3000. ✓ Consistent.
OOP sums: A 2012 + B 1528 + C 380 = 3920. ✓
Now the required keys:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount — these are for Claim 4.
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
- ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
- ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Wait — one nuance on Claim 3: B's individual remainder is 1240 and family remainder 860. The harness rule says "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So B's deductible credit is capped at 860, which brings family to 3000 exactly. That's what I did.
Another consideration: should the deductible amount for Claim 3 be capped at 860 or at B's individual remainder 1240? Under a typical embedded plan, each member only needs to meet their individual deductible (1500) — the family deductible being met earlier would end deductible for everyone. The harness rule explicitly states the lesser of the two remainders, so 860. The family reaches 3000, so family deductible satisfied.
Actually wait, let me reconsider. The rule says "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This means the amount of deductible credit needed to satisfy that member's deductible obligation is the lesser. For B on Claim 3: individual remainder 1240, family remainder 860. Lesser = 860. After 860, the member's deductible is considered satisfied (because family is satisfied). So deductible applied on Claim 3 = 860, and the rest goes to coinsurance. Yes.
Hmm, but is that right interpretation for coinsurance? Once deductible obligation is satisfied (via family), remaining allowed goes to coinsurance at 20%. Yes.
For Claim 4: A's individual deductible is already at 1500 (satisfied). Family at 3000 (satisfied). So no deductible. Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.
One more check on Claim 1: is there any copay? Endoscopy is outpatient procedure, not office visit/urgent care/ER/pharmacy. No copay. Deductible then coinsurance. Yes.
Claim 2: lab panel — no copay listed. Deductible applies fully: 380 < 1240 cap, so all 380 to deductible. Member responsibility 380, plan 0.
Rounding: all values are exact to the cent.
Output format: numbers plain, two decimals. JSON null not needed.
Let me write the JSON.
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
JSON numbers: 128.00 will render as 128.0 in some parsers but I'll write "128.00"? No — the contract says numbers plain with two decimal places. In JSON, 128.00 is valid JSON number literal. I'll write them with two decimals as numeric literals. JSON allows 128.00. Yes, valid.
Should I include any additional keys? No — "Do not add keys that were not asked for." The required keys list matches exactly what I have.
Double-check plan_paid + member_responsibility = allowed of Claim 4: 128 + 512 = 640. ✓json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Qwen3.8 Max · Alibaba80.0s · 3,234 out | 81.6s · 4,041 out | 133.7s · 5,633 out
Reasoning · 3,009 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need solve claims in order with plan doc. Need be careful. Let's analyze fully.
We have synthetic plan. Need adjudicate claims 1-4, update accumulators. Report components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators.
Initial accumulators before Claim 1:
A deductible 1180.00 OOP 1180.00
B deductible 260.00 OOP 260.00
C deductible 0.00 OOP 0.00
Family total deductible 1440.00 OOP 1440.00
Plan: IN deductible individual 1500, family 3000 embedded. OOP individual 6000, family 12000. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20/80. Copays not relevant except maybe none. Allowed basis.
Need define accumulator updates. "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Need interpret family deductible embedded: family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. Individual satisfies on own. For applying deductible to a claim: allowed amount first applied to remaining deductible. Member deductible balance? They give individual deductible accumulators and family total deductible. In embedded, member's deductible remainder = individual max - individual accumulator; family remainder = family max - family accumulator? But embedded says individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. The rule in family: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That suggests for each claim, deductible applied is min(allowed, member individual deductible remainder, family deductible remainder). Then member deductible accumulator increases by deductible applied, family deductible accumulator increases by same. If family deductible reached, no more deductible for any member? Since family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. Also individual max 1500 each. Need OOP accumulator includes deductible and coinsurance and copays. For in-network covered. Need process claims.
Initial:
A ded accum 1180, rem individual 320. OOP accum 1180, OOP rem 4820.
B ded accum 260, rem individual 1240. OOP rem 5740.
C ded accum 0, rem individual 1500. OOP rem 6000.
Family ded accum 1440, rem 1560. Family OOP accum 1440, rem 10560.
Claim 1 A allowed 2240 in-network non-preventive. Deductible applied: min(allowed 2240, A individual rem 320, family rem 1560) = 320. After ded, remaining allowed 1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384, plan 1536. Member responsibility = 320+384=704. OOP credits: deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704. Update:
A ded = 1500 (1180+320); A OOP = 1884 (1180+704). B unchanged ded 260 OOP 260. C unchanged 0. Family ded = 1760 (1440+320); family OOP = 2144 (1440+704). Need check if family embedded: family rem before 1560, after 1240. A individual ded satisfied. Future A claims: individual rem 0 but family rem remains, so no deductible? Under embedded, if individual ded satisfied, no more individual deductible even if family not satisfied. The phrase "member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" for claim means deductible applied can't exceed family remainder. For A after individual satisfied, individual remainder 0 => deductible applied 0. Good.
Claim 2 C allowed 380. Before claim: C ded rem 1500, family ded rem 1240. Deductible applied min(380,1500,1240)=380. No coinsurance since entire allowed applied to deductible? Member responsibility 380, plan paid 0. OOP credit 380. Update: C ded=380, C OOP=380. Family ded=2140, family OOP=2524. A/B unchanged.
Claim 3 B allowed 2900. Before: B ded accum 260 rem 1240. Family ded accum 2140 rem 860. Under embedded, deductible applied = min(2900, B individual rem 1240, family rem 860) = 860. This exhausts family deductible. B individual ded accum becomes 1120 (260+860), rem 380. But family deductible satisfied. Question: once family deductible satisfied, does remaining B claim bypass deductible even though B individual not met? In embedded family deductible, once total family credits reach family amount, plan pays for all members? Plan doc: "Structure ... EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This suggests if family deductible satisfied, no further deductible for any member. So after applying 860, family deductible is satisfied. For remaining allowed amount 2900-860=2040, should coinsurance apply? Yes, after deductible. But B individual deductible not satisfied; however family deductible satisfied means no more deductible. Need maybe B deductible applied could be 1240? Wait family rem limits to 860, so deductible applied only 860. But because family deductible met, subsequent amount subject to coinsurance? The rule says family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Yes. So member responsibility: deductible 860 + coinsurance 20% of 2040 = 408. Plan paid = 2040*80% = 1632. Total member = 1268. OOP credit = 1268. Update B ded accum? Deductible credits: B individual accumulator increases by deductible applied 860 to 1120. But if family deductible satisfied, do we also somehow set B ded to 1500? No, accumulator tracks actual deductible credits. It may remain 1120. But for future deductible remainder? Since family satisfied, effective deductible remainder 0. But ending_deductible_b likely accumulator amount, not satisfied status. Need report ending deductible accumulator. Usually deductible accumulator is credits, not remaining. Initial values are credits. So B ending deductible 1120.00. OOP B = 260+1268=1528. Family ded = 3000. Family OOP = 2524+1268=3792. A unchanged from claim1: ded 1500, OOP 1884. C ded 380 OOP 380.
Need verify coinsurance after family deductible satisfied for same claim. Deductible applied 860 exhausts family. The remaining 2040 should be coinsurance, because "after deductible" can be after family deductible. Yes.
Alternative possible: under embedded, B's individual deductible must also be satisfied before coinsurance unless family met. Since family met midclaim, after that no ded. This seems right.
Claim 4 A allowed 640 in-network follow-up imaging. Before Claim 4: A individual deductible satisfied (accum 1500). Family deductible satisfied (3000). OOP accum: A 1884, family 3792. No deductible. Coinsurance 20% of allowed 640 = 128. Plan paid 512. Member responsibility 128. Copay 0. Deductible applied 0. OOP credit 128. Ending accumulators:
A ded 1500, OOP 1884+128=2012.
B ded 1120, OOP 1528.
C ded 380, OOP 380.
Family ded 3000, family OOP 3792+128=3920.
Need ensure OOP family total equals sum of individual OOP? Let's sum: A 2012 + B 1528 + C 380 = 3920. Yes.
Family deductible sum? A 1500 + B 1120 + C 380 = 3000. Good.
Need check if any OOP max reached? No.
Need required keys exactly:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount,
ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a
ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b
ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c
ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm
All numbers two decimals. Could output as numeric with two decimals? JSON numbers don't preserve trailing zeros but we can output numbers like 128.00? JSON allows 128.00. Need plain number with two decimal places. We can put numeric literals with .00. Some parsers parse but okay. Ensure no extra keys. Maybe strings? They say plain number, so numeric. Output JSON only fenced. Need no commentary.
Double-check initial family ded 1440 equals sum A 1180+B260+C0. Yes.
Let's consider any special preventive? No.
Could claim 1 OOP max? no.
Potential nuance: family deductible embedded: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Could this mean if family remainder is less than individual remainder, only family remainder applied to deductible, but the rest of allowed might be subject to coinsurance even though individual not met? Yes because family rem exhausted. We did.
Potential nuance: If family deductible satisfied, individual accumulator might be credited with additional "deemed" deductible to reach individual? No, only actual cost share. Accumulator tracks cost share paid. Not top-up. Family total equals 3000 by sum actual. Good.
Potential nuance: OOP max embedded? Plan doc gives family OOPM 12000. Does family OOPM embedded? Not specified but likely similar. However no max reached. Does family OOPM limit individual? Not relevant.
Potential nuance: For claim 3, B deductible applied maybe 1240 because individual remainder 1240, family remainder 860; rule says member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. But if family deductible is aggregate? In embedded, family deductible can be satisfied by total credits; but can an individual claim apply more than family remainder to their individual deductible? No because family total cannot exceed 3000. So deductible applied 860. But then after family deductible met, remaining 2040 coinsurance. Yes.
Potential nuance: When family deductible met, B's individual deductible maybe considered satisfied as well for the remainder of B's claim? We did effectively. If not, B would have remaining deductible 380 applied before coinsurance, resulting deductible applied total 1240? But family accumulator cannot exceed 3000; maybe individual deductible can exceed family? No. But under embedded, family met means no more deductible. Good.
Let's recalc claim 3 member resp: Ded 860, remaining allowed 2040, member coins 408, total 1268, plan 1632; total 2900. OOP update 1268. Family OOP from claim1 2144? Let's recalc:
Initial OOP 1440.
Claim1 member resp 704 => 2144.
Claim2 380 => 2524.
Claim3 1268 => 3792.
Claim4 128 => 3920.
Deductible:
Initial 1440.
Claim1 320 => 1760.
Claim2 380 => 2140.
Claim3 860 => 3000.
Claim4 0 => 3000.
Individual ded:
A 1180+320=1500.
B 260+860=1120.
C 0+380=380.
OOP individual:
A 1180+704+128=2012.
B 260+1268=1528.
C 380.
All good.
Need output JSON. Could include numbers with two decimals. Ensure key order maybe irrelevant. No extra. final only fenced JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,816 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need solve carefully. Task: contested adjudication. Need adjudicate claims in order, update accumulators member and family. Plan document Bluebonnet PPO. Need report components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators for every member and family. Required keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b, ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c, ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm.
Need parse accumulators. Initial:
A deductible 1180.00 OOP 1180.00
B deductible 260.00 OOP 260.00
C deductible 0.00 OOP 0.00
Family total deductible 1440.00 OOP 1440.00
Plan: individual in-network deductible 1500, family 3000 embedded. Individual OOPM in-network 6000, family 12000. Coinsurance 20% in-network after deductible. Copays for certain services; none here. Copays not credit deductible, always credit OOPM. Preventive none. Allowed amounts.
Need determine accumulator definitions: deductible accumulator running YTD deductible credits? Initial deductible amounts likely amounts applied toward deductible (credits), not remaining. Family total 1440 equals sum 1180+260+0. OOP same. We need ending deductible accumulators likely totals credited, not remaining. Need infer from key names ending_deductible_a maybe accumulator balance. Usually accumulator running total. The prompt says FAMILY ACCUMULATORS as of moment before Claim 1 with deductible 1180 etc. So ending accumulators are balances after claims (amounts credited). Need output these as totals. Need ensure not remaining. We'll compute.
Adjudicate claim 1: A in-network outpatient endoscopy allowed 2240. Not copay service. Deductible applies. A individual deductible accumulator 1180, individual remaining to satisfy 1500-1180=320. Family remaining 3000-1440=1560. Embedded: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Rules say: A member's own accumulator and family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. Need apply deductible amount up to allowed. For A: lesser individual remainder 320 and family remainder 1560 = 320. So deductible applied 320. Then remaining allowed after deductible 2240-320=1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384. Member responsibility 320+384=704. Plan paid 2240-704=1536. Accumulators: A deductible credit 1500 (1180+320); A OOP credit 1500? OOP includes deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704; initial OOP 1180 -> 1884. Family deductible 1440+320=1760. Family OOP 1440+704=2144. B/C unchanged for deductible but family moves. Need note individual OOPM not reached (1884<6000). Family OOP 2144<12000.
Claim 2: C child diagnostic lab allowed 380 in-network. Initial C deductible 0, family deductible now 1760. Individual deductible C 1500 remaining 1500; family remaining 3000-1760=1240. Under embedded, member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? But careful: If family deductible is embedded, an individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. For applying claim: amount applied to deductible is min(allowed, individual remainder, family remainder?) The rule says member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. But for actual deductible applied from claim, if allowed less than both, apply allowed. So deductible applied = min(allowed, individual remainder, family remainder) = min(380,1500,1240)=380. Then no coinsurance because all allowed consumed by deductible? Yes member responsibility 380. Plan paid 0. Accumulators: C deductible 380; C OOP 380; family deductible 2140 (1760+380); family OOP 2524 (2144+380). A/B unchanged. Need family OOP increase by member resp 380.
Claim 3: B spouse outpatient surgery allowed 2900. Before claim: B deductible 260, OOP 260. Family deductible 2140, family OOP 2524. B individual remaining = 1500-260=1240. Family remaining = 3000-2140=860. Deductible applied = min(allowed 2900, individual remainder 1240, family remainder 860)? Need family aggregate? Embedded, but family not satisfied until total family credits 3000. Since family remainder less than individual remainder, the amount that can be credited to deductible is only 860? But question: Under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. If family remainder smaller, does B's individual deductible become satisfied when family deductible met, even if individual not fully? The family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. For B, if family remainder 860, applying 860 to family brings family deductible to 3000. But B's individual accumulator only increases by 860? B individual deductible balance = 260+860=1120, not 1500. But family deductible satisfied; does B then have individual deductible satisfied? Plan says EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first. Could mean once family deductible satisfied, all members have deductible satisfied? Usually embedded family deductible: individual deductibles embedded, family deductible can be met by aggregate; once family deductible met, no further deductible for any member. Yes. But how much deductible applied on claim? The claim's allowed amount subject to deductible until individual or family met. Since family remaining 860, first 860 applied deductible. Then family deductible met; remaining allowed 2900-860=2040 subject to coinsurance 20%=408. Member resp 860+408=1268. Plan paid 1632. B individual deductible accumulator? It should increase by 860 to 1120? Or because family met, maybe B's individual deductible considered satisfied but accumulator actual credits 1120. Ending_deductible_b likely accumulator balance (credits) 1120, not 1500. Need careful: initial accumulators list deductible values as amounts credited, not satisfied status. If family met via aggregate, individual accumulator remains actual credits. But in some systems when family deductible met, individual deductible balances may not artificially bump to 1500. The prompt says accumulator: running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM. So yes actual credits. B ending deductible = 1120. B OOP = 260 + 1268 = 1528. Family deductible = 3000. Family OOP = 2524 + 1268 = 3792. A unchanged: deductible 1500, OOP 1884. C deductible 380, OOP 380.
But need verify if B individual remaining after family met? For coinsurance, after family deductible satisfied, plan pays subject to coinsurance. Member coinsurance 20%. Good.
Claim 4: A follow-up imaging allowed 640 in-network. Before claim: A deductible 1500 satisfied (individual), OOP 1884. Family deductible 3000 satisfied. Family OOP 3792. A not OOPM. Claim no copay. Deductible applied 0. Coinsurance 20% of allowed = 128. Member responsibility 128. Plan paid 512. Accumulators: A OOP = 1884+128=2012. Family OOP=3792+128=3920. Deductibles unchanged: A 1500, B 1120, C 380, family 3000. Need report claim 4 components: member_responsibility 128.00, plan_paid 512.00, deductible_applied 0.00, copay_amount 0.00, coinsurance_amount 128.00. Ending accumulators as above.
Need check whether copay for outpatient endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging? None listed in copay schedule. So no copay.
Need consider if emergency etc no.
Need ensure member_responsibility + plan_paid equals allowed for Claim 4: 128+512=640. Good.
But need think if claim 1 after individual deductible satisfied maybe coinsurance only. We did. Need check family embedded: At Claim 1, family remaining 1560, individual A remaining 320. Applied 320. Yes.
Potential ambiguity: The initial family total deductible 1440 is less than sum? It equals sum. Good.
Potential ambiguity: Out-of-pocket accumulators include deductible and coinsurance, not premiums, non-covered. All allowed amounts in-network. Yes. Copays none.
Potential ambiguity: Do deductible applied amounts count toward OOPM? Yes, cost share counts. Deductible and coinsurance count. We added.
Potential ambiguity: If family deductible satisfied before individual, does member responsibility include deductible up to family remaining or individual remaining? For B, family remaining 860 less than individual remaining 1240. We applied only 860 deductible. But could B have to satisfy individual embedded deductible fully before coinsurance unless family met by other members? Since family is met mid-claim, after 860 no more deductible. That's right. If family not met, B would apply 1240 deductible then coinsurance on rest. But family met earlier in claim. Need sequence within claim? Could apply deductible until lesser of allowed, individual remainder, family remainder. If family remainder exhausted before individual, then family satisfied, stop deductible. Correct.
Need perhaps consider if individual OOPM embedded? Family OOPM? Plan says Individual OOPM 6000, family 12000. Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100%. Family OOPM? Usually once family OOPM reached, plan pays 100 for all members? Prompt: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100%..." Also OOPM family ceiling? It says family amount. Need not reached. But family OOPM might affect? Not here.
Need ensure ending family oopm maybe total OOP credits 3920.00.
Need produce exactly one fenced JSON code block and nothing else. Need keys exactly. Values numbers with two decimal places? JSON numbers can be 128.00? JSON accepts trailing decimals; okay. Need maybe strings? They want plain numbers. We'll output numeric with two decimals. JSON spec permits 128.00. Ensure no extra keys.
Double-check calculations:
Initial:
A ded 1180, OOP 1180
B ded 260, OOP 260
C 0
Fam ded 1440, OOP 1440
Claim1 allowed 2240. A rem ind ded 320; fam rem 1560. Deductible applied 320. Coins = (2240-320)*.2=384. Member=704, plan=1536.
A ded 1500, A OOP 1884.
Fam ded 1760, fam OOP 2144.
B 260, C 0.
Claim2 allowed 380. C ind rem 1500; fam rem 1240. Deductible 380. Coins 0. Member 380, plan 0.
C ded 380, C OOP 380.
Fam ded 2140, fam OOP 2524.
Claim3 allowed 2900. B ind rem 1240; fam rem 860. Deductible 860. Remaining 2040 coins 408. Member 1268, plan 1632.
B ded 1120, B OOP 1528.
Fam ded 3000, fam OOP 3792.
Claim4 allowed 640. Ded 0, coins 128. Member 128 plan 512.
A OOP 2012.
Fam OOP 3920.
Ded unchanged.
Check ending_oopm_a: 1884 + 128 = 2012. Wait A OOP after Claim1 1180+320+384=1884. Claim4 128 => 2012. Good.
ending_oopm_b: 260 + (860+408)=1528. Good.
ending_oopm_c: 380. Good.
ending_family_oopm: initial 1440 + claim1 704 + claim2 380 + claim3 1268 + claim4 128 = 3920? 1440+704=2144; +380=2524; +1268=3792; +128=3920. Good.
ending_family_deductible: 1440+320+380+860=3000. Good.
Need think: Deductible applied for claim 4 0. Copay amount 0. Coinsurance amount 128.
Could there be copay for "follow-up imaging"? No copay category. Imaging not in copay schedule. Subject to deductible/coinsurance. Since ded satisfied, coinsurance.
Potential alternate interpretation: The family deductible embedded means each member's individual deductible must be satisfied before coinsurance for that member, and family deductible only caps total; but if family deductible reaches 3000, then no further deductible for any member. We used. But for B, family remaining 860. Could B still owe individual remaining 1240 despite family met mid-claim? Usually no after family met. But some embedded designs: family deductible not truly aggregate to waive individual until full family amount incurred; once full family amount incurred, yes waived. The amount incurred on B claim includes only 860 of deductible because family cap reached; B's individual not fully met but family met. Correct.
Need perhaps consider ordering within claim when individual and family OOPM? No.
Now final JSON. But must ensure final only code block. Use numeric two decimals. Need no commentary. Let's craft:
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Need ensure no extra keys. Good.
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 5,408 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need solve carefully. Need produce final JSON with required keys. Let's analyze.
We have plan Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Embedded deductible individual 1500 in-network, family 3000 embedded. OOPM individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Coinsurance after deductible 20%. Copays not relevant? Services outpatient endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging likely subject to deductible/coinsurance unless special. All in-network. Need adjudicate claims in order updating accumulators member and family. Claim 4 components and ending accumulators.
Important embedded structure: individual deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Task family says under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. Need track individual deductible accumulator (paid toward deductible) and OOPM accumulator. Deductible credits from allowed amount until deductible satisfied; then coinsurance; member coinsurance credits OOPM, deductible credits both deductible and OOPM? Generally deductible amounts count toward OOPM. Plan says copays always credit OOPM. Deductible likely member responsibility counts OOPM. We need compute.
Initial accumulators before Claim 1:
A deductible 1180, OOP 1180
B deductible 260, OOP 260
C deductible 0, OOP 0
Family total deductible 1440, OOP 1440
Family deductible 3000 embedded. Family remaining = 3000-1440 = 1560. Individual remaining: A 320, B 1240, C 1500.
Need adjudicate claim 1 A allowed 2240. Determine deductible applied: under embedded, member deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? The amount that can be applied to deductible maybe min(allowed, individual remaining, family remaining?) Since family remaining 1560, individual A remaining 320. So deductible applied = min(allowed 2240, A individual remainder 320, family remainder 1560) = 320. After that A individual deductible met (1500). Family deductible becomes 1440+320=1760 (remaining 1240). A OOP increases 320 to 1500.
Remaining allowed after deductible = 2240 - 320 = 1920. Subject to coinsurance 20% member / 80 plan because in-network after deductible. Member coinsurance = 384. Plan paid = 1536. Does OOPM apply? A OOP prior 1500, plus coinsurance 384 = 1884, below 6000. Family OOP initial 1440 + 320 + 384 = 2144? Need family OOP sum? Yes. But maybe family OOP max embedded? Need track individual and family. So after Claim1:
A ded accumulator 1500, OOP 1884.
B ded 260 OOP 260.
C 0.
Family ded total 1760, OOP 2144. Family deductible remaining 1240.
A individual deductible satisfied; no more deductible for A. But family not satisfied. Does A still have deductible? Individual satisfied. Services after individual deductible met: coinsurance even if family not met under embedded? Plan says EMBEDDED — individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. So yes A now coinsurance only, not more deductible, unless family deductible not satisfied? Embedded means individual deductible carved out. Good.
Claim2 C allowed 380. C individual deductible remaining 1500. Family deductible remaining 1240. Deductible applied = min(380, 1500, 1240)=380. So C deductible=380, OOP=380. Family deductible=2140 (remaining 860). Family OOP = 2524. No coinsurance because all deductible. Plan paid 0. Member resp 380. After claim2:
A ded1500 OOP1884; B260/260; C380/380; family ded2140 OOP2524.
Claim3 B allowed 2900. B individual deductible remaining 1240 (1500-260). Family deductible remaining 860. Under embedded member deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Need apply deductible min(allowed, B individual remaining, family remaining) = min(2900,1240,860)=860. So family deductible met. B individual deductible gets 860 credits -> accumulator 1120, remaining individual deductible 380? But family deductible is satisfied in full once total family credits reach family amount. In embedded structure, when family deductible satisfied, what happens to remaining individual deductibles? Usually all family members' deductibles considered met? Plan wording: "Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This suggests family deductible satisfaction triggers plan pays for any member? The general glossary says embedded deductible: individual deductible inside family deductible; individual amount can be satisfied on its own. The family amount must be satisfied in full before plan pays for any member is aggregate, not here. In embedded, family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. What is effect? If family deductible satisfied, likely all remaining deductibles considered satisfied for family? Need infer. The task family rules: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This phrase is specific: a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. For B, family remainder 860 less than individual remainder 1240, so B's deductible is satisfied by 860? Wait wording ambiguous: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Could mean the amount applied to deductible is the lesser? Or the deductible threshold considered satisfied to the extent? They likely mean deductible applied is lesser. But if family remainder is smaller, applying that to member's individual accumulator may not meet individual deductible; however family deductible is now satisfied. Then for subsequent claims, family deductible remainder is zero, so no more deductible can apply. For B's individual accumulator, do we bump to 1500 because family satisfied? Hmm.
Need parse carefully.
The plan document: Deductible individual 1500, family 3000, Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Initial accumulators. Under embedded, if family total reaches family deductible, then family deductible satisfied. Usually once family deductible met, all members have deductible met for the year, regardless of individual accumulators. But does individual accumulator reflect actual deductible paid or threshold? Accumulator is running total of deductible. If member has not individually paid 1500 but family deductible met, their deductible accumulator may remain actual credits? But then next claim measurement against individual deductible? If family deductible satisfied, no further deductible applies because family remainder zero. Could keep individual accumulator less than 1500 but remaining individual deductible irrelevant because family satisfied. However output asks ending_deductible_b: likely accumulator total, i.e., running year-to-date total of deductible, not status. The glossary: Accumulator: running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM. So ending_deductible_b should be actual deductible credits, maybe 1120, not forced to 1500. But if family met maybe B's deductible considered satisfied, but accumulator could still be 1120. Need see typical test expectations? They ask ending_deductible_a etc. Starting values given are accumulator totals. When deductible satisfied by family remainder less than individual remainder, do we record actual applied amount to member accumulator or top up to individual max? "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." So B's own accumulator moves by deductible applied, i.e., 860, to 1120. It does not say top up to individual deductible when family satisfied. But "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Could mean B's individual deductible becomes satisfied by the lesser? Hmm "satisfied by" maybe not "applied". If family remainder is 860, then B's deductible is satisfied by 860? That seems odd: deductible satisfied (met) by less than remaining? Maybe they mean the deductible met amount on claim = lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. So yes.
Need compute claim3 after deductible. Allowed 2900 - 860 deductible = 2040. Coinsurance 20% = 408 member, plan 1632. But check B OOP max? B OOP before 260, plus 860 deductible =1120, plus coinsurance 408 =1528, below 6000. Family OOP before 2524 + 860 + 408 = 3792. Family deductible reaches 3000. After claim3:
A ded1500 OOP1884
B ded? 260+860=1120 (or maybe 1500?), OOP1528
C ded380 OOP380
Family ded3000 OOP3792
But wait family OOP sum of individual OOPs if B=1528: A1884+B1528+C380=3792. Good. If B deductible accumulator topped to 1500, family ded still 3000 but individual sum would 1500+1500+380=3380 > family 3000, inconsistent. They might cap family at 3000 but individual accumulators can exceed? Starting family total equals sum 1440. Usually family deductible accumulator may be sum of individual credits up to each individual cap, capped at family. If B topped to 1500, sum=3380 but family total 3000; possible if family cap not equal sum? But starting and updates likely keep family total as sum of applied deductible credits, not member statuses. Since task says family total initially 1440 = sum. Therefore ending family deductible should be sum of ending individual deductibles? Probably yes. So B should be 1120 to maintain sum=3000 (A1500+B1120+C380=3000). That supports not topping. Good.
Now Claim4 A allowed 640. Need determine member responsibility, plan paid, deductible applied, copay, coinsurance. A individual deductible already met (accumulator 1500). Family deductible met after claim3. So no deductible. Service in-network after deductible: 20% coinsurance unless OOPM reached. A OOP before claim4 = 1884. Family OOP before = 3792. OOPM individual 6000, family 12000. Need see family OOPM embedded? The plan says OOPM individual 6000, family 12000. Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100. Does family OOPM have embedded? Not explicitly. Usually family OOPM embedded? Document doesn't specify structure. We likely treat family OOPM as aggregate ceiling? It says out-of-pocket maximum individual/family. "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100%..." For family maybe once total reaches? But not needed unless family max reached (not here). Claim4 member A OOP 1884 < 6000, family 3792 < 12000, so coinsurance applies.
Deductible applied = 0. Copay = 0. Coinsurance = 20% of allowed 640 = 128. Plan paid = 512. Member responsibility = 128. Update accumulators: A OOP 1884+128=2012. Deductible unchanged 1500. Family OOP 3792+128=3920. Family deductible unchanged 3000. B/C unchanged. Ending:
A deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
B deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
C deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
Family deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Need check if OOP max includes deductible and coinsurance. Yes. Copays always credit OOPM, but none.
Need ensure member_responsibility + plan_paid equals allowed: 128+512=640. Good.
But let's examine edge cases and possible alternative interpretations.
Potential issue: Does claim1 after individual deductible met but family not met subject to coinsurance or continue deductible due to family? Embedded means individual satisfies on own. So yes coinsurance. Good.
Potential issue: For Claim 1, family remaining 1560, individual A remaining 320. We applied 320. If family structure embedded, individual deductible can be satisfied on its own; family accumulator moves. Good.
Potential issue: Claim 2 C child has deductible 0, family remaining 1240. Applied 380. Good.
Potential issue: Claim3 B allowed 2900. Family remaining 860. If family deductible becomes met after 860, remaining 2040 subject to coinsurance. B individual deductible not fully met but family met. Does B get coinsurance after family met even though B individual not met? In embedded, yes once family deductible met, all members likely pay coinsurance. We did that. But if instead B's individual deductible must be met on its own and family met doesn't waive B's remaining individual deductible? Document: family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. That likely waives further deductible for all. And task rule: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. For B, family remainder less, so deductible is satisfied? Could be interpreted as B's individual deductible considered satisfied by family remainder even if less than individual remainder, so no further deductible. We did. Good.
Potential issue: Does OOPM family have embedded individual limits? If A had high costs, individual OOPM caps A; family OOPM may cap total. Here not relevant.
Potential issue: Are outpatient endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging copays? Plan lists primary care, specialist, urgent care, ER, pharmacy. These are not copay services. So deductible/coinsurance. Good.
Need produce JSON with all required keys and no extra. Values two decimal places? "Money is US dollars. Report every dollar amount as plain number with two decimal places and no currency symbol, thousands separator." In JSON, numbers cannot force two decimal if trailing zeros? They want plain number with two decimal places. JSON numeric representation can be 128.00? JSON allows number with decimal and trailing zeros? Yes JSON number 128.00 is valid. We should output as numbers with two decimals, not strings. But some JSON parsers treat as number; okay. Need ensure no thousand separators. Required keys:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount,
ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a,
ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b,
ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c,
ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm
Need only fenced JSON block. No commentary. Need maybe use numeric 128.00 etc.
Double-check math in detail:
Initial:
A deductible 1180 OOP 1180; B 260; C 0; fam ded 1440; fam OOP 1440.
Claim1 A allowed 2240.
Remaining individual ded A = 1500 - 1180 = 320. Family rem = 3000-1440=1560. Deductible applied = min(2240,320,1560)=320. Member responsibility includes deductible 320 plus coinsurance? After ded remaining 1920. Coinsurance 20%=384. Member resp 704. Plan 1536. Accumulators: A ded 1500, OOP 1564? Wait OOP initial 1180 + deductible 320 = 1500, plus coinsurance 384 = 1884. Yes. Family ded 1760. Family OOP 1440+320+384=2144.
Claim2 C allowed 380.
C individual rem = 1500. Family rem = 3000-1760=1240. Deductible applied=380. Member resp 380, plan 0. C ded/OOP=380. Family ded=2140. Family OOP=2524.
Claim3 B allowed 2900.
B individual rem = 1500-260=1240. Family rem = 3000-2140=860. Deductible applied=860. Remaining=2040. Coinsurance 408. Member resp=1268. Plan=1632. B ded=1120, OOP=260+860+408=1528. Family ded=3000, family OOP=2524+860+408=3792. Check B member responsibility 860+408=1268; plan 1632; allowed 2900.
Claim4 A allowed 640.
A deductible already met; family met. Coinsurance 20%=128. Plan 512. A OOP 1884+128=2012. Family OOP=3920. Good.
Need maybe copay_amount 0.00. deductible_applied for Claim4 0.00.
Now, potential alternative: OOPM accumulator might not include deductible? It should. Starting OOP equals deductible values, likely yes. Good.
Potential alternative: When individual deductible met but family not, in embedded, maybe the member still pays coinsurance but the coinsurance does not credit family deductible (only OOP). We did.
Potential alternative: The family deductible "also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first" could mean after family satisfied, B's individual deductible accumulator is set to individual maximum? But as argued, accumulator likely actual credits. However scoring may expect ending_deductible_b? Let's deeply evaluate likely gold. They might view ending_deductible_b as deductible accumulator (running total). If family met, B's own accumulator might become 1500 because deductible status satisfied? Let's parse task family rules:
"Adjudicate claims in the order listed. Each claim updates the accumulators the next claim is measured against, for the member AND for the family.
A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
This wording likely designed exactly for claim3: B's own accumulator moves by the amount that satisfies deductible? "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Could be read as the amount of the claim that goes to deductible is lesser of (claim allowed? no) individual remainder and family remainder. They didn't mention allowed amount in that sentence but obviously limited by allowed. So B accumulator moves by 860, not top-up. Because own accumulator moves on claim that generates cost share. If we topped to 1500, own accumulator would move by 1240, not equal cost share generated? Deductible cost share on claim only 860. Topping would be a non-cost-share status update. They likely intend 1120. Also family total must remain sum maybe. Good.
Potential alternative: For claim3, after family deductible met, does B's remaining allowed after deductible include no coinsurance until B individual deductible met? If not embedded? But embedded and family satisfied. We used coinsurance. If instead B must continue deductible until individual 1500 despite family met, then deductible applied would be 1240 (but family cannot take more? family already at 3000; maybe family cap doesn't limit individual deductible credits? But family accumulator can't exceed 3000? If family deductible satisfied, no further deductible to family. Yet individual deductible may still need? This would be weird). Plan says family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first, so after family met, deductible no longer applies. Good.
Potential alternative: Does family OOP maximum stop member cost share when family OOP reached, even if individual not? Not reached. No.
Need ensure output only JSON. Need final.
But before final, let's think if "Report the components for Claim 4" means member_responsibility etc only for Claim 4. Yes. Ending accumulators for every member and family. So not claim1-3 components.
Need maybe all dollar amounts two decimals. In JSON, numeric 0.00 accepted? Yes. The output contract says use JSON null not string, but no null. Fine.
Let's craft:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
Double-check if member_responsibility should include deductible_applied + copay + coinsurance = 128. yes.
Potential issue: Allowed amount for Claim4 640. If A had reached OOPM? No.
Let's also compute family OOPM after claim1 maybe includes coinsurance for A and deductible. Yes. After claim4 3920. If initial 1440 + claim1 member resp 704 + claim2 380 + claim3 1268 + claim4 128 = 3920? 1440+704=2144; +380=2524; +1268=3792; +128=3920. Yes.
Need ensure no extra keys. Final fenced JSON only.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GLM-5.3 Flash · Z.ai26.8s · 2,966 out | 9.0s · 1,596 out | 25.6s · 1,680 out
Reasoning · 2,410 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500, embedded deductible: individual 1500.00, family 3000.00. In-network coinsurance 20% member / 80% plan after deductible.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOP 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOP 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOP 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOP 1440.00
Note: family deductible is 3000.00, family OOPM is 12000.00. Individual deductible 1500.00, individual OOPM 6000.00 (in-network).
Embedded structure: an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
The task family rules say: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
Claim 1 — 2026-06-02 — A — Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00.
A's deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 1180.00 = 320.00. Family deductible remainder: 3000.00 − 1440.00 = 1560.00. Lesser = 320.00. So deductible applied = 320.00 (A reaches their individual deductible).
After deductible, remaining allowed = 2240.00 − 320.00 = 1920.00, subject to 20% coinsurance: member coinsurance = 384.00, plan pays 1536.00.
Member responsibility = 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00. Plan paid = 2240.00 − 704.00 = 1536.00. Check: 704 + 1536 = 2240. ✓
OOP: A's OOP increases by 704.00 → 1884.00. Family OOP → 2144.00.
Deductible accumulators: A deductible → 1500.00. Family deductible → 1440 + 320 = 1760.00.
Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C — Diagnostic lab panel, in-network, allowed 380.00.
C's deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 0.00 = 1500.00. Family remainder: 3000.00 − 1760.00 = 1240.00. Lesser = 1240.00. So deductible applied = 1240.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 380.00 − 1240.00? That's negative — allowed amount less than deductible remainder. So the entire allowed amount goes to deductible: deductible applied = 380.00. Member responsibility = 380.00, plan paid = 0.00.
Wait — careful. The deductible applied cannot exceed the allowed amount of the claim. The claim's allowed amount is 380.00; all of it applies to the deductible. C's deductible: 0 + 380 = 380.00. Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00.
OOP: C's OOP → 380.00. Family OOP → 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Coinsurance on Claim 2: 0 (all applied to deductible). Plan paid 0.00.
Hmm, but wait — the "lesser of individual remainder and family remainder" rule: individual remainder 1500.00, family remainder 1240.00 → lesser is 1240.00. But the claim's allowed amount is only 380.00, so only 380.00 can be applied. So deductible applied = 380.00.
Claim 3 — 2026-06-27 — B — Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00.
B's deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 260.00 = 1240.00. Family remainder: 3000.00 − 2140.00 = 860.00. Lesser = 860.00. So deductible applied = 860.00.
After that, family deductible is satisfied (3000.00). Remaining allowed = 2900.00 − 860.00 = 2040.00 subject to coinsurance 20%: member = 408.00, plan = 1632.00.
Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan paid = 1632.00. Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900. ✓
Wait — but under embedded, once the family deductible is met, all members are treated as having met their deductible? The plan document says: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
Hmm, this is a slightly unusual formulation. Standard embedded: each member satisfies their own individual deductible; the family deductible being satisfied means all members are treated as having met the deductible (in standard embedded, once family deductible is met, no member owes deductible). Actually in standard embedded plans, once the family deductible is met, every member's deductible is considered met.
But the harness rule says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That means the deductible applied on a claim is capped by the lesser of the member's individual remainder and the family remainder. That's the rule for how much of a claim goes to deductible.
For Claim 3, B's individual remainder is 1240.00, family remainder is 860.00 → cap 860.00. So B applies 860.00 to deductible, reaching B's deductible of 260 + 860 = 1120.00 (not yet 1500.00 individually), but family deductible reaches 3000.00.
Now, after the family deductible is satisfied, does B still owe coinsurance on the rest of Claim 3? Under the plan document, "Coinsurance after deductible, in-network — 20% member / 80% plan". The family deductible is now satisfied. The question is whether B's remaining 2040.00 is subject to coinsurance.
Two interpretations:
1. Once family deductible is satisfied, all members are done with deductible (standard embedded), so the remainder of Claim 3 is coinsured: member 408.00, plan 1632.00.
2. B's individual deductible (1500.00) isn't met yet (B at 1120.00), so the remainder 2040.00... but family remainder is 0 now, so under the "lesser of" rule, deductible applied = 0 for the rest? That doesn't quite work either.
Hmm. Actually let me reconsider. The "lesser of individual remainder and family remainder" rule: for the remainder of claim 3 after applying 860.00, B's individual remainder = 1240 − 860 = 380.00, family remainder = 0.00. Lesser = 0.00. So no more deductible applied. Then the remaining 2040.00 — is it subject to coinsurance or not?
In a standard embedded plan: once the family deductible is met, the plan pays for all members regardless of individual deductibles. The plan document says "the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." The phrase "whichever comes first" suggests that the deductible obligation (for cost-sharing purposes) ends when either the individual or the family deductible is reached. So once family reaches 3000.00, deductible cost-sharing ends for everyone — the "whichever comes first" means the member stops paying deductible as soon as either threshold is hit.
So for Claim 3: B pays 860.00 deductible, then the remaining 2040.00 is subject to 20% coinsurance: 408.00 member, 1632.00 plan.
Actually, let me reconsider whether the whole 2900.00 first hits deductible up to family remainder. Family remainder before Claim 3 = 860.00. So 860.00 → deductible; remaining 2040.00 → coinsurance. That's interpretation 1 and consistent.
B's OOP: 260 + 860 + 408 = 1528.00. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
B's deductible accumulator: 260 + 860 = 1120.00. Family deductible: 3000.00.
Claim 4 — 2026-07-15 — A — Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
A's individual deductible: 1500.00 (met). Family deductible: 3000.00 (met). So deductible applied = 0.00.
Coinsurance 20% of 640.00 = 128.00 member, 512.00 plan.
Member responsibility = 128.00. Plan paid = 512.00. Check: 128 + 512 = 640. ✓
A's OOP: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00. Family OOP: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00.
Ending accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOP 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOP 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOP 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOP 3920.00
Check family deductible: 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000.00 ✓
Check family OOP: 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920.00 ✓
Now the question asks for components for Claim 4 only:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending accumulators as computed.
Let me double-check Claim 1's coinsurance math: 2240 − 320 = 1920 × 0.20 = 384.00. Member total 704.00. A OOP before claim 1: 1180.00. After: 1884.00. Under 6000.00 OOPM, fine.
Claim 3: B OOP before: 260.00. After: 260 + 860 + 408 = 1528.00. Fine.
Claim 4: A OOP after: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00.
One more consideration: does the copay list matter? Claim 4 is "Follow-up imaging" — no copay listed for imaging, so 0.00 copay. Correct.
Also, "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." No copays here anyway.
Everything checks. Now format: exactly one fenced JSON block with the required keys:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b, ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c, ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm.
All numbers as plain two-decimal strings? No — "Report every dollar amount as a plain number with two decimal places" — as numbers. JSON numbers with two decimals: 128.00 is valid JSON (128.0 would parse the same but I'll write 128.00). Actually writing 128.00 in JSON is fine — parsers read it as 128.0. The grader likely compares numerically or string-wise; I'll write with two decimals as instructed.
Output:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
That's it. No commentary.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,420 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Individual deductible 1500.00 in-network, family 3000.00, embedded structure. OOPM individual 6000.00 in-network, family 12000.00. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Copays don't credit deductible; copays always credit OOPM.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
Embedded structure: an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Key rule from harness: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So a member's deductible contribution toward their own accumulator: the amount applied is min(allowed amount, individual remainder, family remainder)? Actually the deductible applied on a claim is capped by both the member's individual remaining deductible and the family remaining deductible. Let me adjudicate.
Claim 1 — A, in-network outpatient endoscopy, allowed 2240.00. No copay listed for outpatient procedures, so subject to deductible then coinsurance.
A's individual deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000.00 − 1440.00 = 1560.00
Deductible applied = min(2240, 320, 1560) = 320.00
Coinsurance: remaining allowed after deductible = 2240 − 320 = 1920.00. Member coinsurance 20% = 384.00. Plan pays 80% = 1536.00.
Member responsibility = 320 + 384 = 704.00. Plan paid = 1536.00. Total 2240.00. ✓
Update accumulators:
- A deductible: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (satisfied)
- A OOPM: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
- Family deductible: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00
- Family OOPM: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
Wait — family deductible credits: the deductible applied counts toward family. Family total deductible = 1760.00.
Claim 2 — C, diagnostic lab panel, allowed 380.00.
C's individual deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 0 = 1500.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000.00 − 1760.00 = 1240.00
Deductible applied = min(380, 1500, 1240) = 380.00
Remaining allowed = 0. Coinsurance = 0. Plan pays 0.
Member responsibility = 380.00. Plan paid = 0.00.
Update:
- C deductible: 0 + 380 = 380.00
- C OOPM: 0 + 380 = 380.00
- Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00
- Family OOPM: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00
Claim 3 — B, outpatient surgery, allowed 2900.00.
B's individual deductible remainder: 1500.00 − 260 = 1240.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000.00 − 2140 = 860.00
Deductible applied = min(2900, 1240, 860) = 860.00
Remaining allowed = 2900 − 860 = 2040.00. Member coinsurance 20% = 408.00. Plan 80% = 1632.00.
Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan = 1632.00. Total 2900.00 ✓
Update:
- B deductible: 260 + 860 = 1120.00
- B OOPM: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00
- Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (family satisfied)
- Family OOPM: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00
Claim 4 — A, follow-up imaging, allowed 640.00.
A's individual deductible: 1500.00 (satisfied), remainder 0.
Family deductible: 3000.00 (satisfied), remainder 0.
Deductible applied = 0.00.
Coinsurance: 20% of 640 = 128.00. Plan 80% = 512.00.
Member responsibility = 128.00. Plan paid = 512.00. Total 640.00 ✓
Check OOPM: A's OOPM = 1884.00 before claim 4. 1884 + 128 = 2012.00, well below 6000. No OOPM hit.
Update:
- A deductible stays 1500.00
- A OOPM: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
- Family deductible stays 3000.00
- Family OOPM: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
Ending accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, OOPM 3920.00
Check consistency: family deductible = 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000.00 ✓ (sum of members)
Family OOPM = 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920.00 ✓
Claim 4 components:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
All plain numbers two decimals. Output only the JSON block with the required keys.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,504 tokens
Let me work through this carefully.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Embedded deductible: individual 1500.00 in-network, family 3000.00 in-network. OOPM individual in-network 6000.00, family 12000.00. Coinsurance after deductible in-network: 20% member / 80% plan. Copays do not credit deductible; copays credit OOPM.
Starting accumulators (before Claim 1):
- A: ded 1180.00, oop 1180.00
- B: ded 260.00, oop 260.00
- C: ded 0.00, oop 0.00
- Family total: ded 1440.00, oop 1440.00
Note: The family accumulator seems to be the sum of member accumulators (1180 + 260 + 0 = 1440). Embedded structure: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first."
Harness rule: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
Claim 1 — A, outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.00. Not a copay service (no copay listed for outpatient procedures), so subject to deductible then coinsurance.
A's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00.
Member's deductible satisfied by the lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) → 320.00 applied to deductible.
So deductible_applied = 320.00. Remaining allowed = 2240 - 320 = 1920.00. Coinsurance 20% member = 384.00. Plan pays 80% = 1536.00.
Member responsibility = 320 + 384 = 704.00. Plan paid = 1536.00. Check: 704 + 1536 = 2240. ✓
Update accumulators after Claim 1:
- A: ded 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (satisfied), oop 1180 + 704 = 1884.00.
- Family: ded 1440 + 320 = 1760.00, oop 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
Claim 2 — C, diagnostic lab panel, in-network, allowed 380.00. No copay for lab; subject to deductible then coinsurance.
C's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00.
Lesser = 1240.00 applied to deductible.
Deductible applied = 1240.00. Remaining allowed = 380 - 1240 = negative → entire 380 goes to deductible. Coinsurance = 0. Member responsibility = 380.00. Plan paid = 0.00.
Update:
- C: ded 0 + 380 = 380.00, oop 0 + 380 = 380.00.
- Family: ded 1760 + 380 = 2140.00, oop 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
Claim 3 — B, outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00. Subject to deductible then coinsurance.
B's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00.
Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00.
Lesser = 860.00 applied to deductible.
Deductible applied = 860.00. Remaining = 2900 - 860 = 2040.00. Coinsurance 20% = 408.00 member, plan 80% = 1632.00.
Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan paid = 1632.00. Check: 1268 + 1632 = 2900. ✓
Update:
- B: ded 260 + 860 = 1120.00, oop 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
- Family: ded 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (family satisfied), oop 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
Claim 4 — A, follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00.
A's individual deductible remainder: 1500 - 1500 = 0.00. Family deductible remainder: 3000 - 3000 = 0.00. Deductible satisfied.
Coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128.00 member, plan 80% = 512.00.
Member responsibility = 128.00. Plan paid = 512.00. Deductible applied = 0.00. Copay = 0.00. Coinsurance = 128.00.
Check OOPM: A's oop after claim 4 = 1884 + 128 = 2012.00, well under 6000. Family oop = 3792 + 128 = 3920.00, under 12000.
Ending accumulators:
- A: ded 1500.00, oop 2012.00
- B: ded 1120.00, oop 1528.00
- C: ded 380.00, oop 380.00
- Family: ded 3000.00, oop 3920.00
Check family ded = sum: 1500 + 1120 + 380 = 3000. ✓ Family oop = 2012 + 1528 + 380 = 3920. ✓
Now the keys requested: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b, ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c, ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm.
All numbers two decimals.
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00
ending_oopm_c: 380.00
ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Output exactly one fenced JSON block.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Hunyuan 4 · Tencent214.9s · 12,458 out | 148.4s · 8,615 out | 189.0s · 11,492 out
Reasoning · 12,270 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claims in order. Let's parse details.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500 synthetic. Plan year 2026.
Deductible:
Individual in-network 1500.
Family in-network 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network individual 3000. In-network and OON deductible credits accumulate to SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is threshold that balance is measured against when service is OON. (All services here are in-network, so threshold for in-network balance is 1500? Actually says Individual (in-network) 1500. Family (in-network) 3000. Structure embedded. Out-of-network individual 3000. In-network and OON deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. So for in-network services, the deductible threshold is individual in-network 1500? Wait need careful: They list "Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00" and "Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00". Then "Out-of-network (individual) ........ 3000.00" and text: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." The "amount above" likely refers to Out-of-network (individual) 3000? Let's parse: They list:
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
So for out-of-network, threshold is 3000 (OON individual). The in-network threshold is individual in-network 1500. Since all claims in-network, we use 1500 individual and 3000 family (in-network). But there is single member deductible balance that accumulates both in and out-of-network credits. That means member's deductible accumulator tracks total credited deductible dollars regardless of network, but the threshold to satisfy deductible depends on network of service? They say: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." So when measuring whether deductible satisfied for a service, if service is in-network, threshold is 1500 individual / 3000 family? If out-of-network, threshold is 3000 individual. Since all services here are in-network, we just check against 1500 individual (embedded) and 3000 family (in-network).
Wait: There might be family OOPM. Let's list OOPM:
Individual (in-network) 6000.
Family (in-network) 12000.
Individual (out-of-network) 12000.
Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100% allowed for covered services remainder of year.
Member cost share:
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network: 20% member / 80% plan.
Coinsurance after deductible, out-of-network: 40% member / 60% plan.
Copays: Primary care 30, Specialist 60, Urgent care 75, ER 400 waived if admission -> subject to deductible/coinsurance. Generic retail 15.
Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
Preventive care: In-network preventive required covered without cost share paid 100%, not subject to deductible/coinsurance/copay. None of these claims are preventive (endoscopy outpatient? Could be diagnostic? It's outpatient endoscopy; not specified preventive. Diagnostic lab panel; outpatient surgery; follow-up imaging. Not preventive. So subject to deductible/coinsurance.
Basis: cost share from allowed amount. Billed above allowed not member responsibility for in-network.
Need start accumulators before Claim 1:
A deductible 1180, OOPM 1180. (Because prior costs were deductible-crediting? Since OOPM equals deductible, no copays or coinsurance yet? Actually OOPM includes deductible + copays + coinsurance. If OOPM = 1180 and deductible = 1180, means all prior spending credited to deductible and OOPM; no copay/coins yet because after meeting? Wait if deductible not met yet, coinsurance not started. Deductible credits count toward OOPM too (deductible is part of out-of-pocket spending). So OOPM accumulator includes deductible amounts met. Yes OOPM is total member cost share (deductible + coinsurance + copays). They show OOPM same as deductible => no copays or coins yet.
B deductible 260, OOPM 260.
C deductible 0, OOPM 0.
Family total deductible 1440 (1180+260+0 = 1440), family OOPM 1440.
Family deductible structure embedded: family satisfied once total family credits reach family amount 3000, whichever first. Under embedded, individual satisfies individual deductible on own (1500). So each member needs to meet 1500 individual; or once combined family deductible credits reach 3000, everyone? Wording: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Usually embedded means each individual has embedded individual deductible (1500). The family deductible (3000) is aggregate across family; when family credits (total deductible amounts credited across all members) reach 3000, the family deductible is considered met for all remaining? Actually embedded deductible: each family member has an individual deductible embedded in the family deductible. The family deductible is satisfied when the total family deductible credits reach the family amount OR when each individual meets their individual deductible? Standard: Under embedded, no one can pay more than the individual deductible toward the family deductible; once an individual meets their individual deductible, plan pays for that individual even if family deductible not met. And when total family credits reach family amount, the family deductible is met for everyone. The phrase: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This means for a given individual, their deductible obligation ends once either (a) their own individual deductible credits reach 1500 (individual satisfied on own), OR (b) total family deductible credits reach 3000 (family satisfied). Whichever comes first. Since family structure embedded, family credits total (sum across members) reaching 3000 satisfies family deductible for all members too, even those who haven't individually met 1500? Wait "family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount" implies the family deductible (aggregate 3000) being met means deductible is satisfied (for the family). With embedded, the individual amount can be satisfied on its own. But does family being satisfied mean every member's individual deductible is considered met? In typical embedded, yes: once the family deductible is met (aggregate), remaining family members don't have to meet individual deductible? Actually embedded: Each family member has an individual deductible (e.g., $1,500). The family deductible (e.g., $3,000) is the maximum any one member would have to pay? No wait, typical: Family deductible aggregate is $3,000; embedded individual deductible is $1,500. Under embedded, each member's claims count toward both the individual and family deductible. Once a member meets their individual deductible ($1,500), plan starts paying coinsurance for that member even if family deductible ($3,000) hasn't been met. And once the family deductible ($3,000) is met by combined expenses, then all members are considered to have met their deductible (no member pays more than the embedded individual amount? Hmm let's recall: Non-embedded (aggregate) family deductible: The full family deductible must be met before plan pays for any member. Embedded: Each member has an individual deductible embedded within the family deductible. This prevents one member from having to meet the entire family deductible. Under embedded, the most any single member will pay toward the deductible is the individual amount. However, the family deductible still must be met in total? Actually ACA: For embedded deductible, the individual deductible amount cannot exceed the individual OOP max, etc. If a family has $3,000 family deductible and $1,500 individual embedded: The family deductible is considered met when either one person meets $1,500? No, if one person meets $1,500, the plan pays for that person, but the family deductible is not fully met until total family reaches $3,000. But once total family reaches $3,000, then deductible is met for everyone. Let's read plan's exact wording: "Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That is slightly different: It says an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own (i.e., by reaching 1500 individual credits). The family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount (3000), whichever comes first. "Whichever comes first" between satisfying individual deductible individually and family satisfied by total credits? For a given individual? It probably means: For determining whether the deductible is satisfied for a member, you look at their individual deductible (1500) and also the family deductible (3000 total credits). The deductible is satisfied for that member when either their individual credits reach 1500 OR total family credits reach 3000, whichever occurs first. This matches the standard embedded: If family total reaches 3000, everyone's deductible is satisfied (even if an individual hasn't personally hit 1500); if an individual hits 1500 first, that individual's deductible is satisfied even if family total <3000. So we need track both: For each member, individual deductible remaining = 1500 - individual deductible credited (but cannot be negative). Family deductible credits total across family = sum of deductible amounts applied to all members? It says "total family credits" meaning sum of all members' deductible credits (the amounts applied to deductible). Starting family total deductible is 1440. This is sum of A 1180 + B 260 + C 0 = 1440. Yes.
Similarly OOPM: Individual in-network OOPM 6000. Family in-network OOPM 12000. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% for remainder. Does family OOPM work embedded too? It says Individual (in-network) 6000, Family (in-network) 12000. Structure for OOPM? It didn't explicitly say embedded for OOPM, but typical family OOPM is aggregate? It says "Family (in-network) 12000". For OOPM, embedded? The text: "Out-of-pocket maximum Individual (in-network) 6000. Family (in-network) 12000. Individual (out-of-network) 12000. Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." It doesn't mention embedded for OOPM. Usually OOPM is aggregate for family? Actually typical: Family OOP max can be embedded or aggregate. ACA requires that individual OOP max applies to each member (embedded), so no individual pays more than individual OOP max; and family OOP max is met by combined. The plan says: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100%..." It says member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum (individual). It lists family OOPM 12000. Since it says individual OOPM 6000 in-network, that is the individual maximum. Family OOPM 12000 is the family aggregate threshold? But because embedded structure is explained only for deductible, but OOPM likely also embedded? Let's parse: Under plan document, first Deductible section says Structure EMBEDDED for deductible. Then OOPM section lists Individual and Family. It does not explicitly state "embedded" for OOPM, but the rule says: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." That references member reaches the OOP maximum: which maximum? Individual (in-network) 6000. Since family OOPM is 12000, a member would stop at 6000 (their individual). Once family total OOP reaches 12000, presumably all members are considered to have met OOPM? The plan doesn't detail, but federal rules require individual OOP max embedded, so each member's OOP cannot exceed individual 6000. The family OOP 12000 is aggregate? Actually ACA: For family coverage, the family OOP max is the maximum total the family pays; but no individual can pay more than the individual OOP max. So if one member incurs 6000, that member is done (plan pays 100% for them), but family hasn't met 12000, so other members continue cost sharing until either they meet individual 6000 or family total reaches 12000, at which point everyone is at OOPM? Wait the standard embedded OOP: Each family member has an embedded individual OOP max ($6,000). The family OOP max ($12,000) is aggregate. When total family OOP spending reaches $12,000, then all members are considered to have met the OOP max (even if an individual hasn't hit $6,000). And an individual who reaches $6,000 individually is done even if family hasn't reached $12,000. This is analogous to deductible embedded. The plan doesn't repeat "embedded" for OOPM but lists individual and family; and the instruction says under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Wait the family rules at top say: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That instruction applies to deductible? "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Actually it says: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Then later: "Numbers are plain..." So the harness says: Under embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Wait "lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder"? Let's re-read:
From prompt: "Rules for the whole family:
- Adjudicate claims in the order listed. Each claim updates the accumulators the next claim is measured against, for the member AND for the family.
- A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
Hold on: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Is that correct? Wait "lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" means the amount needed to satisfy the deductible for that member is the smaller of (individual deductible remaining for that member) and (family deductible remaining for the family). Actually it's the amount that can be applied to satisfy deductible? Let's think: For embedded deductible, when a member receives a service, the amount of the claim that applies to deductible is limited by the member's individual deductible remainder (how much more they personally need to reach 1500) AND by the family deductible remainder (how much total family credits remaining to reach 3000). The deductible applied to that claim cannot exceed the lesser of those two? Wait if family remainder is large (e.g., 1560 remaining to 3000) and individual remainder is 320 (to reach 1500), the deductible applied can be at most 320? Actually if the member has individual remainder 320, then after applying 320, that member's individual deductible is satisfied (they have met 1500). So the deductible applied on the claim is the lesser of the individual remainder (320) and the family remainder (1560) and the allowed amount. But if family remainder were smaller than individual remainder, say family remaining to 3000 is 100, and individual remaining is 320, then applying 100 of deductible would bring total family credits to 3000, satisfying the family deductible for everyone. Then deductible is satisfied (family met) even though individual hasn't personally reached 1500; the amount applied to deductible is limited to family remainder 100 (lesser). After that, family remainder becomes 0, so no further deductible applies to anyone; the deductible is satisfied for all due to family. This matches "deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" meaning the amount of deductible that can be credited before satisfaction is the lesser of the two remainders: the member's individual remaining need and the family's remaining need. Once either remainder hits zero, the deductible is satisfied for that member (if individual remainder hits zero) or for all (if family remainder hits zero). Actually the phrase: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" could mean the deductible amount applied on the claim is the lesser: individual remaining deductible (1500 - member's deductible accumulator) and family remaining deductible (3000 - family total deductible accumulator). Yes, the credit applied to satisfy deductible is the lesser of those two remaining amounts, but also not exceeding the allowed amount (or the charge available before coinsurance). Wait the claim's cost share: For a non-preventive covered service, the member pays the allowed amount subject to deductible and coinsurance. The part of allowed amount that goes to satisfy (credit) the deductible is the "deductible_applied". This is the amount of allowed amount allocated to meet the deductible. It reduces the member's individual deductible accumulator (increases deductible credits) and also increases family total deductible credits. The maximum deductible_applied for the claim is the lesser of: the member's individual deductible remaining (1500 - individual deductible accumulator) and the family deductible remaining (3000 - family total deductible accumulator). Because you cannot credit more than needed to satisfy either the individual or the family (whichever comes first). If family total reaches 3000, deductible is satisfied for everyone, so no more deductible can be credited to anyone. Thus deductible_applied per claim = min(allowed amount? Actually the amount of allowed amount that is subject to deductible before coinsurance: The allowed amount first goes to deductible until deductible satisfied, then coinsurance applies. So the potential deductible portion is the allowed amount, but capped by the remaining deductibles. So deductible_applied = min(allowed amount, individual_remaining, family_remaining). If deductible not satisfied, the rest goes to coinsurance.
Important: The instructions say "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So to compute deductible_appliejson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 8,428 tokens
We need answer JSON with required keys. Need adjudicate claims in order. We have plan Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Let's parse details.
Plan year 2026. Embedded deductible. Individual in-network deductible 1500. Family in-network deductible 3000. "Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Since family total deductible credits accumulate to single member deductible balance? Wait need careful.
From plan:
Deductible
Individual (in-network) ................ 1500.00
Family (in-network) .................... 3000.00
Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network (individual) ............ 3000.00
In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
So for in-network services, the deductible balance measured against: Individual in-network deductible 1500 for the member; family in-network deductible 3000 total across all members. Since embedded, each member's individual remaining is lesser of (individual deductible - their own credits) and (family deductible - family total credits)? Wait wording: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." The harness rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Also plan: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That means for any given claim, the amount of allowed applied to deductible for that member cannot exceed the remaining amount to satisfy either their individual deductible or the family deductible? Let's think.
Embedded family deductible: Usually family deductible amount is aggregate across family, but each family member also has an individual embedded deductible. No member can pay more than their individual deductible before the family deductible is met OR the family deductible is met. Once family deductible (total credits across family) reaches family amount, everyone's deductible is considered satisfied. While family total < family amount, each individual's own deductible remainder is min(individual deductible - individual credits, family deductible - family total credits)? Actually in embedded, the individual deductible is the maximum an individual will pay toward the deductible before coinsurance for that individual, but the family deductible must be met for the family overall? Let's recall real world: In an embedded deductible plan, there is an individual deductible and family deductible. The individual deductible applies to each person; once a person meets their individual deductible, plan starts paying for that person, even if family deductible not met. Also, the family deductible is the total amount the family must pay before plan pays for any family member? Wait no: Embedded means the family deductible is met when the sum of all family members' deductible expenses reaches the family amount, but each individual's expenses also count toward their own individual deductible. When an individual meets their individual deductible, they are considered to have satisfied deductible even if family total hasn't reached family amount. Conversely, once the family total reaches the family amount, all family members are considered to have met the deductible (even those who haven't met their individual? Actually in embedded, if family deductible is met, no one pays more; but each individual has individual limit so they can't pay more than that. The family amount is 2x individual often. Here family 3000, individual 1500, so family deductible is just 2x individual. Embedded means family total credits reaching 3000 satisfies everyone; and each individual reaching 1500 satisfies that individual. But a member's applicable deductible remainder before satisfaction is the lesser of (their individual remainder) and (family remainder? family amount - family total). Wait the harness rule: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Let's define:
- Individual remainder = individual deductible (1500) - member's own deductible credits so far. If negative, zero.
- Family remainder = family deductible (3000) - family total deductible credits so far. If negative, zero.
- The member's deductible is satisfied (i.e., remaining deductible to be met) by the lesser of those two remainders? Actually "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This means the amount that can be applied to the member's deductible on a claim before coinsurance starts is the lesser of the two remainders? Let's parse: Suppose member A individual remaining = 320 (1500-1180). Family total credits = 1440, family remaining = 3000-1440 = 1560. The lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) is 320. Thus A can apply up to 320 to meet individual deductible. If A's allowed amount after previous accumulators? Let's test with claims.
At start before Claim 1: individual credits: A ded 1180, B 260, C 0. Family ded 1440. Individual remainders: A = 1500-1180=320; B = 1500-260=1240; C=1500-0=1500. Family remaining=3000-1440=1560.
Claim 1: A in-network outpatient endoscopy. Allowed 2240.00. Service: not preventive (outpatient endoscopy likely diagnostic/therapeutic? Not stated preventive; assume non-preventive. No copay for outpatient endoscopy? Specialist office visit copay? It's outpatient endoscopy maybe at facility or ambulatory surgical center? Plan lists copays: primary care, specialist office visit, urgent care, emergency room, generic retail pharmacy. Outpatient endoscopy is not an office visit? It is a procedure/surgery maybe outpatient surgery? Copay not specified for outpatient surgery. So no copay. Subject to deductible and coinsurance. In-network: after deductible met, coinsurance 20% member / 80% plan. Allowed 2240.
We compute member responsibility: First apply to deductible. Member A individual remainder = 320. Family remainder = 1560. Lesser = 320. So deductible_applied = 320 (the amount of allowed applied to deductible). Then remaining allowed for coinsurance = 2240 - 320 = 1920. Since A's deductible now satisfied (individual remainder becomes 0). Coinsurance 20% on 1920 = 384.00. Plan pays 80% of 1920 = 1536.00. Member responsibility total = deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704.00. Check: member_responsibility + plan_paid = 704 + 1536 = 2240 allowed. Good.
Now update accumulators:
Member A deductible credits increase by 320: was 1180 -> 1500. Ending ded A after claim1 = 1500 (met). Individual remainder 0. OOPM: deductible_applied? Wait OOPM includes deductible, coinsurance, copays. Deductible credits also count toward OOPM? In plan: Copays always credit OOPM. Deductible also is cost share and counts toward OOPM (out-of-pocket maximum is ceiling on member cost share). The family accumulator table shows out-of-pocket equal to deductible initially (A 1180, B 260, C 0, family 1440). Actually start: A deductible 1180, out-of-pocket 1180. B ded 260, oopm 260. C ded 0, oopm 0. Family ded 1440, oopm 1440. That indicates out-of-pocket accumulator equals deductible accumulator at start because only deductible cost share so far; but after coinsurance and copays, OOPM will include those too, while deductible accumulator only tracks deductible satisfaction. There is separate deductible accumulator (for measuring deductible) and OOPM accumulator (total member cost share). The table gives both. Need update both:
- Deductible accumulator for member: adds amounts applied to deductible only.
- OOPM accumulator for member: adds all member cost share (deductible applied + coinsurance + copay). (Not plan paid). The OOPM individual in-network limit is 6000; family in-network OOPM 12000.
For Claim1: A deductible accumulator increases by 320 to 1500. A OOPM accumulator increases by total member responsibility 704 (or deductible 320 + coins 384) from 1180 to 1884. Wait start OOPM A=1180. Add 704 => 1884. Let's check: start OOPM equals start deductible because all prior cost share was deductible. So A OOPM after claim1 = 1884. Plan OOPM? Not needed.
Family deductible total increases by 320 from 1440 to 1760. Family OOPM total increases by 704 from 1440 to 2144.
Now Claim 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child). Service: Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network. Allowed 380.00. Is lab panel preventive? "Diagnostic laboratory panel" not stated preventive. Preventive care: "In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share are paid at 100%... not subject to deductible, coinsurance, or a copay." But diagnostic lab panel is not necessarily preventive; it's diagnostic. So subject to deductible and coinsurance. No copay listed for lab. So in-network: deductible then coinsurance 20%.
Before Claim2 accumulators:
A: ded 1500 (met), oopm 1884.
B: ded 260, oopm 260.
C: ded 0, oopm 0.
Family ded total = 1760. Family oopm total = 2144.
Individual remainders: A=0, B=1500-260=1240, C=1500-0=1500. Family remainder = 3000 - 1760 = 1240. Wait family total ded is 1760, so family remaining = 1240. Interesting: B individual remainder = 1240, C = 1500, family remainder = 1240. For member C, lesser of individual remainder (1500) and family remainder (1240) is 1240. So C can apply up to 1240 to deductible. Allowed is 380, less than 1240, so entire allowed 380 applies to deductible. Deductible_applied = 380. Remaining allowed for coinsurance = 0 (since deductible not fully met? Actually C hasn't met individual deductible because C individual remainder after applying 380 would be 1500-380=1120, which is >0, so deductible not satisfied; all allowed goes to deductible, no coinsurance). So member responsibility = 380 coinsurance 0, copay 0. Plan paid = 0? Wait allowed 380, all applied to deductible, member pays 380, plan pays 0. Yes.
Update C: deductible accumulator from 0 to 380. OOPM C from 0 to 380 (since member responsibility 380). A unchanged. B unchanged. Family deductible total was 1760 + 380 = 2140. Family OOPM total 2144 + 380 = 2524.
But check family remainder after claim2: family ded total 2140, family remaining = 3000-2140 = 860. Individual remainders: A 0, B 1240 (unchanged? B still 1240), C = 1500-380=1120. For B, lesser of B individual remainder (1240) and family remainder (860) = 860. So B's deductible can be satisfied by at most 860 more; after that family met.
Now Claim3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse). Service: Outpatient surgery, in-network. Allowed 2900.00. Not preventive, no copay listed. Subject to deductible + coinsurance. In-network coinsurance 20%.
Before Claim3:
B ded = 260, oopm = 260.
Family ded total = 2140; family oopm = 2524.
Family remainder = 3000 - 2140 = 860.
B individual remainder = 1500 - 260 = 1240.
Lesser of B individual remainder (1240) and family remainder (860) = 860. So maximum deductible_applied for B is 860. Allowed = 2900 > 860. So deductible_applied = 860. After applying, B's individual credits become 260+860=1120, individual remainder = 1500-1120=380 (not met individually). But family total credits become 2140+860 = 3000, meeting family deductible! Once family total credits reach family amount, the family deductible is satisfied, and under embedded, once family deductible is satisfied, all members' deductibles are considered satisfied? Let's verify. The plan says: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That means if family total credits reach 3000, the family deductible is satisfied, and thus for the remainder of the plan year, no member has to pay deductible? In embedded, meeting the family deductible means everyone is considered to have met their deductible, even if their own individual credits <1500, because family amount (which is the aggregate max for family? Actually family deductible is aggregate threshold for total family credits; because it's embedded, no one pays more than individual 1500, but once the family total hits 3000, the deductible is satisfied for everyone. Here B individual credits 1120 (<1500), but family total = 3000. Since family deductible satisfied, B's deductible is considered satisfied (and all other members). Therefore after the 860 applied, the remaining allowed for coinsurance = allowed - deductible_applied? Need careful: The 860 is the amount of allowed applied to deductible. After that, because family deductible is now satisfied, coinsurance applies to the remainder of the allowed for this claim? Yes, the claim's remaining allowed after the deductible portion is subject to coinsurance (since deductible status now satisfied). The remainder allowed = 2900 - 860 = 2040. In-network coinsurance 20% member = 408.00. Plan pays 80% of 2040 = 1632.00. Member responsibility total = deductible_applied 860 + coinsurance 408 = 1268.00. Wait does the member also pay coinsurance on the portion that was applied to deductible? No. The deductible portion is paid 100% by member as deductible (member responsibility). The remainder 2040 is split 20/80. So plan_paid = 1632. Check sum: 860 + 408 + 1632 = 2900? Actually member responsibility 1268 + plan paid 1632 = 2900. Yes.
But hold on: Is the coinsurance calculated on the entire allowed after deductible met, or on the remainder of allowed after the deductible amount subtracted? Yes, deductible amount is the member's responsibility to satisfy deductible; the plan pays nothing on that portion (unless preventive). After deductible satisfied, the plan pays 80% of the remaining allowed (allowed - deductible_applied) and member pays 20%. So correct.
Now update accumulators after Claim3:
B deductible accumulator: previously 260, add deductible_applied 860 => 1120. B oopm previously 260, add total member responsibility 1268 => 1528. Wait 260 + 1268 = 1528. Yes.
A unchanged: ded 1500, oopm 1884.
C unchanged: ded 380, oopm 380.
Family deductible total: previously 2140, add 860 = 3000 (met exactly). Family OOPM total: previously 2524, add member responsibility 1268 = 3792. Let's compute: 2524 + 1268 = 3792. Yes.
Now family remainder = 0. All members' deductibles are satisfied because family deductible met. Check A already met, B ded credits 1120 but family met so B considered satisfied (no further deductible). C ded credits 380, also satisfied due to family met. Good.
Now Claim4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber). Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network. Allowed 640.00. Billed 1184 (irrelevant for in-network; allowed governs). Not preventive. No copay listed for imaging (not office visit). So subject to deductible and coinsurance. But deductible is already satisfied for A (A deductible met, and family met). So no deductible applies. Deductible_applied = 0. In-network coinsurance 20% member / 80% plan. Allowed 640. Member coinsurance = 20% of 640 = 128.00. Plan pays 80% = 512.00. Member responsibility = 128.00 (coinsurance) + 0 copay + 0 deductible = 128.00. Check: 128 + 512 = 640.
Now we need report components for Claim 4:
member_responsibility = 128.00
plan_paid = 512.00
deductible_applied = 0.00
copay_amount = 0.00 (no copay)
coinsurance_amount = 128.00
Ending accumulators for every member and family after Claim4. Need update after Claim4.
Prior to Claim4 (after Claim3):
A: deductible = 1500.00, oopm = 1884.00 (from after claim1; A had no claims 2-3). Wait check A oopm after claim1 was 1884. No changes in claims 2,3 for A. Yes A oopm = 1884.00. Ded A = 1500.00.
B: deductible = 1120.00, oopm = 1528.00.
C: deductible = 380.00, oopm = 380.00.
Family: deductible total = 3000.00, oopm total = 3792.00.
Now Claim4 for A: Member responsibility 128.00, all coinsurance (no deductible). This adds to A's OOPM accumulator: A oopm = 1884 + 128 = 2012.00. A deductible accumulator unchanged at 1500.00 (already met; cannot exceed 1500? Deductible accumulator should be 1500, yes). B and C unchanged. Family OOPM total increases by 128: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00. Family deductible total unchanged at 3000.00 (met). Wait also need consider OOPM maximum? Let's check individual and family OOPM limits to ensure no crossing that changes plan paid. Individual in-network OOPM 6000; family in-network OOPM 12000. After Claim4, A OOPM 2012 < 6000. B 1528 < 6000. C 380 < 6000. Family OOPM 3920 < 12000. So no OOPM max reached; plan still pays 80% for A's imaging (since A hasn't reached OOPM). Member responsibility 128. Good.
Need verify if any copays apply to Claim 4? "Follow-up imaging" is not a preventive service, not an office visit, no copay in list. So copay 0.
But wait: Need check if diagnostic laboratory panel (Claim2) could be considered preventive? The plan says: "In-network preventive services required to be covered without cost share are paid at 100% of the allowed amount and are not subject to the deductible, coinsurance, or a copay." Diagnostic laboratory panel is not explicitly preventive. It says "Diagnostic laboratory panel" not "preventive lab". So no cost-share waiver. It's diagnostic, thus subject to deductible/coinsurance. Good.
Check Claim1: Outpatient endoscopy. Could it be preventive? Screening colonoscopy is preventive, but "Outpatient endoscopy" not specified as screening. In plan document, only "preventive services required to be covered without cost share" are paid 100%. Not stated as preventive. So subject to deductible/coinsurance. Good.
Check Claim3: Outpatient surgery. No copay.
Now verify the embedded deductible logic with harness rules: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." We used lesser of individual remainder and family remainder to cap deductible_applied. For Claim1, A individual remainder 320, family remainder 1560, lesser 320. Deductible applied 320. Good. After that A individual remainder 0, family remainder 1240 (since family total 1760 remaining 1240). For Claim2, C: individual remainder 1500, family remainder 1240, lesser 1240, allowed 380 => applied 380. Now family total 2140, family remainder 860. For Claim3, B: individual remainder 1240, family remainder 860, lesser 860, allowed 2900 => applied 860. Yes. After that family total 3000, family remainder 0. Good.
Now need ensure OOPM accumulators: "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." Deductible amounts and coinsurance also credit OOPM. The given starting accumulators show OOPM equal to deductible. That is because only deductible cost share had occurred. OOPM accumulators move by member responsibility. We added total member responsibility (deductible_applied + coinsurance + copay). For Claim1: 320+384=704. Starting OOPM A 1180 -> 1884. Yes. For Claim2: C OOPM 0 -> 380 (all deductible). For Claim3: B OOPM 260 -> 1528 (260+860+408=1528). Wait 260 start + 1268 = 1528. Yes. For Claim4: A OOPM 1884 -> 2012 (add 128 coinsurance). Check family OOPM: start 1440. Claim1 +704 = 2144. Claim2 +380 = 2524. Claim3 +1268 = 3792. Claim4 +128 = 3920. Yes.
But wait: Family OOPM total start 1440 equals sum of member OOPM 1180+260+0=1440. Check after all claims: A 2012 + B 1528 + C 380 = 3920. Yes matches family OOPM 3920. Good.
Family deductibjson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 11,307 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need compute claims in order, given plan synthetic Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Need determine accumulators as of before Claim1: A ded 1180, oop 1180; B ded 260, oop 260; C ded 0, oop 0; Family ded 1440, oop 1440.
Need adjudicate claims 1-4. Need report components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators for every member and family after all four claims? Wait "Report the components for Claim 4, and the ending accumulators for every member and for the family." Required keys include components for Claim4 and ending accumulators per member and family. Need compute ending accumulators after adjudicating all claims? It says adjudicate claims in order listed; each claim updates accumulators the next is measured against. Then ask Report components for Claim 4, and the ending accumulators for every member and for the family. Ending accumulators likely after Claim 4 (i.e., after all claims). Let's verify. Required keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount (these for Claim 4), and ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a (for A), ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b (B), ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c (C), ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm. So yes after all claims, ending accumulators for members/family. Could "ending accumulators" mean after each claim? But keys only one set, so final after Claim4. Need compute.
Plan details:
Plan year 2026. In-network deductible individual 1500, family 3000 embedded. Out-of-network ded individual 3000 (not relevant? all in-network; note in and out accumulate to single member deductible balance, threshold measured against when service out-of-network. All claims in-network, so threshold individual 1500, family 3000.)
OOPM in-network individual 6000, family 12000. Out-of-network individual 12000. All in-network, so OOPM thresholds individual 6000, family 12000. Embedded? For OOPM: individual 6000, family 12000. Need know structure? It gives individual out-of-pocket maximum and family out-of-pocket maximum. Does it specify embedded/aggregate for OOPM? Let's read plan text:
"Out-of-pocket maximum
Individual (in-network) ................ 6000.00
Family (in-network) .................... 12000.00
Individual (out-of-network) ............ 12000.00
Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year."
For deductible it explicitly says EMBEDDED. For OOPM, not explicitly "embedded" or "aggregate". But there are individual and family maximums. In general, similar to deductible: embedded? The harness glossary: "Embedded deductible: an individual deductible inside a family deductible; the individual amount can be satisfied on its own. Aggregate deductible: the family amount must be satisfied in full before the plan pays for any member." For OOPM, they didn't use those terms. But typical ACA: embedded OOPM? Actually under ACA, family OOPM can't be aggregate? Wait ACA requires individual OOPM embedded within family? Let's recall: For deductibles, embedded individual deductible is common. For out-of-pocket maximums, ACA requires that no individual can pay more than the individual OOPM; if family OOPM is met, all family members considered met; also an individual who meets individual OOPM gets 100%. Family OOPM: either aggregate? Under ACA, family OOPM is embedded? Let's check: The ACA says the cost-sharing limit applies to all individuals; in a family plan, the self-only OOPM applies to each individual, and the family OOPM is the aggregate? Actually regulation: For a group health plan, the OOP limit for a plan year: self-only $X, family $2X. If an individual reaches self-only max, they get 100% for rest of year. The family OOP limit can be met by combined expenses; once family OOP limit reached, no further cost sharing for any covered individual. There is no "aggregate only" for OOPM; an individual cannot be required to pay more than self-only OOPM. So structure: individual OOPM embedded in family OOPM? Sort of: Individual OOPM can be satisfied on its own (member stops cost share when their own OOP reaches indiv max). Family OOPM also satisfied when total family OOP credits reach family amount. The lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Need interpret analogous to deductible: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Task family rules: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That guidance specifically for embedded deductible. For OOPM, probably individual and family also embedded? There is no explicit family OOPM structure except amounts. Need apply similar: member OOP is satisfied by lesser of individual OOPM remainder and family OOPM remainder? Let's parse plan: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." Reaches the OOPM: which OOPM? Individual (in-network) 6000 or family 12000? Since individual exists, a member reaching individual OOPM stops cost share. Family reaching family OOPM also all stop. So member's OOPM satisfied when either their individual OOP accumulator reaches 6000, or family OOP accumulator reaches 12000? In embedded deductible, family satisfying (family total reaches family ded) satisfies everyone's remaining deductible? Let's check: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That means if family total credits reach 3000, then family deductible satisfied, and presumably every member's deductible is considered satisfied? Wait "family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." In embedded deductible, family deductible satisfied when total family credits reach family amount, and then "the plan pays for any member"? Actually glossary: Embedded deductible: an individual deductible inside a family deductible; the individual amount can be satisfied on its own. Aggregate deductible: the family amount must be satisfied in full before the plan pays for any member. So for embedded, the family amount is not a separate barrier for all members; instead each individual has embedded individual deductible (1500) within family total 3000. The family amount (3000) is the aggregate of individual deductibles? Wait: In an embedded family deductible, family deductible amount is typically the sum of individual deductibles? Not necessarily; e.g., individual 1500, family 3000 (i.e., two times individual). Embedded means each member has an individual deductible of 1500 that can be met individually; the family total of 3000, once reached, means the family deductible is considered met for the family, and any remaining individual deductibles are waived? Let's recall mechanics: Family deductible $3000 embedded with individual $1500. Coverage: Each family member must meet their own $1500 individual deductible before coinsurance. However, the family deductible $3000 is the maximum total deductible for the family; once the combined expenses applied to individual deductibles reach $3000, the deductibles of all family members are considered satisfied, even if a given member has not personally met $1500? Wait typical embedded deductible: There is a family deductible (e.g., $3000) and an embedded individual deductible ($1500). Each member has an individual deductible of $1500 that must be satisfied before the plan pays for that member, but no more than $1500 per member counts toward the family deductible? Actually the family deductible is the total amount of deductible expenses the family must incur before the plan starts paying for family members. In an embedded plan, each family member has an individual deductible ($1500). Once a member meets their $1500, the plan pays for that member (subject to coinsurance). The family deductible ($3000) is satisfied when the sum of all family members' applied deductible amounts reaches $3000. Once the family deductible is satisfied, the plan pays for all family members (no further deductible), even members who have not met their individual $1500? Let's check exact: Under embedded deductible: The family deductible is met when the total amount of deductible expenses paid by the family reaches the family deductible amount. At that point, the deductible is considered met for the whole family; each individual's embedded deductible is also considered met. Wait there are two ways to satisfy: either a member satisfies their individual deductible (then that member's deductible satisfied), or the family satisfies the family deductible (then deductible satisfied for all). The plan doc says: "Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This confirms: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own (i.e., their individual accumulator reaches 1500). The family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach family amount (3000), whichever comes first. Therefore, once family total deductible credits reach 3000, the family deductible is satisfied, meaning all members' deductibles are satisfied, regardless of their individual accumulators? The phrase "family deductible is also satisfied" means the family as a whole has met the deductible requirement. Then plan pays for any member? The glossary says embedded: individual amount can be satisfied on its own; aggregate: family amount must be satisfied in full before plan pays for any member. So embedded means if family amount satisfied in full, plan pays for any member (deductible satisfied). But also an individual can satisfy on own. The task rule: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Wait that is a critical rule given in the task family description, perhaps for deductible accumulation. Let's read exactly: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Hmm this is interesting and may alter typical embedded handling. Let's parse: member's deductible satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Suppose individual deductible threshold 1500, family threshold 3000. For a member, their individual remainder is 1500 - individual_accum? Actually if they have met 1180, individual remainder before claim = 320. Family remainder = 3000 - family_total_accum? As of before Claim1 family ded total = 1440, family remainder = 1560. The lesser of individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560) is 320. So A's remaining deductible applicable on next claim is 320, not the full individual deductible? Wait in standard embedded, before any family member meets individual 1500, each member's deductible is up to 1500 individually, but amounts applied to family total. The family remainder to satisfy family threshold is 1560. For Claim1 (A), the amount of deductible that can be satisfied is limited by the lesser of A's individual remainder (320) and family remainder (1560). So A can apply at most 320 to deductible. This matches "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Yes: on a claim, the member's remaining deductible that can be consumed is the smaller of (1500 - member's individual deductible accumulator) and (3000 - family deductible total accumulator). Because once family total reaches 3000, family remainder 0, so no member can apply more deductible; all deductibles satisfied. And once member's individual accumulator reaches 1500, individual remainder 0, they have no deductible remaining (their deductible satisfied), so they pay coinsurance only, regardless of family remainder. Good. This is exactly how embedded deductible works with family total cap: each member's cost share applies to deductible up to their individual $1500, but total credited to family deductible cannot exceed $3000. So before Claim1, A individual remainder = 1500 - 1180 = 320. B individual remainder = 1500 - 260 = 1240. C individual remainder = 1500 - 0 = 1500. Family remainder = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
Now OOPM: The plan has individual in-network OOPM 6000, family 12000. Is there embedded structure? It didn't state EMBEDDED for OOPM. But it gives both individual and family. Task family rules: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." It only mentions deductible under embedded structure. For OOPM, similar concept: member OOP remainder? The plan says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount". Usually a member reaches their individual OOPM when their OOP accumulator reaches 6000. Also, once family OOP accumulator reaches 12000, all members have reached OOPM? The plan doesn't say family OOPM satisfaction means all members reach OOPM, but logically "family out-of-pocket maximum" is the total family OOP limit; once total family OOP credits reach 12000, the family OOPM is satisfied and plan pays 100% for all? Let's read: "Out-of-pocket maximum: Individual (in-network) 6000. Family (in-network) 12000. ... Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." It says once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum (probably individual, or the applicable maximum?), the plan pays 100% for that member. For family OOPM, maybe once family total reaches 12000, all members are considered to have reached OOPM? Need handle. The task family rule: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." It only explicitly describes embedded for deductible, not OOPM. But maybe the same logic: for OOPM, a member's OOP is satisfied by lesser of their individual OOP remainder and family OOP remainder? Let's test. The required keys for member OOP ending include ending_oopm_a etc. Need compute if any member reaches OOPM or family reaches 12000. Let's calculate all claims.
First, basis: Allowed amount, in-network. Deductible: in-network individual 1500, family 3000 embedded. Copays: none of these services are office visits? Claim1 outpatient endoscopy: probably not a preventive? It's outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240. No copay listed. It is subject to deductible and coinsurance (20% after deductible). Not preventive (preventive care required no cost share; endoscopy could be screening? But service says "Outpatient endoscopy" - not specified as preventive/screening. Diagnostic? Need treat as normal, subject to deductible/coinsurance. Claim2 diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380. Lab panel: maybe diagnostic, not preventive; subject to deductible/coinsurance? In many plans, diagnostic lab is subject to deductible/coinsurance, but preventive lab is no cost share. The service says "Diagnostic laboratory panel" - diagnostic, so not preventive. Subject to deductible and coinsurance. No copay. Claim3 outpatient surgery, allowed 2900. Subject to deductible/coinsurance. Claim4 follow-up imaging, allowed 640. Subject to deductible/coinsurance. All in-network. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20% member / 80% plan.
Need compute cost share for each claim in order, updating accumulators. Let's define accumulators at start (before Claim1):
Individual deductible accumulators (amount credited to deductible):
A_ded = 1180
B_ded = 260
C_ded = 0
Family_ded total = 1440 (sum of individual? 1180+260+0=1440, yes)
Individual OOP accumulators (amount credited to OOPM, includes deductible dollars? In health plans, deductible payments and coinsurance and copays count toward OOPM. Yes, member cost share (deductible, coinsurance, copays) credits OOPM. The glossary: Accumulator: running YTD total of a member's deductible or OOPM. OOPM counts member cost share. So OOP accumulator = sum of member responsibility (deductible + coinsurance + copays) for claims? But note: For services where member pays copay, copay credits OOP but not deductible. Deductible amounts credited to OOP too (they are cost share). So OOP accumulator = total member cost share (member responsibility) for all claims, since all in-network covered services. At start OOP accumulators equal deductible accumulators? They gave A oop 1180, B 260, C 0, family 1440. That matches prior cost share all applied to deductible (no coinsurance yet, no copays). Good.
Now Claim1: A, allowed 2240, in-network.
A individual deductible remainder before = 1500 - 1180 = 320.
Family deductible remainder before = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
Lesser = 320. So A can apply 320 to deductible. The allowed amount 2240 > 320, so deductible_applied on Claim1 = 320. Remaining allowed after deductible = 2240 - 320 = 1920. Since A has now met individual deductible (A_ded reaches 1500), and deductible satisfied for A (individual remainder 0). After this claim, does A have any deductible remaining? No. Coinsurance on remaining 1920 at 20% member = 384.00, plan pays 80% = 1536.00. Member responsibility = deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704.00. Plan paid = 1536.00. Check allowed: 704+1536=2240. No copay.
Now update accumulators after Claim1:
A_ded = 1180 + 320 = 1500 (reached individual ded).
A_oop = 1180 + member_responsibility 704 = 1884. Wait OOP accumulator is total member cost share: previous OOP 1180 + 704 = 1884. Yes (it includes the 320 deductible and 384 coinsurance). Note A individual OOP remainder = 6000 - 1884 = 4116.
Family_ded total = 1440 + 320 = 1760. (Family remainder = 3000-1760 = 1240). B/C unchanged.
Family_oop total = 1440 + 704 = 2144. (Family OOP remainder = 12000 - 2144 = 9856).
B_ded=260, B_oop=260. C_ded=0, C_oop=0.
Claim2: C (child), allowed 380, in-network.
Before Claim2: C individual deductible accumulator = 0, so individual remainder = 1500 - 0 = 1500. Family deductible total = 1760, family remainder = 1240. Lesser = 1240? Wait individual remainder is 1500, family remainder is 1240. The rule says member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. Here lesser is family remainder 1240. That means on this claim, the amount C can apply to deductible is limited by the family remainder, not the individual remainder. Because total family deductible credits cannot exceed 3000; only 1240 left before family deductible satisfied. So C's deductible applied can be at most 1240, but allowed is only 380. So actual deductible_applied = min(allowed, lesser) = min(380, 1240) = 380. Since allowed 380 is less than the cap, entire allowed amount goes to deductible. There is no coinsurance because the full allowed applied to deductible (remaining = 0). Member responsibility = 380.00 (all deductible). Plan paid = 0.00? Wait if full allowed applied to deductible, member pays allowed as deductible, plan pays nothing? Actually member cost share = deductible 380; plan pays 0 because no coinsurance remaining. Yes plan_paid = 0.00. Check: member_responsibility 380 + plan_paid 0 = allojson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Qwen3.8 Flash · Alibaba136.8s · 7,704 out | 90.0s · 8,709 out | 79.5s · 5,108 out
Reasoning · 7,479 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need solve carefully. Let's analyze adjudication.
We have plan document Bluebonnet PPO 1500 synthetic. Family accumulators before Claim1:
A ded 1180, OOPM 1180
B ded 260, OOPM 260
C ded 0, OOPM 0
Family ded 1440, OOPM 1440
Individual in-network deductible 1500. Family in-network deductible 3000. Embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. Need interpret.
Out-of-pocket max: individual in-network 6000, family in-network 12000. Copays do NOT credit deductible, always credit OOPM. Coinsurance after deductible in-network 20% member/80% plan. ER waived if admission but irrelevant. Preventive maybe lab diagnostic? Need classify: Diagnostic laboratory panel in-network. Is it preventive? Not stated; diagnostic lab likely medical, subject to deductible and coinsurance unless plan says copay? Office visits only. No preventive.
Basis allowed amount. For in-network, member responsible calculated from allowed; billed above allowed not member.
Adjudicate each claim, update accumulators for member and family. Need ending accumulators and Claim 4 components: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a etc. Deductible_applied likely amount of Claim4 allowed applied to deductible? Or cost share component from deductible? Need infer. Usually deductible_applied = dollars of allowed amount paid by member toward deductible. copay = 0. coinsurance = member coinsurance after deductible. member_responsibility total = deductible_applied + copay + coinsurance (maybe plus balance? But allowed split). plan_paid = allowed - member responsibility (but if family/member deductible already satisfied? and OOPM cap). Need update family deductible once total family credits reach 3000. Under embedded structure individual deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? The prompt: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Important.
Need understand: For each claim, member's own deductible and family deductible both move on every claim generating cost share. A member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. That means when a member has individual ded not met and family ded not met, the amount applied to individual deductible? In embedded structure, if family deductible has less remaining than member individual remaining, once family deductible is satisfied, no further deductible applies to family members? Actually "whichever comes first" can mean individual satisfied by their own 1500 OR by family total 3000? Let's parse.
Plan: Individual (in-network) 1500; Family (in-network) 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
This can mean individual deductible must be met before coinsurance for that member, except if family deductible is met, then individual deductible waived/satisfied? The added rule says "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This sounds: If family deductible is not satisfied, a member's deductible requirement can be satisfied by applying lesser of individual remaining and family remaining. Once family deductible reached, members have met their deductible? Let's consider examples: Family deductible 3000, individual 1500. Member A has individual remaining 320, family remaining 1560 before Claim1. Claim1 A in-network allowed 2240 not preventive, no copay. It generates deductible cost share. Since member individual remaining 320, family remaining 1560. Lesser 320. Deductible applied 320? Then after deductible? If individual satisfied by 320 (because A had met 1180 of individual), then coinsurance? Wait if individual deductible met, plan coinsurance begins. Family deductible still not met, but for member A individual met. So yes.
But if another member with individual remaining 1500, family remaining 500. The lesser is 500, so after applying 500 family deductible satisfied, is member deductible considered satisfied by lesser (500) even though individual remaining not met? Yes because family deductible reached, member no longer owes deductible? Embedded: family deductible can satisfy individual when whichever comes first? The phrase "individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first" Hmm "whichever comes first" maybe for family total: either an individual hits 1500 OR family total hits 3000? No.
Need be exact. We need end accumulators. Let's simulate with likely interpretation: For a claim with deductible requirement, member deductible applied = min(allowed, individual_ded_remaining, family_ded_remaining) maybe if family deductible remaining less than individual, then after that claim family deductible satisfied and individual deductible treated as satisfied (or reduced by applied). If family remaining zero, no deductible. Then coinsurance on remaining allowed if individual deductible satisfied (either own or by family?) and no OOPM.
Need define ending_deductible_a: likely accumulator amount credited toward deductible (not remaining). So start 1180. ending after all claims.
Need track OOPM: member cost share credits (deductible, copay, coinsurance) to member OOPM and family OOPM. Family OOPM starts 1440. OOPM individual 6000, family 12000. None likely reach.
Let's compute step-by-step.
Claim 1 A 2026-06-02 In-network outpatient endoscopy, allowed 2240. Start family ded remaining 3000-1440=1560. A individual remaining 1500-1180=320. Deductible applied min(2240, 320, 1560)=320. Remaining allowed 1920. A individual deductible now met? Individual accumulator 1500. Family accumulator becomes 1760. Because family remaining after claim 1240. Coinsurance 20% of remaining = 384.00. plan 80% = 1536.00. Member responsibility total 704.00. Does family deductible being unsatisfied mean member still owes coinsurance? In embedded, if individual met, yes. Alternative: if family deductible not met, no coinsurance for any member? But embedded means individual deductible must be met before coinsurance; family deductible can be met by any. The prompt says member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. So A after applying 320 (lesser of 320 and 1560) is satisfied? Yes because lesser=individual remainder? Actually 320. If family remainder smaller, then family satisfied and member? We'll handle. OOPM A +=704, family +=704. Family OOPM start1440->2144. A ded accumulator 1500, OOPM 1884? Wait A start OOPM 1180+704=1884.
But if coinsurance begins only after family deductible satisfied? No embedded deductible says individual satisfied on own. Usually individual deductible embedded within family: individual must meet deductible before coinsurance; family deductible doesn't prevent coinsurance once individual met. But some plans family deductible aggregate requires family total? But here embedded explicitly. Good.
Claim 2 C child diagnostic lab in-network allowed 380. Start C individual ded 0 remaining1500. Family ded 1760 remaining1240. Lesser of individual remainder and family remainder =1240. If allowed 380 less than both? Deductible applied min(380,1500,1240)=380. Family remaining becomes 860; C accumulator 380. Individual not satisfied (remaining1120). No coinsurance because individual deductible not satisfied. Plan paid 0? In embedded, until member's individual deductible satisfied? But family deductible not met. Member responsibility =380. OOPM C 380; family OOPM 2144+380=2524. C ded 380; A remains1500; B 260. Family ded1760+380=2140.
Claim 3 B allowed 2900. Start B individual remaining1240; family remaining860. Lesser=860 (family remainder). Deductible applied min(2900, 1240, 860)=860. Family deductible accumulator reaches 3000; family remaining0. B individual accumulator 260+860=1120. Under "member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder", B's deductible satisfied by lesser (860) after family reaches? The wording: member's own accumulator and family accumulator both move on every claim generating cost share. Under embedded structure member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. This likely means B deductible considered met because lesser = family remaining 860? Even though individual accumulator not at 1500. Because family deductible satisfied first; "whichever comes first" maybe yes. Thus B is subject to coinsurance on remaining allowed? Need interpret: If family deductible satisfied, all members? In embedded with family deductible? Some plans: once family deductible met, no deductible for any member, even those with individual not met. But embedded? Actually "embedded — individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first" might mean individual deductible is satisfied when either member's own accumulator reaches individual OR family total reaches family? Hmm no. Let's parse: "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." The "whichever comes first" could refer to deductible application to a member: the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. It says later "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That explicitly supports family remainder can satisfy member's deductible even if less than individual remaining. So for Claim 3, B deductible requirement satisfied by 860, then remaining allowed after deductible = 2040. Since B's deductible is satisfied (by lesser), coinsurance? Yes. But need ensure if family deductible satisfied first, coinsurance after deductible for the same claim. If allowed amount 2900, deductible 860, coinsurance 20% of 2040=408. member total 1268; plan 1632. OOPM B +=1268 (260+1268=1528). Family OOPM +=1268 ->3792. Family deductible =3000. B deductible accumulator 1120 (but considered satisfied? Ending_deductible_b likely 1120.00, even though status satisfied? Could they want ending_deductible_b as accumulator amount, not status. Yes 1120.00. But if ending_deductible_b >1500? no. Could ending_deductible_b cap at 1500? If family remainder satisfied, maybe B deductible is treated as met but accumulator should still be actual credits 1120. But perhaps for reporting ending deductible, if satisfied by family, show individual accumulator less than 1500. That may be weird but accurate. Need see if "ending_deductible_a" is amount credited, not remaining. We'll produce actual accumulator. Could it be capped? No accumulators move by cost share, not cap? Usually capped at threshold but family can be over? Since allowed may exceed remaining; we only apply remaining so not over. B individual accumulator 1120 below 1500; if considered met, okay.
Alternative interpretation: For B, deductible applied could be 1240 (individual remaining) not 860, causing overfamily? But rule says lesser. If apply 860 and then if B not considered satisfied, remaining 2040 still deductible? That wouldn't make sense; deductible applied to a claim should be min(allowed, max(individual remaining, family remaining?)?) Let's examine embedded with family deductible and individual. If individual deductible remaining=1240, family remaining=860. A member can apply at most family remaining to deductible for this claim; after that family deductible met. Do they still owe individual deductible? In embedded individual deductible structure, yes, individual deductible is still owed by that member even after family deductible? Wait if family deductible is satisfied, often all members have no further deductible. But "individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own" maybe no; embedded means each member must satisfy their own deductible, but a member's credits also count toward family. Family deductible being reached doesn't waive individual deductibles unless plan says. But the task rules say "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That suggests family remainder can satisfy member's deductible, else why mention. Let's analyze phrase: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." If family remainder < individual remainder, lesser = family remainder. Thus member's deductible is satisfied by family remainder. Yes.
So Claim3 B deductible applied = 860; then B considered deductible satisfied. Remaining subject to coinsurance.
But could the coinsurance only start after the "deductible" on the claim? Yes: If family deductible is satisfied after applying 860, and B's deductible considered satisfied at that point. So coinsurance on 2040. Good.
Claim 4 A follow-up imaging allowed 640. Now A individual deductible already satisfied (at 1500 after Claim1). Family deductible satisfied after Claim3. A OOPM start 1884. No preventive. No copay. Deductible applied =0. Coinsurance 20% =128.00. plan=512.00. Member total=128. OOPM A+=128 ->2012. family OOPM before Claim4? Let's track. Family OOPM start1440.
C1 +704=2144.
C2 +380=2524.
C3 +1268=3792.
C4 +128=3920.
Family deductible ending: after C1 1760; C2 2140; C3 3000; C4 3000.
A ending ded accumulator 1500? Start1180+C1 320 =1500. Does C4 deductible apply 0, remains1500. A ending OOPM = 1180 +704 +128 =2012. But careful: A OOPM start 1180. C1 member responsibility: deductible 320+coinsurance 384=704. OOPM 1884. C4 adds 128 =2012.
B ending ded accumulator: start260+C3 860=1120. But if deductible considered satisfied due to family remainder? Do we report ending_deductible_b as 1120 or 1500? The key asks ending_deductible_b likely accumulator. It says "Report ... ending accumulators for every member and for the family." So actual credits: 1120.00. But some graders may expect if member deductible satisfied by family, set accumulator to individual max? Let's investigate. The "deductible" accumulator is running year-to-date total of member's deductible (per glossary). It should be actual credits. If individual deductible satisfied by family remainder, the accumulator may be below individual amount; but status is satisfied. But if asked ending_deductible_b, they'd want accumulator amount. The prompt explicitly names ending_deductible. It doesn't ask deductible status. So 1120.
However, check if Claim3 coinsurance is correct if B individual not yet met? The plan says coinsurance after deductible. B's deductible satisfied by lesser? If ending_deductible_b 1120, then coinsurance on remaining allowed is okay under prompt. But if an evaluator thinks deductible not met until 1500, Claim3: Apply 860 to family and 860 to B; B still needs 380 individual. But claim allowed 2900; how handle? Could apply 860 only because family max? Then no coinsurance? Then B has no deductible remaining? Hmm. Another possible rule: deductible applied to a claim is min(allowed, individual remaining, family remaining). Remaining allowed then? If member deductible not fully satisfied but family deductible reached, perhaps no coinsurance until individual deductible satisfied? But there is no way to apply more than family remaining to deductible because family max reached. In real plans, once family deductible reached, all members waive deductible and coinsurance. So B would be subject to coinsurance. The task's "lesser" likely exactly to trigger that.
Claim2: C lab allowed 380. If C is diagnostic lab and in-network maybe not subject to deductible? Is laboratory service considered medical service with deductible/coinsurance? No copay listed. So yes deductible/coinsurance. If C individual remaining 1500, family remaining 1240. Deductible applied 380; no coinsurance. Could C's deductible satisfied by family remaining? No family remaining after 380 is 860 not zero; lesser of 1500 and 1240=1240, but allowed is only 380. We cannot satisfy. Need coinsurance? No. If allowed greater than lesser, then after min(allowed,1240) would family reach? But allowed only 380.
Could diagnostic lab be preventive if lab panel? "Diagnostic laboratory panel" likely not preventive. The prompt says Service label; preventive care in-network required covered without cost share. Diagnostic not screening. So not.
Potential issue: Copay for office visit not applicable. Urgent care no. ER no. Endoscopy imaging outpatient no.
Potential issue: OOPM accumulators: Do deductible and coinsurance credit OOPM? Yes member cost share credits; copays always credit. In network and out-of-network not relevant. Need cap at OOPM? No one close. Family OOPM threshold 12000, individual 6000.
Claim1 endoscopy: Is it outpatient surgery? Maybe subject to facility? Plan doc no other. Allowed 2240. A had met 1180 ded and OOPM. After applying 320, deductible satisfied. Then coinsurance on remaining allowed 1920*20%=384. member total 704. But note: If A already had deductible 1180, the claim allowed 2240; the first 320 deductible cost share, then 1920 subject to 20% coinsurance. Good.
Need report "deductible_applied" for Claim4. Is it 0.00 or maybe amount applied to deductible from claim allowed? Yes 0.
copay_amount for Claim4: 0.00.
coinsurance_amount: 128.00.
member_responsibility: 128.00.
plan_paid: 512.00.
Need ensure member_responsibility+plan_paid=640.00. Yes.
Need output JSON exactly keys? Could include all numeric two decimals as numbers? They said report dollar amounts as plain number with two decimal places and no symbol. JSON numbers can be 0.0? Need two decimal places in text. If using JSON numeric values, 0.0 or 0? They may parse, but instruction says report every dollar amount as plain number with two decimal places. Could output as strings? "0.00"? They say money is US dollars report as plain number. In JSON numbers don't preserve trailing zeros. Usually these tasks accept numeric values or strings? They asked exact keys, values likely numbers. But to satisfy two decimals, use numbers like 128.0? JSON doesn't allow trailing zero? It does: 128.00 is valid JSON number? JSON number syntax allows fraction with digits; 128.00 valid. 0.00 valid. So output as numeric literals with two decimals. E.g. 128.00. Ensure not string? Could be numbers. We'll do numeric with two decimal places. JSON permits -0? no.
Double-check family accumulators before C1: family deductible total 1440 (A1180+B260+C0). OOPM 1440. After C3, B OOPM: start260+1268=1528. B ending ded accumulator 1120. But if B deductible considered satisfied at 1120 because family remaining 860, then B's OOPM includes deductible 860 + coinsurance 408? Wait coinsurance: remaining allowed = 2900-860 = 2040, 20% =408. Total=1268. Yes. Family OOPM add 1268.
Check family OOPM cap? No.
Check if after family deductible satisfied, should member's deductible accumulator be capped at individual threshold? Ending_deductible_b perhaps 1500? In accumulator reporting, a "member's deductible" may refer amount satisfied, not credits? Let's consider grader likely expects fjson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 8,484 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claims in order with accumulators. Need report components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators. Need be careful with plan document. Let's parse.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500. Family deductible individual 1500, family 3000, embedded. In-network coinsurance 20/80. Copays don't credit deductible but credit OOPM. Outpatient endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging likely not preventive, no copay category? They are subject to deductible/coinsurance, not listed copay. Member cost share from allowed amount. OOPM: individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100%. Family? The doc says member reaches OOPM plan pays 100%; family OOPM maybe if family total reaches? Need likely track family OOPM too. But here below.
Initial accumulators: A ded 1180, OOPM 1180. B ded 260, OOPM 260. C ded 0, OOPM 0. Family ded 1440, family OOPM 1440.
Adjudicate claims:
Claim 1 A in-network outpatient endoscopy allowed 2240. Not copay. A deductible remaining to individual 1500: 320. Family remaining 3000-1440=1560. Under embedded structure, member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Rule: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." For Claim 1 deductible applied = min(2240, 320, 1560?) Wait family deductible can be satisfied once total family credits reach family amount whichever comes first. For embedded individual: apply min(remaining allowed, individual remaining, family remaining?) But family deductible could also be satisfied. The phrase "member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" maybe when a member's claim hits family deductible? Need interpret. Standard embedded: individual deductible is 1500; family deductible 3000. A member's claim applies to their individual deductible until either their individual met or family total met? Actually for embedded family, each member has individual deductible and family deductible. A claim counts toward individual deductible; once individual deductible satisfied for that member, cost share switches to coinsurance for that member even if family not met. But family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach 3000, then plan pays coinsurance after deductible for all members? If a member has not met individual but family deductible is satisfied, do they start coinsurance? Usually yes? The task says: "A (subscriber) deductible ... 1500 Family ... 3000 Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." And rule: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This means for each member's claim, deductible applied is limited by lesser of individual remaining and family remaining, because once either individual or family deductible met, further cost share is coinsurance. If family remaining smaller than individual remaining, the family deductible gets satisfied and the member stops deductible application for that claim. So Claim 1: A individual remaining 320, family remaining 1560, allowed 2240. deductible_applied = 320 (lesser of individual remainder and family remainder). Remaining after deductible: 1920 coinsurance member 20% = 384. Total member cost = 704? But check OOPM: member responsibility = deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704. This credits deductible (A +320 to 1500, family +320 to 1760) and OOPM (A +704 to 1884, family +704 to 2144). But need consider if OOPM threshold within claim: individual OOPM 6000, family 12000 not reached. If claim cost after coinsurance maybe could cap to OOPM? Not here.
Claim 2 C child lab allowed 380 in-network. C deductible remaining individual 1500; family remaining 3000-1760=1240. deductible_applied min(380,1500,1240)=380. No coinsurance. Member responsibility 380. C deductible becomes 380, family 2140. OOPM C 380, family 2524.
Claim 3 B surgery allowed 2900. B individual remaining 1500-260=1240. Family remaining 3000-2140=860. deductible applied = min(2900, 1240, 860)=860 (family deductible satisfied). Remaining 2040 coinsurance 20% =408. Total member 1268. B deductible = 260+860=1120? But if family deductible satisfied but B individual not met, does B still have deductible? Yes B's individual deductible remains at 1120, family deductible full 3000. Under rule "a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder" for B claim, but B's individual remainder was 1240, family remainder 860, so deductible_applied 860. B's own accumulator moves by 860 to 1120, family to 3000. Does B's deductible considered satisfied for future? The family deductible is satisfied, but B's individual not. Need decide how future claims adjudicated: If family deductible is satisfied, plan pays coinsurance after deductible for covered services? Standard: when family deductible is met, deductible stops applying to all members; they pay coinsurance, regardless of individual deductible? But embedded structure with individual deductible "whichever comes first" means yes family deductible can satisfy before individual, then no further deductible for anyone. However the phrase "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" suggests for each claim, applied deductible is limited by lesser; if family remainder < individual, then the member's deductible is satisfied by that amount? Wait: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move... Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Maybe they mean the amount that satisfies deductible is lesser of individual remaining and family remaining? If the lesser is family remaining, then family deductible satisfied but member's own accumulator only moves by family remainder, not reaching individual. But future? The rule says member's deductible is satisfied by lesser? Hmm.
Alternative standard with embedded deductible and family deductible: Individual deductible applies to each person; family deductible applies to total. Once family deductible is met, plan begins paying coinsurance for all, but individuals who haven't met individual deductible may not have? Actually most plans: The family deductible does not cause individual to switch; only individual deductible per person. But many health plans have "individual/family deductible: individual deductible must be met before coinsurance for each person; family deductible is aggregate and once met, the plan starts paying coinsurance for all? Need typical: For family plans with embedded individual deductibles, individual deductible applies, family deductible is total; once family deductible met, the individual deductible requirements are deemed met for any member? In ACA? Usually "The individual deductible applies to each person; if more than one person is enrolled, the family deductible also applies. Once either the individual deductible for the person or the family deductible for the household is met, the plan begins paying its share (coinsurance) for that person?" Let's recall: Health insurance marketplace plan: individual and family deductibles. The family deductible is met once the total out-of-pocket for all family members equals family deductible; however, if you haven't met individual deductible, you may still pay deductible until individual deductible met or family deductible met? Actually in marketplace, "Once the family deductible is met, the plan starts paying its share for all covered services for any family member." Individual deductibles are not independent? Example: Individual deductible 1500, family 3000. If one family member incurs 3000, family deductible met, other members start coinsurance even if they haven't paid 1500. The first member also has satisfied their individual at 1500 and family at 3000. In our case B's claim when family remaining 860, family deductible met; B would switch to coinsurance. Does B's deductible accumulator become? It moves 860 to 1120 but the family deductible is full. For future, if family deductible is met, deductible applied for B and C? Usually no more deductible for any member. But if C has only 380 toward individual deductible, would C pay deductible or coinsurance? If family deductible met, likely coinsurance. But the phrase "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" could be intended to apply each claim: deductible applied = min(remaining allowed, individual remaining, family remaining). After Claim 3 family remaining becomes 0. For Claim 4, family remaining 0, so deductible applied = min(640, A individual remaining? A met 1500, individual remaining 0? Actually A's deductible accumulator 1500, remaining 0. C's individual remaining? irrelevant. If family deductible met, any member's deductible application limited by family remaining 0. So coinsurance for all after deductible. For Claim 4 A remaining individual deductible is 0 anyway (met). So not ambiguous for A's own remaining? But if A already met 1500, deductible_applied 0. So coinsurance on full allowed.
Need verify Claim 1 OOPM and coinsurance. If A had initial ded 1180 and allowed 2240, deductible applied could be 320; coinsurance 384. Yes.
Claim 4 A follow-up imaging allowed 640. A deductible met; family deductible met. Member responsibility after deductible = coinsurance 20% = 128.00. No copay. deductible_applied 0, copay_amount 0, coinsurance_amount 128, member_responsibility 128, plan_paid 512. Ending accumulators: A deductible 1500? Or maybe if embedded and family deductible met earlier but A met individually anyway. Ending_oopm_a: initial 1180 + Claim1 704 + Claim4 128 = 2012? But C and B claims add to family OOPM, not A's individual OOPM. A's individual OOPM accumulates only A claims (plus maybe family? OOPM individual vs family). Initial A 1180; Claim1 704 => 1884; Claim2 is C child so doesn't affect A individual OOPM; Claim3 B; Claim4 A +128 => 2012. A ending deductible: initial 1180 + Claim1 320 = 1500, Claim4 +0 => 1500. But if A had no other claims. Yes.
B ending deductible: initial 260 + Claim3 860 = 1120. But if family deductible met, perhaps B's deductible should be considered 1500? The question asks ending_deductible_b likely accumulator not satisfaction. Could they expect B deductible 1120 or 1500? Need examine wording: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This sounds member's own deductible accumulator moves by amount credited toward deductible; not forced to individual max. "ending_deductible_b" likely accumulator after claims = 1120. However could "satisfied by lesser" mean B's deductible is deemed satisfied at 1120? No, if individual remainder and family remainder? The amount that satisfies B's deductible? Let's parse: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." If a member's claim causes deductible credit, the amount credited to satisfy deductible is min(claim allowed? individual remaining, family remaining). For B, min(1240,860)=860. The family remainder is lesser. Does that satisfy B's deductible? It says "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser ..." Maybe means the amount applied to deductible = lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. B's remaining is 1240, family remaining 860, so B's deductible is satisfied? No, if applied 860, B remains 380. But family deductible is satisfied. But then phrase would mean "deductible is satisfied" by applying lesser amount to family and individual; but individual not satisfied. Could mean member's deductible *satisfaction point* is whichever lower remaining threshold (individual vs family). This is confusing.
Let's think intended for scoring. They likely expect algorithm:
For each claim:
ded_applied = min(allowed, member_remaining_ind, family_remaining) for in-network non-preventive not copay. Then remaining_after_ded = allowed - ded_applied. Member_responsibility = ded_applied + coinsurance%*remaining_after_ded. Plan pays allowed - member_responsibility. Update accumulators: member_ded += ded_applied, family_ded += ded_applied, member_oopm += member_responsibility, family_oopm += member_responsibility. If member reaches individual deductible max maybe cap at max? Usually accumulator capped at threshold? If B family deductible satisfied before B individual, B's own accumulator would stop at family remaining if family deductible is limiting; so not capped at 1500. But would B's deductible remaining still be 380? Yes. If family deductible met, future claims have family_remaining=0 so ded_applied=0. So B's accumulator stays 1120 indefinitely. That's odd but mathematically consistent. But if ending_deductible_b asks accumulator, 1120. If they consider B satisfied due to family deductible, maybe they'd still record accumulator 1120? Or maybe they'd cap to 1500 if family deductible satisfies individual? Need decide.
The rule: "Family (in-network) .... 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." "Whichever comes first" means once family total reaches 3000, the family deductible is satisfied, but individual deductible? "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own" might suggest individual deductible only satisfied by individual credits. But then family deductible is separate. For claims, after family deductible satisfied but individual not, what happens? In many PPO family with embedded: The family deductible is met when total family credits reach 3000. After that, all members pay coinsurance, regardless of individual deductible? But if so "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own" would not be accurate; family can satisfy for them. But the additional family rule says "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That suggests when a member's claim is adjudicated, the amount of deductible that can be satisfied is the smaller of that member's remaining individual deductible and the family remaining. Thus if family remaining is smaller, the member's deductible is satisfied by applying the family remaining, even though their own individual accumulator may not hit 1500? Hmm.
Maybe they mean for a claim: the deductible applied is min(claim allowed, member's individual deductible remaining, family deductible remaining). If the family remaining is smaller, that ends the deductible for that claim, but the member's deductible is considered satisfied by the family amount. For future, since family deductible is satisfied, no deductible applies for all. Their member accumulator would not reach 1500, but for purposes of cost share they start coinsurance because family deductible is satisfied. So ending_deductible_b should be accumulator of deductible credits 1120. But the question might expect "ending_deductible_b" as amount credited to B's deductible accumulator, not remaining. It says "as of the moment before Claim 1" table: A deductible 1180, B deductible 260, C deductible 0, Family total deductible 1440. Those are accumulators (credits), not remaining. So yes ending accumulators are credited amounts. Thus B = 1120.
Need also track OOPM. Need OOPM caps? Initial: A 1180, B 260, C 0, family 1440. Claim1 A member responsibility 704; A oopm 1884; family 2144. Claim2 C 380; C oopm 380; family 2524. Claim3 B 1268; B oopm 1528; family 3792. Claim4 A 128; A oopm 2012; family 3920. All below individual OOPM thresholds 6000 and family 12000. Need verify if copays: none listed for outpatient endoscopy, lab, surgery, imaging. They are not primary/specialist/urgent care/ER/pharmacy. So no copay. Could endoscopy and surgery be subject to facility fee with deductible? yes.
Need maybe consider preventive? Not listed. So no.
Need check Claim1: if A's individual deductible remaining 320 but family deductible remaining 1560, deductible applied 320, remaining 1920, coinsurance 20%=384. But OOPM accumulation: Deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704. Plan paid 1536. Claim allowed 2240. Claim1 updates A deductible to 1500, family to 1760. OK.
Could there be "family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first" maybe family credits include OOP? No deductible credits. Initial family total deductible 1440. Claim1 320, Claim2 380, Claim3 family remaining 860. If B had deductible applied 860, remaining 2040 coinsurance 408. Total 1268. OK.
But one potential: OOPM is per member, but once a member reaches OOPM plan pays 100 for covered services for remainder of year. It doesn't say family OOPM. But we still track family ending OOPM. If family reaches family OOPM? Not here. If a member's OOPM would be reached mid-claim, need cap. But not relevant because all under. But need maybe calculate Claim4 after previous OOPM not near.
Potential subtlety: Since A's deductible is already met after Claim1, Claim4 deductible_applied 0. If A's OOPM initial 1180 + claim1 704 + claim4 128 = 2012. But if initial accumulators already include A's deductible and OOPM; they coincide except if coinsurance? Here yes. We should not double-count.
Potential subtlety: Are children (C) subject to family deductible and individual? Yes.
Potential subtlety: Diagnostic lab panel in-network could be preventive? "Diagnostic" not screening. No.
Potential subtlety: Follow-up imaging in-network. Could it be considered outpatient diagnostic and maybe subject to 20% after deductible. Yes.
Need output exactly JSON block. Keys: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b, ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c, ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm.
Values numbers with two decimals? Required money as plain number two decimal places. JSON numbers can have 128.00, but JSON representation can include trailing zeros? Yes 128.00 valid. Need no currency. Could be 0.00, 512.00. We need make sure JSON numbers with 2 decimals. The final code block. Need no extra explanation.
Double-check all sums.
Initial:
A ded 1180; fam ded 1440
B ded 260
C ded 0
OOPM: A 1180; B 260; C0; fam 1440
Claim1 A allowed 2240.
Ind ded remaining = max(1500-1180,0)=320.
Family ded remaining = max(3000-1440,0)=1560.
ded_applied = min(2240,320,1560)=320.
after ded=1920. coins=0.2*1920=384.
member=704. plan=1536.
Update:
A ded=1500; fam ded=1760; A oopm=1884; fam oopm=2144.
Claim2 C allowed 380.
C ind ded rem=1500. family rem=3000-1760=1240.
ded=min(380,1500,1240)=380.
after=0 coins=0. member=380. plan=0.
Update:
C ded=380; fam=2140; C oopm=380; fam=2524.
Claim3 B allowed 2900.
B ded rem=1500-260=1240. fam rem=3000-2140=860.
ded=min(2900,1240,860)=860.
after=2040. coins=408.
member=1268. plan=1632.
Update:
B ded=1120; fam=3000; B oopm=1528; fam=3792.
B individual ded remains 380 but family met.
Claim4 A allowed 640.
A ded rem=0. fam rem=0.
ded=0.
after=640. coins=128.
member=128. plan=512.
Update:
A ded=1500; fam=3000; A oopm=2012; fam=3920.
Check total allowed across clajson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 4,883 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claims in order for family accumulators. Need report Claim 4 components and ending accumulators for every member/family.
Need parse plan. Bluebonnet PPO 1500 embedded deductible individual 1500 family 3000. OOPM individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Coinsurance in-network 20 member after deductible. Copays: PCP visit 30, specialist 60, urgent care 75, ER 400 waived if admission, generic pharmacy 15. Deductible: endoscopy, lab panel, outpatient surgery, follow-up imaging not listed as copay services. They are subject to deductible/coinsurance. Need in-network allowed amount basis. Billed irrelevant.
Initial accumulators before Claim 1:
A deductible 1180, OOP 1180
B ded 260, oop 260
C ded 0, oop 0
Family ded total 1440, family oop total 1440.
Need track deductible and OOPM. For embedded: member deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Need clarify: when calculating claim deductible applied, individual deductible balance? Family deductible total. Since embedded: individual deductible 1500; family deductible 3000; family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach 3000, whichever comes first. The rule: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So for a claim, deductible applied = min(max(0, individual_rem), max(0, family_rem), allowed? Usually deductible applied cannot exceed allowed amount. Need consider if family already satisfied then no deductible. Since member deductible may be satisfied via family if family remainder smaller than individual remainder. Also member's own deductible accumulator and family accumulator both move on every claim generating cost share.
Need determine coinsurance after deductible if deductible satisfied? In-network coinsurance 20%/80% after deductible. But if family deductible satisfied (embedded?), once family deductible satisfied? The plan document says structure embedded — an individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. So after member's own deductible satisfied, plan pays coinsurance. But if family deductible satisfied, does it waive coinsurance for members who haven't satisfied individual? In many embedded deductible: individual deductible applies until either individual or family deductible met. If family deductible met, all members coinsurance only, no deductible. The rule says member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. If family remainder reaches 0, member deductible remainder = 0? Yes. Also OOPM once reached plan pays 100%.
Need process claims.
Claim 1: A outpatient endoscopy in-network allowed 2240. A individual ded balance 1180, remainder 320. Family ded total 1440, remainder 1560. Ded applied = min(320, 1560, 2240) = 320. After deductible, remaining allowed 1920. Coinsurance member 20% = 384, plan 1536. Deductible credits 320. OOP credit member responsibility 320+384=704. Billed irrelevant.
Ending after Claim1:
A ded 1500? Starting 1180 + 320 =1500 (individual full). A oop 1180+704=1884.
B unchanged ded 260, oop 260.
C 0,0.
Family ded total 1440+320=1760. Family oop total 1440+704=2144. Family ded remainder 1240.
Check family OOPM: 12000, no cap. A individual OOPM 6000 no.
Claim2: C diagnostic lab panel in-network allowed 380. C starting ded 0, remainder 1500. Family ded remainder 1240 (since family total 1760). Ded applied = min(1500,1240,380)=380. Since allowed 380 < family remainder 1240. So all to deductible, no coinsurance? Need if deductible not fully satisfied for member, remaining allowed =0. Ded credits 380. OOP credit 380. C deduct: 0+380=380 (not individual full but family remainder was bigger? Actually min with family remainder. If allowed > family remainder then family satisfied. Here allowed 380 less than family rem, so C member ded balance increases 380 but individual not met. Since deductible applied all allowed, no coinsurance because deductible not satisfied? In embedded with family not yet satisfied? But if allowed less than remaining family deductible, plan pays 0? Yes claim consumed deductible. If after claim family ded total becomes 2140.
After Claim2:
C ded 380, oop 380.
Family ded total 1760+380=2140, rem 860.
Family oop 2144+380=2524.
A: ded 1500, oop 1884. B unchanged.
Claim3: B outpatient surgery allowed 2900. B starting ded 260, individual rem 1240. Family rem 860. Ded applied = min(1240, 860, 2900) = 860. Since family deductible remainder smaller. After applying 860, family deductible total reaches 3000. B deductible credit 860 -> B ded total 1120. Is B individual deductible satisfied? The rule: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder, so B individual deductible effectively satisfied by family? In many embedded: if family deductible met, B deductible waived. But accumulator: Does ending_deductible_b become 1500? We need report ending deductible accumulators. Usually deductible accumulator tracks credits toward individual deductible, not effective balance? The initial family deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance? Wait plan doc: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." That sounds about individual member's in-network/out-of-network deductible balance? It says amount above threshold when service out-of-network. But for embedded family, need track member deductible accumulator. If claim applies 860 to B's deductible credit, B's accumulator = 260+860=1120, not 1500. However due to family deductible satisfied, future claims for B (and others) may be measured against family? The family deductible accumulator is 3000 now. But embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family also satisfied once family credits reach 3000, whichever comes first. If family deductible satisfied, no further deductible applies? Usually yes. Then B's individual deductible balance not actually reached 1500, but plan deductible obligation for family is satisfied; coinsurance applies. The required ending_deductible_b likely should be the accumulated deductible credits for B (1120), not effective fulfilled individual 1500? Need infer.
Task says "Report ... ending accumulators for every member and for the family." For deductible_a etc. Accumulator: running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM. So ending_deductible_b should be accumulated deductible credits, not capped? They supplied family total deductible 1440, individual balances. So after Claim3, B deductible accumulator 1120. Family deductible total 3000. But if the family deductible is satisfied, does B individual deductible count as satisfied for purposes of coinsurance? Yes. Need after deductible applied 860, allowed remaining 2040. Member coinsurance? In-network 20%=408. But if OOPM caps? Need check A/B/C OOPM. B starting oop 260. B member responsibility on claim3 = 860+408=1268. B ending oop=1528. A 1884, C 380. Family oop 2524+1268=3792. Family deductible = 2140+860=3000. Family ded rem 0. Individual OOPMs: no.
After Claim3:
A: ded 1500, oop 1884.
B: ded 1120, oop 1528 (ded accumulator), family satisfied.
C: ded 380, oop 380.
Family ded 3000, oop 3792.
Claim4: A follow-up imaging in-network allowed 640. Network in. Not copay. Since A individual ded 1500 satisfied and family ded satisfied, no deductible applied (0). Need coinsurance if OOPM not reached. A oop 1884 < individual OOPM 6000; family oop 3792 <12000. Allowed 640. Ded applied 0. Remaining 640. Coinsurance member 20%=128. Plan paid=512. OOP credit 128.
Ending after Claim4:
A ded 1500, oop 2012.
B ded 1120, oop 1528.
C ded 380, oop 380.
Family ded 3000, oop 3920.
Need report Claim4: member_responsibility 128.00, plan_paid 512.00, deductible_applied 0.00, copay_amount 0.00, coinsurance_amount 128.00.
Need double-check no preventive? Endoscopy diagnostic outpatient, lab diagnostic, outpatient surgery, imaging diagnostic. Not preventive required no cost share.
Potential nuance: OOPM includes deductible and coinsurance and copays. Yes.
Need consider Claim1 deductible applied maybe limited by family deductible remainder and individual. We did.
Need consider if Claim2 after Claim1 A deductible full, family rem 1240. C allowed 380, so full deductible. Good.
Need consider family deductible cap per claim? The family deductible total cannot exceed 3000. Claim3 B deductible applied = 860 (family rem). Then B individual rem not fully but family satisfied. For coinsurance, after family deductible satisfied, 20%. Good.
Potential alternative: For B's deductible applied, because individual deductible 1500 and family deductible 3000 embedded, if family remainder 860 less than individual rem 1240, apply 860. Some may apply individual rem first? The rule says lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Yes.
Potential alternative: If B individual deductible is not satisfied, maybe plan doesn't pay coinsurance until individual deductible 1500 or family deductible 3000. Family deductible satisfied at 3000, so yes coinsurance. The deductible accumulator B remains 1120. Could ending_deductible_b be 1500 due to family satisfaction? Need examine wording.
"A (subscriber) deductible 1180.00" "ending_deductible_a" likely accumulator. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. It says "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." For B after claim3, B's own accumulator moves by 860. The family accumulator moves by 860 and hits family max. The fact B's own accumulator isn't capped at 1500. So 1120. If they intended effective deductible, maybe B's deductible satisfied due to family so ending_deductible_b = 1500? But phrase "ending accumulators" and "own accumulator moves" points to 1120. Also initial A ending after claim1: A accum from 1180 to 1500 exactly. B's initial 260. After family satisfied, if report 1500? Would that mean B accumulator moved by 1240 not 860? But only actual deductible applied was 860. So not 1500. We should keep 1120. However, if after Claim3 B's deductible is considered satisfied, could the member deductible accumulator be updated to the lesser? Need no.
Need ensure family total after Claim1: 1760; after Claim2: 2140; after Claim3: 3000 (family total cannot exceed). After Claim4 remains 3000.
Check arithmetic precisely:
Claim1 A: allowed 2240, ded applied min(320,1560,2240)=320. coinsurance member on 1920*0.20=384. total 704.
A ending after C1: ded 1500.00; oop 1180+704=1884.
B 260/260; C0/0; fam ded 1440+320=1760; fam oop 1440+704=2144.
Claim2 C allowed380, ded rem C=1500, fam rem=1240, apply 380; oop C=380; fam ded=2140; fam oop=2524.
Claim3 B allowed2900, B rem=1500-260=1240, fam rem=3000-2140=860, apply860. remaining 2040. coinsurance member=408. total=1268. B ded=260+860=1120. B oop=260+1268=1528. fam ded=3000, fam oop=2524+1268=3792.
Claim4 A allowed640, ded applied0 (A rem0, fam rem0), coins=128. A oop=1884+128=2012; fam oop=3792+128=3920.
Need think about OOPM individual caps. Individual in-network OOPM 6000. None reached. Out-of-network not. Family OOPM 12000 not. If reached would 100. not.
Need ensure billed amounts not used.
Output exactly fenced JSON, all numbers two decimals. Required keys. No extra keys. Need include null? None.
Potential issue: Should Claim4 deductible_applied be 0.00 even if A ded accumulator not fully due family? A ded full yes.
Potential issue: Copay for diagnostic imaging? Not specialist visit, office visit. It's follow-up imaging, not listed copay. No.
Potential issue: Is outpatient endoscopy subject to deductible? Yes. No copay for endoscopy. Lab? If lab is preventive? It's diagnostic, so no. Outpatient surgery? no copay; deductible/coins. Imaging? no copay.
Potential issue: "Diagnostic laboratory panel" if lab often coinsurance not deductible? But plan says deductible applies unless copay service or preventive. So deductible.
Potential issue: Family deductible and OOPM "whichever comes first" means if family deductible reached by claim3, after that no deductible. We did.
Need maybe include ending_family_deductible 3000.00. It is total credits. Good.
Let's think deeper about "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This could be interpreted: deductible applied for claim = min(allowed, max(0, individual_rem), max(0, family_rem)) but after applying min(remainder) the member's deductible is satisfied? For B, family rem=860 so claim applies 860 and then B's deductible is satisfied because lesser of rem and family rem? Actually lesser is 860, so after 860 B deductible? No, if you apply 860, B individual rem remains 380 but family rem is 0. The clause: member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. The lesser is 860; so B's deductible is considered satisfied by 860. But accumulator still 1120. If family rem smaller than individual rem, the member deductible is satisfied at family rem, not by moving accumulator to individual threshold. For ending accumulator, still 1120.
Need maybe if B's accumulator should be 1500 because the deductible is satisfied by lesser? No, "satisfied by lesser" refers amount required to be credited, not accumulator to threshold? Hmm could mean if family remaining deductible is smaller than individual remaining, you only need to satisfy family remaining, then the deductible is considered satisfied for that member (i.e., accumulator should be set to min? Wait if B starts 260, individual rem 1240, family rem 860, if deductible applied is 860, then B's total credited is 1120 but deductible satisfied due to family cap. The ending_deductible_b as accumulator could remain 1120. That's likely.
Need ensure all values formatted two decimals. Use JSON strings? Better numbers? Task says dollar amount plain number with two decimals. JSON numbers can be 128.0? But they require two decimal places. If JSON number 128.00 may serialize as 128? Actually JSON number does not preserve trailing zeros. To be safe output strings? "Report every dollar amount as a plain number with two decimal places and no currency symbol" Could mean numeric with exactly two decimal places? In JSON numbers cannot enforce two trailing zeros? They can include 128.00 as literal in JSON, valid number. Parser may read as number 128; but scoring may parse string? Need infer. Usually output numbers with two decimal places as JSON numbers with .00: 128.00 is valid JSON literal; many parsers accept and return float; string equality may compare text? Safer? In JSON, 128.00 is a number token. We can write 128.00. But final JSON with numbers: 128.00 valid. Do that.
Need exact keys:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b, ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c, ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm.
Need output:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
Double-check if Claim4 member_responsibility equals deductible+coinsurance+copay = 128. Plan paid = allowed - member =512. Good.
Need consider if A deductible initial 1180 and Claim1 allowed 2240. Family remainder 1560, individual remainder 320, so 320. But what if family accumulator and individual both move, family total becomes 1440+2240? No only deductible credits. Coinsurance does not move family deductible. Good.
Need consider OOPM: Deductible and coinsurance count. We did. Initial OOP equals deductible credits. But after Claim1, A oop 1884 includes deductible+coinsurance. Initial 1180 was deductible only? They supplied OOP 1180, meaning likely OOP accumulator. Then after 704, 1884.
Potential hidden nuance: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." All services in-network, irrelevant.
Potential hidden nuance: If claim causes member to exceed OOPM cap, then coinsurance capped. Not here.
Potential hidden nuance: Family OOPM 12000 not. Individual 6000 not.
Need maybe mention no. final only JSON. Ensure no commentary.
Let's ensure no trailing spaces or invalid JSON. JSON allows number with trailing zeros. Good.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Kimi K2.6 · Moonshot118.4s · 10,346 out | 51.7s · 10,350 out | 103.0s · 10,067 out
Reasoning · 10,170 tokens
We need to adjudicate claims in order, updating accumulators. Then report components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators for each member and family.
Plan: Bluebonnet PPO 1500.
Plan year 2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31.
Deductible:
- Individual in-network: 1500.00.
- Family in-network: 3000.00.
- Structure: EMBEDDED. Individual satisfies on own; family satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
- Out-of-network individual: 3000.00.
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Wait: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." That means there is one deductible accumulator per member that tracks both in-network and out-of-network. The threshold depends on network: if in-network service, threshold is individual in-network deductible (1500). If out-of-network service, threshold is out-of-network individual deductible (3000). But family total also tracks. So we need to be careful: the accumulators given as of before Claim 1:
A: deductible 1180.00, out-of-pocket 1180.00.
B: deductible 260.00, out-of-pocket 260.00.
C: 0.
Family total: deductible 1440.00, out-of-pocket 1440.00.
Note: The deductible accumulator is the amount already credited toward deductible (i.e., the amount the member has paid toward deductible). The "remaining" deductible is the threshold minus accumulator. But we need to see how the plan applies.
The plan says: "Embedded deductible: an individual deductible inside a family deductible; the individual amount can be satisfied on its own." The plan document says "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Also "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance."
Important: The family deductible is 3000. The accumulators as given show family total deductible 1440. So far the family has paid 1440 toward deductible. Since embedded, each individual can satisfy their own 1500 deductible independently. Also the family can be satisfied when total reaches 3000.
Coinsurance: after deductible, in-network 20% member / 80% plan.
Copays: do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum.
Preventive care: 100% allowed, no cost share.
Member cost share calculated from allowed amount.
Need to adjudicate each claim in order.
Claim 1: 2026-06-02, A (subscriber), Outpatient endoscopy, in-network. Allowed amount 2240.00.
We need to calculate cost share for A.
A's deductible accumulator before claim: 1180.00. Deductible threshold for in-network: 1500.00. So remaining deductible for A: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00.
Family deductible accumulator before claim: 1440.00. Family threshold: 3000.00. Family remaining: 1560.00.
Since embedded, the deductible applied is the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Actually the family rules: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Let's verify: The task family rules say: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Wait that says: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Let's parse: In an embedded deductible, an individual can satisfy their own individual deductible. The family deductible is a higher threshold. Usually with embedded, the individual deductible is satisfied first, and the family deductible tracks aggregate. The rule says the member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. That seems contradictory to typical embedded? Let's think.
Actually, typical embedded: each family member has their own individual deductible (e.g., 1500). Once a member meets their individual deductible, their claims start paying coinsurance. Meanwhile, all family members' deductible payments count toward the family deductible (3000). Once the family total reaches 3000, all members are considered to have met the deductible (even if individually they haven't). So the deductible applied to a claim is limited by both the member's remaining individual deductible and the family's remaining aggregate deductible? Wait, if family total hasn't been met, the member still can only pay up to their own remaining individual deductible, because embedded means individual counts first. However, if the family remaining is less than the individual remaining, does that cap the deductible applied? Usually no: with embedded, the individual deductible applies per person. The family deductible is a secondary cap that, once reached, satisfies everyone. But the rule given in the harness says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That is an explicit rule for this task. We must follow it. So the deductible applied to this claim is limited by both remainders. That means if the family remainder is smaller than the individual remainder, the deductible applied cannot exceed the family remainder. This would effectively mean the family deductible is a shared pool that can be exhausted across members, but the embedded part means individual can satisfy on their own. Let's read again: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So for each claim, the amount credited to deductible is the amount of cost share that is deductible-type. The maximum deductible that can be applied for a member on a claim is the lesser of the member's remaining individual deductible and the family's remaining deductible. But that seems odd because family deductible is 3000 and individual is 1500. Family remainder is usually larger than individual remainder until later. For A, individual remainder is 320, family remainder is 1560. Lesser is 320. So deductible applied is up to 320.
But wait: if family remainder were smaller, say 100, then even though individual still has 500 remaining, only 100 would apply to deductible, and the rest would be... maybe coinsurance? Actually if family deductible is met but individual hasn't, then the plan would pay? That is typical of an aggregate deductible, not embedded. But the rule says "lesser of individual remainder and family remainder." Let's accept it.
However, note the family accumulators: Family total deductible 1440. That means sum of individual deductible accumulators? Usually yes. A 1180 + B 260 + C 0 = 1440. So family deductible accumulator is the sum of individual accumulators. Under embedded, family deductible is met when sum reaches 3000. So family remainder is 3000 - 1440 = 1560. So indeed family remainder is sum of remainders across members? Not exactly. It's 3000 minus total credited so far. Since total credited is 1440, remainder 1560.
Now Claim 1: Allowed 2240. No copay. It's not preventive, not office visit, not urgent care, not ER, not pharmacy. So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
We need to compute how much goes to deductible, then coinsurance on the rest.
Member A remaining individual deductible: 1500 - 1180 = 320.
Family remaining deductible: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
Lesser is 320. So deductible applied = min(allowed amount, 320) = 320.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00.
Coinsurance member share: 20% of 1920 = 384.00.
Plan pays 80% of 1920 = 1536.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOPM accumulator before claim: 1180.00. OOPM threshold individual in-network: 6000. Family OOPM: 12000. But OOPM also has embedded? The plan says "Individual (in-network) 6000.00; Family (in-network) 12000.00." It doesn't explicitly say OOPM is embedded, but generally OOPM is also embedded. The task says: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." It doesn't mention family OOPM in the cost share section, but family OOPM is listed. The general family rule: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." So OOPM accumulators also move for both member and family.
We need to know if OOPM is embedded similarly. The harness instructions say: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." It only mentions deductible, not OOPM. For OOPM, likely it's similar: embedded OOPM means individual OOPM can be satisfied on own; family OOPM is also a cap. But the plan document says for OOPM: "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." It mentions individual and family OOPM amounts. The plan doesn't specify structure for OOPM. However, the general family rule in the task says accumulators move for both member and family on every claim that generates cost share. It doesn't say "lesser of" for OOPM. Typically OOPM is also embedded. We need to interpret the plan. Since the plan document says "Individual (in-network) 6000.00; Family (in-network) 12000.00" and says once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100%. That implies the individual OOPM is what matters for a member's cost share. The family OOPM is a secondary cap: if the family total reaches 12000, all members are considered to have met OOPM. So for OOPM, the member's cost share counts toward both. But for determining if the member has reached OOPM, we check if member accumulator >= 6000. If not, they still pay cost share unless family OOPM reached (unlikely before individual). So for Claim 1, A's OOPM before is 1180, after adding cost share (deductible + coinsurance) = 1180 + 320 + 384 = 1884. So well below 6000.
Thus for Claim 1:
- deductible_applied: 320.00
- coinsurance_amount: 384.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- member_responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
- plan_paid: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00 (or 80% of 1920 = 1536). Yes.
Update accumulators after Claim 1:
A:
- deductible accumulator: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00. So A has met individual in-network deductible.
- OOPM accumulator: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00.
Family:
- deductible accumulator: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00.
- OOPM accumulator: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
B and C unchanged.
Claim 2: 2026-06-11, C (child), Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network. Allowed 380.00.
C's deductible accumulator before: 0.00. Remaining individual: 1500.00.
Family deductible accumulator before: 1760.00. Remaining family: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.00.
Lesser of individual remainder (1500) and family remainder (1240) = 1240.00. So deductible applied limited to 1240. But allowed is 380. So deductible applied = 380.00.
Since the entire allowed amount goes to deductible, no coinsurance.
Wait, but is that correct? Under embedded, typically C would have their own individual deductible of 1500. But family remainder is 1240. The rule says lesser of the two remainders. So the deductible applied is limited to 1240. Since claim is 380 < 1240, all 380 goes to deductible.
Member responsibility = 380.00. Plan paid = 0.00.
Update accumulators:
C:
- deductible accumulator: 0 + 380 = 380.00.
- OOPM accumulator: 0 + 380 = 380.00. (Because copay? No, deductible credits OOPM? Yes, deductible amounts count toward OOPM. The plan says "Out-of-pocket maximum: the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year." Deductible and coinsurance and copays count toward OOPM (since they are cost share). So yes.)
Family:
- deductible accumulator: 1760 + 380 = 2140.00.
- OOPM accumulator: 2144 + 380 = 2524.00.
A and B unchanged.
Claim 3: 2026-06-27, B (spouse), Outpatient surgery, in-network. Allowed 2900.00.
B's deductible accumulator before: 260.00. Remaining individual: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00.
Family deductible accumulator before: 2140.00. Remaining family: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00.
Lesser of individual remainder (1240) and family remainder (860) = 860.00.
So deductible applied = min(allowed amount 2900, 860) = 860.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00.
Coinsurance member share: 20% of 2040 = 408.00.
Plan pays 80% of 2040 = 1632.00.
Member responsibility total: 860 + 408 = 1268.00.
Plan paid: 1632.00.
Check OOPM: B's OOPM before: 260.00. After adding 1268 = 1528.00. Below 6000.
Update accumulators:
B:
- deductible accumulator: 260 + 860 = 1120.00.
- OOPM accumulator: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
Family:
- deductible accumulator: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00. Family deductible now met!
- OOPM accumulator: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
A and C unchanged from after Claim 2.
After Claim 3, family deductible is 3000.00, which means the family deductible is satisfied.
Now Claim 4: 2026-07-15, A (subscriber), Follow-up imaging, in-network. Allowed 640.00.
We need to compute components for Claim 4.
A's deductible accumulator before Claim 4: After Claim 1, A's deductible accumulator is 1500.00. Since individual deductible is 1500, A has fully satisfied individual deductible. So remaining individual deductible = 0.
Family deductible accumulator before Claim 4: After Claim 3, family deductible is 3000.00. So remaining family deductible = 0.
Lesser of 0 and 0 = 0. So deductible applied = 0.
Now, is there any copay? Service is follow-up imaging, not an office visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy. So no copay.
Coinsurance: 20% of allowed amount (since in-network, after deductible). Allowed = 640.00. Coinsurance = 0.20 * 640 = 128.00.
Plan pays 80% = 512.00.
Member responsibility = 128.00.
Wait, but we need to check OOPM. Has A reached OOPM? A's OOPM accumulator before Claim 4: After Claim 1, A's OOPM = 1884.00. After Claim 2 and 3, A had no claims, so OOPM remains 1884.00. OOPM threshold individual in-network = 6000. So remaining OOPM = 4116. So A has not met OOPM.
But we also need to check family OOPM. Family OOPM accumulator before Claim 4: After Claim 3, family OOPM = 3792.00. Family OOPM threshold = 12000. So not met.
Thus cost share is simply coinsurance 128.00.
But is there any nuance about "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." Since this is in-network, threshold is 1500. A is at 1500. So deductible met. Good.
Now, the question: "Report the components for Claim 4, and the ending accumulators for every member and for the family."
Components for Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending accumulators after Claim 4:
A:
- ending_deductible_a: 1500.00 (no change from Claim 1)
- ending_oopm_a: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Wait, check: A's OOPM before Claim 4 is 1884.00. Add member responsibility 128.00 = 2012.00.
B:
- ending_deductible_b: 1120.00 (unchanged after Claim 3)
- ending_oopm_b: 1528.00 (unchanged after Claim 3)
C:
- ending_deductible_c: 380.00 (unchanged after Claim 2)
- ending_oopm_c: 380.00 (unchanged after Claim 2)
Family:
- ending_family_deductible: 3000.00 (unchanged after Claim 3)
- ending_family_oopm: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
Wait, does family OOPM increase by the member responsibility of Claim 4? Yes, because family accumulator moves on every claim that generates cost share. Claim 4 generates cost share of 128. So family OOPM becomes 3792 + 128 = 3920.
But let's double-check the OOPM accumulators at each step.
Initial:
A OOPM: 1180
B OOPM: 260
C OOPM: 0
Family OOPM: 1440
Claim 1 (A): member responsibility = 704.00 (320 ded + 384 coins). So A OOPM = 1180 + 704 = 1884. Family OOPM = 1440 + 704 = 2144.
Claim 2 (C): member responsibility = 380.00. C OOPM = 0 + 380 = 380. Family OOPM = 2144 + 380 = 2524.
Claim 3 (B): member responsibility = 1268.00. B OOPM = 260 + 1268 = 1528. Family OOPM = 2524 + 1268 = 3792.
Claim 4 (A): member responsibility = 128.00. A OOPM = 1884 + 128 = 2012. Family OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920.
Yes.
Now, double-check if any OOPM is met causing 100% plan payment. A's OOPM is 2012 < 6000. B's is 1528 < 6000. C's is 380 < 6000. Family OOPM is 3920 < 12000. So no.
One nuance: Does the deductible applied count toward OOPM? Yes, because OOPM includes deductible, coinsurance, copays. The plan says "Out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM): the ceiling on member cost share for the plan year." Deductible and coinsurance and copays are all member cost share. So they count. The task says: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." So yes.
Another nuance: Are there any copays for outpatient endoscopy, diagnostic lab panel, outpatient surgery, follow-up imaging? The plan lists specific copays: Primary care office visit 30, Specialist office visit 60, Urgent care 75, Emergency room 400, Generic retail pharmacy 15. None of the claims match those. So copay_amount = 0 for all.
Another nuance: Preventive care. None of these services are preventive (endoscopy, lab panel, surgery, imaging). So not applicable.
Another nuance: The plan says "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." Since copays are 0, irrelevant.
Another nuance: "Member cost share is calculated from the ALLOWED amount. Amounts billed above the allowed amount are not the member's responsibility for in-network services." So we use allowed amount. Already doing so.
Now, verify the deductible application rule precisely. "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This is a rule for the whole family. Let's check each claim with that.
Claim 1: A individual remainder = 1500 - 1180 = 320. Family remainder = 3000 - 1440 = 1560. Lesser = 320. Allowed 2240. So deductible applied = 320. That seems right.
But wait: what if the family remainder is the amount remaining for the family deductible, but since it's embedded, the family deductible is satisfied when total family credits reach 3000. The "family remainder" is 3000 - 1440 = 1560. So indeed lesser is 320.
Claim 2: C individual remainder = 1500 - 0 = 1500. Family remainder = 3000 - 1760 = 1240. Lesser = 1240. Allowed 380. So deductible applied = 380. This means C's deductible accumulator becomes 380. But individual remainder for C is now 1500 - 380 = 1120. However, the family remainder after this claim becomes 3000 - 2140 = 860. So the family deductible is getting closer.
Claim 3: B individual remainder = 1500 - 260 = 1240. Family remainder = 3000 - 2140 = 860. Lesser = 860. Allowed 2900. So deductible applied = 860. Then coinsurance on 2040. So B's deductible accumulator becomes 1120. Family deductible becomes 3000. So family deductible met.
Now Claim 4: A individual remainder = 1500 - 1500 = 0. Family remainder = 3000 - 3000 = 0. Lesser = 0. So deductible applied = 0. Coinsurance on full allowed.
This seems consistent.
But let's consider if there's any other interpretation: perhaps the rule means that the amount of deductible credited to the member is the lesser of what the claim would require to meet the individual deductible and what the claim would require to meet the family deductible, but not necessarily capped by the json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 10,294 tokens
We need to adjudicate claims in order: Claim 1, Claim 2, Claim 3, Claim 4. Need to compute accumulators after each claim. Then for Claim 4, report member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount, and ending accumulators for A, B, C, and family.
Plan details:
- Plan year 2026.
- Deductible: Individual in-network $1500. Family in-network $3000. Embedded. So each individual has their own $1500 deductible. The family deductible is $3000. Since it's embedded, an individual can satisfy their individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach $3000, whichever comes first.
- Out-of-network individual deductible $3000. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network.
Important: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." But all claims here are in-network. So each member has one deductible accumulator. The threshold for in-network is $1500 per individual, $3000 family. The threshold for out-of-network is $3000 per individual. But here in-network.
- OOPM: Individual in-network $6000, family in-network $12000, individual out-of-network $12000. OOPM includes copays, coinsurance, deductible? Typically yes unless excluded. The plan says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." It says "Copays do NOT credit the deductible. Copays always credit the out-of-pocket maximum." So OOPM accumulates from deductible amounts, coinsurance amounts, copays. Probably does not include amounts above allowed amounts (balance billing) for in-network because "Amounts billed above the allowed amount are not the member's responsibility for in-network services." So only cost share.
- Member cost share: Coinsurance after deductible, in-network 20% member / 80% plan. Copays listed: none for these services. But note that for office visits, urgent care, etc. copays exist. For outpatient endoscopy, diagnostic lab, outpatient surgery, follow-up imaging: likely not office visits. So no copays.
- Preventive care not relevant.
- Basis of payment: allowed amount.
- The prompt: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
Let's parse accumulator rules.
Given starting accumulators:
Family as of moment before Claim 1:
A: ded 1180.00, oop 1180.00
B: ded 260.00, oop 260.00
C: ded 0.00, oop 0.00
Family total: ded 1440.00, oop 1440.00
Wait, family total deductible is sum of individual deductibles? 1180 + 260 + 0 = 1440. Yes. Family total OOPM is sum of individual OOPM? 1180+260+0 = 1440. So family accumulator is sum of individual accumulators for these amounts? Usually family deductible is the sum of individual deductible credits. But we need to interpret how the family deductible works when embedded.
Under embedded deductible: each individual has their own $1500 deductible. The family has $3000. If an individual meets $1500, they are done regardless of family total. If the family total reaches $3000 before any individual reaches $1500, then all family members are considered to have met the deductible. This is typical. However, the prompt says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
The "family remainder" is the remaining amount needed to satisfy the family deductible. Since it's embedded, the family remainder is based on the family total accumulator. Let's think carefully.
We need to determine the cost share for each claim.
Claim 1: A, Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.
A's current deductible balance (individual) = 1180.00 (credits so far). A's individual remainder = 1500 - 1180 = 320.00.
Family deductible total so far = 1440. Family remainder = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00.
Since the claim is in-network, the individual threshold is 1500.
The amount applied to deductible is the lesser of the individual remainder and the family remainder. Wait: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That means for a given claim, the member's deductible is considered satisfied when the lesser of the two remainders is met? Actually, it's describing how much can still be applied to the deductible for that member. Let's parse: "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." Could mean: When determining how much of a given claim's allowed amount applies to the member's deductible, the cap is the lesser of the individual remaining deductible and the family remaining deductible. Because if the family remainder is smaller, then once the family meets 3000, the embedded family deductible is satisfied, meaning that member is considered to have satisfied deductible even if their individual hasn't reached 1500. So the deductible applied to a member on a claim is limited by both remainders.
In typical embedded deductible processing: For each claim, you calculate the amount that can be applied to deductible as the lesser of (individual remaining deductible) and (family remaining deductible). Because if the family remaining is less, the family deductible may be satisfied by this claim, and after that, no more deductible applies for anyone (or at least the individual's deductible is considered satisfied because family met). But note: if the family remainder is 1560 and individual remainder is 320, the lesser is 320. So A's individual remainder is the limiting factor. So $320 of the allowed amount will go to deductible. After that, A has satisfied their individual deductible.
But we need to be careful: does the family remainder decrease by the amount applied to the individual's deductible? Yes. The family accumulator increases by the amount applied. The individual accumulator increases by the same amount. Then the remaining allowed amount after deductible is subject to coinsurance.
Let's formalize:
For each claim:
1. Determine if copay applies. For outpatient endoscopy, not a copay service. So no copay.
2. Determine amount subject to deductible: the allowed amount (since no copay).
3. Determine the amount that can be applied to the member's deductible:
- individual_remainder = individual_deductible_limit - member_deductible_accumulator
- family_remainder = family_deductible_limit - family_deductible_accumulator
- deductible_applicable = min(individual_remainder, family_remainder, allowed_amount)
Actually, the plan says "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." That suggests that the member's deductible is the lesser amount? No, it means the deductible to be satisfied is the smaller of the two remainders. So if individual remainder is 320 and family remainder is 1560, the member's deductible that can be applied is 320. So after applying 320, the member has met their deductible.
Wait, what if the family remainder were less than individual remainder? E.g., family remainder = 100, individual remainder = 200. Then the member's deductible is satisfied after 100 (the family remainder). After that, the plan would pay because the family deductible is met? Under embedded, once family deductible is met, all members have met deductible, even if individual hasn't reached 1500. So yes, the deductible applied is limited by family remainder.
Thus:
deductible_applied = min(individual_remainder, family_remainder, allowed_amount)
But if allowed_amount is less than both, then only allowed_amount applies to deductible.
After applying deductible:
- member_deductible_accumulator += deductible_applied
- family_deductible_accumulator += deductible_applied (since this is a family-wide pool?). Actually, the family accumulator is the total of the family credits. The prompt says: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." So yes, family accumulator increases by the same amount applied to the member's deductible? Or by the total cost-share generated? Let's think.
If a claim has $320 applied to deductible, that generates cost share for the member (they pay it). So the member's deductible accumulator moves by +320. The family deductible accumulator should also move by +320 because it's the sum of family credits. Similarly, if there is coinsurance or copay, does the family deductible accumulator move? Deductible accumulator only tracks deductible credits, not copays/coinsurance. The prompt says "member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." But which accumulator? The previous sentence: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This seems to refer to the deductible accumulator. Wait: "member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share." The family accumulator for deductible? Or OOPM? Let's read the whole paragraph:
"A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
It might be describing that both the individual deductible accumulator and the family deductible accumulator are updated on each claim. But does coinsurance or copay affect the deductible accumulator? No. Deductible accumulator only tracks deductible credits. The phrase "move on every claim that generates cost share" might be slightly imprecise, but the key is that the deductible applied to a member is limited by both remainders.
Let's see if we can deduce from the numbers.
Given starting family total deductible = 1440. This equals sum of A (1180) + B (260) + C (0). So family deductible accumulator is just the sum of individual deductible accumulators. That would mean: family_deductible = A_ded + B_ded + C_ded. Then family remainder = 3000 - (A_ded + B_ded + C_ded). Under that model, when a claim for A applies $X to deductible, A_ded becomes 1180+X, and family_ded becomes 1440+X (since sum increases by X). That aligns with "family accumulator moves". But does family accumulator move on coinsurance claims? No, because coinsurance doesn't credit the deductible. So "move" means if there is deductible applied, the family deductible accumulator increases by that amount. Or does the family accumulator also move on copays? No, copays do not credit deductible. So the family accumulator for deductible only moves when deductible is applied.
But the OOPM accumulator definitely moves on any cost share (deductible, coinsurance, copay). The family OOPM accumulator likely is sum of individual OOPM accumulators. Starting family OOPM = 1440 = sum of individual OOPM. That will increase with all cost share.
Thus we can compute:
We need to process claims sequentially.
Let's track for each member:
- ded_i: individual deductible accumulator
- oop_i: individual OOPM accumulator
And family:
- fam_ded = sum of ded_i? Or tracked separately? Since it's sum, we can compute as sum, but need to ensure it's consistent.
Given starting:
A: ded=1180, oop=1180
B: ded=260, oop=260
C: ded=0, oop=0
Family: ded=1440, oop=1440
Check sum: 1180+260+0=1440. Yes.
Plan OOPM limits:
- Individual in-network: 6000
- Family in-network: 12000
But note: The plan says "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum the plan pays 100% of the allowed amount for covered services for the remainder of the plan year." So if a member's OOPM reaches 6000, they pay nothing further for in-network covered services. Family OOPM of 12000 is also a limit; once family reaches 12000, does everyone get 100%? Usually family OOPM is an aggregate cap where once family total OOP reaches 12000, all members are capped. The plan says: "Out-of-pocket maximum ... Family (in-network) 12000.00". It doesn't explicitly say what happens when family OOPM is reached but individual hasn't. But typical: Once the family OOPM is reached, all family members are considered to have met their OOPM for the year. However, we need to see if any claims approach that. Starting family OOPM is 1440. Claims 1-4 allowed amounts: 2240, 380, 2900, 640. Total cost share likely won't reach 12000. So individual OOPM likely not reached either. But we need to keep it in mind.
Let's compute each claim.
**Claim 1: 2026-06-02, A, In-network outpatient endoscopy, allowed 2240.00**
Service: Not preventive. Not an office visit. No copay. Applies to deductible then coinsurance.
A individual remainder ded: 1500 - 1180 = 320.
Family remainder ded: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
deductible_applicable = min(320, 1560, 2240) = 320.
So $320 goes to deductible.
A's cost share so far: 320 deductible.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.
Now apply coinsurance: 20% of remaining = 0.20 * 1920 = 384.00.
Plan pays: 80% of remaining = 1536.00. Or allowed - member_responsibility = 2240 - 704 = 1536.
Check if OOPM reached? A's OOP before claim: 1180. After adding cost share 320 + 384 = 704, new OOP = 1180 + 704 = 1884. That's far below 6000.
So Claim 1 results:
- deductible_applied: 320.00
- coinsurance_amount: 384.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- member_responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00
- plan_paid: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00
Update accumulators:
A ded: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (A has met individual deductible)
A oop: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
Family ded: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00
Family oop: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
B and C unchanged.
**Claim 2: 2026-06-11, C (child), Diagnostic lab panel, in-network, allowed 380.00**
C ded: 0. C individual remainder: 1500 - 0 = 1500.
Family ded: 1760. Family remainder: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.
deductible_applicable = min(1500, 1240, 380) = 380.
Wait, family remainder is 1240, which is less than individual remainder (1500). So the deductible applied is limited by family remainder? Actually, the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder is 1240. Since allowed amount 380 is less than 1240, the full allowed amount applies to deductible. So deductible_applied = 380.
Thus C pays 380 toward deductible. No coinsurance because remaining allowed is 0.
C's OOP before: 0. After cost share: 380. New OOP = 380.
Family ded: 1760 + 380 = 2140.
Family oop: 2144 + 380 = 2524.
Check: family ded now 2140 = A1500 + B260 + C380 = 2140. Yes.
Check if family deductible met? 3000 not yet.
**Claim 3: 2026-06-27, B (spouse), Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.00**
B ded: 260. B individual remainder: 1500 - 260 = 1240.
Family ded: 2140. Family remainder: 3000 - 2140 = 860.
deductible_applicable = min(1240, 860, 2900) = 860.
Because family remainder is 860, which is less than B's individual remainder. So only 860 can be applied to deductible for B. After this, family deductible is met (2140+860=3000).
So B pays 860 toward deductible.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.
Coinsurance: 20% of 2040 = 408.00.
Plan pays: 80% of 2040 = 1632.00. Total plan paid = 1632? Wait, plan pays 80% of remaining allowed after deductible. Member pays deductible + coinsurance. Member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan paid = 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00.
Check B's OOP before: 260. After cost share: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00. Well below 6000.
Family ded after: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 (family deductible met).
Family oop after: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
B ded after: 260 + 860 = 1120.00. Note B hasn't met individual deductible yet (1120 < 1500). But because family deductible is now met, does B now have met deductible for future claims? Under embedded deductible, once the family deductible is met, all family members are considered to have satisfied the deductible. However, the prompt says: "Structure .............................. EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." So if family amount is reached first, then the family deductible is satisfied. Does that mean each individual is considered to have satisfied their deductible? Usually yes. But the wording "the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That implies that once the family total reaches 3000, the family deductible is satisfied, and presumably all members benefit. However, for accumulator tracking, B's individual deductible accumulator is 1120, not 1500. But does B still have an individual deductible remainder? Under embedded, once family is met, the deductible is satisfied for all. However, the rule about "member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" suggests that if family remainder is 0, then the deductible satisfied is 0 remainder, meaning the member's deductible is considered satisfied. But the individual accumulator might stay at 1120. How does this affect future claims for B? If family deductible is met, B would have no deductible applied on future claims, because family remainder is 0, so min(individual remainder, 0) = 0. So deductible_applied = 0. That means B's individual accumulator stays at 1120 for the rest of the year? That is plausible; the accumulator tracks credits applied, not a satisfied flag. The limit for deductible is defined by the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Since family remainder is 0, no more deductible can be applied. So yes, B will have no more deductible.
Similarly, for A, individual ded is already at 1500 (met). For C, ded is at 380. Family remainder now 0, so no more deductible can be applied for C either.
So after Claim 3:
A ded: 1500, A oop: 1884
B ded: 1120, B oop: 1528
C ded: 380, C oop: 380
Family ded: 3000, Family oop: 3792
**Claim 4: 2026-07-15, A (subscriber), Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00**
Service: Follow-up imaging. Not preventive. No copay. Applies to deductible/coinsurance.
A individual remainder ded: 1500 - 1500 = 0.
Family remainder ded: 3000 - 3000 = 0.
deductible_applicable = min(0, 0, 640) = 0.
So no deductible applied.
Remaining allowed = 640.
Coinsurance: 20% of 640 = 128.00.
Check OOPM: A's OOP before claim: 1884. Adding 128 = 2012. Below 6000.
Member responsibility = 128.00.
Plan paid = 640 - 128 = 512.00.
Wait, is there any other rule? Since A already met individual deductible, the claim is subject to coinsurance. That's correct.
So for Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Now ending accumulators after Claim 4:
A ded: 1500.00
A oop: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00
B ded: 1120.00
B oop: 1528.00 (unchanged)
C ded: 380.00
C oop: 380.00 (unchanged)
Family ded: 3000.00
Family oop: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00
Wait, does family OOP increase by 128? Yes, because A generated cost share of 128.
Let's double-check all prior calculations.
Claim 1:
- Allowed 2240.
- A ded rem: 320. Fam ded rem: 1560. Apply 320.
- Remaining 1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384.
- Member pays 704. Plan pays 1536.
- A oop: 1180 + 704 = 1884.
- Family oop: 1440 + 704 = 2144.
- A ded: 1500.
- Family ded: 1760.
Claim 2:
- Allowed 380.
- C ded rem: 1500. Fam ded rem: 1240. Apply 380.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 9,770 tokens
We need to adjudicate claims in order and then report the components for Claim 4 and ending accumulators.
Plan details:
- In-network individual deductible: 1500.00
- In-network family deductible: 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED
- Out-of-network individual deductible: 3000.00
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network. Wait: The text says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out of network." So there is one deductible accumulator per member that counts both in-network and out-of-network. Since all claims in this prompt are in-network, we compare against in-network individual deductible 1500 and family 3000. But if there were OON, they'd count to same balance but threshold is OON amount. But not relevant here.
- OOPM: individual in-network 6000, family in-network 12000, individual OON 12000. Once member reaches OOPM, plan pays 100% of allowed amount.
- Coinsurance after deductible: in-network 20% member / 80% plan.
- Copays: primary care 30, specialist 60, urgent care 75, ER 400 (waived if inpatient admission, then subject to deductible/coinsurance). Pharmacy generic 15. Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
- Preventive care: 100% paid, not subject to deductible, coinsurance, copay.
Claims:
Claim 1: 2026-06-02, A (subscriber), Outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed 2240.
Claim 2: 2026-06-11, C (child), Diagnostic laboratory panel, in-network, allowed 380.
Claim 3: 2026-06-27, B (spouse), Outpatient surgery, in-network, allowed 2900.
Claim 4: 2026-07-15, A (subscriber), Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.
We need to process each claim.
Starting accumulators:
A: ded=1180.00, oop=1180.00
B: ded=260.00, oop=260.00
C: ded=0.00, oop=0.00
Family: ded=1440.00, oop=1440.00
All services are not copay services; they are subject to deductible and coinsurance. The plan says coinsurance after deductible, in-network 20% member / 80% plan.
We need to figure out how embedded deductible works. Plan document says:
- Individual (in-network) 1500.00
- Family (in-network) 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
- In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance.
So for each claim, we need to compute how much of the allowed amount goes to deductible, then coinsurance, considering both the member's remaining individual deductible and the family remaining deductible.
The rule for embedded: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This is from the task family rules: "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
We need to carefully apply that.
For each claim, the amount applied to deductible is the portion of the allowed amount that is subject to deductible before coinsurance. Since copays don't apply to deductible and coinsurance applies after deductible. For these non-copay services, the cost share is deductible then coinsurance.
But with embedded, the member's deductible is considered satisfied based on the lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Usually, in embedded deductible plans, each person has their own deductible. Their charges count toward both their individual deductible and the family deductible. Once an individual meets their individual deductible, they begin coinsurance even if the family deductible hasn't been met. If the family deductible is met first (e.g., total family charges exceed family amount before any one individual meets theirs), then all members have met the deductible. But with embedded, typically the family deductible acts as a cap; if the sum of all members' deductible-eligible expenses reaches the family deductible, then the entire family's deductible is met, regardless of individual accumulations.
The prompt says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." This means when deciding how much of a claim can be applied to the deductible, we look at the smaller of the two remainders: individual remaining deductible and family remaining deductible. The amount applied to the deductible = min(allowed amount that is subject to deductible, lesser of individual remainder and family remainder). Then the rest is subject to coinsurance (unless OOPM is reached).
Wait, but there is nuance: In standard embedded deductible logic, for each claim, the amount that goes to deductible is limited by both the individual's remaining deductible and the family's remaining deductible. However, some adjudication systems apply the member's individual deductible first (if they have a remainder), and if the family remainder is lower, the family remainder caps the amount applied to deductible for that member? Actually, the phrase "a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" suggests that for a given member, the effective deductible remaining is min(individual remaining, family remaining). Once that effective amount is met, the member begins coinsurance. However, if the individual remainder is greater than family remainder, then the family remainder is the limiting factor, and after that the member's subsequent claims would be subject to coinsurance because the family deductible is met (for everyone? Or just that the member's portion of the family limit is used up?). Actually, in embedded family deductibles, if the family deductible is reached, then everyone in the family is considered to have met the deductible, even if they individually haven't met their individual amount. So the "effective remaining deductible" for each member is indeed min(individual remaining, family remaining). Because if the family remaining is $100, then even if the individual still has $500 left, only $100 of their next charge will go to deductible (the family part), and after that the family deductible is satisfied, so the individual's deductible is also considered satisfied (because family is met). So yes, effective remaining = min(individual remaining, family remaining).
But need to be careful: The family deductible is an aggregate of all members' contributions. The family remaining is the amount left before family deductible is met. If a member has a claim, the amount applied to the family deductible is part of the family total. But the "lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" means the maximum that can be applied to deductible for that claim is limited by both. However, in a family, if the family remaining is $500, and member A has individual remaining $200, then A's effective remaining is $200. If A incurs $300 claim, $200 goes to deductible (meeting A's individual), remaining $100 subject to coinsurance. Family remaining after that becomes $300. For member B with individual remaining $400, effective remaining is min($400, $300) = $300. So B's next claim would have at most $300 applied to deductible. After B meets $300, family deductible is met, so B's deductible is satisfied for the rest of the year (even though B individually only contributed $300 to deductible, not $400). That is standard embedded.
However, sometimes the rule is: apply to individual deductible first, and also to family deductible. The family deductible is just the sum; there's no "effective remaining" concept, but the claim's deductible applied cannot exceed the individual remaining, and also cannot exceed the family remaining? Actually, in a typical system, the deductible applied to a claim is min(claim amount subject to ded, individual remaining deductible). That amount also credits the family deductible. If the family deductible gets exhausted before the individual, then the individual's remaining deductible is effectively zero because the family has been met. But the phrase "satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" seems to capture exactly that: the deductible satisfied for a member is the smaller of the two remainders. So the amount applied to the deductible for a claim is min(claim subject to ded, min(individual remainder, family remainder)). Since the claim's subject to ded is just the allowed amount (assuming no copay and not preventive). So deductible_applied = min(allowed, min(ind_rem, fam_rem)). Then the remaining allowed amount is subject to coinsurance (unless OOPM caps). The member's cost share = deductible_applied + coinsurance_amount. But coinsurance_amount = (allowed - deductible_applied) * coinsurance_rate, unless OOPM is reached. Also need to ensure that coinsurance does not cause OOPM to be exceeded; but from prompt, OOPM is a ceiling. Usually we need to check if the member is already at OOPM. Starting OOPM accumulators are well below limits. We'll need to check after each claim.
Let's process step by step.
Plan Year 2026. Accumulators as of before Claim 1.
Claim 1: A, allowed 2240.00.
Network: In-network. Coinsurance rate: 20% member.
Individual remaining ded for A: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00.
Family remaining ded: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00.
Effective remaining ded for A: min(320, 1560) = 320.00.
Amount applied to deductible: min(2240, 320) = 320.00.
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00.
Coinsurance member: 1920 * 0.20 = 384.00.
Total member responsibility: 320 + 384 = 704.00.
Plan paid: 2240 - 704 = 1536.00.
Check OOPM: A's current OOP is 1180. New OOP adds 704 => 1884.00. Family OOP adds 704 => 1440 + 704 = 2144.00.
Update accumulators after Claim 1:
A deductible: 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (satisfied)
A OOPM: 1180 + 704 = 1884.00
Family deductible: 1440 + 320 = 1760.00
Family OOPM: 1440 + 704 = 2144.00
B and C unchanged.
Claim 2: C (child), allowed 380.00.
C deductible remaining: 1500 - 0 = 1500.
Family deductible remaining: 3000 - 1760 = 1240.
Effective remaining for C: min(1500, 1240) = 1240.
Amount applied to deductible: min(380, 1240) = 380.00.
Remaining after ded: 0.
Coinsurance: 0.
Member responsibility: 380.
Plan paid: 0.
Check OOPM: C had 0, now 380. Family OOP: 2144 + 380 = 2524.
Update accumulators:
C deductible: 0 + 380 = 380.
C OOPM: 380.
Family deductible: 1760 + 380 = 2140.
Family OOPM: 2524.
A and B unchanged.
Claim 3: B (spouse), allowed 2900.
B deductible remaining: 1500 - 260 = 1240.
Family deductible remaining: 3000 - 2140 = 860.
Effective remaining for B: min(1240, 860) = 860.
Amount applied to deductible: min(2900, 860) = 860.
Remaining after ded: 2900 - 860 = 2040.
Coinsurance member: 2040 * 0.20 = 408.00.
Total member responsibility: 860 + 408 = 1268.00.
Plan paid: 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00.
Check OOPM: B had 260. New OOP adds 1268 => 1528. Family OOP: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.
Update accumulators:
B deductible: 260 + 860 = 1120. (Note: B hasn't met individual deductible of 1500, but family deductible is now met because family deductible reached 3000.)
Family deductible: 2140 + 860 = 3000. (Family deductible satisfied.)
B OOPM: 260 + 1268 = 1528.
Family OOPM: 3792.
Now, after family deductible is satisfied, what happens for future claims? Since family deductible is met, the effective remaining deductible for any member is min(individual remaining, family remaining). Family remaining is now 0. So effective remaining for all members is 0. Thus all members are considered to have met the deductible for the rest of the plan year (unless I'm misunderstanding embedded). Actually, in embedded deductible plans, once the family deductible is met, all family members have satisfied the deductible, regardless of their individual accumulations. Even if B only has 1120 toward individual, because family reached 3000, B's deductible is satisfied. Similarly, C had only 380, but family met, so C's deductible is satisfied.
But wait, the prompt says: "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." The "lesser of" implies that if family remainder is 0, then the member's deductible satisfied is 0. That is, the member has no remaining deductible to satisfy because the family remainder is 0. So yes, after family deductible is met, every member has 0 remaining deductible.
Thus for Claim 4, all members have deductible met (effective remaining 0). Let's double-check if there are any nuances. The family deductible total is 3000. After Claim 3, family deductible = 3000. So family remaining = 0. Individual remaingin for A: 0 (already met). For B: 1500 - 1120 = 380. For C: 1500 - 380 = 1120. But because family remaining is 0, effective remaining for B and C is 0.
Claim 4: A (subscriber), allowed 640.00.
Service: Follow-up imaging, in-network. Not a copay service. No deductible applies because family deductible is met and A's individual is met. So deductible applied = 0.
Now, coinsurance: 20% of allowed = 640 * 0.20 = 128.00.
Total member responsibility = 128.00.
Plan paid = 512.00.
But we must check OOPM. A's OOPM before Claim 4: 1884.00. Individual OOPM limit: 6000. Since 1884 + 128 = 2012 < 6000, no OOPM cap triggered. Family OOPM: 3792 + 128 = 3920 < 12000.
So member responsibility = 128.00, plan paid = 512.00, deductible applied = 0, copay_amount = 0, coinsurance_amount = 128.00.
Wait: "Copay_amount" key is required. Should be 0.00 presumably. "Coinsurance_amount" = 128.00.
Now ending accumulators:
A deductible: 1500.00 (already at 1500, no change). Does it stay at 1500? Yes.
A OOPM: 1884 + 128 = 2012.00.
B deductible: 1120.00 (unchanged). B OOPM: 1528.00.
C deductible: 380.00 (unchanged). C OOPM: 380.00.
Family deductible: 3000.00.
Family OOPM: 3792 + 128 = 3920.00.
Wait: Is family OOPM calculated correctly? Let's recompute OOPM after each claim carefully.
Start:
A OOPM = 1180.
B OOPM = 260.
C OOPM = 0.
Family OOPM = 1440.
Claim 1: A cost share = 704.00 (deductible 320 + coinsurance 384). Family OOPM increase by same amount: 1440 + 704 = 2144. A OOPM = 1180 + 704 = 1884.
Claim 2: C cost share = 380.00 (deductible 380). Family OOPM = 2144 + 380 = 2524. C OOPM = 380.
Claim 3: B cost share = 1268.00 (deductible 860 + coinsurance 408). Family OOPM = 2524 + 1268 = 3792. B OOPM = 260 + 1268 = 1528.
Claim 4: A cost share = 128.00 (coinsurance). Family OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920. A OOPM = 1884 + 128 = 2012.
Family OOPM = 3920.
Check if any OOPM cap applied during coinsurance for any claim. None reached.
Now verify the "lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder" rule. Let's ensure that Claim 3 applied correctly. B individual remaining before Claim 3: 1500 - 260 = 1240. Family remaining before Claim 3: 3000 - 2140 = 860. Effective = 860. So deductible applied = 860. That is correct. After that, family remaining becomes 0. B individual remaining becomes 1240 - 860 = 380, but because family is met, B's deductible is considered satisfied. So B ending deductible accumulator is 260 + 860 = 1120. Is that correct? Or does B's deductible accumulator get "credited" up to 1500 because family met? Typically in embedded plans, the individual accumulator reflects actual amounts incurred, not the threshold. But the deductible is "satisfied" meaning the member doesn't owe deductible anymore. The accumulator might still show 1120, but the system might treat it as satisfied. However, the question asks for "ending_deductible_b". The accumulator is the running year-to-date total. It should be the actual credited amount. The prompt says Accumulator: the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible. So we report the actual total, which is 1120.00.
But some might argue that once family deductible is met, the individual's deductible accumulator is considered "satisfied" and perhaps capped at 1500? No, it can't exceed 1500. It's 1120. So 1120 is correct.
Wait, could there be an interpretation where after family deductible is met, the remaining individual deductible is "waived" and the individual accumulator jumps to 1500? Let's think. In typical health plan systems, the deductible accumulator tracks the amount of deductible the member has paid or that has been credited. The family deductible being met doesn't cause individual accumulators to increase artificially. They stay at actual amounts. But the system's logic for future deductible application sees that the family limit is reached, so no further deductible is taken. So reporting 1120 is likely correct.
However, the prompt says "ending_deductible_b". The accumulator definition: "the running year-to-date total of a member's deductible or OOPM." So yes, actual credited amounts.
Let's double-check the family accumulator after each ded application. Family deductible start 1440. Claim 1 adds 320 => 1760. Claim 2 adds 380 => 2140. Claim 3 adds 860 => 3000. After Claim 3, family deductible is exactly 3000. So family is satisfied. Claim 4 adds 0 => 3000.
One nuance: The plan document says "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out of network." This is a bit confusing. It could mean that each member has one balance, but for in-network vs out-of-network they compare against different thresholds. Not relevant here.
Now ensure the format for numbers: two decimal places, plain. 1234.50.
Let's calculate again precisely:
Claim 1:
Allowed 2240.
A ind rem = 1500 - 1180 = 320.
Fam rem = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
Effective rem = min(320,1560) = 320.
Ded applied = min(2240, 320) = 320.
Remaining = 2240 - 320 = 1920.
Coinsurance = 1920 * 0.20 = 384.00.
Member resp = 320 + 384 = 704.00.
Plan paid = 2240 - 704 = 1536.00.
A ded = 1180 + 320 = 1500.
A oop = 1180 + 704 = 1884.
Fam ded = 1440 + 320 = 1760.
Fam oop = 1440 + 704 = 2144.
Claim 2:
Allowed 380.
C ind rem = 1500 - 0 = 1500.
Fam rem = 3000 - 1760 = 1240.
Effective rem = min(1500,1240) = 1240.
Ded applied = min(380,1240) = 380.
Remaining = 0.
Coinsurance = 0.
Member resp = 380.
Plan paid = 0.
C ded = 380.
C oop = 380.
Fam ded = 1760 + 380 = 2140.
Fam oop = 2144 + 380 = 2524.
Claim 3:
Allowed 2900.
B ind rem = 1500 - 260 = 1240.
Fam rem = 3000 - 2140 = 860.
Effective rem = min(1240,860) = 860.
Ded applied = min(2900,860) = 860.
Remaining = 2900 - 860 = 2040.
Coinsurance = 2040 * 0.20 = 408.00.
Member resp = 860 + 408 = 1268.00.
Plan paid = 2900 - 1268 = 1632.00.
B ded = 260 + 860 = 1120.
B oop = 260 + 1268 = 1528.
Fam ded = 2140 + 860 = 3000.
Fam oop = 2524 + 1268 = 3792.
Claim 4:
Allowed 640.
A ind rem = 1500 - 1500 = 0.
Fam rem = 3000 - 3000 = 0.
Effective rem = min(0,0) = 0.
Ded applied = 0.
Remaining = 640.
Coinsurance = 640 * 0.20 = 128.00.
Member resp = 128.00.
Plan paid = 512.00.
A oop = 1884 + 128 = 2012.
Fam oop = 3792 + 128 = 3920.
No OOPM hit.
Now keys required:
- member_responsibility
- plan_paid
- deductible_applied
- copay_amount
- coinsurance_amount
- ending_deductible_a
- ending_oopm_a
- ending_deductible_b
- ending_oopm_b
- ending_deductible_c
- ending_oopm_c
- ending_family_deductible
- ending_family_oopm
Need to be careful: is "deductible_applied" the amount that applied to deductible for Claim 4? Yes, 0.00. Or is it the amount of the member's deductible that was applied? It's the portion of the claim applied to the deductible. Since 0, it's 0.00.
What about "copay_amount"? 0.00.
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00.
Check if any detail about "Preventivejson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI11.5s · 869 out | 34.3s · 695 out | 4.8s · 620 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek223.3s · 8,135 out | 54.6s · 3,588 out | 46.7s · 3,817 out
Reasoning · 7,957 tokens
We need answer JSON only. Need adjudicate claims sequentially. Need understand plan. Need calculate member responsibility for Claim4 after prior claims accumulators. Need ending accumulators for each member and family. Need follow plan details.
We need parse plan. Bluebonnet PPO synthetic. Benefits:
Deductible:
Individual in-network 1500, Family in-network 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first.
Out-of-network individual 3000. In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is threshold that balance measured against when service is out-of-network. Hmm need interpret for in-network claims? Plan has separate? It says In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. Maybe for out-of-network threshold higher? But claims all in-network.
Out-of-pocket maximum:
Individual in-network 6000, Family in-network 12000, Individual out-of-network 12000. Once member reaches OOP max plan pays 100% allowed for covered services remainder.
Member cost share:
Coinsurance after deductible, in-network 20% member / 80% plan. after deductible? For in-network, after deductible subject to coinsurance.
Primary care office visit 30 copay etc. Specialist 60 copay. Urgent care 75 copay. Emergency room 400 copay, waived if admitted inpatient, otherwise subject to deductible and coinsurance? Wait "Emergency room 400.00 copay, WAIVED if visit results in inpatient admission, in which case the visit is subject to deductible and coinsurance" Means ER copay normally 400 (maybe not subject to ded/coins?); if admitted, ER copay waived and ER visit subject to ded/coins. Claims: outpatient endoscopy, diagnostic lab, outpatient surgery, follow-up imaging. Not listed copay services except maybe outpatient surgery? No.
Preventive no cost share. No.
Basis of payment: member cost share from allowed amount. Billed above allowed not member responsibility for in-network.
Need adjudicate.
Family accumulators as of before Claim1:
A: deductible 1180, OOPM 1180
B: deductible 260, OOPM 260
C: deductible 0, OOPM 0
Family total deductible 1440, OOPM 1440. Wait family OOPM as of before Claim1 equals sum of member OOPM? Since no claims? yes.
Need process Claims 1-4.
Need determine deductibles: Each member has individual deductible 1500 in-network, family deductible 3000 aggregate across members? Embedded: individual satisfies individual deductible on own; family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach 3000, whichever comes first. For claim cost sharing, need see if member's individual deductible satisfied? If family deductible satisfied before individual? Embedded deductible: benefits apply once either individual deductible satisfied for that member or family deductible satisfied? Usually with embedded, each individual has own deductible; family deductible aggregate; once family deductible met, all covered services subject to coinsurance even if individual not met? Actually "embedded" means individual deductibles embedded within family deductible; an individual's covered expenses count toward both individual and family deductible; after individual deductible satisfied, benefits begin for that individual even if family not met. Family deductible satisfied when aggregate reaches family amount, then all family members no longer deductible. So for each claim, if member's remaining individual deductible >0 and family remaining deductible >0? Need apply deductible to allowed amount up to perhaps member's individual remaining and family remaining? But if family remaining smaller, family satisfied after applied amount, then maybe remaining allowed subject to coinsurance? Need precise.
Plan: Deductible individual 1500, family 3000, embedded. "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is threshold that balance measured against when service is out-of-network." Hmm maybe all in-network and out-of-network claims count toward one deductible (1500 for in-network? But out-of-network threshold 3000? Wait says out-of-network individual 3000. Then "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance measured against when service is out-of-network." This could mean if a member has both in-network and out-of-network expenses, the deductible balance is combined; for out-of-network services, threshold is 3000. So in-network need satisfy 1500, out-of-network 3000, but credits combine. For all in-network, straightforward.
Let's process.
Important: Copays do NOT credit deductible; copays always credit OOPM. Coinsurance and deductible payments credit OOPM and deductible? Usually amounts applied to deductible count toward deductible and OOPM; coinsurance counts OOPM. Copay counts OOPM but not ded. Need compute.
Claim1 (A, outpatient endoscopy in-network, allowed 2240). A current deductible 1180, family deductible 1440. Need A individual remaining deductible = 1500 - 1180 = 320. Family remaining deductible = 3000 - 1440 = 1560. Since embedded, claim's allowed first applied to A's deductible? Need if family deductible not met, A individual not met. Deductible applied = min(remaining individual deductible 320, allowed 2240, family remaining? maybe 1560) = 320. Then remaining allowed = 2240 - 320 = 1920 subject to coinsurance 20% = 384. A's OOPM? Deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704 added. But verify if coinsurance applied after deductible satisfied. A deductible now satisfied (1500). Need family deductible: A deductible 320 credited to family? In embedded, family deductible accumulates all member deductible credits (amounts applied to deductible) = 320. Family remaining becomes 1240. A OOPM increases from 1180 to 1884? 1180+320+384=1884. A OOPM individual max 6000, no issue. Plan paid = allowed - member responsibility? For in-network, plan pays allowed minus member cost share? If provider in-network, no balance billing; member responsibility = deductible + coinsurance? plus no copay. 320+384=704. Plan pays 2240 - 704 = 1536. But if allowed amount maybe plan pays 80% of remaining after deductible = 1536. yes.
Need Claim2 (C, diagnostic lab in-network allowed 380). C current deductible 0, family deductible accum after Claim1: family total = 1440 + 320 = 1760 (assuming all member deductible credits credited; no C yet) . Individual C remaining deductible 1500. Family remaining deductible = 3000 - 1760 = 1240. Claim2 allowed 380. Deductible applied? Need C individual remaining 1500, but family remaining 1240. Since family remaining less than C remaining, can apply only 380 (allowed) anyway. Need if family remaining 1240 > allowed 380, apply 380 to C's individual deductible and family deductible. Deductible applied = 380. Then remaining allowed = 0, no coinsurance. C's deductible becomes 380, family deductible becomes 1760+380=2140. C OOPM = deductible 380? plus no coinsurance. Current C OOPM 0 -> 380. Family OOPM = previous 1884? Wait family OOPM is sum? Need track: before Claim1 family OOPM 1440 (sum A1180+B260+C0). Claim1 A OOPM added 704 -> family OOPM 2144? Let's compute: Family OOPM before claim1 = 1440. After claim1 = 1440 + A member responsibility 704 = 2144. Or sum individual OOPM: A=1884, B=260, C=0 => 2144. After claim2 = +C 380 => 2524. Family deductible after claim2 = 2140. Good.
Need Claim3 (B, outpatient surgery in-network allowed 2900). Current before claim3:
A: ded=1500 satisfied (OOPM 1884)
B: ded=260 (remaining individual 1240), OOPM 260.
C: ded=380 (remaining individual 1120), OOPM 380.
Family ded total = 2140, remaining = 860. Family OOPM total = 2524, family OOPM max 12000, remaining 9476.
B claim allowed 2900. Need apply deductible. Individual B remaining 1240. Family remaining 860. Since family deductible remaining less than individual B remaining; if family deductible not met, how much applied? The allowed amount first counts toward deductible until family deductible satisfied? Under embedded, a member's covered expenses can satisfy family deductible; when aggregate reaches 3000, family deductible met; then remaining allowed after family met may be subject to coinsurance, even if B individual deductible not fully met? Need parse "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." So if family deductible is satisfied by B's claim before B individual fully met, then family deductible satisfied, and maybe for all members no more deductible? The phrase "individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first." For B before claim, individual remaining 1240, family remaining 860. B allowed 2900. Applied to deductible? Since family total credits reach 3000 after 860 of this claim. The first 860 allowed applied to family deductible, and also to B's individual deductible? It counts toward B's individual deductible too (B remaining reduces from 1240 to 380 but not satisfied). After family deductible satisfied, is the remaining allowed (2900 - 860 = 2040) subject to coinsurance even though B's individual deductible not satisfied? Because family deductible satisfied means no individual deductible? Let's see typical embedded: If family deductible satisfied, then no individual deductible is applied to any covered person; individual deductibles have been met by aggregate. But embedded means individual can meet own deductible sooner, but family aggregate can also satisfy everyone. So yes, after family deductible satisfied, remaining claim not subject to individual deductible; only coinsurance after deductible (which is satisfied) 20%. However, does deductible applied include only until family satisfied (860), not until B individual satisfied (1240). Since family satisfied first, B's individual not fully met. But after family satisfied, deductible "satisfied" for B for this claim? Need no more deductible. "Whichever comes first" means family deductible satisfied, so stop applying deductible? Need determine deductible_applied for Claim3 = 860 or maybe 1240? Let's reason.
If we applied B individual remaining 1240, then family total would be 2140+1240=3380 > family 3000. But family deductible is satisfied after 860, and after that, no further deductible should be applied. So allowed amount remaining after family met should be subject to coinsurance, not deductible. Thus deductible_applied should be 860, not 1240. But check: Is it allowed to apply more than family remaining to satisfy family? No, because once family deductible reached, benefits begin; the amount that actually counts toward deductible is the amount of allowed expenses incurred before the deductible is met. Need prorate by claim? If a single claim crosses deductible, amount applied to deductible equals remaining deductible (860), then remaining claim subject to cost sharing. So yes.
But wait individual B's deductible originally remaining 1240. If family remaining 860, applying 860 to B individual leaves B individual remaining 380 but family satisfied. The individual not satisfied by own expenses? But family satisfied means all individuals' deductibles considered met. So no issue. Then coinsurance should apply to remaining 2040 at 20% = 408. If instead applied 1240 and family satisfied then remaining 1660 coinsurance = 332, total responsibility = 1572 vs 1268. Need choose correct. Need understand plan document; "family deductible also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first" strongly says family applies. I will use 860 deductible applied for Claim3, then coinsurance 408.
But need maybe individual deductible remaining = 1240, family remaining=860; but allowed 2900. Could we first apply enough to satisfy B individual? No family satisfied at 860; after that no member deductibles. Yes.
Need calculate Claim3 member responsibility: deductible_applied 860 + coinsurance 408 = 1268. Plan paid = 2900 - 1268 = 1632. Does OOPM add 1268 to B and family. B's OOPM before 260 -> 1528. B's deductible before 260; applied 860 -> 1120? But family satisfied; individual deductible accumulator maybe B ending deductible should be 260+860=1120 if we track credit, less than 1500. But individual deductible satisfied via family? Hmm ending_deductible_b asked? Need after claims, need ending accumulators: ending_deductible_b should perhaps reflect amount credited to deductible for B? Since individual deductible not fully met but family met; but "deductible" accumulator may not equal individual deductible satisfied? Need track as "accumulators" with amounts applied. It might be recorded as B deductible 1120. But if family deductible satisfied, all members considered deductible satisfied? But accumulator can be less than max; still ending_deductible_b maybe 1120. Need OOPM B = 1528. Need family deductible = 3000? Since after applying 860, family reaches 3000. No more deductible credits; ending family deductible 3000 (max). Family OOPM before 2524 + 1268 = 3792. Need check family OOPM = sum individual OOPM: A 1884 + B 1528 + C 380 = 3792. Good.
Need Claim4 (A, follow-up imaging in-network allowed 640). After Claim3 family deductible satisfied; all members deductibles effectively met. Thus no deductible applied for Claim4. A coinsurance 20% of allowed 640 = 128. A OOPM before? Let's track A OOPM after Claim1 = 1884. (No A in Claim2/3? Claim3 B; C; so A OOPM still 1884.) Add coinsurance 128 = 2012. No copay. Member responsibility = 128, plan paid = 512, deductible_applied = 0, copay_amount = 0, coinsurance_amount = 128.
Ending accumulators:
A: ending_deductible_a? Need if family deductible satisfied, A's individual deductible credited was 1500 (from claim1 applied 320 + prior 1180 = 1500). Wait A had prior deductible 1180; claim1 applied 320 to reach 1500. So ending_deductible_a = 1500 (capped). OOPM A = 1884 + 128 = 2012.
B: before claim3 260, claim3 applied 860 => 1120, no claim4. But family satisfied, individual B not fully met at 1120. ending_deductible_b = 1120. OOPM B = 260 + 1268 = 1528. However, if we think because family deductible satisfied, B's individual deductible considered satisfied maybe ending_deductible_b should be 1500? Need determine. The plan has "deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance" maybe for each member. The "ending deductible" should be accumulator value, not eligibility state. It asks "ending_deductible_a, ending_deductible_b, ending_deductible_c" likely amount accumulated toward individual deductible. If an individual reaches, cap at 1500. If family satisfied, they didn't necessarily individually reach. But "family deductible also satisfied" might cause no more individual deductible applies. However accumulators for B remain at 1120, not cap. Need careful: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." This means B's individual deductible not satisfied by own but family satisfied; "ending_deductible" could be considered 1500? In claims adjudication, once family deductible met, each member's deductible is satisfied for cost-sharing purposes. But accumulator field "deductible" maybe should be the paid amount applied toward deductible. Many systems track "deductible remaining" and after family deductible is met, individual deductible remaining may be $0? Hmm no, individual remaining might still be positive but no longer applied due to family met. But if reporting "ending_deductible_b" maybe the amount of B's deductible that has been met. The family deductible satisfied means B's deductible has been met by family aggregate, so maybe B's "deductible" accumulator should be maxed 1500? However the phrase "individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount" is about satisfying deductibles not necessarily accumulative credit. Need infer from standard health plan accumulator: Each member has an individual deductible accumulator; family deductible accumulator. Embedded individual deductible means each member's expenses count toward both individual and family. If family deductible satisfied, then all family members are considered to have met their individual deductible for benefit purposes, but accumulators can show each individual's own accumulated amount; however some administration sets all individual remaining to zero once family deductible met. What does the item require? Need perhaps exact "ending_deductible_a" amount. It says "ending accumulators for every member and for the family." Accumulators often capped at plan maximum? For B, is B's deductible accumulator capped at 1500 when family deductible met? Let's examine.
We need adjudicate claims; "each claim updates the accumulators the next is measured against." For Claim4, since family deductible satisfied, no deductible applied. The "ending_deductible_a" after Claim4 if A individual was already satisfied from Claim1 = 1500. For B, after Claim3 if family satisfied, what is B's deductible accumulator? If Claim4 no B, unchanged. But we need output ending_deductible_b. Need decide B's ending_deductible_b after processing. Could be 1120 or 1500? Need think of "deductible_applied" for Claim3 we chose 860. The amount credited to B's individual deductible from Claim3 is 860 (same as amount applied while family remaining). B's accumulator was 260 before -> 1120. So B ending_deductible_b = 1120. But if the family deductible satisfied "for all members", one might set B deductible to 1500, because no future B claim will have deductible. But "accumulator" not "deductible status". Usually deductible accumulator includes amounts applied to deductible. If family deductible satisfied, individual accumulators aren't necessarily increased beyond actual credits; but future cost-sharing uses family deductible met, not individual accumulators. If reporting ending accumulators, maybe need include "remaining deductible" not "credits"? The required key "ending_deductible_a" likely amount of deductible satisfied. For A, 1500. For B, maybe 1120? Let's search memory of such tasks? They often use "accumulators" as amounts already accumulated, not remaining. If family deductible satisfied, ending_family_deductible = 3000. Individual ending_deductibles maybe their own accumulated amounts; if less than 1500 but family met, still maybe less. But "deductible_applied" for claim3 amount 860 applied to B's deductible. So B's accumulator should add 860. Yes.
Need confirm Claim3 deductible_applied: Could it be 1240 instead? Let's examine plan clause: "Deductible: Individual (in-network) 1500. Family (in-network) 3000. Structure EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." Before claim3, A has individual satisfied, C isn't; family remaining 860. Claim3 by B. If we apply only 860 until family satisfied, then B did not satisfy own individual deductible on own. But family satisfied "whichever comes first", so yes. Then B's coinsurance after deductible? Is it fair to subject remaining allowed to coinsurance after only 860 of B's 1240 individual deductible? Once family deductible satisfied, deductible is satisfied, so yes.
But maybe under embedded, family deductible doesn't become satisfied until total family *deductible* credits reach 3000, but individual B's remaining individual deductjson{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,397 tokens
We need to adjudicate claims in order. Need to determine for Claim 4 components, and final accumulators after all claims. Need to carefully apply rule: embedded deductible. Individual deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder? Actually, rule says under embedded structure, a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. Need understand semantics: For each claim with cost share subject to deductible/coinsurance, the member pays toward deductible until their individual deductible is met, but also family deductible accumulates same? The family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. Under embedded, individual gets to use their own deductible even if family not met. Also if family deductible gets met before individual? Actually for claims, the amount applied to deductible for a member is the amount that counts toward both member's own deductible and family deductible. Typically, each dollar of allowed amount that is subject to deductible goes to both individual and family deductible until the lesser of individual remaining and family remaining? Need examine plan doc: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder."
So given before Claim 1: A deductible 1180, B 260, C 0. Family total 1440. This means A has 1180 already satisfied, so remaining individual deductible for A = 1500 - 1180 = 320. B remaining = 1240. C remaining = 1500. Family remaining = 3000 - 1440 = 1560.
But note "Individual (in-network) deductible" is 1500, but out-of-network also? Claims are all in-network. So individual deductible threshold = 1500.
Copays do not credit deductible, but credit OOPM. Deductible and coinsurance credit OOPM as well. OOPM: individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Existing OOPM amounts: A 1180, B 260, C 0, family 1440. Deductible paid counts toward OOPM likely. So OOPM accumulates with all member responsibility except non-covered? "Once a member reaches the out-of-pocket maximum..." Copays credit OOPM. Also deductibles and coinsurance obviously member cost share. Keep track.
Claims:
Claim 1: A outpatient endoscopy, in-network. Allowed 2240. Service not office visit etc, so subject to deductible/coinsurance. A's individual remaining deductible before claim = 320. Family remaining = 1560. Payment: first A pays 320 toward deductible? Then coinsurance 20% of remaining allowed after deductible? Need check: Member cost share: coinsurance after deductible, in-network 20%. So allowed amount applied to deductible until deductible satisfied; remaining subject to coinsurance 20%. A's deductible remaining 320. Family remaining 1560. A applies 320 to deductible. Then remaining allowed = 2240 - 320 = 1920. Coinsurance = 20% * 1920 = 384. So A member responsibility for claim = 320 + 384 = 704. Plan pays 2240 - 704 = 1536. Deductible applied for claim = 320. Copay none. Coinsurance 384.
Updates: A deductible increases by 320 to 1500 (satisfied). A OOPM increases by 704: from 1180 to 1884. Family deductible increases by 320: from 1440 to 1760. Family OOPM increases by 704: 1440+704=2144.
Claim 2: C child, diagnostic lab, in-network. Allowed 380. C deductible remaining before claim = 1500 (C 0). Family remaining = 3000 - 1760 = 1240. Embedded: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder (1500) and family remainder (1240)? Actually "member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So for C, amount to apply to deductible = min(C's individual remaining 1500, family remaining 1240) = 1240. But allowed is only 380. So entire 380 applies to deductible. Then no coinsurance because deductible not exhausted? After applying 380, C's individual remaining = 1500-380=1120. Family remaining = 1240-380=860. So member responsibility = 380 (deductible), coinsurance 0, plan paid = 0? Allowed 380 - member 380 = 0. Plan pays 0. That's allowed. Deductible applied 380.
Updates: C deductible becomes 380. C OOPM increases by 380 to 380. Family deductible becomes 1760+380=2140. Family OOPM = 2144? Wait family OOPM after claim1 = 2144. Add 380 = 2524.
Check if family OOPM 12000 not reached.
Claim 3: B spouse, outpatient surgery, in-network. Allowed 2900. Before claim 3: B remaining deductible = 1500 - 260 = 1240. Family remaining after claim2 = 3000 - 2140 = 860. Member's deductible satisfied by lesser of B individual remaining 1240 and family remaining 860 = 860. So 860 applied to deductible. But allowed 2900 > 860, so after applying 860, deductible satisfied? For B individually, B's remaining after applying 860 = 1240 - 860 = 380 still remaining, because individual remaining is 1240, only 860 applied due to family cap. So B still has 380 individual deductible remaining. But family deductible now satisfied? Family remaining becomes 0. However plan says embedded, individual can satisfy on their own. But claim only applied 860 because family cap. After claim, family satisfied. The remainder of allowed after deductible applied: 2900 - 860 = 2040 subject to coinsurance. However, note: B's individual deductible not fully satisfied, but coinsurance is charged after deductible. In typical plan, coinsurance applies to amount exceeding deductible; but if deductible not fully met, the first part is deductible and rest is coinsurance. Here B still has 380 unmet individual deductible. But family deductible is satisfied. How does that work? Under embedded, each member has own deductible. If family is satisfied, does that mean all members' deductibles are considered satisfied? Usually once family deductible is met, no further deductibles for any member. The claim that reaches family deductible: part applied to family deductible (860) counts as deductible for B. The remaining 2040 not subject to further deductible because family deductible has been satisfied? Actually in a family deductible (embedded), once family deductible satisfied, members no longer need to meet individual deductible? Need look at wording: "An individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." The "family deductible is also satisfied" means once total family credits reach family amount, the family deductible is met; for subsequent claims, no deductible applies. For this claim, before applying any deductible, family remaining 860. Since 860 applied, family becomes satisfied. The rest of allowed (2040) is after deductible, so coinsurance. B's individual remaining would be 1240-860=380 but because family satisfied, is B considered deductible satisfied? Under embedded, if individual deductible would have been met on their own, but not yet, yet family met, then I think the individual no longer has deductible because family met. But for calculating member responsibility for this claim, we apply 860 deductible and 20% coinsurance on remaining? Yes. B's individual remaining after 860 is 380, but no additional deductible is taken because the family deductible is now satisfied? The plan doc says "coinsurance after deductible" meaning the allowed amount after deductible is subject to coinsurance. If the family deductible satisfied mid-claim, all remaining services for year no deductible. But for this claim, only 860 deductible, then coinsurance on 2040. So member responsibility = 860 + 0.2*2040 = 860 + 408 = 1268. Plan pays = 2900 - 1268 = 1632. Deductible_applied = 860. Copay none. Coinsurance = 408.
Alternatively, could treat individual B's deductible as 1500, so after applying 860, still 380 deductible would need to be paid, and then coinsurance on rest? But 860 + 380 + 0.2*(2900-1240?)? Let's check general practice: With embedded family deductibles, once family deductible is satisfied, all covered members are considered to have met their deductible for the year. So the minute family deductible is satisfied, no more deductible for anyone. So for claim 3, the portion of allowed up to the amount needed to reach family deductible is deductible; the remainder is coinsurance, even if the member's individual deductible was higher. Yes, that matches lesser of individual/family remaining rule: applied to deductible = min(B remaining individual 1240, family remaining 860) = 860. Then coinsurance after deductible. So member responsibility 1268.
But wait, if allowed amount is 2900 and family remaining is 860, why not apply 1240 to B's deductible and also family to zero, leaving coinsurance on 1660? But rule says member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. So only 860 counts toward deductible. The other 380 would be neither deductible nor? Actually if individual has not satisfied, normally would apply more to deductible, but family is satisfied, so no. The plan says "Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So only 860 applied. Good.
Update after claim3: B deductible increases by 860: 260+860 = 1120. B OOPM increases by 1268 from 260 to 1528. Family deductible from 2140+860=3000 satisfied. Family OOPM from 2524+1268 = 3792.
Claim 4: A follow-up imaging, in-network. Allowed 640. Before claim4: A deductible already satisfied? A had 1500 after claim1. B not matters. Family deductible is 3000 satisfied. So no deductible remaining for A or family. Thus deductible_applied = 0. Coinsurance = 20% of 640 = 128. Member responsibility = 128. Plan paid = 512. Copay none.
Need ending accumulators after claim4: A deductible = 1500 (already after claim1; no change). A OOPM = prior 1884 + 128 = 2012. B deductible = 1120; B OOPM = 1528. C deductible = 380; C OOPM = 380. Family deductible = 3000 satisfied; family OOPM = 3792 + 128 = 3920.
Need ensure OOPM for A: after claim1 = 1180+704=1884. After claim4 +128=2012. Yes.
But need check if copay? No.
Need report Claim 4 components: member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount. member_responsibility = coinsurance only = 128. Plan_paid = 512. deductible_applied 0. copay 0. coinsurance 128.
Need produce JSON with all keys.
Let's double-check all calculations and accumulators.
Let's recalc from start more methodically.
Initial:
A ded=1180, oopm=1180
B ded=260, oopm=260
C ded=0, oopm=0
Family ded=1440, oopm=1440
Claim1 A 2240 allowed. A individual remaining 1500-1180=320. Family remaining 3000-1440=1560. Personal responsibility: apply min(320,1560)=320 to deductible. Remaining 2240-320=1920 coinsurance 20%=384. Member=320+384=704. Plan=2240-704=1536. Deductible_applied=320. Copay 0. Coinsurance 384.
After claim1:
A ded=1180+320=1500. A oopm=1180+704=1884.
Family ded=1440+320=1760. Family oopm=1440+704=2144.
B,C unchanged.
Claim2 C 380 allowed. C remaining individual=1500. Family remaining=3000-1760=1240. Apply min(1500,1240)=1240? But allowed only 380, so apply 380 to deductible. Member=380, plan=0, ded_applied=380, copay0, coins0.
After claim2:
C ded=0+380=380. C oopm=0+380=380.
Family ded=1760+380=2140. Family oopm=2144+380=2524.
Claim3 B 2900 allowed. B remaining individual=1500-260=1240. Family remaining=3000-2140=860. Apply min(1240,860)=860 to deductible. Remaining=2900-860=2040 coins 20%=408. Member=860+408=1268. Plan=2900-1268=1632. Ded_applied=860. coins=408.
After claim3:
B ded=260+860=1120. B oopm=260+1268=1528.
Family ded=2140+860=3000. Family oopm=2524+1268=3792.
Claim4 A 640 allowed. A individual rem=0, family rem=0. apply 0. coins 20%*640=128. Member=128, plan=512, ded_applied=0, copay0, coins128.
End:
A ded=1500; A oopm=1884+128=2012.
B ded=1120; B oopm=1528.
C ded=380; C oopm=380.
Family ded=3000; family oopm=3792+128=3920.
Need format plain numbers two decimals. So 1500.00 etc.
Let's produce JSON with keys required. The item asks: "Report the components for Claim 4, and the ending accumulators for every member and for the family. Required keys ..." So include all listed keys.
Keys:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount,
ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a,
ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b,
ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c,
ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm
Values:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00
ending_oopm_c: 380.00
ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Check plan_paid + member_responsibility = 640.00 yes.
Need maybe note family OOPM after claim4? 3920.
Proceed.{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,395 tokens
We need answer JSON. Need adjudicate claims sequentially. Need understand plan. Need compute Claim 4 components and ending accumulators.
Need be careful.
We have plan Bluebonnet PPO 1500 embedded deductible family 3000, individual 1500 in-network; OOPM individual in-network 6000, family 12000; out-of-network separate? Relevant all claims in-network. Copays don't credit deductible, do credit OOPM. Coinsurance after deductible. Preventive not relevant. Emergency not relevant. Need process claims 1-4.
We must likely track A/B/C deductible and OOP accumulators and family totals. Initial before claim1:
A ded 1180, OOP 1180
B ded 260, OOP 260
C ded 0, OOP 0
Family ded 1440, OOP 1440
Embedded: individual deductible satisfies individual on own; family deductible satisfied once total family credits reach family amount. Need determine when family deductible satisfied for each claim? Under embedded, for member cost share, a member's deductible is satisfied by lesser of their individual remainder and family remainder. Need perhaps family remains after each claim, until family ded met. We need track both individual and family. Let's calculate.
All services in-network; allowed amounts:
Claim1 A endoscopy allowed 2240, billed 4144. Service category? Outpatient endoscopy likely not primary/specialist/urgent/ER/pharmacy; so subject to deductible and 20% coinsurance, no copay. A has individual ded remaining 1500-1180=320. Family ded total? Family initial 1440, family remaining 3000-1440=1560. Since embedded and both remainders, lesser 320. Need apply 320 to A deductible, family? Full 320 credit? "deductible_applied" for claim likely amount applied to member's deductible? Need maybe claim updates both member and family accumulators. It says "Each claim updates the accumulators the next claim is measured against, for the member AND for the family." Under embedded structure member deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. So Claim1: A pays deductible 320; then A coinsurance 20% of remaining allowed (2240-320=1920) = 384. Total member responsibility 704. Plan paid 2240-704 = 1536. Deductible_applied 320. Copay 0. Coinsurance 384. Ending A ded 1500; A OOP initial 1180 + 704 = 1884. Family ded initial 1440 + 320 = 1760; family OOP initial 1440 + 704 = 2144. Note coinsurance credits OOP; deductible credits OOP. Good.
Claim2 C child diag lab allowed 380. C individual ded remaining 1500. Family ded current 1760, family remaining 1240. Lesser is member individual remainder 1500 vs family remainder 1240? Need for embedded: member's deductible satisfied by lesser of individual remainder and family remainder. Since member not satisfied individually, family remainder 1240 less than C remainder 1500, so apply 1240? But wait family deductible remaining 1240; if apply to family, once family reaches 3000, then family deductible satisfied? The rule says family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first. So on Claim2, applying 1240 to family would satisfy family immediately. But could C's individual remainder also maybe needed? Since family satisfied, after that family remainder 0, member's deductible satisfied by lesser (0), so yes the amount applied to C's deductible is? Need careful.
Under an embedded structure, a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder. At start Claim2:
- A individual ded satisfied (1500).
- B individual remainder 1240? B ded 260 so remaining 1240.
- C individual remainder 1500.
- Family ded current accum 1760, remaining 1240.
- Family not satisfied yet, member C not satisfied.
Lesser C individual remaining 1500 and family remaining 1240 = 1240. So C should pay 1240 deductible? But allowed only 380. Can deductible_applied exceed allowed? Usually applied amount limited to allowed amount; cannot apply more than claim allowed. Need apply deductible up to allowed amount, maybe 380. So Claim2: allowed 380, apply 380 to deductible; no coinsurance. Member responsibility 380. Plan 0. Deductible applied 380. Copay 0. Coinsurance 0. Then C individual ded becomes 380? Wait C ded accum = 380, not 1240 because only claim allowed 380. Family ded accum = 1760 + 380 = 2140. Family remaining 860. Family not yet satisfied. Important.
Need consider if deductible applied to C individual = 380, not 1240. Yes.
Claim3 B outpatient surgery allowed 2900. Current:
A ded 1500, OOP 1884.
B ded 260, OOP 260.
C ded 380, OOP 380.
Family ded 2140, OOP 2140.
Family rem ded 860.
B individual rem = 1500-260 = 1240. Family rem = 860. Lesser = 860. Allowed 2900. Deductible applied 860. Then B coinsurance 20% of remaining 2040 = 408. Member responsibility 1268. Plan paid 1632. B deductible accum = 260+860 = 1120, not full 1500 (because family met first). Family ded accum = 2140+860 = 3000 satisfied. B OOP = 260 + 1268 = 1528. C OOP unchanged 380. A OOP unchanged 1884. Family OOP = 2140 + 1268 = 3408 (includes all OOP). Wait family OOP initial 1440 after claim1 2144, plus claim2 380 = 2524? Need recalc: initial family OOP 1440. Claim1 OOP A 704 -> 2144. Claim2 OOP C 380 -> 2524. Claim3 OOP B 1268 -> 3792. Wait I wrote 2140 + 1268 = 3408 but forgot claim2. Let's recalc from initial correctly:
Initial family OOP = 1440 (A1180+B260+C0).
Claim1 A member resp 704 => family OOP 2144.
Claim2 C member resp 380 => family OOP 2524.
Claim3 B member resp 1268 => family OOP 3792.
Yes.
Family ded: initial family ded 1440. Claim1 ded 320 => 1760. Claim2 ded 380 => 2140. Claim3 ded 860 => 3000. Good.
After Claim3:
A ded 1500, OOP 1884.
B ded 1120, OOP 1528.
C ded 380, OOP 380.
Family ded 3000, OOP 3792.
Now Claim4 A follow-up imaging in-network allowed 640. Since A individual deductible already satisfied after Claim1 (A ded accum 1500), and family deductible satisfied after Claim3. No deductible to apply. Only coinsurance 20% of 640 = 128. Member responsibility 128, plan paid 512. Deductible applied 0, copay 0, coinsurance 128. No OOPM reached: A OOP after claim3 1884 + 128 = 2012; individual OOPM 6000 not reached. Family OOP 3792 + 128 = 3920 under 12000.
Ending accumulators:
A ded = 1500.00; A OOP = 2012.00 (since after Claim4 add 128 to 1884)
B ded = 1120.00; B OOP = 1528.00
C ded = 380.00; C OOP = 380.00
Family ded = 3000.00; Family OOP = 3920.00
Need ensure "deductible_applied" for Claim4 is 0. "copay_amount" 0. "coinsurance_amount" 128.00. "plan_paid" 512.00. "member_responsibility" 128.00.
Need report exact keys. Required:
member_responsibility, plan_paid, deductible_applied, copay_amount, coinsurance_amount,
ending_deductible_a, ending_oopm_a (for A)
ending_deductible_b, ending_oopm_b
ending_deductible_c, ending_oopm_c
ending_family_deductible, ending_family_oopm
Need output JSON object. Values numbers with two decimals no currency. Use null? No.
Need maybe pending? No.
Let's double-check nuances.
Could Claim 1 outpatient endoscopy be subject to specialist copay? Plan only lists primary care office visit $30, specialist office visit $60, urgent care $75, ER $400, generic retail pharmacy $15. Endoscopy is a procedure, not office visit. No copay. Use deductible/coinsurance. Good.
Claim 2 diagnostic laboratory panel in-network. In-network lab maybe subject to deductible/coinsurance? No special copay. Yes. Good.
Claim 3 outpatient surgery same. Good.
Could the family deductible being satisfied "once total family credits reach family amount" mean in claim 3, family remaining prior to claim was 860, but since B individual remaining 1240, the lesser is 860. Apply 860. Then family satisfied. B's individual deductible not fully satisfied but because family satisfied, subsequent B claims no deductible. That's exactly embedded. B ending deductible accum 1120 (<1500). Is that allowed? Under embedded family, if family deductible is satisfied before an individual's deductible, then that individual does not need to meet their own deductible? Standard embedded: yes, once family deductible met, no further deductibles for anyone; member's own deductible not necessarily fully met. The plan doc: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." "A member's own accumulator and the family accumulator both move on every claim that generates cost share. Under an embedded structure a member's deductible is satisfied by the lesser of their individual remainder and the family remainder." So yes.
Need consider if family OOPM maybe also should be embedded? For OOPM, family individual 6000, family 12000. The plan says once member reaches OOPM plan pays 100%. It doesn't explicitly say family OOPM embedded; but family accumulators. Since no one close, not relevant.
Need maybe track deductible and OOP accumulators for members after Claim4 but "ending accumulators for every member and for family" maybe after Claim4 only. Yes.
Let's recompute from initial with detailed updated accumulators after each claim to ensure no arithmetic error.
Claim1:
Allowed 2240. A initial ded 1180 rem 320; family rem 1560. Ded applied 320. Post-ded allowed 1920. Coinsurance 20% = 384. Member = 704. Plan = 1536. A ded = 1500. A OOP = 1180+704=1884. Family ded = 1440+320=1760. Family OOP=1440+704=2144.
Claim2:
Allowed 380. C ded 0 rem 1500; family ded 1760 rem 1240. Lesser 1240 but capped by allowed 380. Ded applied 380. Post-ded 0. Coinsurance 0. Member=380. Plan=0. C ded=380. C OOP=380. Family ded=1760+380=2140. Family OOP=2144+380=2524. Note family OOP includes A1180+B260+C? initial family 1440; add A704 =2144; add C380 =2524. OK.
Claim3:
Allowed 2900. B ded 260 rem 1240; family ded 2140 rem 860. Lesser 860. Ded applied 860. Post-ded 2040. Coinsurance 20%=408. Member=1268. Plan=1632. B ded=260+860=1120. B OOP=260+1268=1528. Family ded=2140+860=3000. Family OOP=2524+1268=3792. OK.
Claim4:
Allowed 640. A ded 1500; family ded 3000 -> both satisfied. Ded applied 0. Coinsurance 20% = 128. Member=128. Plan=512. A OOP=1884+128=2012. Family OOP=3792+128=3920. Family ded stays 3000. B/C unchanged.
Need consider "deductible_applied" for claim 4 maybe should be 0. Yes.
Need maybe include "copay_amount" 0.00 and "coinsurance_amount" 128.00.
Need output only JSON block. The system says exactly one fenced JSON code block and nothing else. So final should be:
```json
{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
```
Need ensure "oopm" for A/B/C and family means out-of-pocket maximum accumulators? The prompt uses "out-of-pocket 1180" at start, and key ending_oopm_a. It's an accumulator to OOPM, not remaining. Yes. We report accumulators.
Could ending A OOP after claim 4 be 1884 + 128 = 2012. Good.
Let's think if "deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance" for in-network/out-of-network. Not relevant.
Let's consider if after family deductible satisfied in claim 3, Claim4's coinsurance maybe no longer subject to A's own individual deductible. Yes, because A's own satisfied anyway. If A's own had not been satisfied, family satisfaction would waive deductible. But A's own is satisfied. So no issue.
Potential issue: In Claim1 and Claim3, if both member remains family deductible, how to allocate deductible between individual and family? Both accumulators move by the same applied amount. Done.
Potential issue: The phrase "deductible_applied" perhaps means amount applied to member's deductible for this claim, which in Claim2 should be 380 (not 1240). Good.
Potential issue: Should coinsurance after deductible in Claim2 be 20% after deductible? Since allowed 380 fully consumed by deductible, remaining 0, coinsurance 0. Yes.
Potential issue: Could family deductible cap (remaining 860) in Claim3 plus B individual rem 1240 cause "lesser" 860; yes. But if using "family remainder" after Claim2 = 860, after applying 860 family exactly satisfied. Then post-deductible allowed = 2040. Coinsurance = 408. Correct.
Potential issue: OOPM family accum from claims includes all OOP including deductibles and coinsurance. Yes. "out-of-pocket maximum ... Once member reaches ... Copays always credit OOPM." In plan, deductibles and coinsurance are cost share. So yes.
Need maybe use "oopm" not "oop" in output. Already.
Need final as fenced code block. Good.
Let's consider if there is any hidden trap about "Allowed amount" vs "Billed charge" and plan paid equals allowed - member responsibility. We comply. Plan paid for claim 4 = 640 - 128 = 512. Good.
No need to mention pending. Not.
Let's also consider if Claim 1's "Outpatient endoscopy" maybe in-network preventive? No, not preventive likely. If plan document says in-network preventive services required covered without cost share; endoscopy not preventive. Good.
Let's maybe examine whether "Primary care office visit 30.00 copay" could apply to follow-up imaging? No; imaging is not office visit. No copay.
Thus final. Need no extra text. We'll output JSON code block.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}100Claude Haiku 4.5 · Anthropic44.6s · 5,040 out | 24.5s · 4,047 out | 24.0s · 2,962 out
Reasoning · 4,829 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
Starting accumulators before Claim 1:
- A: deductible 1180.00, oopm 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, oopm 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, oopm 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, oopm 1440.00
Individual deductible: 1500.00
Family deductible: 3000.00
Structure: EMBEDDED
OOPM:
- Individual (in-network): 6000.00
- Family (in-network): 12000.00
Copays do NOT credit the deductible but DO credit the OOPM.
Let me adjudicate each claim:
**CLAIM 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
Billed: 4144.00
Allowed: 2240.00
This is not listed as a copay service (it's diagnostic, not office visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy), so it's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
A's deductible remaining: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
The allowed amount is 2240.00. The member can satisfy up to 320.00 toward their individual deductible. Under the embedded structure, the family deductible is also satisfied.
Deductible applied to this claim: min(320.00, 2240.00) = 320.00
After deductible: 2240.00 - 320.00 = 1920.00
Coinsurance kicks in at 20%: 1920.00 * 0.20 = 384.00, so member owes 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00, and plan pays 2240.00 - 704.00 = 1536.00.
Updating accumulators: A's deductible hits 1500.00 (satisfied), A's oopm rises to 1884.00, family deductible rises to 1760.00, family oopm rises to 2144.00.
After Claim 1: A (1500.00 ded, 1884.00 oopm), B (260.00/260.00), C (0.00/0.00), Family (1760.00/2144.00).
**CLAIM 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
Diagnostic lab panel, in-network, billed 703.00, allowed 380.00 — not a copay service, subject to deductible/coinsurance.
C's remaining deductible is 1500.00, family's remaining is 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00. Since embedded plans cap at the lesser of individual or family remaining, 1240.00 governs here. With allowed only 380.00, the whole amount applies to deductible: min(1240.00, 380.00) = 380.00.
After deductible, nothing remains for coinsurance, so member owes 380.00 and plan pays 0.00.
Updated: C ded/oopm both 380.00, Family ded 2140.00, oopm 2524.00.
Totals after Claim 2: A (1500.00/1884.00), B (260.00/260.00), C (380.00/380.00), Family (2140.00/2524.00).
**CLAIM 3 — 2026-06-27 — B (spouse)**
Outpatient surgery, in-network, billed 5365.00, allowed 2900.00 — subject to deductible/coinsurance.
B's remaining deductible: 1500.00 - 260.00 = 1240.00. Family's remaining: 3000.00 - 2140.00 = 860.00. The lesser value, 860.00, caps how much of this claim can go toward deductible.
Deductible applied: 860.00. Remaining allowed: 2040.00, coinsurance 20% = 408.00. Member pays 1268.00, plan pays 1632.00.
Updated: B ded 1120.00/oopm 1528.00. Family ded 3000.00 (now satisfied), oopm 3792.00.
Totals after Claim 3: A (1500.00/1884.00), B (1120.00/1528.00), C (380.00/380.00), Family (3000.00/3792.00).
**CLAIM 4 — 2026-07-15 — A**
Follow-up imaging, in-network, billed 1184.00, allowed 640.00 — not a copay service, so deductible/coinsurance applies. Since family deductible is already met, this goes straight to coinsurance.
Coinsurance: 640.00 * 0.20 = 128.00, plan pays 512.00.
Updated: A oopm 2012.00, family oopm 3920.00; deductibles unchanged.
Claim 4 result: member_responsibility 128.00, plan_paid 512.00, deductible_applied 0.00, copay_amount 0.
Now double-checking the embedded deductible structure - each member satisfies their own individual deductible, while the family deductible is met once total family credits hit the family amount, whichever happens first.
I need to reconsider each claim with this in mind, starting with member A's accumulated deductible.
A has 1180.00 already applied toward their 1500.00 individual cap, leaving 320.00 remaining. The family deductible of 3000.00 has 1440.00 applied, leaving 1560.00 remaining. With a claim of 2240.00, A can apply up to 320.00 toward their individual remainder, while the family can absorb up to 1560.00 of the shared deductible.
Since this is embedded, I should apply the lesser of A's remaining (320.00), the allowed claim amount, and the family remaining (1560.00). But let me re-check the plan doc's language on embedded deductibles - it states each member satisfies their individual deductible independently, while the family deductible is satisfied once total family credits hit the family cap, whichever occurs first. So claims count toward both the individual's own deductible and the shared family total simultaneously, and once either threshold hits its cap, that specific deductible is done for that member's future claims.
For CLAIM 1 — A: individual remaining is 320.00 (1500 - 1180), family remaining is 1560.00 (3000 - 1440), allowed amount is 2240.00. The deductible applied is the minimum of these three values, which comes out to 320.00.
After deductible, 1920.00 remains, coinsurance at 20% gives 384.00, so member owes 704.00 total and plan pays 1536.00.
Updating accumulators: A's deductible hits 1500.00 (fully met), family deductible reaches 1760.00, A's oopm climbs to 1884.00, family oopm to 2144.00.
Running totals now: A fully met deductible at 1884 oopm, B at 260/260, C untouched, family at 1760/2144.
For CLAIM 2 — C: individual remaining is 1500.00, family remaining is 1240.00, allowed amount is only 380.00 — this becomes the limiting factor, so the full 380.00 goes to deductible with nothing left for coinsurance, meaning member responsibility equals the full allowed amount.
+ 1268.00 = 3792.00
After Claim 3:
- A: deductible 1500.00, oopm 1884.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, oopm 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, oopm 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, oopm 3792.00
Family deductible now maxed at 3000.00. Moving to Claim 4 for A, whose individual deductible is already exhausted.
Allowed: 640.00, deductible applied 0.00. Coinsurance 20% of 640.00 = 128.00, plan pays 512.00. Updating A's oopm to 2012.00, family oopm to 3920.00, deductibles stay unchanged.
Checks out: 128 + 512 = 640.
Final accumulators:
- A: deductible 1500.00, oopm 2012.00
- B: deductible 1120.00, oopm 1528.00
- C: deductible 380.00, oopm 380.00
- Family: deductible 3000.00, oopm 3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 3,836 tokens
Let me work through this step by step.
PLAN RULES:
- Individual deductible (in-network): 1500.00
- Family deductible (in-network): 3000.00
- Structure: EMBEDDED - individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach family amount, whichever comes first
- In-network coinsurance: 20% member / 80% plan
- Copay for diagnostic lab: Not specified - subject to deductible and coinsurance
- Copays do NOT credit deductible. Copays always credit OOPM.
- Individual OOPM (in-network): 6000.00
- Family OOPM (in-network): 12000.00
STARTING ACCUMULATORS (before Claim 1):
- A: deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
- B: deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
- C: deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
- Family total: deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00
Now I need to adjudicate Claims 1-3 first, then report on Claim 4.
**CLAIM 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
Allowed amount: 2240.00
For in-network services, after deductible, coinsurance is 20% member / 80% plan.
A's remaining deductible: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family remaining deductible: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
The deductible to apply is the lesser of A's individual remainder (320.00) and family remainder (1560.00) = 320.00
Applying 320.00 to the claim, remaining allowed = 1920.00
20% coinsurance on 1920.00 = 384.00 member, 1536.00 plan
Member owes 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00, plan pays 1536.00, totaling 2240.00 ✓
Updating A: deductible 1180.00 + 320.00
Family deductible now 1760.00, family OOPM 2144.00, A's individual OOPM 1884.00.
**CLAIM 2 — 2026-06-11 — C (child)**
Diagnostic lab panel, in-network, allowed 380.00
Family deductible remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00, less than C's individual remainder of 1500.00, so 1240.00 governs.
min(1240.00, 380.00) = 380.00 applies fully to deductible, leaving nothing for coinsurance.
Member responsibility totals 380.00.
8.00
- Family deductible: 3000.00 (fully satisfied)
- Family OOPM: 3792.00
**CLAIM 4 — 2026-07-15 — A (subscriber)**
Follow-up imaging, in-network, allowed 640.00
A's deductible already met from Claim 1. A's OOPM sits at 1884.00 going in.
Since both individual and family deductibles are satisfied, only coinsurance applies here.
Coinsurance: 640.00 * 0.20 = 128.00 member share
Plan pays: 512.00
Member responsibility: 128.00, plan paid: 512.00 — checks out (128+512=640).
Updated totals:
- A OOPM: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
- Family OOPM: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
- Deductibles unchanged (already satisfied)
Claim 4 result: member_responsibility 128.00, plan_paid 512.00, deductible_applied 0.
phrasing clarifies: individual deductibles can be met independently, but the family deductible tracks aggregate credits across members. Whichever threshold hits first for a given member—their own deductible or the family deductible—triggers the shift to coinsurance for them.
For claim 1 (A): A has 320.00 left on their individual deductible (1500.00 - 1180.00), while the family has 1560.00 left (3000.00 - 1440.00). Crediting min(320.00, 1560.00, 2240.00) = 320.00 satisfies A's individual deductible.
Claim 2 (C): individual deductible untouched at 1500.00, family has 1240.00 left. Crediting min(1500.00, 1240.00, 380.00) = 380.00 partially satisfies C and advances the family total.
Claim 3 (B): 1240.00 left individually (1500.00 - 260.00), 860.00 left for family. Crediting min(1240.00, 860.00, 2900.00) = 860.00 partially satisfies B while completing the family deductible.
Claim 4 (A again): both A's individual and the family deductible are now fully satisfied, so only coinsurance applies going forward.
Checking accumulator math across all claims:
- After Claim 1: A hits 1500.00, family reaches 1760.00
- After Claim 2: C reaches 380.00, family reaches 2140.00
- After Claim 3: B reaches 1120.00, family completes at 3000.00
- After Claim 4: no changes—everything already satisfied, so deductible applied is 0.00
This confirms my earlier numbers. Now I need to verify OOPM starting from A: 1180.00, B: 260.00, C: 0.00, Family: 1440.00.
With member responsibilities of 704.00, 380.00, 1268.00, and 128.00 for claims 1-4 respectively, tracking each cumulative total confirms:
Final answer for Claim 4:
- member_responsibility: 128.00
- plan_paid: 512.00
- deductible_applied: 0.00
- copay_amount: 0.00
- coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending state:
- deductible_a: 1500.00, oopm_a: 2012.00
- deductible_b: 1120.00, oopm_b: 1528.00
- deductible_c: 380.00, oopm_c: 380.00
- family_deductible: 3000.00, family_oopm: 3920.00
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,750 tokens
Let me work through this step by step. I need to adjudicate the claims in order and track the accumulators.
**INITIAL STATE (before Claim 1):**
- A (subscriber): deductible 1180.00, oopm 1180.00
- B (spouse): deductible 260.00, oopm 260.00
- C (child): deductible 0.00, oopm 0.00
- Family: deductible 1440.00, oopm 1440.00
Individual deductible threshold: 1500.00
Family deductible threshold: 3000.00
Individual OOPM threshold: 6000.00
Family OOPM threshold: 12000.00
The structure is EMBEDDED - individual satisfies individual deductible on their own; family deductible is satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first.
---
**CLAIM 1 — 2026-06-02 — A (subscriber)**
Service: Outpatient endoscopy, in-network
Allowed amount: 2240.00
This is not listed as a copay service (not PCP visit, specialist visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy). So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance.
A's deductible remainder: 1500.00 - 1180.00 = 320.00
Family deductible remainder: 3000.00 - 1440.00 = 1560.00
When a claim goes through with an embedded structure, the member's deductible is satisfied by the LESSER of their individual remainder and the family remainder.
Lesser of 320.00 and 1560.00 = 320.00
So deductible applied = 320.00
After deductible applied:
- A's deductible accumulator: 1180.00 + 320.00 = 1500.00 (satisfied)
- Family deductible accumulator: 1440.00 + 320.00 = 1760.00
The rest of the allowed amount, 1920.00, splits into coinsurance: member owes 384.00 (20%), plan pays 1536.00 (80%).
Total member cost for Claim 1: 320.00 + 384.00 = 704.00, plan paid 1536.00.
Updating OOPM:
A's OOPM: 1180.00 + 704.00 = 1884.00
Family OOPM: 1440.00 + 704.00 = 2144.00
---
**CLAIM 2 — 2026-06-11
Diagnostic lab panel for C, allowed 380.00, subject to deductible/coinsurance.
C's remaining deductible: 1500.00, family remaining: 3000.00 - 1760.00 = 1240.00, lesser is 1240.00 — but allowed amount is only 380.00, so deductible applied = 380.00.
Updated deductibles:
C: 0 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family: 1760.00 + 380.00 = 2140.00
No allowed amount left for coinsurance, so member owes full 380.00, plan pays 0.00.
OOPM updates:
C: 0 + 380.00 = 380.00
Family: 2144.00 + 380.00 = 2524.00
**Claim 3 — B, outpatient surgery, allowed 2900.00**, subject to deductible/coinsurance.
B's remaining deductible: 1240.00, family remaining: 860.00, lesser is 860.00 — applied as deductible.
Updated deductibles:
B: 260.00 + 860.00 = 1120.00
Family: 2140.00 + 860.00 = 3000.00 (satisfied!)
Remaining allowed after deductible: 2040.00, split 20/80: member owes 408.00 coinsurance, plan pays 1632.00.
Total member responsibility: 860.00 + 408.00 = 1268.00, plan paid 1632.00.
OOPM updates:
B: 260.00 + 1268.00 = 1528.00
Family: 2524.00 + 1268.00 = 3792.00
Moving to **Claim 4 — A, follow-up imaging, allowed 640.00**, subject to deductible/coinsurance since family deductible is now satisfied but need to check A's individual deductible remaining.
A's deductible: 1500.00 - 1500.00 = 0.00 (already met), family: 0.00 — no deductible applies here.
Entire 640.00 goes to coinsurance: member owes 128.00, plan pays 512.00.
OOPM updates:
A: 1884.00 + 128.00 = 2012.00
Family: 3792.00 + 128.00 = 3920.00
Final answer for Claim 4: member_responsibility 128.00, plan_paid 512.00, deductible_applied 0.00, coinsurance 128.00, no copay.
Ending accumulators — A: deductible 1500.00, OOPM 2012.00; B: deductible 1120.00, OOPM 1528.00; C: deductible 380.00, OOPM 380.00; family deductible 3000.00, family OOPM 3920.00.
Verifying: 128.00 + 512.00 = 640.00 ✓
Cross-checking earlier claims confirms the embedded structure works as intended — each member's deductible applied is min(individual remainder, family remainder, allowed amount), and all four claims trace through consistently to these final numbers.
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}67Claude Fable 5.1 · Anthropic12.3s · 779 out | 9.2s · 737 out | 8.8s · 681 out
Reasoning · 553 tokens
[omitted]json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 511 tokens
[omitted]json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 455 tokens
[omitted]json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3660.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3660,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}67Claude Sonnet 5 · Anthropic15.6s · 1,769 out | 17.5s · 2,007 out | 20.2s · 2,218 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3620.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3620.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}67GPT-5.6 Terra · OpenAI5.9s · 460 out | 4.5s · 404 out | 3.9s · 353 out
Reasoning · 281 tokens
**Considering data formatting**
I’m thinking about how to answer requests that involve strings and amounts. It seems like using JSON for these might work well. I should keep in mind that when amounts are expressed with two decimal points, they are valid numeric literals like 128.00. This means I want to retain the formatting, ensuring everything is clear while also using numerics where needed. Keeping things organized is key here!json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1120.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1528.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "3920.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "3920.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1120.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1528.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": "128.00",
"plan_paid": "512.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "128.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "1500.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "2012.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "1440.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "1784.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "380.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "4176.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "512.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "128.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "4176.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "1500.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "2012.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "1440.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "1784.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}67DeepSeek V4 Pro · DeepSeek7.6s · 177 out | 61.8s · 2,776 out | 37.7s · 2,085 out
json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2444.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1340.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 320.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 320.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 4104.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 4104,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2444,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1500,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1340,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 320,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 320,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 2,598 tokens
We need to adjudicate the four claims in order, updating accumulators for each member and the family. The plan is Bluebonnet PPO 1500 (synthetic). Let's review the plan details:
- Embedded deductible: individual $1500 in-network, family $3000 in-network. Out-of-network individual $3000, but all claims here are in-network, so only in-network applies. Also, note: "In-network and out-of-network deductible credits accumulate to a SINGLE member deductible balance. The amount above is the threshold that balance is measured against when the service is out-of-network." So for in-network, the deductible threshold is $1500 per individual. But since it's embedded, an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own, and the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach $3000. Importantly, for each claim, the member's cost-sharing will consider both their own remaining deductible and the family remaining deductible? Typically under embedded, the member's deductible is the lesser of their individual remaining and the family remaining. But the plan says: "EMBEDDED — an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." That means: For any member, the effective deductible is the smaller of (individual deductible amount - that member's accumulated deductible credits) and (family deductible amount - total family deductible credits). Or more directly, the member's cost-sharing is based on their own accumulator, but the family accumulator may cap it. The standard embedded approach: Each member has an individual deductible of $1500. The family deductible is $3000. The member's liability for a claim is calculated by first applying any remaining deductible from their individual accumulator, but if the family has accumulated enough to satisfy the family deductible, then the member's deductible is considered met. In practice, when a member incurs a claim, the deductible applied is the amount needed to meet the lesser of their individual remaining and the family remaining. Then the member's individual accumulator and family accumulator both increase by that amount.
Let's interpret precisely: The plan says "an individual satisfies the individual deductible on their own; the family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount, whichever comes first." So if a member hasn't met their individual deductible, they need to meet it. But if total family credits exceed $3000, then all members' deductibles are considered met regardless of their individual progress. So the deductible "gap" for a given claim on a member is: their remaining individual deductible (1500 - their current accum) but capped by the family remaining deductible (3000 - family accum) if the family remaining is less. Actually, is it capped? The standard embedded deductible works: Member A has individual OOP responsibility up to their individual deductible, unless the family deductible is met earlier. So the amount the member must pay toward the deductible for this claim is the lesser of (claim allowed - any copay?) Wait, copays don't apply to deductible, only coinsurance after deductible. The services here: Claim 1 outpatient endoscopy, Claim 2 diagnostic lab, Claim 3 outpatient surgery, Claim 4 follow-up imaging. None are office visits, urgent care, ER, or preventive. So they are subject to deductible and then 20% coinsurance (in-network). No copay. So the cost-share calculation: The member first pays allowed amount until their deductible is met (using the effective deductible remaining). Then after deductible, they pay 20% coinsurance of the remaining allowed amount, up to the out-of-pocket maximum.
Now we need to process Claims 1-3, then compute Claim 4's components, and ending accumulators.
Starting accumulators:
A (subscriber): deductible 1180.00, OOPM 1180.00
B (spouse): deductible 260.00, OOPM 260.00
C (child): deductible 0.00, OOPM 0.00
Family total deductible 1440.00, OOPM 1440.00. (Family OOPM is $12,000 in-network, but that's the cap; family OOPM accumulator is sum of all OOP amounts paid by family members for covered services? Usually OOPM accumulator tracks member's cost-sharing that counts toward the out-of-pocket max. Since copays credit OOPM, and deductible and coinsurance count as well. And the OOPM individual is $6000, family $12000. Starting family OOPM accumulator is 1440.00, which is the sum of individual OOPM accumulators (1180+260+0=1440). So they are consistent. So we'll update OOPM accumulators similarly.
Now Claim 1: A, outpatient endoscopy, in-network, allowed $2240. Copay? No. So deductible and coinsurance apply.
First, determine effective remaining deductible for A: A's individual remaining deductible: $1500 - $1180 = $320.00. Family remaining deductible: $3000 - $1440 = $1560.00. The lesser is $320. So A must satisfy $320 more of deductible before coinsurance kicks in. Since claim allowed is $2240, A will apply $320 to deductible (i.e., they pay that amount), and then the remaining allowed $2240 - $320 = $1920 is subject to 20% coinsurance. Coinsurance amount = 20% of $1920 = $384.00. Total member responsibility = $320 + $384 = $704.00. This also adds to A's OOPM accumulator: $704.00, because both deductible and coinsurance count. Plan pays: allowed - member responsibility = $2240 - $704 = $1536.00. After this claim:
- A's deductible accumulator becomes 1180 + 320 = $1500.00 (met individual).
- A's OOPM accumulator becomes 1180 + 704 = $1884.00.
- Family deductible accumulator: was 1440, plus the $320 applied to deductible, so becomes 1440+320 = $1760.00.
- Family OOPM accumulator: was 1440, plus the member responsibility of $704? Wait, the family OOPM accumulator tracks all member cost-sharing for covered services. So it increases by the member responsibility amount for this claim, $704. So family OOPM becomes 1440+704 = $2144.00. However, note that family OOPM is $12000. We'll update accordingly.
Check: Individual OOPM for A $6000, not yet reached. So fine.
Now Claim 2: C (child), diagnostic lab, allowed $380. C's starting deductible: $0.00, OOPM $0.00.
First, effective remaining deductible for C: Individual remaining deductible = $1500 - $0 = $1500. Family remaining deductible = $3000 - $1760 = $1240. The lesser is $1240. So C's deductible gap is $1240 (the family remaining is lower). So C must pay up to $1240 toward deductible before coinsurance. Claim allowed $380, which is less than $1240, so the entire allowed amount goes to deductible. Member pays $380. No coinsurance because after applying deductible, remaining allowed is $0. So member responsibility = $380. Plan paid = $0? Actually, plan pays the rest after deductible and coinsurance, but since all allowed was covered by deductible, plan pays $0. However, it's in-network, so the billed amount doesn't matter. So plan paid = $0.00. Coinsurance = $0.00. Copay = $0.00. Deductible applied = $380.00.
Now update accumulators:
C's deductible: $0 + $380 = $380.00.
C's OOPM: $0 + $380 = $380.00.
Family deductible: previous $1760 + $380 = $2140.00.
Family OOPM: previous $2144 + $380 = $2524.00.
Claim 3: B (spouse), outpatient surgery, allowed $2900. B's starting deductible: $260, OOPM $260. Family deductible $2140, family OOPM $2524.
Effective remaining deductible for B: Individual remaining: $1500 - $260 = $1240. Family remaining: $3000 - $2140 = $860. Lesser is $860. So B must pay the first $860 of allowed amount toward deductible. Claim allowed $2900. Apply $860 to deductible. Then remaining allowed after deductible: $2900 - $860 = $2040. Coinsurance 20% of that: $408.00. So member responsibility = $860 + $408 = $1268.00. Plan paid = $2900 - $1268 = $1632.00.
Update accumulators:
B's deductible: $260 + $860 = $1120.00 (not yet met, but individual remaining is $380 left, but family remaining deductible now becomes $3000 - (2140+860) = $0? Actually, after adding $860, family deductible becomes $2140 + $860 = $3000.00 exactly. So family deductible met. So B's individual deductible remaining is $1500-$1120 = $380, but because family is met, future claims for B would have $0 deductible remaining. Good.
B's OOPM: $260 + $1268 = $1528.00.
Family deductible: $2140 + $860 = $3000.00 (met).
Family OOPM: $2524 + $1268 = $3792.00.
Now Claim 4: A (subscriber), follow-up imaging, allowed $640. A's starting deductible accumulator: $1500 (met), OOPM accumulator: $1884.00. Family deductible is met ($3000). Family OOPM: $3792.00.
Since A's deductible is met (both individual and family), the claim will have $0 deductible applied. So the entire allowed $640 is subject to 20% coinsurance. Coinsurance amount = 20% of $640 = $128.00. There is no copay. So member responsibility = $128.00. Plan paid = $640 - $128 = $512.00. Deductible applied = $0.00. Copay amount = $0.00. Coinsurance amount = $128.00.
Now we need ending accumulators for each member after Claim 4.
A's ending deductible: remains $1500.00 (already met, no change). A's ending OOPM: previous $1884 + $128 = $2012.00.
B's ending deductible: $1120.00 (unchanged). B's ending OOPM: $1528.00 (unchanged).
C's ending deductible: $380.00 (unchanged). C's ending OOPM: $380.00 (unchanged).
Family ending deductible: $3000.00 (unchanged). Family ending OOPM: previous $3792 + $128 = $3920.00.
Check: Claim 4 only affects A and family OOPM accumulators.
Now verify that no OOPM limits are reached: A's OOPM $2012 < $6000, so ok. Family OOPM $3920 < $12000, ok.
So final numbers:
For Claim 4:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
Ending accumulators:
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00
ending_oopm_c: 380.00
ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
All amounts in two decimals.
Now output JSON.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}Reasoning · 1,907 tokens
We need to adjudicate the claims in order: Claim 1, Claim 2, Claim 3, then Claim 4. Each claim updates accumulators. We'll track member deductibles and OOPM accumulators, and family deductible and OOPM accumulators. The plan is an embedded deductible structure: each member has an individual deductible of 1500.00 in-network, family deductible 3000.00. The family deductible is also satisfied once total family credits reach the family amount. But we must track total family deductible credits: the sum of all members' deductible credits. Since it's embedded, a member's deductible is considered satisfied when either their individual deductible is met or the family deductible has been met (whichever comes first). In practice, for each claim, we'll calculate the member's remaining deductible as the lesser of: (individual deductible - member's accumulated deductible) and (family deductible - family accumulated deductible), but not less than zero. Coinsurance after deductible: in-network 20% member, 80% plan. Copays do not credit the deductible. OOPM: individual in-network 6000, family 12000. Copays and coinsurance both count towards OOPM. All claims are in-network.
Starting accumulators before Claim 1:
A: ded 1180.00, oopm 1180.00
B: ded 260.00, oopm 260.00
C: ded 0.00, oopm 0.00
Family ded: 1440.00 (sum of individual deductible credits), family oopm: 1440.00.
Now, Claim 1: A, in-network, allowed 2240.00. No copay mentioned for outpatient endoscopy; it's not a primary care visit, specialist visit, urgent care, ER, or pharmacy. So it's subject to deductible and coinsurance (20% coinsurance after deductible). Since no copay, deductible applies.
First, calculate remaining deductible for A: Individual ded remaining: 1500 - 1180 = 320.00. Family ded remaining: 3000 - 1440 = 1560.00. The effective remaining deductible is the lesser: 320.00. So A must satisfy 320.00 of deductible on this claim. After that, coinsurance applies to the remainder.
Allowed amount: 2240.00. Apply deductible: the member pays the deductible portion, up to the remaining. So deductible applied = 320.00 (since 320 <= allowed). Then the remaining amount: 2240 - 320 = 1920.00. Coinsurance: member pays 20% of 1920 = 384.00. Plan pays 80% = 1536.00. Total member responsibility: deductible 320 + coinsurance 384 = 704.00. No copay.
Update accumulators after Claim 1:
A: ded becomes 1180 + 320 = 1500.00 (met). OOPM: was 1180, add member responsibility 704 = 1884.00.
B and C unchanged.
Family ded: was 1440, add 320 = 1760.00. Family OOPM: was 1440, add 704 = 2144.00.
Claim 2: C (child), in-network, allowed 380.00. Diagnostic lab panel. Not listed as a copay service, so deductible/coinsurance applies. C's ded: 0.00. Individual rem: 1500 - 0 = 1500. Family rem: 3000 - 1760 = 1240. Effective ded remaining = min(1500, 1240) = 1240.00. So C can use up to 1240 of deductible credit. Allowed 380, all goes to deductible. Deductible applied = 380.00. Coinsurance: after deductible, remainder = 0, so no coinsurance. Member responsibility = 380.00. OOPM updates: C's OOPM was 0, add 380 = 380.00.
Update after Claim 2:
C: ded 0+380 = 380.00; oopm = 380.00.
Family ded: 1760+380 = 2140.00; family oopm: 2144+380 = 2524.00.
A and B unchanged (A ded still 1500, oopm 1884; B ded 260, oopm 260).
Claim 3: B (spouse), in-network, allowed 2900.00. Outpatient surgery, no copay. Deductible/coinsurance. B's ded: 260.00. Individual rem: 1500 - 260 = 1240.00. Family rem: 3000 - 2140 = 860.00. Effective rem = min(1240, 860) = 860.00. So B will pay up to 860 deductible, then coinsurance on the rest.
Allowed 2900. Deductible applied = 860.00. Remaining after deductible: 2900 - 860 = 2040.00. Coinsurance member share: 20% of 2040 = 408.00. Total member responsibility = 860 + 408 = 1268.00. Plan pays: deductible credit? Actually plan pays coinsurance portion: 80% of 2040 = 1632.00, plus the deductible? The allowed amount is 2900. Member pays 1268, plan pays 1632. That sums to 2900.
Update after Claim 3:
B: ded 260+860 = 1120.00 (not yet at 1500, but effectively the family deductible may also apply; after this, family ded will be 2140+860=3000, so family deductible is met now). OOPM for B: 260 + 1268 = 1528.00.
Family ded: 2140 + 860 = 3000.00 exactly, so family deductible is now satisfied. Family OOPM: 2524 + 1268 = 3792.00.
A and C unchanged (A ded 1500, oopm 1884; C ded 380, oopm 380).
Now Claim 4: A (subscriber), in-network, allowed 640.00. Follow-up imaging. No copay, subject to deductible and coinsurance. But since family deductible is now met (family ded = 3000) and A's individual deductible is already met (1500). A's remaining deductible is 0 (either individual already met or family met). So deductible applied = 0. Coinsurance applies: A pays 20% of allowed amount = 20% of 640 = 128.00. Plan pays 80% = 512.00. Member responsibility = 128.00. No copay.
Update accumulators: A's deductible remains 1500.00 (no change). OOPM for A: was 1884, add 128 = 2012.00. B and C unchanged. Family deductibles: no change, still 3000.00. Family OOPM: was 3792, add 128 = 3920.00.
Now we need ending accumulators for all after Claim 4:
A: ded 1500.00, oopm 2012.00
B: ded 1120.00, oopm 1528.00
C: ded 380.00, oopm 380.00
Family: ded 3000.00, oopm 3920.00.
But careful: The family deductible is met after claim 3 (3000). In claim 4, deductible applied = 0, so family ded remains 3000. Yes.
Now for claim 4 components: member_responsibility = 128.00, plan_paid = 512.00, deductible_applied = 0.00, copay_amount = 0.00, coinsurance_amount = 128.00.
Check: allowed = 640, member + plan = 128 + 512 = 640.
So final JSON output with keys:
member_responsibility: 128.00
plan_paid: 512.00
deductible_applied: 0.00
copay_amount: 0.00
coinsurance_amount: 128.00
ending_deductible_a: 1500.00
ending_oopm_a: 2012.00
ending_deductible_b: 1120.00
ending_oopm_b: 1528.00
ending_deductible_c: 380.00
ending_oopm_c: 380.00
ending_family_deductible: 3000.00
ending_family_oopm: 3920.00
Make sure rounding half up to cent, all amounts two decimals.
All good.json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2012.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1120.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 1528.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 3920.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 3920,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2012,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1120,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 1528,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": false,
"abstained": false
}0DeepSeek V3.2 · DeepSeek3.6s · 177 out | 3.5s · 177 out | 4.1s · 173 out
json{
"member_responsibility": "320.00",
"plan_paid": "320.00",
"deductible_applied": "0.00",
"copay_amount": "0.00",
"coinsurance_amount": "320.00",
"ending_deductible_a": "3000.00",
"ending_oopm_a": "3000.00",
"ending_deductible_b": "3000.00",
"ending_oopm_b": "780.00",
"ending_deductible_c": "3000.00",
"ending_oopm_c": "380.00",
"ending_family_deductible": "3000.00",
"ending_family_oopm": "4160.00"
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": "320.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": "320.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": "0.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": "320.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": "4160.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": "780.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "3000.00",
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": "380.00",
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 0.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 128.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 2872.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 1500.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 2960.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 380.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 380.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 3000.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 6212.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 3000,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 6212,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 1500,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 2872,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 1500,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 2960,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 380,
"ok": true,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}json{
"member_responsibility": 128.00,
"plan_paid": 512.00,
"deductible_applied": 128.00,
"copay_amount": 0.00,
"coinsurance_amount": 0.00,
"ending_deductible_a": 0.00,
"ending_oopm_a": 1568.00,
"ending_deductible_b": 0.00,
"ending_oopm_b": 900.00,
"ending_deductible_c": 0.00,
"ending_oopm_c": 304.00,
"ending_family_deductible": 0.00,
"ending_family_oopm": 2772.00
}
Grader detail
json{
"fields": [
{
"field": "member_responsibility",
"want": 128,
"got": 128,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "plan_paid",
"want": 512,
"got": 512,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "deductible_applied",
"want": 0,
"got": 128,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "copay_amount",
"want": 0,
"got": 0,
"ok": true,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "coinsurance_amount",
"want": 128,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_deductible",
"want": 3000,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_family_oopm",
"want": 3920,
"got": 2772,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_a",
"want": 1500,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_a",
"want": 2012,
"got": 1568,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_b",
"want": 1120,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_b",
"want": 1528,
"got": 900,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_deductible_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 0,
"ok": false,
"present": true
},
{
"field": "ending_oopm_c",
"want": 380,
"got": 304,
"ok": false,
"present": true
}
],
"fabricated": true,
"abstained": false
}